Most legitimate scientific organization that disagrees with man made climate change
-
Climate change is a money making farce... In fact... The earth and plants/trees and such put out as much or more harmful carcinogens in the atmosphere than cars or manufacturing plants. This is a FACT!.. There are emissions from Forests and gasseus pockets in the earth...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216657/
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/explosive-methane-pockets-siberia-underground-17094982
-
but, I will admit that there are some orgs who are frightened for our planet because of man made goober warning.
The UN, on of their officers SAID that without a global acceptance of goober warning, there is no chance for REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH IN THE WORLD.
and, of course, the world bank group. they want to redistri....I mean, warn us about man made goober warning give us a hell of a lot of your money, fools. A few weeks ago, we went fishing. Caught some nice bluegills. I threw a nice crappie back - they aren't good eating in the summer. The WATER WAS NOT BOILING. LOL
-
2 days agoHead of World Meteorological Organization also warns 'climate action is not a luxury but a must' as temperatures soar The era of global warming has ended and "the era of global boiling has ...
-
Climate Change and Water. Climate change expresses itself through water. Nine out of ten natural disasters are water-related. Water-related climate risks cascade through food, energy, urban and environmental systems. If we are to achieve climate and development goals, water must be at the core of adaptation strategies.
-
-
oh, one more thing - china has gotten out of the Paris Climate accords.
the biggest polluter....
-
4 days agoNational Review 4:40 PM on July 25, 2023 It was a bad week for anyone who thought China would cooperate on emissions reduction. President Xi Jinping reiterated that his country would set its own path on the issue and not be influenced by outside factors, according to the Washington Post and Bloomberg.
-
-
The alliance for science, eh? LOL
Support for the Alliance for Science is provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
****************************************************
Organizations are run on money. The money for pro-man made goober warning flows freely.
The truth is, we don't need no stinking liberal fudgey wudgey organizations.
******************************************************
-
5 days agoNobel Prize winner Dr. John Clauser, who has disputed issues surrounding climate change, recently was told he would not be speaking to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), according to...The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics Joe Weisenthal Jul 30, 2009, 8:01 AM PDT The media portrays climate scientists as having delivered a final verdict on global warming. They haven't....
The alliance for science, eh? LOL
Support for the Alliance for Science is provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
****************************************************
Organizations are run on money. The money for pro-man made goober warning flows freely.
The truth is, we don't need no stinking liberal fudgey wudgey organizations.
******************************************************
-
5 days agoNobel Prize winner Dr. John Clauser, who has disputed issues surrounding climate change, recently was told he would not be speaking to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), according to...The 10 Most-Respected Global Warming Skeptics Joe Weisenthal Jul 30, 2009, 8:01 AM PDT The media portrays climate scientists as having delivered a final verdict on global warming. They haven't....
1. I said scientific organization. Do you have any?
2. It is fucking hilarious you all bring up money, as if all of these climatologists got into their field for the money... scientists don't make shit. Then on the other side you have freaking oil companies, incredibly wealthy, actually funneling money into think tanks and individuals to push reports that will support their profits. I can only imagine the propaganda around man made climate change and money is there to distract the easily distracted from the real flow of money from oil companies
-
-
Climate change is a money making farce... In fact... The earth and plants/trees and such put out as much or more harmful carcinogens in the atmosphere than cars or manufacturing plants. This is a FACT!.. There are emissions from Forests and gasseus pockets in the earth...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216657/
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/explosive-methane-pockets-siberia-underground-17094982
Climate change is a money making farce... In fact... The earth and plants/trees and such put out as much or more harmful carcinogens in the atmosphere than cars or manufacturing plants. This is a FACT!.. There are emissions from Forests and gasseus pockets in the earth...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216657/
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/explosive-methane-pockets-siberia-underground-17094982
It is always adorable and hilarious when the climate deniers on here post something vaguely scientific and then act like the actual experts in the fields haven't already considered it...
Yeah man, you tell them. Whatever your degree is in, if you have one, I'm sure blows away the climatologists...
-
oh, another "one more thing" ....
-
May 19, 2021 2:20 pm (EST) Summary China is the world's top emitter, producing more than a quarter of the world's annual greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to climate change. It pledged...***************************but, it's OKAY, just give china a lot of money and "then" they will go green:as soon as the UN can fork over another bunch of trillions....monies. It is ALL about redistribution of wealth. Especially, from US to the UN for dispersal.Funding a greener future China needs an estimated additional RMB 40.3 trillion ($6.4 trillion) to RMB 123.4 trillion ($19.4 trillion) to finance the transition to a greener economy. It has started collecting an environment tax to help fund its environmental policies, and is also trying to attract more green investment.
