The Official "account Limited" Thread
-
I'll bring the brownies (no pun intended)
Just make sure you put some "Weeden" in them.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
We had upgraded the $ystem here on March 22nd, and are as pissed off as the rest of you that there are problems these past 24hrs and a few times previous. I guess growth is good and should be embraced, but we have jumped up two full hosting plans to ensure that we had room for growth and to have the crashes, different in nature than last month, but crashes nevertheless - it's not being taken lightly here. We are working with the host on a fix. In October of 2010 we had over 1200+ on the site at one time, so to be told that a number lower than that crashed the site that is currently at a much higher plan and with unlimited measures in key areas such as bandwidth, isn't going over well.
Just know that it is being address.
-
Is the server company located in Pittsburgh by chance?
-
Please do something about the motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking plane.
At least 10 times it has bit my motherfucking ass.
-
Crossing my fingers for the forum to not shut down tonight. Hope all the cock smooches that never regularly post just stay off so I can actually get on. And yes Ghoolie that means I would prefer to see your shining face over about 30 other assholes that have populated this board over the past 24 hours.
-
Crossing my fingers for the forum to not shut down tonight. Hope all the cock smooches that never regularly post just stay off so I can actually get on. And yes Ghoolie that means I would prefer to see your shining face over about 30 other assholes that have populated this board over the past 24 hours.
Crossing my fingers for the forum to not shut down tonight. Hope all the cock smooches that never regularly post just stay off so I can actually get on. And yes Ghoolie that means I would prefer to see your shining face over about 30 other assholes that have populated this board over the past 24 hours.
This post is made of gold.
-
I'll bring the brownies (no pun intended)
Just make sure you put some "Weeden" in them.
Just make sure you put some "Weeden" in them.
seriously old man? didn't know you got down like that.
thought you were a gun toting member of the NRA and liked to shoot hippies?
-
Yesterday instead of account limited it just came up with a shit bunch of characters. Awesome job, web host.
-
Could be worse. Your recovery time was acceptable to me. Drinks and brownies on the house!!
-
it did it again just now. Are you guys any closer to resolving the issue?
-
It was down for like 20/30 mins earlier today...
-
Very annoying... right in the middle of trying to post...t.
-
Sorry we cannot do anything about it! Just an unbelievably high number of people on here right now. The server can only hold so much.
Sorry we cannot do anything about it! Just an unbelievably high number of people on here right now. The server can only hold so much.
Wrong. The script is obviously not optimized and if you had a dedicated server it wouldn't matter. We have 18 sites, 2 of them getting over 60,000 visits a day.
-
Sorry we cannot do anything about it! Just an unbelievably high number of people on here right now. The server can only hold so much.
Wrong. The script is obviously not optimized and if you had a dedicated server it wouldn't matter. We have 18 sites, 2 of them getting over 60,000 visits a day.
Wrong. The script is obviously not optimized and if you had a dedicated server it wouldn't matter. We have 18 sites, 2 of them getting over 60,000 visits a day.
Yes, this isn't any knock on Atenears- I know he's working on the problem. I'm no Internet Guru- but if you have a big enough server(s), doesn't matter how many people are on the site. Like how many people were on NFL.com at one time during the draft? A couple million?
-
Wrong. The script is obviously not optimized and if you had a dedicated server it wouldn't matter. We have 18 sites, 2 of them getting over 60,000 visits a day.
Yes, this isn't any knock on Atenears- I know he's working on the problem. I'm no Internet Guru- but if you have a big enough server(s), doesn't matter how many people are on the site. Like how many people were on NFL.com at one time during the draft? A couple million?
Yes, this isn't any knock on Atenears- I know he's working on the problem. I'm no Internet Guru- but if you have a big enough server(s), doesn't matter how many people are on the site. Like how many people were on NFL.com at one time during the draft? A couple million?
Dude I deal with it everyday. You just can't have a shared server for a site set up like this. There were better options of smaller scripted forums. Maybe putting up one ad on the site would pay for a dedicated host. I could be wrong, but we have a site with 63,000 visitors yesterday and runs as smooth as a baby's bottom.
I can see one thing for sure, if anyone is listening, the CSS should not be embedded at the page level. You need to call it externally so the cache can do it's job. I looked in one the posts page and there are 4417 lines of css in each page, UNHEARD of.
If you changed this you can use a shared server.
One other thing all the links are absolute, which means every time someone clicks a link it leaves the site and comes back to reload un-cached content.
I'll step off my soapbox.
Atenears, Cloud Flare
-
Yes, this isn't any knock on Atenears- I know he's working on the problem. I'm no Internet Guru- but if you have a big enough server(s), doesn't matter how many people are on the site. Like how many people were on NFL.com at one time during the draft? A couple million?
Dude I deal with it everyday. You just can't have a shared server for a site set up like this. There were better options of smaller scripted forums. Maybe putting up one ad on the site would pay for a dedicated host. I could be wrong, but we have a site with 63,000 visitors yesterday and runs as smooth as a baby's bottom.
I can see one thing for sure, if anyone is listening, the CSS should not be embedded at the page level. You need to call it externally so the cache can do it's job. I looked in one the posts page and there are 4417 lines of css in each page, UNHEARD of.
If you changed this you can use a shared server.
One other thing all the links are absolute, which means every time someone clicks a link it leaves the site and comes back to reload un-cached content.
I'll step off my soapbox.
Atenears, Cloud Flare
Dude I deal with it everyday. You just can't have a shared server for a site set up like this. There were better options of smaller scripted forums. Maybe putting up one ad on the site would pay for a dedicated host. I could be wrong, but we have a site with 63,000 visitors yesterday and runs as smooth as a baby's bottom.
I can see one thing for sure, if anyone is listening, the CSS should not be embedded at the page level. You need to call it externally so the cache can do it's job. I looked in one the posts page and there are 4417 lines of css in each page, UNHEARD of.
If you changed this you can use a shared server.
One other thing all the links are absolute, which means every time someone clicks a link it leaves the site and comes back to reload un-cached content.
I'll step off my soapbox.
Atenears, Cloud Flare
Step off your soapbox and pull out your wrench, Mr. Fixit.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login