Skip to content

Currently our 2025 first round pick is....

The Browns Board
684 34 21.0k 1
  • @sdbacker80 said:

    I think 24 now 

    Why?

    @texasag1969 said:

    Why?

    Wild card round losers get placed next in order by worst to best record.  Jax has the best record so far of the losers or potential losers unless NE loses we will be 24 

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    I think 24 now 

    Why?

    @texasag1969 said:

    Why?

    Tankathon currently has the Jags pick at 24.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Why?

    Tankathon currently has the Jags pick at 24.

    @orion said:

    Tankathon currently has the Jags pick at 24.

    Gothcha. I was putting too many teams in the playoffs, 14 and not 16 like I was thinking. 18 were already eliminated first. Still rooting for NE to lose to the Chargers. That puts us at #23.

  • Looks like the NE win puts us at #24.

  • @flugel said:

    Nope, neither guy can play LT so the 2 RTs you mentioned are not in play for me at #6.  I'm not budging.  The limited supply for a big demand of LTs will be done by the time we make our 2nd 1st round pick.  If you want to evaluate our young QB or next victim - you can't sentence them to the crap at LT and RT the Browns ended the year with.  Inexcusable and unacceptable. 

    We're gonna agree to disagree here and that's okay.  If, for some reason I'm wrong and the run on LTs has not begun yet at #6 overall (totally possible) - I don't mind trading back a little. There's a guy that plays LT for Indiana  (Carter Smith) not getting the mock draft popularity RTs like Fano and Mauigoa are getting. Here's a cut and paste and maybe we CAN get this guy at the end of round 1 or in round 2. 

    image.png.afaf1ff82b6dee15160229d1e49b16ad.png

    I think there's a lot of RTs with similar skillsets and I'd be fine with getting Iowa's Gennings Dunker in round 2.  Here's what I want by the end of round 2 selection (LT, RT & WR) and I'm fine with going WR before RT.  

    Now, I'm fine going BPA the rest of the draft.

    So we can’t fix this unless we reach for a left tackle at 6? 

    I say reach because it appears the left tackle prospects aren’t Top 10 material. 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    So we can’t fix this unless we reach for a left tackle at 6? 

    I say reach because it appears the left tackle prospects aren’t Top 10 material. 

    I'm not trying to be obnoxious here; unfortunately, that comes more easily than I'd like it to sometimes. Okay, so I'm feeling like I'm trying to sell tanning beds in the tropics here.  No worries, I love every DAMN 1 of yuz. I just want to challenge our collective minds here to dig deeper on what's stopping the show via our personnel on the field aside from any coaches you feel are responsible. In particular, what position(s) are doing that so I'll try to guide you here. If you're not interested - I understand...

    What's the most important position in an NFL Offense today?   If you don't have 1 before the draft - do you reach to get 1 in a very limited supply for a big demand?  Why or why not?  

    What other position(s) do you protect this investment best from on the field?   If you don't have one or two do you reach if there's a limited supply of this/these position(s)?  If not, could trading back a little for an additional pick or 2 help us out?

  • With all eyes on Mendoza, I wanted to know what makes the machine go.

    His LT - Carter Smith 

    His C - Pat Coogan

    Really standing out to me. 

    @texasag1969 said:

    They also say Proctor from Alabama is the best OT in this draft and have the Browns picking him next at #6.

     Proctor, at least in my early viewings, suffers from the same symptoms the majority of Bama LTs before him (Leatherwood, Neal, Jonah Williams, Cam Robinson )  did.   

     He's a large body with incredibly heavy feet.   Sadly there's a lot of history working against him.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    With all eyes on Mendoza, I wanted to know what makes the machine go.

    His LT - Carter Smith 

    His C - Pat Coogan

    Really standing out to me. 

    I wondered who you might like in the IU trenches. Coogan transferred from Notre Dame. Do you think Smith has the feet to stick at OT or is he another “might be better as a Guard” guy?

  • @tiamat63 said:

    With all eyes on Mendoza, I wanted to know what makes the machine go.

    His LT - Carter Smith 

    His C - Pat Coogan

    Really standing out to me. 

    I wondered who you might like in the IU trenches. Coogan transferred from Notre Dame. Do you think Smith has the feet to stick at OT or is he another “might be better as a Guard” guy?

    @ibleedbrown said:

    I wondered who you might like in the IU trenches. Coogan transferred from Notre Dame. Do you think Smith has the feet to stick at OT or is he another “might be better as a Guard” guy?

     Building my QB, OL & WR viewing list for this off-season including the website work.  So far, my thoughts are from just watching live and some sky cam replays.  So a bit "rough draft-ish"...   but early impressions on his arch step are solid. 

     Myself, @flugel...possibly @dutch-oven (and anyone else that's willing to join) will be tagging along with me for some film review for OTs on my RunThe9 channel either tonight or tomorrow. 

     I'll give you an expanded review once I've charted more snaps for Smith.  

  • It should be interesting to see how he does against Miami's edge Reuben Bain,Jr and or others along their DL.