-
-
climate experts do not get money for their orgs if they deny the truth.
They only get big money when they go with the flow of crap. Now, WHY WOULD THEY BLACKLIST CLIMATE EXPERTS WHO DON"T FALL IN LINE? (answer - MONEY)
-
Feb 9, 2020ASSOCIATED PRESS A climate advocacy group called Skeptical Science hosts a list of academics that it has labeled "climate misinformers ." The list includes 17 academics and is intended as a...
-
Judith Curry, a climate expert at the Georgia Institute of Technology - who was not part of the analysis - called the study "completely unconvincing" while John Christy of University of Alabama claimed he and other climate sceptics included in the survey were simply "being blacklisted" by colleagues.Marlo Lewis, Jr. • 08/16/2019 Climate Authors of a study published recently in the journal Nature Communications want editors and journalists to blacklist "climate change contrarians." Of course, the study doesn't put it quite that way, but that clearly is the upshot.Twitter battle reveals reporters blacklisted climate expert - CFACT Reporters have apparently put Roger Pielke, Jr. on their "do not call" list despite his expertise on extreme weather trends, according to information that was revealed during a Twitter fight between the climate expert and a news editor.
-
-
Climate change is a money making farce... In fact... The earth and plants/trees and such put out as much or more harmful carcinogens in the atmosphere than cars or manufacturing plants. This is a FACT!.. There are emissions from Forests and gasseus pockets in the earth...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK232630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216657/
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/explosive-methane-pockets-siberia-underground-17094982
It is always adorable and hilarious when the climate deniers on here post something vaguely scientific and then act like the actual experts in the fields haven't already considered it...
Yeah man, you tell them. Whatever your degree is in, if you have one, I'm sure blows away the climatologists...
It is always adorable and hilarious when the climate deniers on here post something vaguely scientific and then act like the actual experts in the fields haven't already considered it...
Yeah man, you tell them. Whatever your degree is in, if you have one, I'm sure blows away the climatologists...
... You don't disappoint with your stupid rhetoric once again and always avoiding the obvious evidence... Keep your head up your ass.. You must love the odor... All your degree has done is show people how gullible and emotional you are...
-
Curious... for all the climate deniers here... what is the most legitimate scientific organization that agrees with you? Seriously. Name one.
Where, on the other side... https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change
Curious... for all the climate deniers here... what is the most legitimate scientific organization that agrees with you? Seriously. Name one.
Where, on the other side... https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change
Follow the money, most tend to lean toward the funding...
-
It is always adorable and hilarious when the climate deniers on here post something vaguely scientific and then act like the actual experts in the fields haven't already considered it...
Yeah man, you tell them. Whatever your degree is in, if you have one, I'm sure blows away the climatologists...
... You don't disappoint with your stupid rhetoric once again and always avoiding the obvious evidence... Keep your head up your ass.. You must love the odor... All your degree has done is show people how gullible and emotional you are...
... You don't disappoint with your stupid rhetoric once again and always avoiding the obvious evidence... Keep your head up your ass.. You must love the odor... All your degree has done is show people how gullible and emotional you are...
This has nothing to do with me. The experts here are the climatologists that have dedicated their lives to the subject. Hilarious to think you're over here, struggling with long division, and thinking you have some ground breaking info the experts don't know.
-
So, a lot of posts about political crap, but no orgs yet.
But it's the climatologists that are in it for the money... Right....
-
... You don't disappoint with your stupid rhetoric once again and always avoiding the obvious evidence... Keep your head up your ass.. You must love the odor... All your degree has done is show people how gullible and emotional you are...
This has nothing to do with me. The experts here are the climatologists that have dedicated their lives to the subject. Hilarious to think you're over here, struggling with long division, and thinking you have some ground breaking info the experts don't know.
This has nothing to do with me. The experts here are the climatologists that have dedicated their lives to the subject. Hilarious to think you're over here, struggling with long division, and thinking you have some ground breaking info the experts don't know.
It has everything to do with you...You started the thread Dupa...
-
So, a lot of posts about political crap, but no orgs yet.
But it's the climatologists that are in it for the money... Right....
So, a lot of posts about political crap, but no orgs yet.
But it's the climatologists that are in it for the money... Right....
Has any of those climatologists predictions come true...the Earth should have ended four or five times already.
