Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Preseason Power Rankings

Preseason Power Rankings

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
46 Posts 22 Posters 2.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Silverback

    @choco said:

    Dude....i was enjoying reading this up until the point where you said....for the umpteenth time....that richardson is the #1 RB in the NFL.

    Florio's point was, who gives a shit even if Richardson is the #1 RB in the NFL. Where did that get the Vikings, the Jaguars, or the Titans the past few years? RB is a dime a dozen position, and why you don't waste a top 5 pick on one.

    sisky fringo sisky fringoS
    • 2k Posts
    • 96 Reputation
    sisky fringoS sisky fringo wrote on last edited by sisky fringo
    #20

    @silverback said:

    Florio's point was, who gives a shit even if Richardson is the #1 RB in the NFL. Where did that get the Vikings, the Jaguars, or the Titans the past few years? RB is a dime a dozen position, and why you don't waste a top 5 pick on one.

    florio was lazy and did piss poor homework. i think that was his (their) point(s).

    and if the DA/Quinn episode was a debacle i didn't see it. i thought our board saw more action regarding them in fact.

    florio sux, fuk him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
      • 57k Posts
      • 4k Reputation
      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
      #21

      @king-ghoolie-lives said:

      Gipper, all teh criticisms you make of our poor performance you could have said about the Browns team that Sipe took over.

      Yet, with the same exact team, just a change of QB, EVERYONE raised their level of play.

      Players play to the level that they believe in their QB. The diffeence between winning and losing in close competitions is passion.

      This is one we won't have to wait long to see a resolution to. I am that convinced that McCoy to Weeden, with the addition of Richardson, will make every difference in teh play of the rest of the team.

      Shurmur isn't the problem.

      Except, if you remember, coaching was a problem then also. When Sipe took over it also corresponded with when Rutigliano took over.

      So, to my view, it is an equal problem. Maybe a great QB can get this team to play better...maybe not if the coaching is lousy.

      I am hoping you are right....that Shurmur isn't the problem.....because we are stuck with him.

      I am hoping he is the reincarnation of Bill Walsh.

      But my reservation of judgment is well justified. And I believe nearly everyone here will agree with that.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • S Silverback

        @choco said:

        Dude....i was enjoying reading this up until the point where you said....for the umpteenth time....that richardson is the #1 RB in the NFL.

        Florio's point was, who gives a shit even if Richardson is the #1 RB in the NFL. Where did that get the Vikings, the Jaguars, or the Titans the past few years? RB is a dime a dozen position, and why you don't waste a top 5 pick on one.

        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
        • 57k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
        #22

        @silverback said:

        Florio's point was, who gives a shit even if Richardson is the #1 RB in the NFL. Where did that get the Vikings, the Jaguars, or the Titans the past few years? RB is a dime a dozen position, and why you don't waste a top 5 pick on one.

        OK, you make a certain point. A good RB cannot make a team good. But, not having a good RB can make a team bad.

        I also think with the Vikings/Jags/Titans several other components of those teams fell off to cause their records to fall off. Like their defenses etc.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • WRREBEL WRREBELW
          • 2k Posts
          • 87 Reputation
          WRREBELW WRREBEL wrote on last edited by
          #23

          Starting to all make sense, today is the day Marty mcfly arrived to the future

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • The Cysko Kid T Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
            • 15k Posts
            • 2k Reputation
            T The Cysko Kid wrote on last edited by
            #24

            No its not. Marty mcfly arrived in the future in 2015.

            Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind...
            The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • T The Cysko Kid

              No its not. Marty mcfly arrived in the future in 2015.

              The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
              • 57k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
              #25

              @the-cysko-kid said:

              No its not. Marty mcfly arrived in the future in 2015.

              Yea, it was 2015.

              So, we have 3 years for science and technology to deliver on holographic movies, hoverboards, flying cars, and Mr. Fusion.

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Represent R
                • 523 Posts
                • 24 Reputation
                R Represent wrote on last edited by
                #26

                The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                In Cleveland failure is an artform.
                USFBrownU chocoC 2 Replies Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • R Represent

                  The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                  Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                  USFBrown USFBrownU Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 2k Posts
                  • 270 Reputation
                  USFBrownU USFBrown wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  @represent said:

                  The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                  Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                  When you are that far at the bottom of the barrel, does it really matter exactly how deep? All those teams, including the Browns, are terrible in their own special way. Maybe this year will prove different. I certainly hope so.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • Zombo Z
                    • 8k Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    I LIKE being ranked #32. I want the lowest expectations possible, because they don't mean a thing. And I want the players to be driven.