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    So we can’t fix this unless we reach for a left tackle at 6? 

    I say reach because it appears the left tackle prospects aren’t Top 10 material. 

    I'm not trying to be obnoxious here; unfortunately, that comes more easily than I'd like it to sometimes. Okay, so I'm feeling like I'm trying to sell tanning beds in the tropics here.  No worries, I love every DAMN 1 of yuz. I just want to challenge our collective minds here to dig deeper on what's stopping the show via our personnel on the field aside from any coaches you feel are responsible. In particular, what position(s) are doing that so I'll try to guide you here. If you're not interested - I understand...

    What's the most important position in an NFL Offense today?   If you don't have 1 before the draft - do you reach to get 1 in a very limited supply for a big demand?  Why or why not?  

    What other position(s) do you protect this investment best from on the field?   If you don't have one or two do you reach if there's a limited supply of this/these position(s)?  If not, could trading back a little for an additional pick or 2 help us out?

    @flugel said:

    I'm not trying to be obnoxious here; unfortunately, that comes more easily than I'd like it to sometimes. Okay, so I'm feeling like I'm trying to sell tanning beds in the tropics here.  No worries, I love every DAMN 1 of yuz. I just want to challenge our collective minds here to dig deeper on what's stopping the show via our personnel on the field aside from any coaches you feel are responsible. In particular, what position(s) are doing that so I'll try to guide you here. If you're not interested - I understand...

    What's the most important position in an NFL Offense today?   If you don't have 1 before the draft - do you reach to get 1 in a very limited supply for a big demand?  Why or why not?  

    What other position(s) do you protect this investment best from on the field?   If you don't have one or two do you reach if there's a limited supply of this/these position(s)?  If not, could trading back a little for an additional pick or 2 help us out?


    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    We partially agree but we have a core difference.   I agree we are bad because we can’t block and we can’t catch the football and sometimes we can’t throw the ball.  And I’ve said a few days ago we are repeatedly in this cycle not just because of the things mentioned above but because we repeatedly fumble the gift we are given over and over again picking at or near the top of the draft.  You take elite talent I say gold jacket type talent at or near 6 overall.  If there is a tackle that emerges as gold jacket type talent that should be the tiebreaker between say Caleb Downs and unknown elite tackle.  Take Elite talent over good talent.  Even if good talent quenches the largest thirst.

    Having said all this in different way again. I said Downs at 6…but maximizing positional value of picking at 6 I wouldn’t take a WR, QB or OT but I’d trade back and grab preferably a tackle may consider a WR.  

    where did we draft Bitonio? Where did Buffalo draft Teller?  Mitchell Schwartz wasn’t too shabby where was he drafted? 
     

    If we need a center sometimes it isn’t wise to force it and take a cam Irving or tackle and take Jed Wills.  
     

    The draft can still be heavily (and it should) invested in OT, G and WR spots 

  • It should be interesting to see how he does against Miami's edge Reuben Bain,Jr and or others along their DL.

    @texasag1969 said:

    It should be interesting to see how he does against Miami's edge Reuben Bain,Jr and or others along their DL.

    Bain is a problem now and likely next season at the next level.  Knock is he’s compact short arms but the burst and violence with hands - he’s good.  I’m going to upset too many people in here but having a Meh attitude to what I’ve seen from WRs and Oline prospects at the top of the draft.  Hes entering Downs territory for me. 

  • @flugel said:

    I'm not trying to be obnoxious here; unfortunately, that comes more easily than I'd like it to sometimes. Okay, so I'm feeling like I'm trying to sell tanning beds in the tropics here.  No worries, I love every DAMN 1 of yuz. I just want to challenge our collective minds here to dig deeper on what's stopping the show via our personnel on the field aside from any coaches you feel are responsible. In particular, what position(s) are doing that so I'll try to guide you here. If you're not interested - I understand...

    What's the most important position in an NFL Offense today?   If you don't have 1 before the draft - do you reach to get 1 in a very limited supply for a big demand?  Why or why not?  

    What other position(s) do you protect this investment best from on the field?   If you don't have one or two do you reach if there's a limited supply of this/these position(s)?  If not, could trading back a little for an additional pick or 2 help us out?


    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    We partially agree but we have a core difference.   I agree we are bad because we can’t block and we can’t catch the football and sometimes we can’t throw the ball.  And I’ve said a few days ago we are repeatedly in this cycle not just because of the things mentioned above but because we repeatedly fumble the gift we are given over and over again picking at or near the top of the draft.  You take elite talent I say gold jacket type talent at or near 6 overall.  If there is a tackle that emerges as gold jacket type talent that should be the tiebreaker between say Caleb Downs and unknown elite tackle.  Take Elite talent over good talent.  Even if good talent quenches the largest thirst.

    Having said all this in different way again. I said Downs at 6…but maximizing positional value of picking at 6 I wouldn’t take a WR, QB or OT but I’d trade back and grab preferably a tackle may consider a WR.  

    where did we draft Bitonio? Where did Buffalo draft Teller?  Mitchell Schwartz wasn’t too shabby where was he drafted? 
     

