Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. "First Amendment for Me and Not for Thee"

"First Amendment for Me and Not for Thee"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
137 Posts 14 Posters 4.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
    • 4k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by FairHooker11
    #2

    I'm still waiting for more of the Jewish mega-donors to the nation's failed academies, 

    to wake up and stop donating to them.

    Leon Cooperman comes close with a threat but fails to act. 

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/jewish-billionaire-donor-leon-cooperman-threatens-to-cut-off-columbia-university-for-anti-israel-activity/ar-AA1j2AVj

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

      I'm not going to rehash the pending SCOTUS case regarding the Biden administration pressuring tech companies to censor "disinformation" and "hate speech." It was cheered on by a bunch of idiots in the media and government who genuinely think "hate speech is not free speech" trumps the Constitution. The tech companies' decisions to go along with the Biden administration was rightfully derided by "conservatives."

      Now, these same "conservatives" are chipping away at the first amendment in the wake of the crisis in Israel. 

      Exhibit A: If your college has anti-Zionist protestors, then your federal funding will get pulled. Thank god this retard has no chance at the presidency. 
      image.thumb.png.72002a32048f4d0fc25ff4ff05e89440.png

      Exhibit B: Desantis bans pro-Palestine groups from Florida state universities campuses citing terroristic threats. Below is the chancellor's letter. 

      image.thumb.png.0fe3d0800e8fa8b30e3b6cacab245867.png

      Didn't we already go through this shit in 2001 with the Patriot Act? Erosion of the Bill of Rights is bad and should be opposed in all forms because, as the last 8 years have demonstrated, it can be applied to anyone the current government doesn't like. Someone needs to tell these GOP idiots that they're running for president of the US, not president of Israel. 

      calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #3

      @vaportrail said:

      Now, these same "conservatives" are chipping away at the first amendment in the wake of the crisis in Israel. 

      Exhibit A: If your college has anti-Zionist protestors, then your federal funding will get pulled. Thank god this retard has no chance at the presidency. 

      You are being ignorant - supporting terrorism can not be "free speech".

      supporting hamas vile war crimes is not "free speech".

      With freedoms come responsibility and supporting terrorists is irresponsible and threatening to every

      American everywhere.

      That is "inciting to riot" and is death threats to Jewish Americans, as well as an entire nation, as well as death threats to all of us who support Israel.

      VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      Quote Reply
      • C calfoxwc

        @vaportrail said:

        Now, these same "conservatives" are chipping away at the first amendment in the wake of the crisis in Israel. 

        Exhibit A: If your college has anti-Zionist protestors, then your federal funding will get pulled. Thank god this retard has no chance at the presidency. 

        You are being ignorant - supporting terrorism can not be "free speech".

        supporting hamas vile war crimes is not "free speech".

        With freedoms come responsibility and supporting terrorists is irresponsible and threatening to every

        American everywhere.

        That is "inciting to riot" and is death threats to Jewish Americans, as well as an entire nation, as well as death threats to all of us who support Israel.

        VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 6k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by VaporTrail
        #4

        @calfoxwc said:

        You are being ignorant - supporting terrorism can not be "free speech".

        supporting hamas vile war crimes is not "free speech".

        With freedoms come responsibility and supporting terrorists is irresponsible and threatening to every

        American everywhere.

        That is "inciting to riot" and is death threats to Jewish Americans, as well as an entire nation, as well as death threats to all of us who support Israel.

        Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

        C F Canton DawgC 3 Replies Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
          • 39k Posts
          • 9k Reputation
          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
          #5

          Face it; the ship we call freedom of speech has sailed long long ago. So has life liberty and the pursuit of happiness but that's another discussion.

          (Gag order; are you fucking kidding me?)

          WSS

          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
          VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • W Westside Steve

            Face it; the ship we call freedom of speech has sailed long long ago. So has life liberty and the pursuit of happiness but that's another discussion.

            (Gag order; are you fucking kidding me?)

            WSS

            VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 6k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @westside-steve said:

            Face it; the ship we call freedom of speech has sailed long long ago. So has life liberty and the pursuit of happiness but that's another discussion.

            (Gag order; are you fucking kidding me?)

            WSS

            No, it hasn't. We are NOT Europe (at least not yet). Here's a picture of an English soccer fan getting arrested this year for wearing a jersey making light of the 97 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough crush incident. These tea sipping assholes just can't handle the banter. We can still wear shirts to Browns games with all sorts of imaginative depictions of killing A*t, and no one would bat an eye. I'm going to continue to advocate for the Bill of Rights no matter how scared people get of the bogeyman of the month. 

            image.png.ef6322465529956b65e597b57f7aa97e.png

            W 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

              @westside-steve said:

              Face it; the ship we call freedom of speech has sailed long long ago. So has life liberty and the pursuit of happiness but that's another discussion.

