Skip to content

Voting Resources

Political Discussion
69 12 1.5k
  • @hammertime said:

    Go watch some abortion videos…cheer you right up I bet.

    Try to follow along hammer.  Gee, I've only said this around a dozen times here.  I happen to be pro life, and anti abortion... I even donated fairly regularly to the (now defrocked) Father Frank Pavone's Priests for Life- until he devolved into trying to hit me up for contributions every two weeks.  And sold my name and address to every anti abortion group in the country.  FYI- I do keep a spreadsheet of who's asking me for money, and how often. It's now 210 lines long. ?

    @hoorta said:

    Try to follow along hammer.  Gee, I've only said this around a dozen times here.  I happen to be pro life, and anti abortion... I even donated fairly regularly to the (now defrocked) Father Frank Pavone's Priests for Life- until he devolved into trying to hit me up for contributions every two weeks.  And sold my name and address to every anti abortion group in the country.  FYI- I do keep a spreadsheet of who's asking me for money, and how often. It's now 210 lines long. ?

    but you vote for abortion on demand - even pba candidates,

    go figure.

  • @hoorta said:

    Try to follow along hammer.  Gee, I've only said this around a dozen times here.  I happen to be pro life, and anti abortion... I even donated fairly regularly to the (now defrocked) Father Frank Pavone's Priests for Life- until he devolved into trying to hit me up for contributions every two weeks.  And sold my name and address to every anti abortion group in the country.  FYI- I do keep a spreadsheet of who's asking me for money, and how often. It's now 210 lines long. ?

    but you vote for abortion on demand - even pba candidates,

    go figure.

    @calfoxwc said:

    but you vote for abortion on demand - even pba candidates,

    go figure.

    Go figure Cal... I'm not a one issue voter...  FWIW, one of the preeminent American Catholic Prelates- Bishop Robert Barron recently said it's OK to not be one. 

    Well- I'll give you my thinking on abortion. Even though I consider it seriously morally wrong, let's assume abortion was 100% legal (BTW- after birth abortion- killing a viable fetus outside of the womb is considered infanticide). Should a woman choose to have an abortion, I've never heard of a case where someone put a gun to her head and told her she had to have one.  

  • @calfoxwc said:

    but you vote for abortion on demand - even pba candidates,

    go figure.

    Go figure Cal... I'm not a one issue voter...  FWIW, one of the preeminent American Catholic Prelates- Bishop Robert Barron recently said it's OK to not be one. 

    Well- I'll give you my thinking on abortion. Even though I consider it seriously morally wrong, let's assume abortion was 100% legal (BTW- after birth abortion- killing a viable fetus outside of the womb is considered infanticide). Should a woman choose to have an abortion, I've never heard of a case where someone put a gun to her head and told her she had to have one.  

    @hoorta said:

    Go figure Cal... I'm not a one issue voter...  FWIW, one of the preeminent American Catholic Prelates- Bishop Robert Barron recently said it's OK to not be one. 

    Well- I'll give you my thinking on abortion. Even though I consider it seriously morally wrong, let's assume abortion was 100% legal (BTW- after birth abortion- killing a viable fetus outside of the womb is considered infanticide). Should a woman choose to have an abortion, I've never heard of a case where someone put a gun to her head and told her she had to have one.  

    It's a tough, divisive issue - I find it wrong - but in some special circumstances, I understand it.

    My disgust with the issue is women getting pregnant, and wanting to wait til the 4th - 9th month to decide

    to destroy the child for no legitimate reason. why? so they can get those federal single mother checks coming in as long as possible?

    I don't get it.

  • @hoorta said:

    Go figure Cal... I'm not a one issue voter...  FWIW, one of the preeminent American Catholic Prelates- Bishop Robert Barron recently said it's OK to not be one. 

    Well- I'll give you my thinking on abortion. Even though I consider it seriously morally wrong, let's assume abortion was 100% legal (BTW- after birth abortion- killing a viable fetus outside of the womb is considered infanticide). Should a woman choose to have an abortion, I've never heard of a case where someone put a gun to her head and told her she had to have one.  

    It's a tough, divisive issue - I find it wrong - but in some special circumstances, I understand it.

    My disgust with the issue is women getting pregnant, and wanting to wait til the 4th - 9th month to decide

    to destroy the child for no legitimate reason. why? so they can get those federal single mother checks coming in as long as possible?

    I don't get it.

    @calfoxwc said:

    It's a tough, divisive issue - I find it wrong - but in some special circumstances, I understand it.