    If we need a center sometimes it isn’t wise to force it and take a cam Irving or tackle and take Jed Wills.  
     

    The draft can still be heavily (and it should) invested in OT, G and WR spots 

    @sdbacker80 said:


    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    We partially agree but we have a core difference.   I agree we are bad because we can’t block and we can’t catch the football and sometimes we can’t throw the ball.  And I’ve said a few days ago we are repeatedly in this cycle not just because of the things mentioned above but because we repeatedly fumble the gift we are given over and over again picking at or near the top of the draft.  You take elite talent I say gold jacket type talent at or near 6 overall.  If there is a tackle that emerges as gold jacket type talent that should be the tiebreaker between say Caleb Downs and unknown elite tackle.  Take Elite talent over good talent.  Even if good talent quenches the largest thirst.

    Having said all this in different way again. I said Downs at 6…but maximizing positional value of picking at 6 I wouldn’t take a WR, QB or OT but I’d trade back and grab preferably a tackle may consider a WR.  

    where did we draft Bitonio? Where did Buffalo draft Teller?  Mitchell Schwartz wasn’t too shabby where was he drafted? 
     

    If we need a center sometimes it isn’t wise to force it and take a cam Irving or tackle and take Jed Wills.  
     

    The draft can still be heavily (and it should) invested in OT, G and WR spots 

    Thanks!  Nice job with clarifying where you are coming from on this.

    We're still going differ on what needs to happen with our 1st pick overall; and it is mostly due to the tiny supply of LTs in this draft. It's no secret that a limited supply on a big demand of certain positions often has us watching a run on those positions that puts BPA in the back seat until that run is over. We see it almost every year. IMO, this draft won't be any different so if a team wants any of these LTs: Caleb Lomu (Utah) or Carter Smith (Indiana) or Trevor Goosby (Texas) or Isaiah World (Oregon) or  Austin Barber (Florida) or  Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) and I know I missed 1 or 2 - they better grab their guy quickly.  The following guys some sites are listing/leading people to believe they're LTs but only played RT in 2025 are Ben Miller (Clemson), Spencer Fano (Utah), Gennings Dunker (Iowa) so make sure you double-check these guys.

    Now to answer your questions. The Browns drafted Nevada Tackle (Bitonio) to play Guard in round 2 at the 35th overall pick (and he's frequented Pro Bowls).  Teller is an OG that Dorsey made a trade with Buffalo to acquire and he has also frequented Pro Bowls here. Schwartz was a RT they drafted in upper 2nd round at #37 overall.  Joe Thomas was drafted at #3 overall - he was drafted to play LT here so he went very high being the best one in his draft class. After starting his career with a 10-6 record in Cleveland he made the Pro Bowl 10 consecutive years and landed in the HOF. Now for the Alabama RT the Browns drafted at #10 overall to play LT here - he actually had a solid rookie year and the Browns went to the playoffs with an 11-5 record and beat Pittsburgh. After that season, he had nagging injuries and just never looked like he returned with any desire or passion to continue to build on the rookie season. That picked turned out to be a stinker - especially knowing Tampa drafted Wirfs at #13 overall. (I already provided how many Pro Bowls he made at Right Tackle & Left Tackle as well Super Bowls/playoffs played in earlier in this thread).  The team that did it's homework on OTs got the better guy 3 spots after the unnecessary knee jerk from the Browns. 

    When the Buckeyes got dominated by Miami on the line of scrimmage - did the greatness of Caleb Downs matter more to the outcome of that game than the line of scrimmage?  That line of scrimmage was so disruptive Justin Sayin threw 2 INTs, was sacked 5 times and pressured all night.  None of that is a knock on Caleb because I agree he's a great player and what that dynamic at Safety can do for the secondary; HOWEVER it's a reality that nothing else matters if you can't block on the line of scrimmage.  That said, when you can reliably  block for the running game or protect a passer you can help control time of possession and with scoring points in the process.  This allows our defense to rest more than it was able to in 2024 and 2025.  I'm sticking with getting our 2 Tackles and WR within our 1st 3 picks then going BPA the rest of the draft.

    If the OT positions don't get upgraded - we're used to disappointing offense in Cleveland so at least we'll be very experienced watching the inevitable pretending maybe next year 1 more time...

  • @flugel said:

    I'm not trying to be obnoxious here; unfortunately, that comes more easily than I'd like it to sometimes. Okay, so I'm feeling like I'm trying to sell tanning beds in the tropics here.  No worries, I love every DAMN 1 of yuz. I just want to challenge our collective minds here to dig deeper on what's stopping the show via our personnel on the field aside from any coaches you feel are responsible. In particular, what position(s) are doing that so I'll try to guide you here. If you're not interested - I understand...

    What's the most important position in an NFL Offense today?   If you don't have 1 before the draft - do you reach to get 1 in a very limited supply for a big demand?  Why or why not?  

    What other position(s) do you protect this investment best from on the field?   If you don't have one or two do you reach if there's a limited supply of this/these position(s)?  If not, could trading back a little for an additional pick or 2 help us out?