              (Gag order; are you fucking kidding me?)

              WSS

              No, it hasn't. We are NOT Europe (at least not yet). Here's a picture of an English soccer fan getting arrested this year for wearing a jersey making light of the 97 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough crush incident. These tea sipping assholes just can't handle the banter. We can still wear shirts to Browns games with all sorts of imaginative depictions of killing A*t, and no one would bat an eye. I'm going to continue to advocate for the Bill of Rights no matter how scared people get of the bogeyman of the month. 

              image.png.ef6322465529956b65e597b57f7aa97e.png

              Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
              • 39k Posts
              • 9k Reputation
              W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
              #7

              @vaportrail said:

              No, it hasn't. We are NOT Europe (at least not yet). Here's a picture of an English soccer fan getting arrested this year for wearing a jersey making light of the 97 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough crush incident. These tea sipping assholes just can't handle the banter. We can still wear shirts to Browns games with all sorts of imaginative depictions of killing A*t, and no one would bat an eye. I'm going to continue to advocate for the Bill of Rights no matter how scared people get of the bogeyman of the month. 

              image.png.ef6322465529956b65e597b57f7aa97e.png

              Keywords being not yet. Europe is worse, no doubt, but history did not begin 25 years ago. Go back a few decades and ask people what they would think of getting fired for using the incorrect pronoun.

              WSS

              www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
              VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                @calfoxwc said:

                You are being ignorant - supporting terrorism can not be "free speech".

                supporting hamas vile war crimes is not "free speech".

                With freedoms come responsibility and supporting terrorists is irresponsible and threatening to every

                American everywhere.

                That is "inciting to riot" and is death threats to Jewish Americans, as well as an entire nation, as well as death threats to all of us who support Israel.

                Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                #8

                @vaportrail said:

                Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                this means nothing. would you care to try to explain ?

                you can't yell "FIRE" in a crowded theater.

                It isn't that speech isn't liked, it's that that speech is destructive to society.

                Your pro-palestinian bias is tough to follow.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  You are being ignorant - supporting terrorism can not be "free speech".

                  supporting hamas vile war crimes is not "free speech".

                  With freedoms come responsibility and supporting terrorists is irresponsible and threatening to every

                  American everywhere.

                  That is "inciting to riot" and is death threats to Jewish Americans, as well as an entire nation, as well as death threats to all of us who support Israel.

                  Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                  FY56 F One Year In Posting Machine Conversation Starter Very Popular Dedicated Collaborator Reacting Well First Post One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 4k Posts
                  • 3k Reputation
                  F FY56 wrote on last edited by FY56
                  #9

                  @vaportrail said:

                  Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                  Case in point?

                  Cal gave no examples of him banning speech he didn't like. He has no authority to ban speech unless it comes from his wife.lol

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • FY56 F One Year In Posting Machine Conversation Starter Very Popular Dedicated Collaborator Reacting Well First Post One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 3k Reputation
                    F FY56 wrote on last edited by FY56
                    #10

                    It's a touchy subject I admit.

                    Certainly you can't yell "fire" in a crowded auditorium, but does speech supporting a murderous group of subhumans extend to that level? The line must be drawn somewhere.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                      • 39k Posts
                      • 9k Reputation
                      W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      In the 18th century it was common for someone who printed pamphlets advocating democracy over monarchy or one church over the other to be flogged or hung for sedition. That's why they wrote the Bill of Rights and the First Amendment as simple as that. Sometimes conservatives are accused of wanting to turn the clock back to the 1950s but these guys want to turn it back to the 1750s.

                      WSS

                      www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                        • 4k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        look - another failed academy.

                        and the escalation is taking place quite nicely 

                        (to the wishes of OP?)

                        said no one paying tuition ever

                        https://x.com/stillgray/status/1723112021007503813?s=20

                        JaxJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • F FairHooker11

                          look - another failed academy.

                          and the escalation is taking place quite nicely 

                          (to the wishes of OP?)

                          said no one paying tuition ever

                          https://x.com/stillgray/status/1723112021007503813?s=20

                          Jax JaxJ One Year In Posting Machine Very Popular Conversation Starter One Month Later Reacting Well Collaborator Week One Done Dedicated First Post
                          • 6k Posts
                          • 4k Reputation
                          JaxJ Jax wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @fairhooker11 said:

                          look - another failed academy.

                          and the escalation is taking place quite nicely 

                          (to the wishes of OP?)

                          said no one paying tuition ever

                          https://x.com/stillgray/status/1723112021007503813?s=20

                          That kind of action should get you expelled, minimum.

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                            I'm not going to rehash the pending SCOTUS case regarding the Biden administration pressuring tech companies to censor "disinformation" and "hate speech." It was cheered on by a bunch of idiots in the media and government who genuinely think "hate speech is not free speech" trumps the Constitution. The tech companies' decisions to go along with the Biden administration was rightfully derided by "conservatives."

