Skip to content

Erin Andrews Sues Ohio State

The Browns Board
99 18 8.4k
  • She should definitely sue

  • I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

  • I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

    nmills said:

    I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

    I call BS. Prove it.

  • nmills said:

    I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

    I call BS. Prove it.

    @thaak said:

    I call BS. Prove it.

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

  • @thaak said:

    I call BS. Prove it.

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    nmills said:

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    ESPM News

    Sam Schulte

    July 23, 2009

    Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

    Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

    Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

  • I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

    nmills said:

    I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

    Oh christ, to what benefit? So she could turn around and sue Ohio State? Are you really this god damn delusional? The guy that video taped here had been stalking here and tried to do the same once before. It's not like prior to this incident she was working for peanuts. You can't possibly believe this and if for some reason you do it's time to step out from under the tin foil cape and wake the fvck up.

  • @thaak said:

    I call BS. Prove it.

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    nmills said:

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    I have never seen it. Where can it be viewed? Is it really all that and a bag of chips?

  • nmills said:

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    ESPM News

    Sam Schulte

    July 23, 2009

    Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

    Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

    Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

    @dawgpound3 said:

    ESPM News

    Sam Schulte

    July 23, 2009

    Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

    Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

    Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

    I can't believe you or someone else took the time to fake that article. ESPM news? The reporters name is also spelled incorrectly. The best part is the use of "Broad" when talking about Andrews. Who the hell is their expert? Howard Stern?

  • nmills said:

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    ESPM News

    Sam Schulte

    July 23, 2009

    Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

    Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

    Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

    @dawgpound3 said:

    ESPM News

    Sam Schulte

    July 23, 2009

    Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

    Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

    Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

    Of course, shortly thereafter she did make that appearance on Dancing with the Stars, and other things. Makes you wonder if in fact it may actually have been a publicity ploy. Not saying it was....but?

  • nmills said:

    I've seen the video, she knew she was being filmed. Posing, shaken her booty for the camera even smiling while looking right at the camera. Give me a break

    Oh christ, to what benefit? So she could turn around and sue Ohio State? Are you really this god damn delusional? The guy that video taped here had been stalking here and tried to do the same once before. It's not like prior to this incident she was working for peanuts. You can't possibly believe this and if for some reason you do it's time to step out from under the tin foil cape and wake the fvck up.

    Homotron said:

    Oh christ, to what benefit? So she could turn around and sue Ohio State? Are you really this god damn delusional? The guy that video taped here had been stalking here and tried to do the same once before. It's not like prior to this incident she was working for peanuts. You can't possibly believe this and if for some reason you do it's time to step out from under the tin foil cape and wake the fvck up.

    Why'd Pam Anderson, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, etc. etc. etc. do it? They were not in need of money. An expert comes out today and says exactly what I said yesterday, its not a coincidence watch the video.

  • nmills said:

    I PM'd it to you Thaak, enjoy hahaha

    I have never seen it. Where can it be viewed? Is it really all that and a bag of chips?

    @the-gipper said:

    I have never seen it. Where can it be viewed? Is it really all that and a bag of chips?

    No. She certainly has a solid body but it's not worth going out of your way to watch. It was posted on another message board of mine otherwise I myself may have never seen it.

  • Homotron said:

    Oh christ, to what benefit? So she could turn around and sue Ohio State? Are you really this god damn delusional? The guy that video taped here had been stalking here and tried to do the same once before. It's not like prior to this incident she was working for peanuts. You can't possibly believe this and if for some reason you do it's time to step out from under the tin foil cape and wake the fvck up.

    Why'd Pam Anderson, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, etc. etc. etc. do it? They were not in need of money. An expert comes out today and says exactly what I said yesterday, its not a coincidence watch the video.

    nmills said:

    Why'd Pam Anderson, Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian, etc. etc. etc. do it? They were not in need of money. An expert comes out today and says exactly what I said yesterday, its not a coincidence watch the video.

    She doesn't need money and neither does Paris Hilton or Kardashian. I can't speak for Pamela Anderson. The former did it for the increased celebrity. Their families have more money than god otherwise. As far as the "expert" is concerned post the actual article WITH the link because there were several terrible typos in the article posted above. The reporters name is spelled wrong and ESPN of all things is spelled incorrectly.

  • @the-gipper said:

    I have never seen it. Where can it be viewed? Is it really all that and a bag of chips?

    No. She certainly has a solid body but it's not worth going out of your way to watch. It was posted on another message board of mine otherwise I myself may have never seen it.

    Homotron said:

    No. She certainly has a solid body but it's not worth going out of your way to watch. It was posted on another message board of mine otherwise I myself may have never seen it.

    Let's put it this way: I would rather see it myself and then decide if it was worth going out of my way to watch. But not having seen it, I wouldn't know. Maybe you can make it easy on us and link it. Then I would not have to go out of my way at all except for a few mouse clicks.

  • @dawgpound3 said:

    ESPM News

    Sam Schulte

    July 23, 2009

    Hartford, Connecticut - ESPN Reporter Erin Andrews, who has vowed to press criminal charges and sue the Peeping Tom that violated her privacy by filming her dressing nude in her hotel room, allegedly knew about the voyeur and was conspiring with him to boost her career and overall fame.

    Private Investigator and MSNBC contributor Mac Mccord questioned the way Andrews apparently "knew just how darn sexy she was being." He added, "I could tell by the way the she was oiling her body, and posing her butt all sexy like, that she knew. She knew."

    Expert testimony such as this can only be damaging to Andrews' claims that she did not know there was someone filming her. "I maintain that I was unaware that I was being filmed; that my perfect body was on display for the entire world to enjoy, unbeknownced to me." Ronald Materson, Director of the Patriarchal Society of America, says "sex sells and our society objectifies women. This is a fact, I know it, you know it, and Erin Andrews knows it." He went on to say that "this broad" calculated this move, wanted some attention, and got it. He claims rushes to her defense are a result of the "sensitizing" of American males, and this is an excellent way for her to play the victim card and increase her earnings. "If I looked like that I would do the same thing, more power to her."

    Of course, shortly thereafter she did make that appearance on Dancing with the Stars, and other things. Makes you wonder if in fact it may actually have been a publicity ploy. Not saying it was....but?

    @the-gipper said:

    Of course, shortly thereafter she did make that appearance on Dancing with the Stars, and other things. Makes you wonder if in fact it may actually have been a publicity ploy. Not saying it was....but?

    Gip that article is not legitimate.

  • Homotron said:

    No. She certainly has a solid body but it's not worth going out of your way to watch. It was posted on another message board of mine otherwise I myself may have never seen it.

    Let's put it this way: I would rather see it myself and then decide if it was worth going out of my way to watch. But not having seen it, I wouldn't know. Maybe you can make it easy on us and link it. Then I would not have to go out of my way at all except for a few mouse clicks.

    @the-gipper said:

    Let's put it this way: I would rather see it myself and then decide if it was worth going out of my way to watch. But not having seen it, I wouldn't know. Maybe you can make it easy on us and link it. Then I would not have to go out of my way at all except for a few mouse clicks.

    I don't have the video and certainly don't care to dig it up. I was also voicing my opinion. Watch it 80 times if you want.

  • Why sue Ohio State University? What did they have to do with it? Hotel: OK, University: no.

  • Why sue Ohio State University? What did they have to do with it? Hotel: OK, University: no.

    @allaneddie said:

    Why sue Ohio State University? What did they have to do with it? Hotel: OK, University: no.

    THe hotel is a part of Ohio State.

  • I'd post the link but I dont know if Stan would be to happy about that

  • @miktoxic said:

    you spill hot coffee on yourself is it your fault or the guy they pay $7/hr to to pour it for you? where is espn's responsibility in all this? don't they have a security dept. that does their booking and research? do most celebrities you know go into a hotel using their real name, no. why doesn't she sue espn for not doing their job? put the pervert in jail and fire the person that blabbed on the phone. but no. she and her vampire lawyer will try to suck the blood out of everyone and everything that was in or around that hotel on that day. my general beef is the whole lawsuit thing. i'm not saying she wasn't done wrong but 40-50 years ago we wouldn't even be reading about this douchebag.

    oh and btw i wouldn't know about her videotape on the internet. how would you? maybe they'll get a list of people that viewed it and sue you too. homotron.

    You can't be this sheltered. How do you think she found out about the video/pictures in the first place? They were posted all over the internet otherwise she would have no zero idea the guy in question existed. The hot coffee argument is also irrelevant because if you spill hot coffee on yourself it's YOUR xxxxing fault. If you're in your hotel room behind a locked door and someone is using the peep whole they reversed to video tape you nude it's now the person inside the rooms fault? Get f.ucking real. The hotel was a affiliate of ohio state and the employee in question was a employee of Ohio State. She's suing all those involved and that's the bottom line. How would you feel if your wife/daughter/sister were exposed to a similar situation? Is your point of view really this short sighted? Get real dude. I'm all for eliminating the sue happy masses but in this instance she was completely violated and exposed to the world. It's the sort of thing a woman could need therapy for, for the rest of her life.

    Homotron said:

    she was completely violated and exposed to the world. It's the sort of thing a woman could need therapy for, for the rest of her life.

    erinandrewssf.jpg43615621.jpg

    yeah...................o.k. dumbass. 😆

  • i think she is guilty in all of this...................guilty of having a 'world-class' ass!!

    inessainz2.jpg