    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    We partially agree but we have a core difference.   I agree we are bad because we can’t block and we can’t catch the football and sometimes we can’t throw the ball.  And I’ve said a few days ago we are repeatedly in this cycle not just because of the things mentioned above but because we repeatedly fumble the gift we are given over and over again picking at or near the top of the draft.  You take elite talent I say gold jacket type talent at or near 6 overall.  If there is a tackle that emerges as gold jacket type talent that should be the tiebreaker between say Caleb Downs and unknown elite tackle.  Take Elite talent over good talent.  Even if good talent quenches the largest thirst.

    Having said all this in different way again. I said Downs at 6…but maximizing positional value of picking at 6 I wouldn’t take a WR, QB or OT but I’d trade back and grab preferably a tackle may consider a WR.  

    where did we draft Bitonio? Where did Buffalo draft Teller?  Mitchell Schwartz wasn’t too shabby where was he drafted? 
     

    If we need a center sometimes it isn’t wise to force it and take a cam Irving or tackle and take Jed Wills.  
     

    The draft can still be heavily (and it should) invested in OT, G and WR spots 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    ...and there you have it.  Modern NFL football in a nutshell.  Said by Joe Banner years ago, Pass & Rush The Passer.

    We've got that Rush The Passer thing going...but we struggle passing.  Because we have too many things Affecting the Passer.  With pick 6 we need the best OLineman or WR avaiable.  The two worst position groups in the league.  Addressing any other position will not change the W/L record and thus will not be making the 'team' any better.  MHO

  • @sdbacker80 said:


    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    We partially agree but we have a core difference.   I agree we are bad because we can’t block and we can’t catch the football and sometimes we can’t throw the ball.  And I’ve said a few days ago we are repeatedly in this cycle not just because of the things mentioned above but because we repeatedly fumble the gift we are given over and over again picking at or near the top of the draft.  You take elite talent I say gold jacket type talent at or near 6 overall.  If there is a tackle that emerges as gold jacket type talent that should be the tiebreaker between say Caleb Downs and unknown elite tackle.  Take Elite talent over good talent.  Even if good talent quenches the largest thirst.

    Having said all this in different way again. I said Downs at 6…but maximizing positional value of picking at 6 I wouldn’t take a WR, QB or OT but I’d trade back and grab preferably a tackle may consider a WR.  

    where did we draft Bitonio? Where did Buffalo draft Teller?  Mitchell Schwartz wasn’t too shabby where was he drafted? 
     

    If we need a center sometimes it isn’t wise to force it and take a cam Irving or tackle and take Jed Wills.  
     

    The draft can still be heavily (and it should) invested in OT, G and WR spots 

    Thanks!  Nice job with clarifying where you are coming from on this.

    We're still going differ on what needs to happen with our 1st pick overall; and it is mostly due to the tiny supply of LTs in this draft. It's no secret that a limited supply on a big demand of certain positions often has us watching a run on those positions that puts BPA in the back seat until that run is over. We see it almost every year. IMO, this draft won't be any different so if a team wants any of these LTs: Caleb Lomu (Utah) or Carter Smith (Indiana) or Trevor Goosby (Texas) or Isaiah World (Oregon) or  Austin Barber (Florida) or  Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) and I know I missed 1 or 2 - they better grab their guy quickly.  The following guys some sites are listing/leading people to believe they're LTs but only played RT in 2025 are Ben Miller (Clemson), Spencer Fano (Utah), Gennings Dunker (Iowa) so make sure you double-check these guys.

    Now to answer your questions. The Browns drafted Nevada Tackle (Bitonio) to play Guard in round 2 at the 35th overall pick (and he's frequented Pro Bowls).  Teller is an OG that Dorsey made a trade with Buffalo to acquire and he has also frequented Pro Bowls here. Schwartz was a RT they drafted in upper 2nd round at #37 overall.  Joe Thomas was drafted at #3 overall - he was drafted to play LT here so he went very high being the best one in his draft class. After starting his career with a 10-6 record in Cleveland he made the Pro Bowl 10 consecutive years and landed in the HOF. Now for the Alabama RT the Browns drafted at #10 overall to play LT here - he actually had a solid rookie year and the Browns went to the playoffs with an 11-5 record and beat Pittsburgh. After that season, he had nagging injuries and just never looked like he returned with any desire or passion to continue to build on the rookie season. That picked turned out to be a stinker - especially knowing Tampa drafted Wirfs at #13 overall. (I already provided how many Pro Bowls he made at Right Tackle & Left Tackle as well Super Bowls/playoffs played in earlier in this thread).  The team that did it's homework on OTs got the better guy 3 spots after the unnecessary knee jerk from the Browns. 

