One person one vote
-
Conservatives are great at
- falling for grifts
- getting fear mongered
- playing the victim card
- and acting like their belief is what the majority of Americans want but it isn't even close. Because they live sheltered little lives in their Facebook echo chambers
Conservatives are great at
- falling for grifts
- getting fear mongered
- playing the victim card
- and acting like their belief is what the majority of Americans want but it isn't even close. Because they live sheltered little lives in their Facebook echo chambers
Liberals are great at accusing others of what they do or what they are.
If Steve's examples aren't enough, I'd gladly contribute more.
-
Bottom line again nobody gives a fuck about this. It's abortion and I know where you stand. Next time it will be about something else and people will switch hats. Advocates and detractors are mischaracterizing this vote and this measure for their own purposes.
WSS
Ah so "bottom line" you're now completely ignoring the earlier post you made and refusing to acknowledge where it was pointed out as incorrect, gotcha.
Of course the special election is really about abortion. That's the point. Republicans are the ones trying to make people believe it's about out of state influence or whatever (and irs clear from this thread their base is falling for that).
If this was proposed in a vacuum it would be one thing. But it is being proposed by republicans as a last ditch attempt to stop the will of the majority of Ohioans. But Reps are all about pushing things through that the majority doesn't agree with so... here we are.
But Reps are all about pushing things through that the majority doesn't agree with so... here we are.
And the Dims ran Obamacare up our collective asses…so there’s that.
-
See also: what the majority of citizens want
The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.
1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."
2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.
3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.
#'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?
-
See also: what the majority of citizens want
The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.
1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."
2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.
3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.
#'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?
The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.
1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."
2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.
3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.
#'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?
Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights
-
The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.
1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."
2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.
3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.
#'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?
Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights
Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights

-
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
-
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
-
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
-
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
-
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
-
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
-
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
-
How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments?
You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??
-
How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments?
You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??
You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??
He's a tard... It's too hard for him...
-
-
I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state.
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
-
I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state.
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
-
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
-
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.
Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login