                            Now, these same "conservatives" are chipping away at the first amendment in the wake of the crisis in Israel. 

                            Exhibit A: If your college has anti-Zionist protestors, then your federal funding will get pulled. Thank god this retard has no chance at the presidency. 
                            image.thumb.png.72002a32048f4d0fc25ff4ff05e89440.png

                            Exhibit B: Desantis bans pro-Palestine groups from Florida state universities campuses citing terroristic threats. Below is the chancellor's letter. 

                            image.thumb.png.0fe3d0800e8fa8b30e3b6cacab245867.png

                            Didn't we already go through this shit in 2001 with the Patriot Act? Erosion of the Bill of Rights is bad and should be opposed in all forms because, as the last 8 years have demonstrated, it can be applied to anyone the current government doesn't like. Someone needs to tell these GOP idiots that they're running for president of the US, not president of Israel. 

                            Jax JaxJ One Year In Posting Machine Very Popular Conversation Starter One Month Later Reacting Well Collaborator Week One Done Dedicated First Post
                            • 6k Posts
                            • 4k Reputation
                            JaxJ Jax wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @vaportrail said:

                            I'm not going to rehash the pending SCOTUS case regarding the Biden administration pressuring tech companies to censor "disinformation" and "hate speech." It was cheered on by a bunch of idiots in the media and government who genuinely think "hate speech is not free speech" trumps the Constitution. The tech companies' decisions to go along with the Biden administration was rightfully derided by "conservatives."

                            Now, these same "conservatives" are chipping away at the first amendment in the wake of the crisis in Israel. 

                            Exhibit A: If your college has anti-Zionist protestors, then your federal funding will get pulled. Thank god this retard has no chance at the presidency. 
                            image.thumb.png.72002a32048f4d0fc25ff4ff05e89440.png

                            Exhibit B: Desantis bans pro-Palestine groups from Florida state universities campuses citing terroristic threats. Below is the chancellor's letter. 

                            image.thumb.png.0fe3d0800e8fa8b30e3b6cacab245867.png

                            Didn't we already go through this shit in 2001 with the Patriot Act? Erosion of the Bill of Rights is bad and should be opposed in all forms because, as the last 8 years have demonstrated, it can be applied to anyone the current government doesn't like. Someone needs to tell these GOP idiots that they're running for president of the US, not president of Israel. 

                            Big difference between supporting terrorists and hiding behind the new made up ideologies of hate speech in which that term is specifically introduced to control speech or opposition such is being used by the left to suppress maga voters.

                            Speech should not incite violence, and there are times when there is actually a valid concern but because the lefties blurred that line to abuse it's meaning it's difficult to agree when such times actually exist.

                            Having laws against supporting terrorists seems pretty clear cut, where is the problem exactly with this law in specific?

                            F 1 Reply Last reply
                            👍 ❤
                            Quote Reply
                            • JaxJ Jax

                              @fairhooker11 said:

                              look - another failed academy.

                              and the escalation is taking place quite nicely 

                              (to the wishes of OP?)

                              said no one paying tuition ever

                              https://x.com/stillgray/status/1723112021007503813?s=20

                              That kind of action should get you expelled, minimum.

                              FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                              • 4k Posts
                              • 2k Reputation
                              F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              @jax said:

                              That kind of action should get you expelled, minimum.

                              I'm all for the expulsion of the school administrators who let this go on 

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                                @calfoxwc said:

                                You are being ignorant - supporting terrorism can not be "free speech".

                                supporting hamas vile war crimes is not "free speech".

                                With freedoms come responsibility and supporting terrorists is irresponsible and threatening to every

                                American everywhere.

                                That is "inciting to riot" and is death threats to Jewish Americans, as well as an entire nation, as well as death threats to all of us who support Israel.

                                Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                                Canton Dawg Canton DawgC Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                                • 12k Posts
                                • 7k Reputation
                                Canton DawgC Canton Dawg wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                @vaportrail said:

                                Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                                I agree, free speech is free speech regardless of whether you like it or not.

                                What are your thoughts on the WH and DNC censoring conservative tweets on Twitter?

                                Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
                                VaporTrailV 1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply
                                • JaxJ Jax

                                  @vaportrail said:

                                  I'm not going to rehash the pending SCOTUS case regarding the Biden administration pressuring tech companies to censor "disinformation" and "hate speech." It was cheered on by a bunch of idiots in the media and government who genuinely think "hate speech is not free speech" trumps the Constitution. The tech companies' decisions to go along with the Biden administration was rightfully derided by "conservatives."

                                  Now, these same "conservatives" are chipping away at the first amendment in the wake of the crisis in Israel. 

