Skip to content

Another one of woodpecker's "illegals who just wanted a better life" ?

Political Discussion
52 5 615 2
  • @jax said:

    There are Americans that make excuses for this.

    Another illegal let in by Biden in 2022.

    This was an awful, senseless attack and hopefully the attacker/terrorist is fully prosecuted/dealt with 

    A few things here though:

    - I don't think any children were victims. Of the list I saw, none were children. And luckily no one died (hopefully the few in critical condition survive). Crazy that tweet felt the need to add that lie 

    - This guy entered the country legally, and then was on a legal two year work authorization. It expired in March. So at that point he becomes "illegal", but he wasn't some illegal sneaking over or whatever 

    I fully expect deranged responses to the above. Correcting the record and calling out lies will somehow be interpreted as supporting terrorism. 

    It's a damn shame this insane individual did this shit. The right already just latches onto individual incidents and not the big picture, overall data, etc. The public's view on Israel and Palestine was clearly turning. Now the Trump admin will use this to push even crazier crackdowns fueled by the fearmongering of their base. 

    @mld-woody said:

    The right already just latches onto individual incidents and not the big picture

    The big picture is the racist hate towards Jews and all these protests supporting it.

  • @jax said:

    Illegal that Biden let in, unchecked no doubt.

    No kids were victims from what I found.

    Did she learn what habeas corpus means yet?

    You gonna acknowledge your early shared tweet had multiple inaccuracies?

  • @jax said:

    Illegal that Biden let in, unchecked no doubt.

    No kids were victims from what I found.

    Did she learn what habeas corpus means yet?

    You gonna acknowledge your early shared tweet had multiple inaccuracies?

    @mld-woody said:

    Did she learn what habeas corpus means yet?

    You gonna acknowledge your early shared tweet had multiple inaccuracies?

    Right after you acknowledge everything you post is full of shit.

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    Did she learn what habeas corpus means yet?

    You gonna acknowledge your early shared tweet had multiple inaccuracies?

    Right after you acknowledge everything you post is full of shit.

    @jax said:

    Right after you acknowledge everything you post is full of shit.

    Well you already acknowledged no children were injured. You kinda swept that under the rug. But that's a good start in admitting your post has multiple lies 

    I already posted this guys immigration history. I recognize your fear mongering side doesn't have the actual data to support your anti immigrant crusade, and you have to sensationalize what stories you get, but just straight up lying seems a little much. Though completely expected 

  • @jax said:

    Right after you acknowledge everything you post is full of shit.

    Well you already acknowledged no children were injured. You kinda swept that under the rug. But that's a good start in admitting your post has multiple lies 

    I already posted this guys immigration history. I recognize your fear mongering side doesn't have the actual data to support your anti immigrant crusade, and you have to sensationalize what stories you get, but just straight up lying seems a little much. Though completely expected 

    @mld-woody said:

    Well you already acknowledged no children were injured. You kinda swept that under the rug. But that's a good start in admitting your post has multiple lies 

    I already posted this guys immigration history. I recognize your fear mongering side doesn't have the actual data to support your anti immigrant crusade, and you have to sensationalize what stories you get, but just straight up lying seems a little much. Though completely expected 

    It came out before any details, no one is trying to lie. Too bad you don't think the event, triggered by an illegal and Jewish hate protests is enough carnage. 

    Illegals don't have to commit any other crime besides entering and staying illegally for me to be against it. No need to sensationalize a thing beyond that.

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    Well you already acknowledged no children were injured. You kinda swept that under the rug. But that's a good start in admitting your post has multiple lies 

    I already posted this guys immigration history. I recognize your fear mongering side doesn't have the actual data to support your anti immigrant crusade, and you have to sensationalize what stories you get, but just straight up lying seems a little much. Though completely expected 

    It came out before any details, no one is trying to lie. Too bad you don't think the event, triggered by an illegal and Jewish hate protests is enough carnage. 

    Illegals don't have to commit any other crime besides entering and staying illegally for me to be against it. No need to sensationalize a thing beyond that.

    @jax said:

    It came out before any details, no one is trying to lie. Too bad you don't think the event, triggered by an illegal and Jewish hate protests is enough carnage. 

    Illegals don't have to commit any other crime besides entering and staying illegally for me to be against it. No need to sensationalize a thing beyond that.

    Right, yeah, the account just spewed some inflammatory nonsense to get the base riled up and to be "first". 

    It's clear you and other right wingers have real issues with sources, fake news, and falling for half truths or straight up lies. But I also don't think you really care. You just want to consume whatever info either enrages you the most or aligns with your view of the world the most. 

    I mean, even here I'm telling you multiple ways the post you shared was objectively wrong and I'm just getting "whatever! It doesn't matter!". How many right wing idiots live in a bubble where this stuff isn't going to get corrected?

  • https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/06/03/ice-operation-results-more-70-illegal-alien-arrests-cartel-run-night-club-near

    Prior to the operation, ICE received information from a source that “The Alamo"-–an underground illegal nightclub-–was the location of weapons, narcotics, and human trafficking. ICE also seized cash, narcotics, and firearms during the operation.

    During the operation, law enforcement executed a search warrant at the unlicensed establishment, leading to:

    • 72 arrests, including individuals with serious prior offenses.
    • 6 juveniles recovered and turned over to state social services for protection and care.

    Arrests are still being processed.

  • Ah, ok, anything other than addressing the lies you posted. Fair enough. Wasn't expecting much. 