    When the Buckeyes got dominated by Miami on the line of scrimmage - did the greatness of Caleb Downs matter more to the outcome of that game than the line of scrimmage?  That line of scrimmage was so disruptive Justin Sayin threw 2 INTs, was sacked 5 times and pressured all night.  None of that is a knock on Caleb because I agree he's a great player and what that dynamic at Safety can do for the secondary; HOWEVER it's a reality that nothing else matters if you can't block on the line of scrimmage.  That said, when you can reliably  block for the running game or protect a passer you can help control time of possession and with scoring points in the process.  This allows our defense to rest more than it was able to in 2024 and 2025.  I'm sticking with getting our 2 Tackles and WR within our 1st 3 picks then going BPA the rest of the draft.

    If the OT positions don't get upgraded - we're used to disappointing offense in Cleveland so at least we'll be very experienced watching the inevitable pretending maybe next year 1 more time...

    @flugel said:

    Thanks!  Nice job with clarifying where you are coming from on this.

    We're still going differ on what needs to happen with our 1st pick overall; and it is mostly due to the tiny supply of LTs in this draft. It's no secret that a limited supply on a big demand of certain positions often has us watching a run on those positions that puts BPA in the back seat until that run is over. We see it almost every year. IMO, this draft won't be any different so if a team wants any of these LTs: Caleb Lomu (Utah) or Carter Smith (Indiana) or Trevor Goosby (Texas) or Isaiah World (Oregon) or  Austin Barber (Florida) or  Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) and I know I missed 1 or 2 - they better grab their guy quickly.  The following guys some sites are listing/leading people to believe they're LTs but only played RT in 2025 are Ben Miller (Clemson), Spencer Fano (Utah), Gennings Dunker (Iowa) so make sure you double-check these guys.

    Now to answer your questions. The Browns drafted Nevada Tackle (Bitonio) to play Guard in round 2 at the 35th overall pick (and he's frequented Pro Bowls).  Teller is an OG that Dorsey made a trade with Buffalo to acquire and he has also frequented Pro Bowls here. Schwartz was a RT they drafted in upper 2nd round at #37 overall.  Joe Thomas was drafted at #3 overall - he was drafted to play LT here so he went very high being the best one in his draft class. After starting his career with a 10-6 record in Cleveland he made the Pro Bowl 10 consecutive years and landed in the HOF. Now for the Alabama RT the Browns drafted at #10 overall to play LT here - he actually had a solid rookie year and the Browns went to the playoffs with an 11-5 record and beat Pittsburgh. After that season, he had nagging injuries and just never looked like he returned with any desire or passion to continue to build on the rookie season. That picked turned out to be a stinker - especially knowing Tampa drafted Wirfs at #13 overall. (I already provided how many Pro Bowls he made at Right Tackle & Left Tackle as well Super Bowls/playoffs played in earlier in this thread).  The team that did it's homework on OTs got the better guy 3 spots after the unnecessary knee jerk from the Browns. 

    When the Buckeyes got dominated by Miami on the line of scrimmage - did the greatness of Caleb Downs matter more to the outcome of that game than the line of scrimmage?  That line of scrimmage was so disruptive Justin Sayin threw 2 INTs, was sacked 5 times and pressured all night.  None of that is a knock on Caleb because I agree he's a great player and what that dynamic at Safety can do for the secondary; HOWEVER it's a reality that nothing else matters if you can't block on the line of scrimmage.  That said, when you can reliably  block for the running game or protect a passer you can help control time of possession and with scoring points in the process.  This allows our defense to rest more than it was able to in 2024 and 2025.  I'm sticking with getting our 2 Tackles and WR within our 1st 3 picks then going BPA the rest of the draft.

    If the OT positions don't get upgraded - we're used to disappointing offense in Cleveland so at least we'll be very experienced watching the inevitable pretending maybe next year 1 more time...

    @orion said:

    ...and there you have it.  Modern NFL football in a nutshell.  Said by Joe Banner years ago, Pass & Rush The Passer.

    We've got that Rush The Passer thing going...but we struggle passing.  Because we have too many things Affecting the Passer.  With pick 6 we need the best OLineman or WR avaiable.  The two worst position groups in the league.  Addressing any other position will not change the W/L record and thus will not be making the 'team' any better.  MHO

    You can fix the problem without picking the OT at 6.  I’m trying to say this but is coming off as nonsense?  
     

    You guys are hellbent on picking a prospect that might be 18 or 20 on most boards because we need it.  
     

    For instance you can trade back increase your assets for 27 when we may need a passer.  Or add some draft pieces to increase the depth at OT, G and WR in Day 2.  

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    Follow me.

    I’ll humor you…Two most important components of football in 2026 1. The passer 2. Affecting the Passer (getting after him and protecting him.

    ...and there you have it.  Modern NFL football in a nutshell.  Said by Joe Banner years ago, Pass & Rush The Passer.

    We've got that Rush The Passer thing going...but we struggle passing.  Because we have too many things Affecting the Passer.  With pick 6 we need the best OLineman or WR avaiable.  The two worst position groups in the league.  Addressing any other position will not change the W/L record and thus will not be making the 'team' any better.  MHO

    @orion said:

    ...and there you have it.  Modern NFL football in a nutshell.  Said by Joe Banner years ago, Pass & Rush The Passer.

