Skip to content

FREE AGENTS: WIDE RECIEVERS

The Browns Board
24 17 2.5k
  • MSW is absolutely not worth the effort. He completely disappeared last year.

    Smith is far too old. Jackson is a head case.

    Floyd/rice/holmes - perhaps.

    There really isn't a quick fix available.. it's all about the draft.

    @unsympathetic said:

    MSW is absolutely not worth the effort. He completely disappeared last year.

    7 TD's and 33 First down catches in 43 total receptions. Disappeared? And he was hurt for 2 games.

  • James Jones or Sidney Rice (although I doubt the Vikings let him leave--he does have some lingering injury issues, not sure how his hip is going to be in 2011)

  • i think Lance Moore would be a nice cheep option to bring in as a really good slot guy, but I highly doubt he leaves NO.
    He was a Cleveland Brown in 2006.
    We made an oops.It just goes to show that our organization really isn't going to try and progress rookies.

    you're basing this off of the previous regime's mistakes. how can you make a statement like this when both tj ward and joe haden got plenty of playing time? that's not letting them progress?

    why don't we wait and see what holmgren, heckert and co. do instead of judging them based on the past actions of phil, romeo and co.?

  • i think Lance Moore would be a nice cheep option to bring in as a really good slot guy, but I highly doubt he leaves NO.
    He was a Cleveland Brown in 2006.
    We made an oops.It just goes to show that our organization really isn't going to try and progress rookies.

    you're basing this off of the previous regime's mistakes. how can you make a statement like this when both tj ward and joe haden got plenty of playing time? that's not letting them progress?

    why don't we wait and see what holmgren, heckert and co. do instead of judging them based on the past actions of phil, romeo and co.?

    @sj_browns said:

    you're basing this off of the previous regime's mistakes. how can you make a statement like this when both tj ward and joe haden got plenty of playing time? that's not letting them progress?

    why don't we wait and see what holmgren, heckert and co. do instead of judging them based on the past actions of phil, romeo and co.?

    I don't mean that they are going to sit rookies and then drop/trade them, I am saying players that take that 3-4 years to get good enough to become starters are shipped out because they are not producing right away. Obviously Haden and Ward are going to progress, because they came right out good enough to start and the same goes for McCoy, but most UFA's and late round picks the Browns get are dropped before their rookie year is up. Ya this is due to past regimes and I hope the new one stops it but since 1999 the only players who are with the team for a few years are the ones who are starting right off the bat and not progressing for a few years. The only player we picked up as a rookie that was given time to develop was Rubin.

  • Bring back edwards

  • James Jones seems like a likely choice. He has questionable hands at times but he has potential to be an absolute stud.

  • I like M. Floyds' size @ 6' 5", 225 lbs. He would be an excelllent weapon for a high powered passing offense. Hamstring problems could lower his cost for those teams looking to get a good value

    on a player with some potential durability issues. His stats last three years are decent:

    http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/F/FloyMa00.htm

  • I also like floyd.

    The 2 others I wouldn't mind, jame jones, steve breaston

    Rice will be franchised, jets will bring back holmes and no way we will even talk to braylon.

  • vincent jackson (sd)

    sidney rice

    santonio holmes

    braylon edwards

    malcom floyd

    steve smith

    terrell owens

    randy moss

    mike williams

    james jones

    steve breaston

    Early Doucet (ARZ)

    Brian Finneran (ATL)

    Donte' Stallworth (BAL)

    TJ Houshmandzadeh (BAL)

    Rashied Davis (CHI)

    Devin Aromashadu (CHI)

    Chansi Stuckey (CLE)

    Sam Hurd (DAL)

    Jacoby Jones (HOU)

    Mike Sims-Walker (JAC)

    Kevin Curtis (MIA)

    Hank Baskett (MIN)

    Greg Lewis (MIN)

    Lance Moore (NO)

    Courtney Roby (NO)

    Derek Hagan (NYG)

    Darius Reynaud (NYG)

    Brad Smith (NYJ)

    Johnnie Lee Higgins (OAK)

    Legedu Naanee (SD)

    Ben Obomanu (SEA)

    Laurent Robinson (STL)

    Danny Amendola (STL)

    Mark Clayton (STL)

    Maurice Stovall (TB)

    Santana Moss (WAS)

    WHICH ONES WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE BROWNS TARGET???? id like to see us go after sidney rice and santana moss

    @beare said:

    vincent jackson (sd)

    sidney rice

    santonio holmes

    braylon edwards

    malcom floyd

    steve smith

    terrell owens

    randy moss

    mike williams

    james jones

    steve breaston

    Early Doucet (ARZ)

    Brian Finneran (ATL)

    Donte' Stallworth (BAL)

    TJ Houshmandzadeh (BAL)

    Rashied Davis (CHI)

    Devin Aromashadu (CHI)

    Chansi Stuckey (CLE)

    Sam Hurd (DAL)

    Jacoby Jones (HOU)

    Mike Sims-Walker (JAC)

    Kevin Curtis (MIA)

    Hank Baskett (MIN)

    Greg Lewis (MIN)

    Lance Moore (NO)

    Courtney Roby (NO)

    Derek Hagan (NYG)

    Darius Reynaud (NYG)

    Brad Smith (NYJ)

    Johnnie Lee Higgins (OAK)

    Legedu Naanee (SD)

    Ben Obomanu (SEA)

    Laurent Robinson (STL)

    Danny Amendola (STL)

    Mark Clayton (STL)

    Maurice Stovall (TB)

    Santana Moss (WAS)

    WHICH ONES WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE THE BROWNS TARGET???? id like to see us go after sidney rice and santana moss

    We should target the ones i put in red. There are some other decent choices in the list but I feel that a lot of them will be resigned (lance moore, breaston, clayton, ect). If we get one of those guys in red plus A.J. Green I think we will be looking good. We would have momass, cribbs, and robo for slot receivers and watson and evan moore as two good TE options to go along with free agent pickups and possibly Green. And If we can get two of the guys in red I think we can draft defensive front in the first round...

  • @sj_browns said:

    you're basing this off of the previous regime's mistakes. how can you make a statement like this when both tj ward and joe haden got plenty of playing time? that's not letting them progress?

    why don't we wait and see what holmgren, heckert and co. do instead of judging them based on the past actions of phil, romeo and co.?

    I don't mean that they are going to sit rookies and then drop/trade them, I am saying players that take that 3-4 years to get good enough to become starters are shipped out because they are not producing right away. Obviously Haden and Ward are going to progress, because they came right out good enough to start and the same goes for McCoy, but most UFA's and late round picks the Browns get are dropped before their rookie year is up. Ya this is due to past regimes and I hope the new one stops it but since 1999 the only players who are with the team for a few years are the ones who are starting right off the bat and not progressing for a few years. The only player we picked up as a rookie that was given time to develop was Rubin.

    Hillis-iz-Boss said:

    I don't mean that they are going to sit rookies and then drop/trade them, I am saying players that take that 3-4 years to get good enough to become starters are shipped out because they are not producing right away. Obviously Haden and Ward are going to progress, because they came right out good enough to start and the same goes for McCoy, but most UFA's and late round picks the Browns get are dropped before their rookie year is up. Ya this is due to past regimes and I hope the new one stops it but since 1999 the only players who are with the team for a few years are the ones who are starting right off the bat and not progressing for a few years. The only player we picked up as a rookie that was given time to develop was Rubin.

    since 99, the browns have never had experienced people like holmgren, heckert, etc. they've always had people in lesser positions that were under someone else who was successful. i just don't think the present regime, based off of their individual accomplishments, should even be brought up in such a conversation. i think they deserve to be judged based off of what they do. it's a wait and see type of thing for me and the past failures shouldn't even be thrown on them. jmo.