    My disgust with the issue is women getting pregnant, and wanting to wait til the 4th - 9th month to decide

    to destroy the child for no legitimate reason. why? so they can get those federal single mother checks coming in as long as possible?

    I don't get it.

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different. 

    But living in an alternate fantasy reality isn't new for you either...

  • @calfoxwc said:

    It's a tough, divisive issue - I find it wrong - but in some special circumstances, I understand it.

    My disgust with the issue is women getting pregnant, and wanting to wait til the 4th - 9th month to decide

    to destroy the child for no legitimate reason. why? so they can get those federal single mother checks coming in as long as possible?

    I don't get it.

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different. 

    But living in an alternate fantasy reality isn't new for you either...

    @mld-woody said:

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different. 

    But living in an alternate fantasy reality isn't new for you either...

    you didn't read and understand my post, dumb ass. There are a lot of reasons for women deciding to have an abortion.

    MY DISGUST... why do we always have to define words for you? Read the article below - one example - 23 weeks. That is over 5 months. So, mothers who decide to keep their baby past 5 months, the have 4 months of fed assistance coming in, only to wait til the ninth month to decide to destroy their child? Outisde of some health of the mother crisis, what other reasons are there?

    Dec 13, 2023To be eligible, women must live in the specified region, be at least 18 years old, 23 weeks pregnant or less with your first child, and have an annual household income under $52,000.
     
  • @mld-woody said:

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different. 

    But living in an alternate fantasy reality isn't new for you either...

    you didn't read and understand my post, dumb ass. There are a lot of reasons for women deciding to have an abortion.

    MY DISGUST... why do we always have to define words for you? Read the article below - one example - 23 weeks. That is over 5 months. So, mothers who decide to keep their baby past 5 months, the have 4 months of fed assistance coming in, only to wait til the ninth month to decide to destroy their child? Outisde of some health of the mother crisis, what other reasons are there?

    Dec 13, 2023To be eligible, women must live in the specified region, be at least 18 years old, 23 weeks pregnant or less with your first child, and have an annual household income under $52,000.
     

    @calfoxwc said:

    you didn't read and understand my post, dumb ass. There are a lot of reasons for women deciding to have an abortion.

    MY DISGUST... why do we always have to define words for you? Read the article below - one example - 23 weeks. That is over 5 months. So, mothers who decide to keep their baby past 5 months, the have 4 months of fed assistance coming in, only to wait til the ninth month to decide to destroy their child? Outisde of some health of the mother crisis, what other reasons are there?

    Dec 13, 2023To be eligible, women must live in the specified region, be at least 18 years old, 23 weeks pregnant or less with your first child, and have an annual household income under $52,000.
     

    I understood your post perfectly. They aren't that hard to follow. 

    Again, what is actually happening and what you think is happening are very different. You just have a very emotionally charged view on this issue. 

    I'd invite you to read up on the topic. Less than 1% of abortions are happening past 21 weeks. 

    https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/25/what-the-data-says-about-abortion-in-the-us/

  • yes, woodpecker. percentages sound small.

    The reality sets in and twists your beak. One percent of 1,026,700 is 10,267 babies being born after 21 weeks.image.thumb.jpeg.6c4a299e79d8caddd2710946060c67da.jpeg

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2024/03/19/1238293143/abortion-data-how-many-us-2023

    More than a million abortions were provided in the U.S. in 2023. That's a major finding from a report published Tuesday by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports access to abortion.

    To be precise, researchers estimate there were 1,026,700 abortions in 2023. "That's the highest number in over a decade, [and] the first time there have been over a million abortions provided in the U.S. formal health care system since 2012," explains Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist with Guttmacher.

  • yes, woodpecker. percentages sound small.

    The reality sets in and twists your beak. One percent of 1,026,700 is 10,267 babies being born after 21 weeks.image.thumb.jpeg.6c4a299e79d8caddd2710946060c67da.jpeg

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2024/03/19/1238293143/abortion-data-how-many-us-2023

    More than a million abortions were provided in the U.S. in 2023. That's a major finding from a report published Tuesday by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports access to abortion.

    To be precise, researchers estimate there were 1,026,700 abortions in 2023. "That's the highest number in over a decade, [and] the first time there have been over a million abortions provided in the U.S. formal health care system since 2012," explains Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist with Guttmacher.

    @calfoxwc said:

    yes, woodpecker. percentages sound small.

    The reality sets in and twists your beak. One percent of 1,026,700 is 10,267 babies being born after 21 weeks.image.thumb.jpeg.6c4a299e79d8caddd2710946060c67da.jpeg

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2024/03/19/1238293143/abortion-data-how-many-us-2023

    More than a million abortions were provided in the U.S. in 2023. That's a major finding from a report published Tuesday by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports access to abortion.