    We've got that Rush The Passer thing going...but we struggle passing.  Because we have too many things Affecting the Passer.  With pick 6 we need the best OLineman or WR avaiable.  The two worst position groups in the league.  Addressing any other position will not change the W/L record and thus will not be making the 'team' any better.  MHO

    Agree with the part in bold

  • @flugel said:

    Thanks!  Nice job with clarifying where you are coming from on this.

    We're still going differ on what needs to happen with our 1st pick overall; and it is mostly due to the tiny supply of LTs in this draft. It's no secret that a limited supply on a big demand of certain positions often has us watching a run on those positions that puts BPA in the back seat until that run is over. We see it almost every year. IMO, this draft won't be any different so if a team wants any of these LTs: Caleb Lomu (Utah) or Carter Smith (Indiana) or Trevor Goosby (Texas) or Isaiah World (Oregon) or  Austin Barber (Florida) or  Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) and I know I missed 1 or 2 - they better grab their guy quickly.  The following guys some sites are listing/leading people to believe they're LTs but only played RT in 2025 are Ben Miller (Clemson), Spencer Fano (Utah), Gennings Dunker (Iowa) so make sure you double-check these guys.

    Now to answer your questions. The Browns drafted Nevada Tackle (Bitonio) to play Guard in round 2 at the 35th overall pick (and he's frequented Pro Bowls).  Teller is an OG that Dorsey made a trade with Buffalo to acquire and he has also frequented Pro Bowls here. Schwartz was a RT they drafted in upper 2nd round at #37 overall.  Joe Thomas was drafted at #3 overall - he was drafted to play LT here so he went very high being the best one in his draft class. After starting his career with a 10-6 record in Cleveland he made the Pro Bowl 10 consecutive years and landed in the HOF. Now for the Alabama RT the Browns drafted at #10 overall to play LT here - he actually had a solid rookie year and the Browns went to the playoffs with an 11-5 record and beat Pittsburgh. After that season, he had nagging injuries and just never looked like he returned with any desire or passion to continue to build on the rookie season. That picked turned out to be a stinker - especially knowing Tampa drafted Wirfs at #13 overall. (I already provided how many Pro Bowls he made at Right Tackle & Left Tackle as well Super Bowls/playoffs played in earlier in this thread).  The team that did it's homework on OTs got the better guy 3 spots after the unnecessary knee jerk from the Browns. 

    When the Buckeyes got dominated by Miami on the line of scrimmage - did the greatness of Caleb Downs matter more to the outcome of that game than the line of scrimmage?  That line of scrimmage was so disruptive Justin Sayin threw 2 INTs, was sacked 5 times and pressured all night.  None of that is a knock on Caleb because I agree he's a great player and what that dynamic at Safety can do for the secondary; HOWEVER it's a reality that nothing else matters if you can't block on the line of scrimmage.  That said, when you can reliably  block for the running game or protect a passer you can help control time of possession and with scoring points in the process.  This allows our defense to rest more than it was able to in 2024 and 2025.  I'm sticking with getting our 2 Tackles and WR within our 1st 3 picks then going BPA the rest of the draft.

    If the OT positions don't get upgraded - we're used to disappointing offense in Cleveland so at least we'll be very experienced watching the inevitable pretending maybe next year 1 more time...

    @orion said:

    ...and there you have it.  Modern NFL football in a nutshell.  Said by Joe Banner years ago, Pass & Rush The Passer.

    We've got that Rush The Passer thing going...but we struggle passing.  Because we have too many things Affecting the Passer.  With pick 6 we need the best OLineman or WR avaiable.  The two worst position groups in the league.  Addressing any other position will not change the W/L record and thus will not be making the 'team' any better.  MHO

    You can fix the problem without picking the OT at 6.  I’m trying to say this but is coming off as nonsense?  
     

    You guys are hellbent on picking a prospect that might be 18 or 20 on most boards because we need it.  
     

    For instance you can trade back increase your assets for 27 when we may need a passer.  Or add some draft pieces to increase the depth at OT, G and WR in Day 2.  

    @sdbacker80 said:

    You can fix the problem without picking the OT at 6.  I’m trying to say this but is coming off as nonsense?  
     

    You guys are hellbent on picking a prospect that might be 18 or 20 on most boards because we need it.  
     

    For instance you can trade back increase your assets for 27 when we may need a passer.  Or add some draft pieces to increase the depth at OT, G and WR in Day 2.  

    If the Browns need OTackles & a WR most - the players in these positions the Browns scouts, coaches & GM rank highest should be our 1st 3 picks that will all be completed by pick #38 overall barring any trading back.  Then they can go BPA for the next 5 rounds.

    When you go grocery shopping do you put things you need on the list?  Or, the things most of your neighbors need and have on their lists?  

    You're talking depth on positions the Browns need starters at.   I thought I mentioned in 1 of my replies in this thread I'm not opposed to a slight trade back for an additional pick.

    You wouldn't be replying to either one of us if the Browns haven't been so negligent to the OL.  We can think of excuses to keep blowing off drafting OT & an early round WR forever.  It's non-competitive football right now.  Supply and demand isn't always compatible with what the Browns need in order to compete.

