Skip to content

One person one vote

Political Discussion
192 17 5.3k 1
  • Conservatives are great at

    - falling for grifts

    - getting fear mongered 

    - playing the victim card

    - and acting like their belief is what the majority of Americans want but it isn't even close. Because they live sheltered little lives in their Facebook echo chambers 

    @mld-woody said:

    Conservatives are great at

    - falling for grifts

    - getting fear mongered 

    - playing the victim card

    - and acting like their belief is what the majority of Americans want but it isn't even close. Because they live sheltered little lives in their Facebook echo chambers 

    Liberals are great at accusing others of what they do or what they are.

    If Steve's examples aren't enough, I'd gladly contribute more.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Bottom line again nobody gives a fuck about this. It's abortion and I know where you stand. Next time it will be about something else and people will switch hats. Advocates and detractors are mischaracterizing this vote and this measure for their own purposes.

    WSS 

    Ah so "bottom line" you're now completely ignoring the earlier post you made and refusing to acknowledge where it was pointed out as incorrect, gotcha. 

    Of course the special election is really about abortion. That's the point. Republicans are the ones trying to make people believe it's about out of state influence or whatever (and irs clear from this thread their base is falling for that). 

    If this was proposed in a vacuum it would be one thing. But it is being proposed by republicans as a last ditch attempt to stop the will of the majority of Ohioans. But Reps are all about pushing things through that the majority doesn't agree with so... here we are. 

    @mld-woody said:

    But Reps are all about pushing things through that the majority doesn't agree with so... here we are. 

    And the Dims ran Obamacare up our collective asses…so there’s that.

  • @fy56 said:

    When democrats are unanimous on an issue, go the opposite way.

    This appears to be a pro-active approach by the Reps to protect the Constitution from the ever-growing leftist lunacy that's out there. 

    See also: what the majority of citizens want 

    @mld-woody said:

    See also: what the majority of citizens want 

    The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.

    1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."

    2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.

    3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.

    #'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?

    Where Ohioans stand on abortion and Issue 1 (nbc4i.com)

  • @mld-woody said:

    See also: what the majority of citizens want 

    The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.

    1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."

    2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.

    3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.

    #'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?

    Where Ohioans stand on abortion and Issue 1 (nbc4i.com)

    @fy56 said:

    The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.

    1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."

    2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.

    3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.

    #'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?

    Where Ohioans stand on abortion and Issue 1 (nbc4i.com)

    Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights 

  • @fy56 said:

    The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.

    1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."

    2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.

    3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.

    #'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?

    Where Ohioans stand on abortion and Issue 1 (nbc4i.com)

    Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights 

    @mld-woody said:

    Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights 

    image.jpeg.972c84ef3f2a1fc3e52fb73d932071e5.jpeg

  • "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

  • "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

    @mld-woody said:

    "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    "the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"

    "We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"

    Love it

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

  • @westside-steve said:

    Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.

    WSS

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

    @mld-woody said:

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

  • @mld-woody said:

    It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ... 

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    @westside-steve said:

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

  • @westside-steve said:

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    @nickers said:

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    They really don't have to eliminate those two. They can water them down to the point that they're basically meaningless.

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    @nickers said:

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

  • @nickers said:

    If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

    @mld-woody said:

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

    You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??

  • @mld-woody said:

    How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments? 

    You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??

    @canton-dawg said:

    You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??

    He's a tard... It's too hard for him...

  • Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

  • Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    @bob806 said:

    Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

  • @bob806 said:

    Back to the original topic lol.

    Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."

    Issue12023.jpeg

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    @mld-woody said:

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

  • @mld-woody said:

    I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state. 

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote. 

    Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election. 

    Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.

    Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.