  • and again, woodpecker says NOTHING about sex trafficking by illegals.

    and, no children were injured or murdered by the illegal, so it's 

    ok with woodpecker except ...

    whatever. Still adds nothing legit to any discussion.

  • Once again Cal, thank you for proving my point completely 

  • JaxJ Jax

    https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/06/03/ice-operation-results-more-70-illegal-alien-arrests-cartel-run-night-club-near

    Prior to the operation, ICE received information from a source that “The Alamo"-–an underground illegal nightclub-–was the location of weapons, narcotics, and human trafficking. ICE also seized cash, narcotics, and firearms during the operation.

    During the operation, law enforcement executed a search warrant at the unlicensed establishment, leading to:

    • 72 arrests, including individuals with serious prior offenses.
    • 6 juveniles recovered and turned over to state social services for protection and care.

    Arrests are still being processed.

    @jax said:

    https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/06/03/ice-operation-results-more-70-illegal-alien-arrests-cartel-run-night-club-near

    Prior to the operation, ICE received information from a source that “The Alamo"-–an underground illegal nightclub-–was the location of weapons, narcotics, and human trafficking. ICE also seized cash, narcotics, and firearms during the operation.

    During the operation, law enforcement executed a search warrant at the unlicensed establishment, leading to:

    • 72 arrests, including individuals with serious prior offenses.
    • 6 juveniles recovered and turned over to state social services for protection and care.

    Arrests are still being processed.

    Illegal clubs can be pretty cool. For whatever reason l dug in to this, l wanted to know how much drugs and weapons they seized. I love those photos of cops looking all proud of themselves with the pounds of cocaine and uzis they seized.

    I don’t think they seized a photo op worthy amount with this raid, which was called “Operation Last Stand.” Kinda sounds like they thought they’d have a real fight on their hands. Maybe a little corny with the name choice with the way it played out?

    I read a few articles on it, mostly from local news outlets round those parts. I thought this one was the most balanced.

    https://www.live5news.com/2025/06/02/charleston-sheriff-cartel-members-intl-murder-suspect-arrested-ice-sting/?outputType=amp

    Sounds like The Alamo had a good few year run as a hot spot for dancing amongst the Spanish speakers there. Years from now they will say “¿Recuerda el Alamo?” 

    Remember the Alamo? 

  • Once again Cal, thank you for proving my point completely 

    @mld-woody said:

    *FART*

    Once again, you won't say Laken Riley's name, and you prove what we believe about you to be very, very true.

  • @mld-woody said:

    *FART*

    Once again, you won't say Laken Riley's name, and you prove what we believe about you to be very, very true.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Once again, you won't say Laken Riley's name, and you prove what we believe about you to be very, very true.

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Once again, you won't say Laken Riley's name, and you prove what we believe about you to be very, very true.

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

    @ibleedbrown said:

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

    I'm beyond caring what he does... Cowards don't matter in my life...

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Once again, you won't say Laken Riley's name, and you prove what we believe about you to be very, very true.

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

    @ibleedbrown said:

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

      I would almost have a very tiny bit of belief that he is a worthwhile human being.

    But no, he's still a birdbrain. I guess you are an ornithologist. have a nice birdie day.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Once again, you won't say Laken Riley's name, and you prove what we believe about you to be very, very true.

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

    @ibleedbrown said:

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

    He's just using her as a political pawn. It's sad. This "say her name" is no different than shouting "TDS". It's just a nonsense phrase to deflect any valid criticism 

  • @ibleedbrown said:

    How satisfied would you actually be if Woody said Laken Riley’s name? Like on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being cream your jeans, 1 being “meh,” where would you be if Woody actually said Laken Riley’s name?

    He's just using her as a political pawn. It's sad. This "say her name" is no different than shouting "TDS". It's just a nonsense phrase to deflect any valid criticism 

    @mld-woody said:

    *woodpecker FART*

    that is extremely stupid, and a cowardly way of hiding.

    you don't use words properly, you use them emotionally like

    all leftwing cowardly hacks do. To wit:

    "A political pawn refers to a person or group that is used by politicians to advance their own agendas, often without regard for the individuals' well-being. This term is frequently applied to vulnerable populations, such as migrants, who are manipulated for political gain."

    so, there is NOTHING that has to do with political gain. You aren't using words correctly. Your twisted bird emotions preclude honest content in your posts.

  • @mld-woody said:

    *woodpecker FART*

    that is extremely stupid, and a cowardly way of hiding.

    you don't use words properly, you use them emotionally like

    all leftwing cowardly hacks do. To wit:

    "A political pawn refers to a person or group that is used by politicians to advance their own agendas, often without regard for the individuals' well-being. This term is frequently applied to vulnerable populations, such as migrants, who are manipulated for political gain."

    so, there is NOTHING that has to do with political gain. You aren't using words correctly. Your twisted bird emotions preclude honest content in your posts.

    @calfoxwc said:

    that is extremely stupid, and a cowardly way of hiding.

    you don't use words properly, you use them emotionally like

    all leftwing cowardly hacks do. To wit:

    "A political pawn refers to a person or group that is used by politicians to advance their own agendas, often without regard for the individuals' well-being. This term is frequently applied to vulnerable populations, such as migrants, who are manipulated for political gain."

    so, there is NOTHING that has to do with political gain. You aren't using words correctly. Your twisted bird emotions preclude honest content in your posts.

    Just more word salads like his hero , Kamala...