    To be precise, researchers estimate there were 1,026,700 abortions in 2023. "That's the highest number in over a decade, [and] the first time there have been over a million abortions provided in the U.S. formal health care system since 2012," explains Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist with Guttmacher.

    ... and?

    I was making the point that you statistically have no idea what the realities are around abortion and that you're way too emotional on the issue. And I know numbers aren't your strong suit either. It seems fairly easy for you to be manipulated by data. 

    You haven't exactly disproven that. 

  • @calfoxwc said:

    yes, woodpecker. percentages sound small.

    The reality sets in and twists your beak. One percent of 1,026,700 is 10,267 babies being born after 21 weeks.image.thumb.jpeg.6c4a299e79d8caddd2710946060c67da.jpeg

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2024/03/19/1238293143/abortion-data-how-many-us-2023

    More than a million abortions were provided in the U.S. in 2023. That's a major finding from a report published Tuesday by the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that supports access to abortion.

    To be precise, researchers estimate there were 1,026,700 abortions in 2023. "That's the highest number in over a decade, [and] the first time there have been over a million abortions provided in the U.S. formal health care system since 2012," explains Isaac Maddow-Zimet, a data scientist with Guttmacher.

    ... and?

    I was making the point that you statistically have no idea what the realities are around abortion and that you're way too emotional on the issue. And I know numbers aren't your strong suit either. It seems fairly easy for you to be manipulated by data. 

    You haven't exactly disproven that. 

    @mld-woody said:

    ... and?

    I was making the point that you statistically have no idea what the realities are around abortion and that you're way too emotional on the issue. And I know numbers aren't your strong suit either. It seems fairly easy for you to be manipulated by data. 

    You haven't exactly disproven that. 

    yes, you are a smart ass birdie, but I just showed how you dishonestly used a "1%" to sound like an extremely small number.

    Pretty much you make a bird's ass of yourself trying to emotionally manipulate numbers to try to justify your bias.

    Why, do you think my 1 percent calc is incorrect?

    "only 1%" emotionally fits you.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    It's a tough, divisive issue - I find it wrong - but in some special circumstances, I understand it.

    My disgust with the issue is women getting pregnant, and wanting to wait til the 4th - 9th month to decide

    to destroy the child for no legitimate reason. why? so they can get those federal single mother checks coming in as long as possible?

    I don't get it.

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different. 

    But living in an alternate fantasy reality isn't new for you either...

    @mld-woody said:

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different.

    So do tell, why and when did you have your first one?

  • It’s amazing how far the sick and depraved have convinced themselves that murder is okay….

    under zero circumstances is it alright to kill a baby.

    what the hell is wrong with people?

    shrinking down the viability date is a start but for crying out loud doesn’t any actually think about how God is gonna feel about us snuffing out the most precious thing he gives us?

    keep in mind that the baby didn’t do anything wrong.

    no matter what happened, life was created and to end it is murder.

  • The leftwing move to make any self-destructive behavior NOT result in unwanted consequences - is a loser in this election.

    "defund police", "no arrests for non-violent crime", "assisted illegal drug use for illegal drug users" "abortion on demand at any length of pregnanacy", "releasing violent criminals/illegals" from custody, harboring illegals in "sanctuary cities"...."dei" emphasis on hiring in gov and the private sector, required dei in the military, teaching young children about perverted subjects........

    it was a major vote getter for the left.

    The American people have gotten sick of it, and voted to fix America.

  • Well this Topic is from last year 2024, yet the "proChoiceproLife" debate never gets old, does it! 

    [By the way: Are there woman members on this Forum? I ask because on this subject, the female perspective rather tends to be relevant!]

    The following are characteristics I have observed from both sides of this debate. 
    Consider this:

    When a woman wants her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as: 
    "My child / my baby".

    When a woman does not want her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as:
    "The fetus / my body".

    My conclusion, while sincerely not seeking to upset anyone on either side of the debate:
    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:
    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

     

  • Well this Topic is from last year 2024, yet the "proChoiceproLife" debate never gets old, does it! 

    [By the way: Are there woman members on this Forum? I ask because on this subject, the female perspective rather tends to be relevant!]

    The following are characteristics I have observed from both sides of this debate. 
    Consider this:

    When a woman wants her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as: 
    "My child / my baby".

    When a woman does not want her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as:
    "The fetus / my body".

    My conclusion, while sincerely not seeking to upset anyone on either side of the debate:
    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:
    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

     

    @robert333 said:

    Well this Topic is from last year 2024, yet the "proChoiceproLife" debate never gets old, does it! 

