One person one vote
-
The mindset is that the value of human life is not up for debate.
1. It's true that a significant majority of Ohioans polled approve of the Nov. amendment to "protect the autonomy on matters such as abortion."
2.What appears antithetical is that exactly half agree with further restrictions on abortion that are currently in place.
3. And by a tiny majority, Ohioans say yes to Issue 1.
#'s 2 and 3 don't quite add up to #1 do they?
Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights
Because issue 1 isn't openly called an abortion bill. If you're not following politics it isn't clear what the purpose is. And it's clear the purpose is just an initial step to ultimately attack reproductive rights
-
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
-
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
-
"the constitution isn't a living breathing document. It's perfect as is. Our founding fathers knew exactly what we needed to do!!"
"We need to change the Ohio constitution. Because, uh, outside influence and stuff!"
Love it
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
-
Well it's actually both. Yes there are proper channels written into the system to make changing the Constitution possible. The 60/40 split makes it a lot harder to do for a reason.
WSS
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
-
It's ok to change a constitution if that change is to make it harder to change ...
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
They really don't have to eliminate those two. They can water them down to the point that they're basically meaningless.
WSS
-
If you're being serious I agree. That's how the national Constitution is.
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
If that's the case then they should quit trying to kill the 1st and 2nd amendment... yet.. they keep trying to change everything
How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments?
-
How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments?
You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??
-
How exactly are they trying to kill those two amendments?
You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??
You gotta be fucking kidding me? ??
He's a tard... It's too hard for him...
-
Back to the original topic lol.
Bottom right is the reason to vote "no."
I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state.
-
I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state.
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
-
I think the middle one could be the most damning. All it takes is one back woods county to stop the will of the rest of the state.
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
-
And on the flip side, we take the large Democratic cities that flip elections in favor of the Libtards.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.
Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
The founding fathers were wise. They realized that the large metro areas is where the shit would flow to. So they ensured that the backbone real Americans would also have a say.
-
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.
Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.
Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.
Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.
-
The founders were genius. They saw the need to provide a safeguard against mob rule, and that election outcomes were the result of all demographics/states having a voice, not just demonrat infested shitholes. They explicitly maintained that the popular vote did not apply.Thank you for the Electoral College.
Issue 1 closely is in line with the Constitution of the United States.
51/50 is not convincing enough of a majority. It's "iffy"
60/40 proves you got it right. No question about it, a clear majority/minority
Vote YES on issue 1.
-
You mean the places with the most citizens. The citizens that each get one vote.
Wild that the most populous area has the most influence in a democratic election.
Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.
Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.
Yes, those highly populated Democratic controlled shitholes.
Thank God we have the Electoral College for the National Elections.
Yes, the electoral college has plenty of flaws as well. Good point.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login