The MAC is Back!

[Alo]

@riffer-x said:

Thad is valuable for what he can do, his decision is probably the right one. Jimmy T would tell him to stay if he thought it was right. Thad is from Euclid and I'm sure could use the coin, I don't know too many Bucks fans surprised by this. More excited about Heyward coming back, although I wish Chekwa would have went, that dude sucks. Bmac thinks he hits like a puss.

I remember watching Chekwa get beat time after time in the Iowa game and thinking, "Umm...Why do people consider this guy a great draft prospect?"

Now, writers on some credible draft sites are talking him up as a potential 1st round pick. Then again, we heard some of the same stuff about Donald Washington last year.

[Thaak]

I think its great that mid-major conferences like the WAC, MWC, and MAC are all winning bowl games and doing well. It is a testament to great coaching and pure desire.

However, you can’t say the MAC is on the same league as the BCS conferences until one of the MAC teams runs the table, plays in, and wins a BCS bowl game much like the MWC and WAC have done recently.

[Riffer X]

@alo said:

I remember watching Chekwa get beat time after time in the Iowa game and thinking, "Umm...Why do people consider this guy a great draft prospect?"

Now, writers on some credible draft sites are talking him up as a potential 1st round pick. Then again, we heard some of the same stuff about Donald Washington last year.

Chekwa is horrible at every aspect of the game. He's got pics of Jim T or sumtin....Guy never gets turned around, misjudges the ball, takes horrible angles in the running game, can't catch a cold and refuses to hit anybody. Other than that, he's pretty good.

He pretty much caused the Iowa game to be close all by himself....that and the kick return breakdown, which for OSU has turned into an epidemic.

[Kosar_For_President]

@k-townbrown said:

And this is on the main BROWNS board why?

Wow 2 posts and this guy is dictating what the mods do. It's like a 10 year old trying to have sex.

[Riffer X]

@kosar_for_president said:

Wow 2 posts and this guy is dictating what the mods do. It's like a 10 year old trying to have sex.

I think it's cute!!!

[ClevelandFanForLife]

JosephSixpack said:

The MAC is no joke.

Name 3 players from the almighty SEC who've been bigger impact pros this decade than Roethlisberger, James Harrison and Randy Moss.

i think it's unfair to put harrison in there. i mean he's been really good the last couple of years but but he was unheard of until he slammed that browns fan in 2005 when he was on special teams.

[jrb12711]

@riffer-x said:

Chekwa is horrible at every aspect of the game. He's got pics of Jim T or sumtin....Guy never gets turned around, misjudges the ball, takes horrible angles in the running game, can't catch a cold and refuses to hit anybody. Other than that, he's pretty good.

He pretty much caused the Iowa game to be close all by himself....that and the kick return breakdown, which for OSU has turned into an epidemic.

finally, someone else sees the light! i have a close circle of about 5 buckeye friends, and everyone says Chekwa has the ability to be an NFL corner. I replayed the Iowa game and literally EVERY play iowa made for scores was on Chekwa getting burned. He is beyond garbage. Teams will run 4 receiver sets with 3 on one side, and immediately look on the short side the Chekwa is guarding. Jim knows it too, but for some reason he keeps him on the field. Worst corner i've seen play there EVER, i mean that seriously.

No joke, watching ohio state and Chekwa turned into a gamble every week with my friends. If he blew more than 5 plays, they bought the beer. I won 5 times.

[ClevelandFanForLife]

JosephSixpack said:

The MAC is no joke.

Name 3 players from the almighty SEC who've been bigger impact pros this decade than Roethlisberger, James Harrison and Randy Moss.

oh, and in this decade you could say percy harvin, jabar gafney and knowshawn moreno

[Thaak]

Shaun Alexander

Antwan Odom

Chris Samuels

Jamaal Anderson

Tony Ugoh

Karlos Dansby

Ronnie Brown

Carnell Williams

Rob Bironas

Brandon Jacobs

Fred Taylor

Jevon Kearse

Champ Bailey

Marcus Stroud

Hines Ward

Joseph Addai

Dwayne Bowe

Alan Faneca

Kevin Mawae

Deuce McAllister

Eli Manning

Patrick Willis

Donald Lee

Eric Moulds

Fred Smoot

Johnathan Joseph

Sidney Rice

Jamal Lewis

Jason Witten

Peyton Manning

John Henderson

Albert Haynesworth

and that's just of the 264 starters off the 2007 NFL active day rosters.

Pick any 3 you like... I happen to like Peyton over Big Gay Ben, Haynesworth over Harrison, and while you may have a point on Moss... Bowe, Harvin, and Rice have a chance to be better.