Why does the climate Czar John Kerry fly in private jets which cause a great deal of pollution?
-
So, a lot of posts about political crap, but no orgs yet.
But it's the climatologists that are in it for the money... Right....
Has any of those climatologists predictions come true...the Earth should have ended four or five times already.
Why does the climate Czar John Kerry fly in private jets which cause a great deal of pollution?
-
Curious... for all the climate deniers here... what is the most legitimate scientific organization that agrees with you? Seriously. Name one.
Where, on the other side... https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change
Curious... for all the climate deniers here... what is the most legitimate scientific organization that agrees with you? Seriously. Name one.
Where, on the other side... https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2021/10/more-999-studies-agree-humans-caused-climate-change
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change
So?
Why is this important to you? Or to anyone?
-
I bet 99% of scientists also agreed that the universe started with the Big Bang. Now the big bang is under debate in the scientific world because of the discoveries the James Webb telescope made in finding bodies that shouldn't exist.
I know I know, the Big Bang was only a theory, but still.
-
I bet 99% of scientists also agreed that the universe started with the Big Bang. Now the big bang is under debate in the scientific world because of the discoveries the James Webb telescope made in finding bodies that shouldn't exist.
I know I know, the Big Bang was only a theory, but still.
I bet 99% of scientists also agreed that the universe started with the Big Bang. Now the big bang is under debate in the scientific world because of the discoveries the James Webb telescope made in finding bodies that shouldn't exist.
I know I know, the Big Bang was only a theory, but still.
It was a sound theory until proven otherwise (Still up for debate).. I've never bought into it completely.. But I do believe it is part of the ignition system if you will.. But were gonna find out in the end I think Sound and light have a lot more to do with this than some inertial event
-
I bet 99% of scientists also agreed that the universe started with the Big Bang. Now the big bang is under debate in the scientific world because of the discoveries the James Webb telescope made in finding bodies that shouldn't exist.
I know I know, the Big Bang was only a theory, but still.
I bet 99% of scientists also agreed that the universe started with the Big Bang. Now the big bang is under debate in the scientific world because of the discoveries the James Webb telescope made in finding bodies that shouldn't exist.
I know I know, the Big Bang was only a theory, but still.
Any time anytime vaguely scientific comes out of the mouths of right wing posters on here I don't believe you've ever been correct...
https://www.space.com/james-webb-space-telescope-science-denial
Kirkpatrick went back to her research and forgot about her quote. That was, until mid-August, when she received a text from a friend saying that there was an article — originally published by an organization called the Institute of Art and Ideas but now being republished on mainstream news sites — saying that JWST's observations of distant galaxies had disproved the Big Bang, which is not correct.
Worse still, the article had taken what Kirkpatrick had told Nature and misused it out of context to give the false impression that astrophysicists were panicking over the thought of the Big Bang theory being wrong.
The author of the article, an independent researcher named Eric Lerner, has been a serial denier of the Big Bang since the late 1980s, preferring his personal pseudoscientific alternative.
Scientists welcome new evidence. Theory is evolving and zeroing in on an answer. But a scientific theory has a lot of rigor behind it than what Joe blow thinks when he hears the word theory.
posters on here seem to have their own beliefs, shun any and all legitimate evidence that disagrees, and blindly believe any illegitimate source that says what they want to hear. Super similar to very religious folks and their beliefs, no surprise. Starting with an outcome and working backwards to cherry pick evidence
-
In the meantime, astronomers continue to learn more about the early universe with the fantastic data coming down from JWST.
The irony is that JWST's observations are actually supporting the Big Bang model, showing that the first galaxies were smaller and grew larger over time, just as Big Bang cosmology predicts. The surprising finding that galaxies in the early universe are more plentiful, and a little more massive and structured than expected, doesn't mean that the Big Bang is wrong. It just means that some of the cosmology that follows the Big Bang requires a little bit of tweaking.
And that's the fun of science. Despite the arguments from Lerner and other science deniers, science is never clean-cut; we're always learning, always improving our theories, and there is no shadowy conspiracy trying to stamp out independent thought. More than anything, science is based on observation and evidence, which the Big Bang has in bucketloads.
That's not to say people shouldn't be allowed to question things, but intelligent questioning is done in a framework of open-mindedness without pre-conceived ideologies, where beliefs are forged by evidence, rather than the other way around. That's exactly how the Big Bang theory was conceived nearly a century ago: by following the (then surprising) evidence that the universe is expanding, working out what this might logically mean, and then testing it on predictions such as the existence of the CMB radiation.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login