Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Micheal Bush?

Micheal Bush?

The Browns Board
14 10 936

  • My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..

  • cribbs is the manC cribbs is the man

    My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..

    @cribbs-is-the-man said:

    My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..

    He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.

    cribbs is the manC 1 Reply

  • I agree with pizza, IMO Bush is better than Peyton, id take him inna heartbeat even if we keep hillis.

    !!!!hopefully i'll be alive when it happens!!!!
  • P pizzadeliveryguy

    @cribbs-is-the-man said:

    My only concern is Michael Bush as a receiver.. our RBs in the system must be able to catch out of the backfield and he doesnt seem to have a lot of experience doing this. plus the price would have to be right..

    He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.

    @pizzadeliveryguy said:

    He caught 37 balls this past year. And screw the price. Bush is the goods, he would be a major upgrade over Hillis.

    Yea 37 is a decent number I dont know how many of those were just dump offs.. I just dont know how his hands are and I dont think 37 receptions tells you that theyre fine..

    Just watched this:

    Not many receptions at all, but rushing-wise he looks like a faster Peyton Hillis. Id be excited, I like the idea of getting a free agent running back at this point just because of the opportunity costs of drafting one.. Id just be wary not too commit to any RB for more than 4 years with significant guaranteed money..

  • Bush has solid hands. He actually a better natural receiver than Hillis.

    Depending on the price, he could be a quality investment for the Browns.

    -jj

  • I love Bush and think that he can be our feature back, but I dont think he is better than Hillis.

    Hillis is a better reciever, blocker and is a little more atheletic.

    Bush is a good reciever, doesnt fumble as much and is more durable.

    Other than that they are pretty similar backs.

  • michael bush we are looking probably could be picked up for around 3.3 - 3.5 million...if we take trent we are looking at spending about 5.2 -5.5 million for four years at #4 if we can swap with lets say the dolphins at #8 probably could get trent for around the 3.5 million mark for 4 years.

  • I get the math. But Bush doesn't cost you a first round pick. Here's hoping the brain trust has a better plan for those 2 ones.

    -jj

  • if we don't sign a running back or re-sign hillis WE will be getting a back in the first round be it Richardson or Wilson or Turbin(the incredible hulk) in the 2nd or 3rd. If we resign hillis and or get bush i think they will go after rg3...if we lose out on both, we will need a back in the first or 2nd round.

  • Bush is slow, and would have 1 or 2 decent years as a starting running back. In Cleveland, he would have a ho-hum 800yds 6Tds

  • Zombo said:

    I hear Terry Kirby is still in good shape.

    Z

    And Boyce Green and Ben Gay may be looking to get back into the league.

Log in to reply