Skip to content

What Teams Do You Think Will Want Our #4?

The Browns Board
16 10 1.0k
  • ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #7

    When we pick, the odds are good Blackmon,Richardson, Clairborne, and Tannehill will be there, so really, every team in the league could have interest in moving up There is a WR, a RB, CB, and a QB. Everybody needs at least one of those positions.

    We have a trading history with Dallas and they might want Clairborne. I'd think that could be a potential landing spot if we in fact trade out of the pick.

    Here is how I see it. If we like Tannehill, we are selecting him at #4. If we decide to pass on him, we probably trade down to get some extra picks. If we want one of those picks to be a next year first rounder that might give us a shot at next years top QB, we are going to have to drop more than 2-3 slots...

  • 1 more season1 1 more season wrote on last edited by
    #8

    It's nice that the Browns and their fans are so concerned about other teams and want to help them by trading down.

  • It's nice that the Browns and their fans are so concerned about other teams and want to help them by trading down.

    USFBrownU USFBrown wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @1-more-season said:

    It's nice that the Browns and their fans are so concerned about other teams and want to help them by trading down.

    That's been the Browns motto lately... Quantity over Quality.

  • When we pick, the odds are good Blackmon,Richardson, Clairborne, and Tannehill will be there, so really, every team in the league could have interest in moving up There is a WR, a RB, CB, and a QB. Everybody needs at least one of those positions.

    We have a trading history with Dallas and they might want Clairborne. I'd think that could be a potential landing spot if we in fact trade out of the pick.

    Here is how I see it. If we like Tannehill, we are selecting him at #4. If we decide to pass on him, we probably trade down to get some extra picks. If we want one of those picks to be a next year first rounder that might give us a shot at next years top QB, we are going to have to drop more than 2-3 slots...

    S SDBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @ballpeen said:

    When we pick, the odds are good Blackmon,Richardson, Clairborne, and Tannehill will be there, so really, every team in the league could have interest in moving up There is a WR, a RB, CB, and a QB. Everybody needs at least one of those positions.

    We have a trading history with Dallas and they might want Clairborne. I'd think that could be a potential landing spot if we in fact trade out of the pick.

    Here is how I see it. If we like Tannehill, we are selecting him at #4. If we decide to pass on him, we probably trade down to get some extra picks. If we want one of those picks to be a next year first rounder that might give us a shot at next years top QB, we are going to have to drop more than 2-3 slots...

    The Redskins didn't have two first round picks within the year and they traded up.

  • I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @harry-buffalo said:

    I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

  • I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #12

    @harry-buffalo said:

    I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

    HB, Gip,

    Did not address this directly earlier, but the problems I have with the above scenario are that:

    - any willingness to trade with a team, e.g., Miami, tells them we are not interested in the player that they are interested in, e.g., Tannehill; and

    - I don't think the Chiefs are interested in Tannehill; Matt Cassel seems to be their guy for at least one more season.

    Anyway my premise that the Viks will take Kalil, may not be true... and that would change everything.

    bleacherreport.com: why-the-browns-should-trade-down-if-the-vikings-pass-on-kalil

  • @harry-buffalo said:

    I don't see us trading back any farther than the 8th pick. We could scare Miami into thinking we are going to trade with the Chiefs or that we ourselves will take Tannehill, maybe drive up the price a bit and trade with them, or trade back to 6 or 7 to St. Louis and Jaq who are both interested in Blackmon and Claiborne.

    HB, Gip,

    Did not address this directly earlier, but the problems I have with the above scenario are that:

    - any willingness to trade with a team, e.g., Miami, tells them we are not interested in the player that they are interested in, e.g., Tannehill; and

    - I don't think the Chiefs are interested in Tannehill; Matt Cassel seems to be their guy for at least one more season.

    Anyway my premise that the Viks will take Kalil, may not be true... and that would change everything.

    bleacherreport.com: why-the-browns-should-trade-down-if-the-vikings-pass-on-kalil

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @tour2ma said:

    HB, Gip,

    Did not address this directly earlier, but the problems I have with the above scenario are that:

    - any willingness to trade with a team, e.g., Miami, tells them we are not interested in the player that they are interested in, e.g., Tannehill; and

    - I don't think the Chiefs are interested in Tannehill; Matt Cassel seems to be their guy for at least one more season.

    Anyway my premise that the Viks will take Kalil, may not be true... and that would change everything.

    What? Do you think the Vikes will take Tannehill, when they just picked up Ponder in the first round last year?

    My view is that the Browns believe that 3 players will be gone by their pick: Luck, RGIII and Kalil Gibran. I also think that they may be willing to take any one of 3 players: Claiborne, Blackmon, Richardson.

    If someone desperately wants Tannehill at #4, then I think the Browns will trade down to 6/7/8 if they can pick up another second rounder in doing so.

    The question is who do they deal with?

  • cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

  • Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

    1 more season1 1 more season wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @cambridgeho said:

    Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

    Yes, it would be crazy.

  • Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @cambridgeho said:

    Would it be to Crazy to trade with Carolina our 4 for there 9 And a 3 or 4th and also take Jimmy Clausen off thier hands, draft M. Floyd and then Doug Martin at 22. Im not saying that Clausen is going to be great but i think he could be better than Colt.

    Fuckabuncha Jimmy Clausen