Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. What Teams Do You Think Will Want Our #4?

What Teams Do You Think Will Want Our #4?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
16 Posts 10 Posters 1.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 9k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #7

    When we pick, the odds are good Blackmon,Richardson, Clairborne, and Tannehill will be there, so really, every team in the league could have interest in moving up There is a WR, a RB, CB, and a QB. Everybody needs at least one of those positions.

    We have a trading history with Dallas and they might want Clairborne. I'd think that could be a potential landing spot if we in fact trade out of the pick.

    Here is how I see it. If we like Tannehill, we are selecting him at #4. If we decide to pass on him, we probably trade down to get some extra picks. If we want one of those picks to be a next year first rounder that might give us a shot at next years top QB, we are going to have to drop more than 2-3 slots...

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    S 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • 1 more season 1 more season1
      • 659 Posts
      • 30 Reputation
      1 more season1 1 more season wrote on last edited by
      #8

      It's nice that the Browns and their fans are so concerned about other teams and want to help them by trading down.

      Soccer, Futball, Fusball, Futsal, Foosball, Europe ... Mods are all gay.
      USFBrownU 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • 1 more season1 1 more season

        It's nice that the Browns and their fans are so concerned about other teams and want to help them by trading down.

        USFBrown USFBrownU Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 2k Posts
        • 270 Reputation
        USFBrownU USFBrown wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @1-more-season said:

        It's nice that the Browns and their fans are so concerned about other teams and want to help them by trading down.

        That's been the Browns motto lately... Quantity over Quality.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • ballpeenB ballpeen

          When we pick, the odds are good Blackmon,Richardson, Clairborne, and Tannehill will be there, so really, every team in the league could have interest in moving up There is a WR, a RB, CB, and a QB. Everybody needs at least one of those positions.

          We have a trading history with Dallas and they might want Clairborne. I'd think that could be a potential landing spot if we in fact trade out of the pick.

          Here is how I see it. If we like Tannehill, we are selecting him at #4. If we decide to pass on him, we probably trade down to get some extra picks. If we want one of those picks to be a next year first rounder that might give us a shot at next years top QB, we are going to have to drop more than 2-3 slots...

          SDBrownsFan S
          • 126 Posts
          • 4 Reputation
          S SDBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @ballpeen said:

          When we pick, the odds are good Blackmon,Richardson, Clairborne, and Tannehill will be there, so really, every team in the league could have interest in moving up There is a WR, a RB, CB, and a QB. Everybody needs at least one of those positions.

          We have a trading history with Dallas and they might want Clairborne. I'd think that could be a potential landing spot if we in fact trade out of the pick.

          Here is how I see it. If we like Tannehill, we are selecting him at #4. If we decide to pass on him, we probably trade down to get some extra picks. If we want one of those picks to be a next year first rounder that might give us a shot at next years top QB, we are going to have to drop more than 2-3 slots...

          The Redskins didn't have two first round picks within the year and they traded up.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo

            I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

            The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
            • 57k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @harry-buffalo said:

            I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Harry BuffaloH Harry Buffalo

              I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

              Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
              • 30k Posts
              • 6k Reputation
              Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
              #12

              @harry-buffalo said:

              I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

              HB, Gip,

              Did not address this directly earlier, but the problems I have with the above scenario are that:

              - any willingness to trade with a team, e.g., Miami, tells them we are not interested in the player that they are interested in, e.g., Tannehill; and

              - I don't think the Chiefs are interested in Tannehill; Matt Cassel seems to be their guy for at least one more season.

              Anyway my premise that the Viks will take Kalil, may not be true... and that would change everything.

              bleacherreport.com: why-the-browns-should-trade-down-if-the-vikings-pass-on-kalil

              "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
              The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                @harry-buffalo said:

                I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

                HB, Gip,

                Did not address this directly earlier, but the problems I have with the above scenario are that:

                - any willingness to trade with a team, e.g., Miami, tells them we are not interested in the player that they are interested in, e.g., Tannehill; and

                - I don't think the Chiefs are interested in Tannehill; Matt Cassel seems to be their guy for at least one more season.

                Anyway my premise that the Viks will take Kalil, may not be true... and that would change everything.

                bleacherreport.com: why-the-browns-should-trade-down-if-the-vikings-pass-on-kalil

                The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @tour2ma said:

                HB, Gip,

                Did not address this directly earlier, but the problems I have with the above scenario are that:

                - any willingness to trade with a team, e.g., Miami, tells them we are not interested in the player that they are interested in, e.g., Tannehill; and

                - I don't think the Chiefs are interested in Tannehill; Matt Cassel seems to be their guy for at least one more season.

                Anyway my premise that the Viks will take Kalil, may not be true... and that would change everything.

                What? Do you think the Vikes will take Tannehill, when they just picked up Ponder in the first round last year?

                My view is that the Browns believe that 3 players will be gone by their pick: Luck, RGIII and Kalil Gibran. I also think that they may be willing to take any one of 3 players: Claiborne, Blackmon, Richardson.

                If someone desperately wants Tannehill at #4, then I think the Browns will trade down to 6/7/8 if they can pick up another second rounder in doing so.

                The question is who do they deal with?

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • cambridgeho cambridgehoC Very Popular Reacting Well Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 139 Reputation
                  cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

                  1 more season1 The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • cambridgehoC cambridgeho

                    Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

                    1 more season 1 more season1
                    • 659 Posts
                    • 30 Reputation
                    1 more season1 1 more season wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    @cambridgeho said:

                    Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

                    Yes, it would be crazy.

                    Soccer, Futball, Fusball, Futsal, Foosball, Europe ... Mods are all gay.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • cambridgehoC cambridgeho

                      Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                      • 57k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @cambridgeho said:

                      Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

                      Fuckabuncha Jimmy Clausen

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      Theme
                      • System
                      • Light
                      • Dark
                      The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                      The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Forums
                      • Recent
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Donate