    [By the way: Are there woman members on this Forum? I ask because on this subject, the female perspective rather tends to be relevant!]

    The following are characteristics I have observed from both sides of this debate. 
    Consider this:

    When a woman wants her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as: 
    "My child / my baby".

    When a woman does not want her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as:
    "The fetus / my body".

    My conclusion, while sincerely not seeking to upset anyone on either side of the debate:
    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:
    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

     

    Define proportion of pregnancies.

  • Well this Topic is from last year 2024, yet the "proChoiceproLife" debate never gets old, does it! 

    [By the way: Are there woman members on this Forum? I ask because on this subject, the female perspective rather tends to be relevant!]

    The following are characteristics I have observed from both sides of this debate. 
    Consider this:

    When a woman wants her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as: 
    "My child / my baby".

    When a woman does not want her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as:
    "The fetus / my body".

    My conclusion, while sincerely not seeking to upset anyone on either side of the debate:
    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:
    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

     

    @robert333 said:

    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:

    < 2%

  • Well this Topic is from last year 2024, yet the "proChoiceproLife" debate never gets old, does it! 

    [By the way: Are there woman members on this Forum? I ask because on this subject, the female perspective rather tends to be relevant!]

    The following are characteristics I have observed from both sides of this debate. 
    Consider this:

    When a woman wants her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as: 
    "My child / my baby".

    When a woman does not want her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as:
    "The fetus / my body".

    My conclusion, while sincerely not seeking to upset anyone on either side of the debate:
    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:
    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

     

    @robert333 said:

    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

    Doesn't it always my friend?

  • @robert333 said:

    Well this Topic is from last year 2024, yet the "proChoiceproLife" debate never gets old, does it! 

    [By the way: Are there woman members on this Forum? I ask because on this subject, the female perspective rather tends to be relevant!]

    The following are characteristics I have observed from both sides of this debate. 
    Consider this:

    When a woman wants her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as: 
    "My child / my baby".

    When a woman does not want her pregnancy, she refers to her pregnancy as:
    "The fetus / my body".

    My conclusion, while sincerely not seeking to upset anyone on either side of the debate:
    While recognizing that a proportion of pregnancies are due to incest / rape:
    Otherwise, the debate boils down to female-selfishness!

     

    Define proportion of pregnancies.

    @hammertime said:

    Define proportion of pregnancies.

    I searched for a percentage for rape / incest related pregnancies,  but bear in mind that the term "rape" could include: 
    incest, and 
    non-reproductive penetration. 

    The reader can view relevant statistics here:
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8765248/!

    The possibility of any female-selfishness, to which I referred in my post above, cannot apply in the case of rape.

  • @hammertime said:

    Define proportion of pregnancies.

    I searched for a percentage for rape / incest related pregnancies,  but bear in mind that the term "rape" could include: 
    incest, and 
    non-reproductive penetration. 

    The reader can view relevant statistics here:
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8765248/!

    The possibility of any female-selfishness, to which I referred in my post above, cannot apply in the case of rape.

    @robert333 said:

    I searched for a percentage for rape / incest related pregnancies,  but bear in mind that the term "rape" could include: 
    incest, and 
    non-reproductive penetration. 

    The reader can view relevant statistics here:
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8765248/!

    The possibility of any female-selfishness, to which I referred in my post above, cannot apply in the case of rape.

    In all these cases what is the percentage of times where’s its the baby’s fault?

  • @robert333 said:

    I searched for a percentage for rape / incest related pregnancies,  but bear in mind that the term "rape" could include: 
    incest, and 
    non-reproductive penetration. 

    The reader can view relevant statistics here:
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8765248/!

    The possibility of any female-selfishness, to which I referred in my post above, cannot apply in the case of rape.

    In all these cases what is the percentage of times where’s its the baby’s fault?

    @hammertime said:

    In all these cases what is the percentage of times where’s its the baby’s fault?

    Contributor "hammertime" knows the answer to their own question, and so I invite them to say why they pose it while also giving if they can, a substantive answer to the first post I put on this thread (which is on this page).

    Are there any women members of this Board who can be invited to discuss this (unemotionally?) (referring of course to the first post I put on this thread)?

  • AxeA Axe

    @mld-woody said:

    Your perception of why women get an abortion and the reality of why and when women get abortions could not be more different.

    So do tell, why and when did you have your first one?

    @axe said:

    So do tell, why and when did you have your first one?

    Yep, I'm sure Woody is an expert on why women get abortions with all the women he has knocked up.?