[BuckeyeBest2]

JosephSixpack said:

The MAC is no joke.

Name 3 players from the almighty SEC who've been bigger impact pros this decade than Roethlisberger, James Harrison and Randy Moss.

Peyton Manning, Fred Taylor (about 12,000 Rushing yard to moss 14,000 Recieving yards at a position yards are easier to get seeing how they have 1 or 2 maybe at most 3 defenders while a RB has between 3-9 defenders at a time), Javon Kearse

hm that was pretty easy

any more questions?

[c-dawg]

@buckeyebest2 said:

Peyton Manning, Fred Taylor (about 12,000 Rushing yard to moss 14,000 Recieving yards at a position yards are easier to get seeing how they have 1 or 2 maybe at most 3 defenders while a RB has between 3-9 defenders at a time), Javon Kearse

hm that was pretty easy

any more questions?

Impact for me ultimately means championships. The list BuckeyeBest2 gave has far less rings than JoeSixPat's list. Joe's list has had more impact.

[Thaak]

For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.

On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.

If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.

[c-dawg]

@thaak said:

For a team perhaps. Maybe for a QB. Although nobody will say that Marino and Moon weren’t two of the best pure passing QB’s to ever play the game and between them they have zero championships.

On my list, Hines Ward has just as many rings as his two Steeler teammates in the original list. I wouldn’t even put him close to Moss’s impact though.

If I’m not mistaken, Moss was not on any of the Patriot championship teams? So does that mean by your criteria that Ward has had more impact than Moss? Ridiculous.

Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.

You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.

And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.

In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.

So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.

Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.

Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.

[BuckeyeBest2]

c-dawg said:

Impact for me ultimately means championships. The list BuckeyeBest2 gave has far less rings than JoeSixPat's list. Joe's list has had more impact.

exept that logic has a huge flaw

by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL

[BuckeyeBest2]

c-dawg said:

Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.

You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.

And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.

In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.

So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.

Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.

Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.

Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around

Impact=Individual on their own

argument over case closed

[BuckeyeBest2]

c-dawg said:

Thaak. I defined impact for my reply. What's your definition? Stick your neck out too. Naysaying is too easy and I thought you were above that from your other posts. I have been wrong before though.

You haven't listed three players from the last ten years (or even from the same conference) either. Play JoeSixPat's game right.

And, yes, by my criteria Ward outranks Moss, doesn't he? Count the rings, that's why people play the game, not individual stats. The Steelers definitely agree Ward had more impact. Oh, yeah, you picked a SB MVP for your example, talk about impact.

In fairness to Moss he did put the Pats up with 2:50 to go in LXII before Eli got lucky.

So, to compare apples and apples, I think you should go find three guys from the same college conference who excelled at their positions with more rings for the last decade. No fair listing long snappers.

Otherwise define what you mean by impact so that I might have access to where you are coming from.

Also, ridiculous? Up your ass with ridiculous. Or maybe you could just shove that fish in your avatar up there.

Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around

Impact=Individual on their own

argument over case closed

[c-dawg]

@buckeyebest2 said:

Rings=TEAM accomplishment with FO, Coaching and great players all around

Impact=Individual on their own

argument over case closed

The only thing closed is your mind brother.

Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.

"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.

I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.

Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"

Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?

[BuckeyeBest2]

c-dawg said:

The only thing closed is your mind brother.

Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.

"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.

I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.

Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"

Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?

Rings=team

impact=individual

fact

discussion over

deal with it

in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings

thats says it allabout what little you know about football

[BuckeyeBest2]

c-dawg said:

The only thing closed is your mind brother.

Cuz Peyton throws to himself, Fred Taylor blocks for himself and Javon Kearse outmaneuvers the Oline all by himself. Oh yeah, and they coached themselves too and called all their own plays. Right.

"Individual on their own" is generally an impossibility in football, except for things like yards after a catch. It's a team sport there sport.

I notice you love to try to curtail discussions when you think you have a trump card. I don't think you are playing with a full deck, however.

Also, you said: "exept that logic has a huge flaw, by your logic Dan Marino never made an impact in the NFL"

Again, Dan Marino hasn't played in the last decade which was the point to JoeSixPat's challenge. Can you even focus or do you not know what decade means?

Rings=team

impact=individual

fact

discussion over

deal with it

in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings

thats says it allabout what little you know about football

[Kosar_For_President]

@buckeyebest2 said:

Rings=team

impact=individual

fact

discussion over

deal with it

in your opinion=Dan Marino=not a good QB since he doesnt have any rings

thats says it allabout what little you know about football

Now I know. Mods, this is Bubby.