Who Were Talking To
-
@RavensInsider: Louisville cornerback Johnny Patrick met with a dozen NFL teams, including the Cleveland Browns. 02-28
<b>Browns | Talked with Noel Devine
</b>
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:15:11 -0800
West Virginia RB Noel Devine said he has talked with the Cleveland Browns at the NFL Scouting Combine.
<b>Browns | Met with Patrick Peterson
</b>
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 11:00:05 -0800
Louisiana State CB Patrick Peterson said he has met with the Cleveland Browns at the NFL Scouting Combine.
<b>Browns | Have talked with Will Hill
</b>
Sun, 27 Feb 2011 14:56:27 -0800
University of Florida S Will Hill said he has spoken with the Cleveland Browns at the NFL Scouting Combine.
<b>Browns | Have talked with Allen Bailey
</b>
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 14:14:16 -0800
University of Miami DE Allen Bailey said he has talked with Cleveland Browns at the NFL Scouting Combine.
<b>Browns | Have met with Tyron Smith
</b>
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:05:43 -0800
Southern California OT Tyron Smith said he has met with the Cleveland Browns at the NFL Scouting Combine.
Read more: <a href="http://www.kffl.com/team/13/nfl#ixzz1FIGbDY86" target="_blank">http://www.kffl.com/team/13/nfl#ixzz1FIGbDY86</a>
-
Glad to see Patrick Peterson there.
-
I know a lot of people aren't taking the Peterson to Browns speculation seriously, but I have a weird feeling he falls to us.
-
I know a lot of people aren't taking the Peterson to Browns speculation seriously, but I have a weird feeling he falls to us.
I know a lot of people aren't taking the Peterson to Browns speculation seriously, but I have a weird feeling he falls to us.
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
Head or Gut? -
I know a lot of people aren't taking the Peterson to Browns speculation seriously, but I have a weird feeling he falls to us.
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
http://sea.scout.com/2/816748.html
History I've seen of him while he was GM and coach for Seattle, agreed with that article, I wasn't really excited over Holmgren's hire until he was named President and not the GM whom Heckert is and i believe Heckert is the main man doing our drafting while Holmgren oversees it. Also have to realize Holmgren was GM AND head coaching those years, I believe just doing one or the other and not both helps greatly in doing those jobs well.
Heckert's tenure with the Eagle's really showed his eye for talent.
Here is Heckert's history before last year's draft: http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/04/in_the_shadows_browns_gm_tom_h.html
Bleed Brown and Orange -
-
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
http://sea.scout.com/2/816748.html
History I've seen of him while he was GM and coach for Seattle, agreed with that article, I wasn't really excited over Holmgren's hire until he was named President and not the GM whom Heckert is and i believe Heckert is the main man doing our drafting while Holmgren oversees it. Also have to realize Holmgren was GM AND head coaching those years, I believe just doing one or the other and not both helps greatly in doing those jobs well.
Heckert's tenure with the Eagle's really showed his eye for talent.
Here is Heckert's history before last year's draft: http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/04/in_the_shadows_browns_gm_tom_h.html
http://sea.scout.com/2/816748.html
History I've seen of him while he was GM and coach for Seattle, agreed with that article, I wasn't really excited over Holmgren's hire until he was named President and not the GM whom Heckert is and i believe Heckert is the main man doing our drafting while Holmgren oversees it. Also have to realize Holmgren was GM AND head coaching those years, I believe just doing one or the other and not both helps greatly in doing those jobs well.
Heckert's tenure with the Eagle's really showed his eye for talent.
Here is Heckert's history before last year's draft: http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2010/04/in_the_shadows_browns_gm_tom_h.html
It looks like his best draft was in 2002 when he didn't make any trades. Look at all of the trades he made afterwards.
It looks like a crap shoot.
-
I know a lot of people aren't taking the Peterson to Browns speculation seriously, but I have a weird feeling he falls to us.
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
I do not believe that Holmgren was making the personell decisions when he was with the Packers. I believe that was Ron Wolfe, so it might be misleading to look at those and apply them to Holmgren's record, though I am sure he had some input.
And here, actually, most of the player acquisition is supposed to be made by Heckert, not Holmgren, though again, I am sure he has significant input.
-
-
Who knows? Does anyone have a history on the Walrus and his draft selections over the years? That may be a tip on how he likes the draft in the early rounds.
I do not believe that Holmgren was making the personell decisions when he was with the Packers. I believe that was Ron Wolfe, so it might be misleading to look at those and apply them to Holmgren's record, though I am sure he had some input.
And here, actually, most of the player acquisition is supposed to be made by Heckert, not Holmgren, though again, I am sure he has significant input.
I do not believe that Holmgren was making the personell decisions when he was with the Packers. I believe that was Ron Wolfe, so it might be misleading to look at those and apply them to Holmgren's record, though I am sure he had some input.
And here, actually, most of the player acquisition is supposed to be made by Heckert, not Holmgren, though again, I am sure he has significant input.
I was referring to Heckert's tenure with the Eagles according to the Plain Dealer article. They made numerous trades and most of them didn't pan out.
-
Hey guys new poster here. First off great site you have here, I have been filling my down time at work reading your posts for a few months now. Ok so here's my take on things. I really think with the 6th pick we will address one of the holes in the front 7 or take peterson or the kid from nebraska. Although I like aj green and jones I don't think wr is the way to go mostly because of the way the cba is shaping up. If there are no mini camps training camp etc. They will not have the time needed to learn the new system or mesh with colt and the coaches. Its a lot easier to have a rookie jump in and learn on the fly on defense as opposed to a wr doing the same. Wouldn't surprise me if we trade down for extra picks either.
-
mikeyP72 said:
No WR on that list.
Not surprising...
I still have no idea why we believe that position is set? All we got is MoMass and Watson to throw to. You play a team with a good secondary they could double cover those guys all day and we'd be screwed.
Don't get me wrong, I think MoMass is great, but he needs help!!!!
-
mikeyP72 said:
No WR on that list.
Not surprising...
I still have no idea why we believe that position is set? All we got is MoMass and Watson to throw to. You play a team with a good secondary they could double cover those guys all day and we'd be screwed.
Don't get me wrong, I think MoMass is great, but he needs help!!!!
Not surprising...
I still have no idea why we believe that position is set? All we got is MoMass and Watson to throw to. You play a team with a good secondary they could double cover those guys all day and we'd be screwed.
Don't get me wrong, I think MoMass is great, but he needs help!!!!
No one said we're not drafting a WR, probably just not in the 1st round. And for the millionth time, there IS free agency.
And MoMass is great? Have we been watching the same team? He has the potential (not yet achieved) to be a good #2.
-
Were going to draft green if hes there...mark it down!
Imagine both Peterson and Green fall to us. That'll be one awesome problem to have, no?
if that does happen, Peterson is too great of a prospect (better than Green) to pass up.
I've already jumped on the Alshon Jeffrey bandwagon. He's a better prospect than AJ Green.
-
Were going to draft green if hes there...mark it down!
Imagine both Peterson and Green fall to us. That'll be one awesome problem to have, no?
if that does happen, Peterson is too great of a prospect (better than Green) to pass up.
I've already jumped on the Alshon Jeffrey bandwagon. He's a better prospect than AJ Green.
Imagine both Peterson and Green fall to us. That'll be one awesome problem to have, no?
if that does happen, Peterson is too great of a prospect (better than Green) to pass up.
I've already jumped on the Alshon Jeffrey bandwagon. He's a better prospect than AJ Green.
Yeah but Alshon Jeffery will be a top 5 selection next year so unless were picking top 5, i dont see us getting him ethier...Heres hoping Green falls to us which may happen if the Bengals take a QB....Also Justin Blackmon is my guy next year i dont think we'll have a shot at Jeffery
-
mikeyP72 said:
No WR on that list.
Not surprising...
I still have no idea why we believe that position is set? All we got is MoMass and Watson to throw to. You play a team with a good secondary they could double cover those guys all day and we'd be screwed.
Don't get me wrong, I think MoMass is great, but he needs help!!!!
Not surprising...
I still have no idea why we believe that position is set? All we got is MoMass and Watson to throw to. You play a team with a good secondary they could double cover those guys all day and we'd be screwed.
Don't get me wrong, I think MoMass is great, but he needs help!!!!
MoMass and great are 2 words that should never be in the same sentence.
-
mikeyP72 said:
MoMass was effective when lined up opposite of Braylon Edwards. He's shown glimpses and can be a solid WR in the NFL if we had more of a passing threat opposite of him...
His numbers weren't entirely too much different. He had about 200 more yards, and one more touchdown against opposing teams #2's. It's a difference, but not anything drastic. I agree, we need a passing threat next to him, I don't think MoMass will ever be a solid #1.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login