    Every week the discussions are the Browns can't block anybody and the WRs can't get open (except Bond) and no matter who played QB even Flacco - people weren't happy.

    Pass Pro on the edges has to improve.  That simple.

    That was my last post on the subject.  It's okay to disagree.  I have no idea what they will do.

  • @flugel said:

    Thanks!  Nice job with clarifying where you are coming from on this.

    We're still going differ on what needs to happen with our 1st pick overall; and it is mostly due to the tiny supply of LTs in this draft. It's no secret that a limited supply on a big demand of certain positions often has us watching a run on those positions that puts BPA in the back seat until that run is over. We see it almost every year. IMO, this draft won't be any different so if a team wants any of these LTs: Caleb Lomu (Utah) or Carter Smith (Indiana) or Trevor Goosby (Texas) or Isaiah World (Oregon) or  Austin Barber (Florida) or  Kadyn Proctor (Alabama) and I know I missed 1 or 2 - they better grab their guy quickly.  The following guys some sites are listing/leading people to believe they're LTs but only played RT in 2025 are Ben Miller (Clemson), Spencer Fano (Utah), Gennings Dunker (Iowa) so make sure you double-check these guys.

    Now to answer your questions. The Browns drafted Nevada Tackle (Bitonio) to play Guard in round 2 at the 35th overall pick (and he's frequented Pro Bowls).  Teller is an OG that Dorsey made a trade with Buffalo to acquire and he has also frequented Pro Bowls here. Schwartz was a RT they drafted in upper 2nd round at #37 overall.  Joe Thomas was drafted at #3 overall - he was drafted to play LT here so he went very high being the best one in his draft class. After starting his career with a 10-6 record in Cleveland he made the Pro Bowl 10 consecutive years and landed in the HOF. Now for the Alabama RT the Browns drafted at #10 overall to play LT here - he actually had a solid rookie year and the Browns went to the playoffs with an 11-5 record and beat Pittsburgh. After that season, he had nagging injuries and just never looked like he returned with any desire or passion to continue to build on the rookie season. That picked turned out to be a stinker - especially knowing Tampa drafted Wirfs at #13 overall. (I already provided how many Pro Bowls he made at Right Tackle & Left Tackle as well Super Bowls/playoffs played in earlier in this thread).  The team that did it's homework on OTs got the better guy 3 spots after the unnecessary knee jerk from the Browns. 

    When the Buckeyes got dominated by Miami on the line of scrimmage - did the greatness of Caleb Downs matter more to the outcome of that game than the line of scrimmage?  That line of scrimmage was so disruptive Justin Sayin threw 2 INTs, was sacked 5 times and pressured all night.  None of that is a knock on Caleb because I agree he's a great player and what that dynamic at Safety can do for the secondary; HOWEVER it's a reality that nothing else matters if you can't block on the line of scrimmage.  That said, when you can reliably  block for the running game or protect a passer you can help control time of possession and with scoring points in the process.  This allows our defense to rest more than it was able to in 2024 and 2025.  I'm sticking with getting our 2 Tackles and WR within our 1st 3 picks then going BPA the rest of the draft.

    If the OT positions don't get upgraded - we're used to disappointing offense in Cleveland so at least we'll be very experienced watching the inevitable pretending maybe next year 1 more time...

    @orion said:

    ...and there you have it.  Modern NFL football in a nutshell.  Said by Joe Banner years ago, Pass & Rush The Passer.

    We've got that Rush The Passer thing going...but we struggle passing.  Because we have too many things Affecting the Passer.  With pick 6 we need the best OLineman or WR avaiable.  The two worst position groups in the league.  Addressing any other position will not change the W/L record and thus will not be making the 'team' any better.  MHO

    You can fix the problem without picking the OT at 6.  I’m trying to say this but is coming off as nonsense?  
     

    You guys are hellbent on picking a prospect that might be 18 or 20 on most boards because we need it.  
     

    For instance you can trade back increase your assets for 27 when we may need a passer.  Or add some draft pieces to increase the depth at OT, G and WR in Day 2.  

    @sdbacker80 said:

    You can fix the problem without picking the OT at 6.  I’m trying to say this but is coming off as nonsense?  

    No, you're stating it fine.  I'm just saying that until you start drafting OL or WR, the W/L record won't get any better. 

    I'm the owner and I say to my GM,  When the 6th pick comes, if we can't trade out, will there be an OLineman or WR that could come in and start, day 1, and thus make my team better?  

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    You can fix the problem without picking the OT at 6.  I’m trying to say this but is coming off as nonsense?  
     

    You guys are hellbent on picking a prospect that might be 18 or 20 on most boards because we need it.  
     

    For instance you can trade back increase your assets for 27 when we may need a passer.  Or add some draft pieces to increase the depth at OT, G and WR in Day 2.  

    If the Browns need OTackles & a WR most - the players in these positions the Browns scouts, coaches & GM rank highest should be our 1st 3 picks that will all be completed by pick #38 overall barring any trading back.  Then they can go BPA for the next 5 rounds.

