Micheal Bush?
-
As long as we don't take Richardson at 4
-
As long as we don't take Richardson at 4
Of Course thats a given, if we were interstred in Richardson id say trade down a least a few spots and then grab him....He may slip out of the Top 10
-
My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..
-
My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..
My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..
He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.
-
I agree with pizza, IMO Bush is better than Peyton, id take him inna heartbeat even if we keep hillis.
-
My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..
He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.
He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.
Yea 37 is a decent number I dont know how many of those were just dump offs.. I just dont know how his hands are and I dont think 37 receptions tells you that theyre fine..
Just watched this:
Not many receptions at all, but rushing-wise he looks like a faster Peyton Hillis. Id be excited, I like the idea of getting a free agent running back at this point just because of the opportunity costs of drafting one.. Id just be wary not too commit to any RB for more than 4 years with significant guaranteed money..
-
I love Bush and think that he can be our feature back, but I dont think he is better than Hillis.
Hillis is a better reciever, blocker and is a little more atheletic.
Bush is a good reciever, doesnt fumble as much and is more durable.
Other than that they are pretty similar backs.
-
michael bush we are looking probably could be picked up for around 3.3 - 3.5 million...if we take trent we are looking at spending about 5.2 -5.5 million for four years at #4 if we can swap with lets say the dolphins at #8 probably could get trent for around the 3.5 million mark for 4 years.
-
if we don't sign a running back or re-sign hillis WE will be getting a back in the first round be it Richardson or Wilson or Turbin(the incredible hulk) in the 2nd or 3rd. If we resign hillis and or get bush i think they will go after rg3...if we lose out on both, we will need a back in the first or 2nd round.
-
Bush is slow, and would have 1 or 2 decent years as a starting running back. In Cleveland, he would have a ho-hum 800yds 6Tds
-
Zombo said:
I hear Terry Kirby is still in good shape.
Z
And Boyce Green and Ben Gay may be looking to get back into the league.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login