                                  Exhibit A: If your college has anti-Zionist protestors, then your federal funding will get pulled. Thank god this retard has no chance at the presidency. 
                                  image.thumb.png.72002a32048f4d0fc25ff4ff05e89440.png

                                  Exhibit B: Desantis bans pro-Palestine groups from Florida state universities campuses citing terroristic threats. Below is the chancellor's letter. 

                                  image.thumb.png.0fe3d0800e8fa8b30e3b6cacab245867.png

                                  Didn't we already go through this shit in 2001 with the Patriot Act? Erosion of the Bill of Rights is bad and should be opposed in all forms because, as the last 8 years have demonstrated, it can be applied to anyone the current government doesn't like. Someone needs to tell these GOP idiots that they're running for president of the US, not president of Israel. 

                                  Big difference between supporting terrorists and hiding behind the new made up ideologies of hate speech in which that term is specifically introduced to control speech or opposition such is being used by the left to suppress maga voters.

                                  Speech should not incite violence, and there are times when there is actually a valid concern but because the lefties blurred that line to abuse it's meaning it's difficult to agree when such times actually exist.

                                  Having laws against supporting terrorists seems pretty clear cut, where is the problem exactly with this law in specific?

                                  FY56 F One Year In Posting Machine Conversation Starter Very Popular Dedicated Collaborator Reacting Well First Post One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 4k Posts
                                  • 3k Reputation
                                  F FY56 wrote on last edited by FY56
                                  #17

                                  @jax said:

                                  Big difference between supporting terrorists and hiding behind the new made up ideologies of hate speech in which that term is specifically introduced to control speech or opposition such is being used by the left to suppress maga voters.

                                  Speech should not incite violence, and there are times when there is actually a valid concern but because the lefties blurred that line to abuse it's meaning it's difficult to agree when such times actually exist.

                                  Having laws against supporting terrorists seems pretty clear cut, where is the problem exactly with this law in specific?

                                  To the left conservative speech IS violence. The left reacts with physical violence feeling justified and entitled to do so.

                                  So the blame is on conservatism. Suppressing all conservative speech is the solution.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • Canton DawgC Canton Dawg

                                    @vaportrail said:

                                    Case in point. Stop trying to ban speech you don't like. 

                                    I agree, free speech is free speech regardless of whether you like it or not.

                                    What are your thoughts on the WH and DNC censoring conservative tweets on Twitter?

                                    VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 6k Posts
                                    • 1k Reputation
                                    VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @canton-dawg said:

                                    I agree, free speech is free speech regardless of whether you like it or not.

                                    What are your thoughts on the WH and DNC censoring conservative tweets on Twitter?

                                    Personally, I think it was a blatantly illegal abuse of power. I'm looking forward to Missouri vs Biden getting elevated to the Supreme Court. I'm also looking forward to these Silicon Valley twats being charged with perjury for lying about it to Congress. 

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    👍
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • W Westside Steve

                                      @vaportrail said:

                                      No, it hasn't. We are NOT Europe (at least not yet). Here's a picture of an English soccer fan getting arrested this year for wearing a jersey making light of the 97 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough crush incident. These tea sipping assholes just can't handle the banter. We can still wear shirts to Browns games with all sorts of imaginative depictions of killing A*t, and no one would bat an eye. I'm going to continue to advocate for the Bill of Rights no matter how scared people get of the bogeyman of the month. 

                                      image.png.ef6322465529956b65e597b57f7aa97e.png

                                      Keywords being not yet. Europe is worse, no doubt, but history did not begin 25 years ago. Go back a few decades and ask people what they would think of getting fired for using the incorrect pronoun.

                                      WSS

                                      VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 6k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @westside-steve said:

                                      Keywords being not yet. Europe is worse, no doubt, but history did not begin 25 years ago. Go back a few decades and ask people what they would think of getting fired for using the incorrect pronoun.

                                      WSS

                                      It's all cyclical. The last time inflation was this high and tranny shit being pushed on the public was Weimar Germany in 1932...

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • VaporTrailV VaporTrail

                                        @westside-steve said:

                                        Keywords being not yet. Europe is worse, no doubt, but history did not begin 25 years ago. Go back a few decades and ask people what they would think of getting fired for using the incorrect pronoun.

                                        WSS

                                        It's all cyclical. The last time inflation was this high and tranny shit being pushed on the public was Weimar Germany in 1932...

                                        Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                        • 39k Posts
                                        • 9k Reputation
                                        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @vaportrail said:

                                        It's all cyclical. The last time inflation was this high and tranny shit being pushed on the public was Weimar Germany in 1932...

                                        So why am I thinking about Joel gray and Liza Minnelli?

                                        WSS

                                        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        😂
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 6k Posts
                                          • 1k Reputation
                                          VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Good news. The Florida universities are refusing to enforce Gov Desantis' mandate because they're concerned about being personally liable for damages (i.e. - their lawyers know damn well it's a blatant 1A violation). 

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate