Another QB Controversy and other tidbits
-
Jake if you want to win, anyone else if you want to lose another close game
I say Jake. At least he's been a starter QB. Senecca has been somewhat adequate but he is what he is a back-up if he was anything more someone would have noticed before now.
This season is going nowhere so let Jake play if he is healthy. If he continues what he did last year and in the first game this year sit him down and let Colt have some starts that way they'll know what they have with him.
-
It has to be and will be jake. He is by all accounts the true leader of the team and wasnt looking bad at all the first half of the bucs game. Secondly he's holmgren choice at qb. There will be no QB controversy as long as holmgren is president, its just not the way he was taught the position by walsh.
-
It has to be and will be jake. He is by all accounts the true leader of the team and wasnt looking bad at all the first half of the bucs game. Secondly he's holmgren choice at qb. There will be no QB controversy as long as holmgren is president, its just not the way he was taught the position by walsh.
Dawgfanforever88 said:
It has to be and will be jake. He is by all accounts the true leader of the team and wasnt looking bad at all the first half of the bucs game. Secondly he's holmgren choice at qb. There will be no QB controversy as long as holmgren is president, its just not the way he was taught the position by walsh.And Walsh was taught by none other than Paul Brown.
-
I'd go with Wallace. Jake is not the future of this team. Wallace is younger and maybe he could be the future QB of this team if given the chance to start week in and week out.
Either way....we're winning on Sunday.
I'd go with Wallace. Jake is not the future of this team. Wallace is younger and maybe he could be the future QB of this team if given the chance to start week in and week out.
Either way....we're winning on Sunday.
I'm sorry, but a 30 year old qb is not the future of any team anywhere especially one that doesn't have any accuracy throwing down the sidelines. All Wallace and Delhomme are is stop gaps till we get our Qb that we want to groom, be that Colt McCoy or somebody else.
What we're seeing here in 2010 is precisely what happened in NE a decade ago. It worked for them then, and it wiill work for us now. Why? Because it's the only way it's ever worked in pro football. Just ask Paul Brown. Or Vince Lombardi. Or Tom Landry. .02, Clemdawg -
Seneca Wallace. He still has a good 3/4 years left and has good feet. If it was Jake out there in the Ravens game we would have more sacks and interceptions.
-
I'd go with Wallace. Jake is not the future of this team. Wallace is younger and maybe he could be the future QB of this team if given the chance to start week in and week out.
Either way....we're winning on Sunday.
I'm sorry, but a 30 year old qb is not the future of any team anywhere especially one that doesn't have any accuracy throwing down the sidelines. All Wallace and Delhomme are is stop gaps till we get our Qb that we want to groom, be that Colt McCoy or somebody else.
Dawgfanforever88 said:
I'm sorry, but a 30 year old qb is not the future of any team anywhere especially one that doesn't have any accuracy throwing down the sidelines. All Wallace and Delhomme are is stop gaps till we get our Qb that we want to groom, be that Colt McCoy or somebody else.I didn't say he was the future of the team. I said he could be..he is 30..but he hasn't played a lot so he would be a young 30 as opposed to an old 35 like Jake. We know Jake isn't the future..he's got a year or two left maybe more if he sticks around as a back up like Brunnell. So why not let Wallace keep starting and see where it goes, its not like he's playing terrible.
-
I can't believe anyone is suggesting Delhomme should be given another opportunity. Based on what exactly? Every throw he made week one was off the mark with the exception of a few. The TD pass to Momass was terrible and if the defense had been worth a sh.it on that play it would have been picked. Delhomme wouldn't start for any other team in the NFL and he shouldn't start for the Browns. Yes he's that bad.
AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month) -
Jake all the way.
-
Seneca Wallace. He still has a good 3/4 years left and has good feet. If it was Jake out there in the Ravens game we would have more sacks and interceptions.
Seneca Wallace. He still has a good 3/4 years left and has good feet. If it was Jake out there in the Ravens game we would have more sacks and interceptions.
Really!?! I guess we will never know. Im just sick of close calls I want wins. We lost 2 games in a row with Seneca. If Jack or Jake is ready to play then lets see what he can do.
-
Seneca Wallace. He still has a good 3/4 years left and has good feet. If it was Jake out there in the Ravens game we would have more sacks and interceptions.
Really!?! I guess we will never know. Im just sick of close calls I want wins. We lost 2 games in a row with Seneca. If Jack or Jake is ready to play then lets see what he can do.
Really!?! I guess we will never know. Im just sick of close calls I want wins. We lost 2 games in a row with Seneca. If Jack or Jake is ready to play then lets see what he can do.
Yeah, let's continue the QB carousel and it'll be a great ol time just like last year!
-
I can't believe anyone is suggesting Delhomme should be given another opportunity. Based on what exactly? Every throw he made week one was off the mark with the exception of a few. The TD pass to Momass was terrible and if the defense had been worth a sh.it on that play it would have been picked. Delhomme wouldn't start for any other team in the NFL and he shouldn't start for the Browns. Yes he's that bad.
Homotron said:
I can't believe anyone is suggesting Delhomme should be given another opportunity. Based on what exactly? Every throw he made week one was off the mark with the exception of a few. The TD pass to Momass was terrible and if the defense had been worth a sh.it on that play it would have been picked. Delhomme wouldn't start for any other team in the NFL and he shouldn't start for the Browns. Yes he's that bad.They've both put up the same amount of wins this season. So what's the difference?
-
Homotron said:
I can't believe anyone is suggesting Delhomme should be given another opportunity. Based on what exactly? Every throw he made week one was off the mark with the exception of a few. The TD pass to Momass was terrible and if the defense had been worth a sh.it on that play it would have been picked. Delhomme wouldn't start for any other team in the NFL and he shouldn't start for the Browns. Yes he's that bad.They've both put up the same amount of wins this season. So what's the difference?
They've both put up the same amount of wins this season. So what's the difference?
Exactly what I was thinking. I don't care who we play as long as we win.
Put in Cribbs for all I care.
-
Jake if he is truely healthy. Regarding the 3rd and 3 call. We don't know what was called by the bench, it is very possible that the qb audibled out of a play for hillis and called the bomb
Actually here is a quote from another thread that indicates seneca did make the call and not dabol
With 4:05 to play and facing a third-and-2, however, Wallace decided not to try and pound the ball for a first down, or even attempt a short pass. Instead, he missed a long pass attempt to Josh Cribbs.
“Seneca liked the matchup and took a chance,” Mangini said. “It was not a bad decision, but we needed a better throw.”
-
Delhomme needs to come back. I'm disappointed in Seneca's play; Delhomme seemed to be
much better at finding open receivers, and getting them the ball quickly. He can also throw a freakin sideline pattern.
I don't hate Seneca, but I expected more out of him...
But, God forbid if Seneca or JD goes on IR, there is always the OLD guy... @@
*************************************
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-morningrush092710
Congratulations to Daunte Culpepper(notes), whose second game for the UFL’s Sacramento Mountain Lions on Saturday was a beauty: He completed 26-of-42 passes for 374 yards and three touchdowns in a come-from-behind victory over the Florida Tuskers, throwing the winning, 33-yard TD pass to Rod Windsor with 31 seconds remaining. Back in June, Culpepper told me a major reason for his decision to play in the fledgling league was so he could share the experience of being a starting quarterback with his five children. “For sure it is [special],” Culpepper reiterated Sunday, noting that his kids were among the estimated 20,000 fans at Hughes Stadium. Personally, I’d like to see this immensely talented player get a call from one of the NFL teams in search of quality QB play. Yes, I’m talking to you Chan Gailey, and Eric Mangini, and Jack Del Rio, and Ken Whisenhunt, and …
-
Delhomme needs to come back. I'm disappointed in Seneca's play; Delhomme seemed to be
much better at finding open receivers, and getting them the ball quickly. He can also throw a freakin sideline pattern.
I don't hate Seneca, but I expected more out of him...
But, God forbid if Seneca or JD goes on IR, there is always the OLD guy... @@
*************************************
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ms-morningrush092710
Congratulations to Daunte Culpepper(notes), whose second game for the UFL’s Sacramento Mountain Lions on Saturday was a beauty: He completed 26-of-42 passes for 374 yards and three touchdowns in a come-from-behind victory over the Florida Tuskers, throwing the winning, 33-yard TD pass to Rod Windsor with 31 seconds remaining. Back in June, Culpepper told me a major reason for his decision to play in the fledgling league was so he could share the experience of being a starting quarterback with his five children. “For sure it is [special],” Culpepper reiterated Sunday, noting that his kids were among the estimated 20,000 fans at Hughes Stadium. Personally, I’d like to see this immensely talented player get a call from one of the NFL teams in search of quality QB play. Yes, I’m talking to you Chan Gailey, and Eric Mangini, and Jack Del Rio, and Ken Whisenhunt, and …
Delhomme needs to come back. I'm disappointed in Seneca's play; Delhomme seemed to be
much better at finding open receivers, and getting them the ball quickly. He can also throw a freakin sideline pattern.
I don't hate Seneca, but I expected more out of him...
But, God forbid if Seneca or JD goes on IR, there is always the OLD guy... @@
If we signed him instead of putting in Colt I would cry myself to sleep even more-so. This is going to be a ROUGH year.
Lets just pray we can make it through without any major injuries.
Already missing D'Qwell Jackson on what is prolly the last year he will be in Cleveland.
-
Really!?! I guess we will never know. Im just sick of close calls I want wins. We lost 2 games in a row with Seneca. If Jack or Jake is ready to play then lets see what he can do.
Yeah, let's continue the QB carousel and it'll be a great ol time just like last year!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login