Erin Andrews Sues Ohio State

pizzadeliveryguy

@mr.-t said:

That isn't Erin Andrews. That is Shana Hiatt and she is smoking hot.

pizzadeliveryguy

Zombo said:
I always love these Internet guys who declare someone like Erin Andrews "not hot."
Please ... like you're pulling down hotter chicks in Baltimore (been there ... Erin Andrews would be an 11 in B-more) or wherever you are from.

And of course, you have to add ... "I'd hit it".

Dude, you couldn't touch it ... you'd hit the fat barfly down at corner tavern if she looked at you cross-eyed.

If this ain't hot you are either gay or delusional ... which is it?

Zombo

There are two scales at play here. The first is the normal woman scale in which EA is a 9-10. The second is the celebrity woman scale in which she is around a 7. I'd still drink her bath water either way.

NewEraDawg

I hear her feet stink and she don't believe in Jesus

miktoxic

Homotron said:
Why the XXXX shouldn't you sue? You don't think she has grounds for a damn lawsuit. Are you serious? She was videotaped butt ass naked and posted all over the internet. The hotel confirmed to a complete stranger that she was in fact going to stay at the hotel and provided a room number. Is that normal procedure in your eyes? Protect herself? She was in a hotel room with the door closed and locked. What the hell should she have done to protect herself? Are you for real? She's a TV personality on one of the biggest networks in the United States and now anyone that sees her is going to think about and remember that video. You can't be serious.

you spill hot coffee on yourself is it your fault or the guy they pay $7/hr to to pour it for you? where is espn's responsibility in all this? don't they have a security dept. that does their booking and research? do most celebrities you know go into a hotel using their real name, no. why doesn't she sue espn for not doing their job? put the pervert in jail and fire the person that blabbed on the phone. but no. she and her vampire lawyer will try to suck the blood out of everyone and everything that was in or around that hotel on that day. my general beef is the whole lawsuit thing. i'm not saying she wasn't done wrong but 40-50 years ago we wouldn't even be reading about this douchebag.

oh and btw i wouldn't know about her videotape on the internet. how would you? maybe they'll get a list of people that viewed it and sue you too. homotron.

Vagitron

@miktoxic said:
you spill hot coffee on yourself is it your fault or the guy they pay $7/hr to to pour it for you? where is espn's responsibility in all this? don't they have a security dept. that does their booking and research? do most celebrities you know go into a hotel using their real name, no. why doesn't she sue espn for not doing their job? put the pervert in jail and fire the person that blabbed on the phone. but no. she and her vampire lawyer will try to suck the blood out of everyone and everything that was in or around that hotel on that day. my general beef is the whole lawsuit thing. i'm not saying she wasn't done wrong but 40-50 years ago we wouldn't even be reading about this douchebag.
oh and btw i wouldn't know about her videotape on the internet. how would you? maybe they'll get a list of people that viewed it and sue you too. homotron.

You can't be this sheltered. How do you think she found out about the video/pictures in the first place? They were posted all over the internet otherwise she would have no zero idea the guy in question existed. The hot coffee argument is also irrelevant because if you spill hot coffee on yourself it's YOUR xxxxing fault. If you're in your hotel room behind a locked door and someone is using the peep whole they reversed to video tape you nude it's now the person inside the rooms fault? Get f.ucking real. The hotel was a affiliate of ohio state and the employee in question was a employee of Ohio State. She's suing all those involved and that's the bottom line. How would you feel if your wife/daughter/sister were exposed to a similar situation? Is your point of view really this short sighted? Get real dude. I'm all for eliminating the sue happy masses but in this instance she was completely violated and exposed to the world. It's the sort of thing a woman could need therapy for, for the rest of her life.

MudratDetector

gotta agree with homotron on this one

miktoxic, look up "false dichotomy" before making one of those arguments again.

Thaak

Homotron said:
You can't be this sheltered. How do you think she found out about the video/pictures in the first place? They were posted all over the internet otherwise she would have no zero idea the guy in question existed. The hot coffee argument is also irrelevant because if you spill hot coffee on yourself it's YOUR xxxxing fault. If you're in your hotel room behind a locked door and someone is using the peep whole they reversed to video tape you nude it's now the person inside the rooms fault? Get f.ucking real. The hotel was a affiliate of ohio state and the employee in question was a employee of Ohio State. She's suing all those involved and that's the bottom line. How would you feel if your wife/daughter/sister were exposed to a similar situation? Is your point of view really this short sighted? Get real dude. I'm all for eliminating the sue happy masses but in this instance she was completely violated and exposed to the world. It's the sort of thing a woman could need therapy for, for the rest of her life.

I actually agree with the Steeler fan here.

Thaak

@mudratdetector said:
gotta agree with homotron on this one
miktoxic, look up "false dichotomy" before making one of those arguments again.

I actually looked that up for myself. I like the usage of the phrase.

BearcatBrownsFan13

She should definitely sue

CLEVELandMILIDH

I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

Thaak

nmills said:
I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

I call BS. Prove it.

CLEVELandMILIDH

@thaak said:
I call BS. Prove it.

I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

dawgpound3

nmills said:
I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

ESPM News

Sam Schulte

July 23, 2009

Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

Vagitron

nmills said:
I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

Oh christ, to what benefit? So she could turn around and sue Ohio State? Are you really this god damn delusional? The guy that video taped here had been stalking here and tried to do the same once before. It's not like prior to this incident she was working for peanuts. You can't possibly believe this and if for some reason you do it's time to step out from under the tin foil cape and wake the fvck up.

The Gipper

nmills said:
I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

I have never seen it. Where can it be viewed? Is it really all that and a bag of chips?

Vagitron · July 23, 2009

@dawgpound3 said:
ESPM News
Sam Schulte

July 23, 2009

Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

I can't believe you or someone else took the time to fake that article. ESPM news? The reporters name is also spelled incorrectly. The best part is the use of "Broad" when talking about Andrews. Who the hell is their expert? Howard Stern?

The Gipper · July 23, 2009

@dawgpound3 said:
ESPM News
Sam Schulte

July 23, 2009

Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

Of course, shortly thereafter she did make that appearance on Dancing with the Stars, and other things. Makes you wonder if in fact it may actually have been a publicity ploy. Not saying it was....but?

CLEVELandMILIDH

Homotron said:
Oh christ, to what benefit? So she could turn around and sue Ohio State? Are you really this god damn delusional? The guy that video taped here had been stalking here and tried to do the same once before. It's not like prior to this incident she was working for peanuts. You can't possibly believe this and if for some reason you do it's time to step out from under the tin foil cape and wake the fvck up.

Why'd Pam Anderson, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, etc. etc. etc. do it? They were not in need of money. An expert comes out today and says exactly what I said yesterday, its not a coincidence watch the video.

Vagitron

@the-gipper said:
I have never seen it. Where can it be viewed? Is it really all that and a bag of chips?

No. She certainly has a solid body but it's not worth going out of your way to watch. It was posted on another message board of mine otherwise I myself may have never seen it.

Vagitron

nmills said:
Why'd Pam Anderson, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, etc. etc. etc. do it? They were not in need of money. An expert comes out today and says exactly what I said yesterday, its not a coincidence watch the video.

She doesn't need money and neither does Paris Hilton or Kardashian. I can't speak for Pamela Anderson. The former did it for the increased celebrity. Their families have more money than god otherwise. As far as the "expert" is concerned post the actual article WITH the link because there were several terrible typos in the article posted above. The reporters name is spelled wrong and ESPN of all things is spelled incorrectly.