The Browns Will Never Win With Holmgren
-
Based on the history of the division.
It's like trying to put a square peg in a round hole.
Read my previous post I've already made the points.
Based on the history of the division.
It's like trying to put a square peg in a round hole.
Read my previous post I've already made the points.
History of the division is not a point, cause when the hell in our division did a team come in and run a WCO and fail, when did a team run a 4-3 defense and fail?
-
Holmgren's philosophy will never work here in Cleveland.
Bill Walsh designed the WCO to play to Montana's strengths.
Colt McCoy is no Joe Montana, to win in the AFC North you need a QB with an arm to throw through the winter winds coming off the lake. It's not 70 degrees here year round like in San Fran.
It's not 1988 anymore either, this classic WCO they run is old and outdated,it simply doesn't work anymore.
Their version of 4-3 defense does not win in the AFC North.
Weather is the great neutralizer of speed. Playing a 4-3 defense based on undersized speed rushing defensive ends in Cleveland is just flat out dumb. Just ask the Colts how it worked out for them in the winter months,can't blame it all on Manning.
Bring back AFC North football and get this California douchbag out of here.
Weather is the great neutralizer of speed. Playing a 4-3 defense based on undersized speed rushing defensive ends in Cleveland is just flat out dumb. Just ask the Colts how it worked out for them in the winter months,can't blame it all on Manning.
-
Same goes for strength. Everyone gets weaker and slower in the cold. The only thing cold truly effects are people who didn't grow up playing football in the cold.
Ruining threads since 1897. -
Same goes for strength. Everyone gets weaker and slower in the cold. The only thing cold truly effects are people who didn't grow up playing football in the cold.
Same goes for strength. Everyone gets weaker and slower in the cold. The only thing cold truly effects are people who didn't grow up playing football in the cold.
For the record Favre grew up in Gulfport Mississippi.
-
Same goes for strength. Everyone gets weaker and slower in the cold. The only thing cold truly effects are people who didn't grow up playing football in the cold.
For the record Favre grew up in Gulfport Mississippi.
-
Holmgren's philosophy will never work here in Cleveland.
Bill Walsh designed the WCO to play to Montana's strengths.
Colt McCoy is no Joe Montana, to win in the AFC North you need a QB with an arm to throw through the winter winds coming off the lake. It's not 70 degrees here year round like in San Fran.
It's not 1988 anymore either, this classic WCO they run is old and outdated,it simply doesn't work anymore.
Their version of 4-3 defense does not win in the AFC North.
Weather is the great neutralizer of speed. Playing a 4-3 defense based on undersized speed rushing defensive ends in Cleveland is just flat out dumb. Just ask the Colts how it worked out for them in the winter months,can't blame it all on Manning.
Bring back AFC North football and get this California douchbag out of here.
Holmgren's philosophy will never work here in Cleveland.
Bill Walsh designed the WCO to play to Montana's strengths.
Colt McCoy is no Joe Montana, to win in the AFC North you need a QB with an arm to throw through the winter winds coming off the lake. It's not 70 degrees here year round like in San Fran.
Yes because it was never windy in San Francisco
Yet another dope drinking a case of Epic Fail
-
My point is even with the right players, all things being equal talent wise across the division Holmgren's style won't win.
My point is even with the right players, all things being equal talent wise across the division Holmgren's style won't win.
I think Holmgren's style might win, but Shurmurs won't. He has no creativity or innovation at all, it seems we are the most vanilla team in the league on both sides of the ball.
-
My point is even with the right players, all things being equal talent wise across the division Holmgren's style won't win.
I think Holmgren's style might win, but Shurmurs won't. He has no creativity or innovation at all, it seems we are the most vanilla team in the league on both sides of the ball.
I think Holmgren's style might win, but Shurmurs won't. He has no creativity or innovation at all, it seems we are the most vanilla team in the league on both sides of the ball.
I got to say, as a Rams fan, this sounds so much like our board when he was with us. I made these signatures back then and thought I'd share them with you guys;
-
haha Shurmur is Brick from Anchorman.
-
I think Holmgren's style might win, but Shurmurs won't. He has no creativity or innovation at all, it seems we are the most vanilla team in the league on both sides of the ball.
I got to say, as a Rams fan, this sounds so much like our board when he was with us. I made these signatures back then and thought I'd share them with you guys;
-
I think Holmgren's style might win, but Shurmurs won't. He has no creativity or innovation at all, it seems we are the most vanilla team in the league on both sides of the ball.
I got to say, as a Rams fan, this sounds so much like our board when he was with us. I made these signatures back then and thought I'd share them with you guys;
-
It worked in Green Bay almost 20 years ago.
In Green Bay Holmgren was just the coach.
With a hall of fame QB and hall of fame defensive end any system will work.
And similar climates different competition, the Packers were not facing the Steelers and Ravens for 25% of their schedule. The NFC central was pretty weak in the 90's Tampa,Chicago,Detroit were cakewalks, you could argue Green Bay underachieved only winning one Superbowl
It worked in Green Bay almost 20 years ago.
In Green Bay Holmgren was just the coach.
With a hall of fame QB and hall of fame defensive end any system will work.
Then what you are actually saying is that it is not the system, but the personell?
And similar climates different competition, the Packers were not facing the Steelers and Ravens for 25% of their schedule.
Then what the Browns need is better defensive players. Better LBs, better DBs, better DL. It doesn't matter whether they play 3-4 or 4-3. It matters if you have killers on your team...and a coach that can do the job....like LeBeau. Jauron is pretty good. Him running the 4-3 is the least of our worries.
-
-
I also said all things being equal I believe we would be at a disadvantage, so no I don't think it's the players not the system.
I don't think you can compare Otto Graham Browns to today's game.
Historically,say the past 25 years our division has been won by physical line play,tough defense and vertical passing.
We seem to be going with finesse line play and horizontal passing.
I just don't like the idea of relying on speed rushing ends in a 4-3. If we should ever play a critical game in the late months of the year and it's snowy/raining our speed rushing ends are useless.
Maybe it's a little premature to worry about that.
-
I also said all things being equal I believe we would be at a disadvantage, so no I don't think it's the players not the system.
I don't think you can compare Otto Graham Browns to today's game.
Historically,say the past 25 years our division has been won by physical line play,tough defense and vertical passing.
We seem to be going with finesse line play and horizontal passing.
I just don't like the idea of relying on speed rushing ends in a 4-3. If we should ever play a critical game in the late months of the year and it's snowy/raining our speed rushing ends are useless.
Maybe it's a little premature to worry about that.
I also said all things being equal I believe we would be at a disadvantage, so no I don't think it's the players not the system.
I don't think you can compare Otto Graham Browns to today's game.
Historically,say the past 25 years our division has been won by physical line play,tough defense and vertical passing.
We seem to be going with finesse line play and horizontal passing.
I just don't like the idea of relying on speed rushing ends in a 4-3. If we should ever play a critical game in the late months of the year and it's snowy/raining our speed rushing ends are useless.
Maybe it's a little premature to worry about that.
Why would speed rushing ends be more useless than speed rushing LBs in the 3-4?
I don't know if it is a little premature to worry about that, but it may be a little absurd to worry about that.
-
Because a 3-4 is mostly based on blitzing a random linebacker/s and getting mismatches.
A 4-3 end is always going against a tackle,and is undersized relying on his speed. derp.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login