    When you go grocery shopping do you put things you need on the list?  Or, the things most of your neighbors need and have on their lists?  

    You're talking depth on positions the Browns need starters at.   I thought I mentioned in 1 of my replies in this thread I'm not opposed to a slight trade back for an additional pick.

    You wouldn't be replying to either one of us if the Browns haven't been so negligent to the OL.  We can think of excuses to keep blowing off drafting OT & an early round WR forever.  It's non-competitive football right now.  Supply and demand isn't always compatible with what the Browns need in order to compete.

    Every week the discussions are the Browns can't block anybody and the WRs can't get open (except Bond) and no matter who played QB even Flacco - people weren't happy.

    Pass Pro on the edges has to improve.  That simple.

    That was my last post on the subject.  It's okay to disagree.  I have no idea what they will do.

    @flugel said:

    If the Browns need OTackles & a WR most - the players in these positions the Browns scouts, coaches & GM rank highest should be our 1st 3 picks that will all be completed by pick #38 overall barring any trading back.  Then they can go BPA for the next 5 rounds.

    When you go grocery shopping do you put things you need on the list?  Or, the things most of your neighbors need and have on their lists?  

    You're talking depth on positions the Browns need starters at.   I thought I mentioned in 1 of my replies in this thread I'm not opposed to a slight trade back for an additional pick.

    You wouldn't be replying to either one of us if the Browns haven't been so negligent to the OL.  We can think of excuses to keep blowing off drafting OT & an early round WR forever.  It's non-competitive football right now.  Supply and demand isn't always compatible with what the Browns need in order to compete.

    Every week the discussions are the Browns can't block anybody and the WRs can't get open (except Bond) and no matter who played QB even Flacco - people weren't happy.

    Pass Pro on the edges has to improve.  That simple.

    That was my last post on the subject.  It's okay to disagree.  I have no idea what they will do.

    In regard to grocery shopping don’t send me….if there is a rib roast on sale I’m buying and going home and putting the chuck roast I bought in the freezer for another time 

  • I'm of the view that we should address it starting with the off season hiring of free agents to address these two areas well before the draft so it can be used to augment needs still needing shoring up through BPA. This is what we did with the D and it clearly needs to continue on the O side.

  • I'm of the view that we should address it starting with the off season hiring of free agents to address these two areas well before the draft so it can be used to augment needs still needing shoring up through BPA. This is what we did with the D and it clearly needs to continue on the O side.

    @texasag1969 said:

    I'm of the view that we should address it starting with the off season hiring of free agents to address these two areas well before the draft so it can be used to augment needs still needing shoring up through BPA. This is what we did with the D and it clearly needs to continue on the O side.

    And that's a good idea for WR and/or maybe RT.  But last year the Browns did sign a journeyman FA OT in his early 30s (Cornelius Lucas) and that wasn't the answer at all.  Lucas started at LT for Washington on the blind side of a rookie QB that became NFL Rookie of the Year.  That said, Washington didn't even try to keep him making him available for the 1st team that thinks about OT the way the Browns do.  Why that?  Because their plan was to trade with Houston for LT Laremy Tunsil whom they got (and overpaid); and then they drafted Oregon LT Josh Connerly Jr whom they started at RT in 2025.  IF Tunsil was playing like a keeper for the $ in Houston - they don't trade him.  In fact, Houston (not possessing a 1st round pick) used a 2nd round pick on Minnesota LT Aireontae Ersery who beat out projected starter Cam Robinson (yes the same guy who wore #68 for the Browns late in the year).  Houston will be moving on to the 2nd round of the playoffs after beating the Steelers 30-6.  The desperate Cleveland Browns went after Cam Robinson and he couldn't move to save his career.  BUT he was a 2nd veteran FA LT the Browns signed.  Lucky for him, Berry probably thinks he pacified Browns fans that don't understand bad performances from OTs have a lot to do with poor QB play.  Last draft saved Berry's career in Cleveland because he should have been fired.  He's the one that traded away all the picks so obviously the Owner only thought Stefanski needed to be fired.  It's a sequel that keeps on giving.

    All the guys that want Caleb Downs at #6 can rest easy unless he goes before then.  

  • I'm of the view that we should address it starting with the off season hiring of free agents to address these two areas well before the draft so it can be used to augment needs still needing shoring up through BPA. This is what we did with the D and it clearly needs to continue on the O side.

    @texasag1969 said:

    I'm of the view that we should address it starting with the off season hiring of free agents to address these two areas well before the draft so it can be used to augment needs still needing shoring up through BPA. This is what we did with the D and it clearly needs to continue on the O side.

    It will sound like I’m arguing against my point (which I sometimes do) I don’t think we will find a LT or RT in free agency that We can afford and has more ability than what we can pick at 24 and/or the top of the second round.  Maybe a quality guard or center in FA but not a good edge protector. 
     

    So while I’m a Caleb Downs guy (right now) I am not opposed to trading back and scratching the right/left tackle itch or making that pick at 24 and/or in the second.