                    The media doesn't put a lot of thought into this. We've got a historically bad (recent history) 4-12 team that ended the season on a long losing streak had no free agent splash and is starting a rookie QB ... Boom! #32

                    Doesn't mean a fucking thing.

                    I remember the 80's when both the Browns and the Indians were on the cover of Sports Illustrated as the favorites to win it all in the same year ... The Browns lost in excruciatingly heartbreaking fashion and the Indians lost 100 games.

                    Pick me last so I can embarrass 31 different teams on my way to the top.

                    indians-sports-illustrated-1987.jpg

                    bernie-kosar-cleveland-browns.jpg

                    Zombo

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • R Represent

                      The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                      Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                      choco chocoC
                      • 4k Posts
                      • 352 Reputation
                      chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      @represent said:

                      The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                      Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                      2 things....

                      one.....that top 10 D wasn't tested, and only top 10 because we were giving up 200 yards rushing and 100 passing.....or more specifically, teams had us beat at halftime because we couldn't score. there is a correlation, but this isn't to say the pass D is a complete myth. we held team to a low number of yards, in part to teams not needing to score on us. considering the list of poor passers we played last year, i think youre a bit overboard in considering our D top 10. if you dig deeper into the ranking stats, our D is good in some areas and weak in others.

                      you cant argue we improved more....because those players youre evaluating haven't played yet. the jags got blackmon, skins rgiii, colts luck.......so just how are you quantifying you anger? youre really saying we SHOULD improve more based on how our rookies SHOULD preform.....but lets not be foolish enough to assume that what exists on paper exists in reality. what if weedz is DA bad? obviously, we all have the O&B glasses on and dont wanna consider that....but its certainly a possibility.

                      much like you thought we were a guaranteed 11-5 team last year.....and emotional prediction. we overhauled the offense in a single year....yes.....with rookies. if youre expecting this offense to take the league by storm, then youre simply making the same mistake you made last year. keep it realistic....theyre gonna struggle, theyre gonna make some great plays, it'll be a rollercoaster season by all indications. 3 rookies at 3 key positions....not exactly a guaranteed successful formula.

                      R BrownsBacker85B 2 Replies Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                        • 57k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
                        #30

                        If you all recall, I too go by a certain method of "Power Rankings".....called The Standings.

                        You are what your record is, no more, no less. When this team starts playing games, then we can talk about where they rate by looking at the records.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • G Gafreleets

                          @king-ghoolie-lives said:

                          The Browns will make a run at a playoff spot, and sweep the Steelers.

                          why are you guys so in love with the Steelers? seriously....we weren't even the division champs last year. worry about putting together a winning season, because you managed to put up the 4th worst record in the NFL and it's odd that the main priority of browns fans is beating the Steelers (finally).

                          slimdawg slimdawgS
                          • 541 Posts
                          • 49 Reputation
                          slimdawgS slimdawg wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          @gafreleets said:

                          why are you guys so in love with the Steelers? seriously....we weren't even the division champs last year. worry about putting together a winning season, because you managed to put up the 4th worst record in the NFL and it's odd that the main priority of browns fans is beating the Steelers (finally).

                          WTF?!?!? do you and your troll buddies get text messages sent to you as soon as somebody types in the word steelers on the brownsboard? Or do you seriously troll that much in here?

                          !!!!hopefully i'll be alive when it happens!!!!
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • chocoC choco

                            @represent said:

                            The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                            Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                            2 things....

                            one.....that top 10 D wasn't tested, and only top 10 because we were giving up 200 yards rushing and 100 passing.....or more specifically, teams had us beat at halftime because we couldn't score. there is a correlation, but this isn't to say the pass D is a complete myth. we held team to a low number of yards, in part to teams not needing to score on us. considering the list of poor passers we played last year, i think youre a bit overboard in considering our D top 10. if you dig deeper into the ranking stats, our D is good in some areas and weak in others.

                            you cant argue we improved more....because those players youre evaluating haven't played yet. the jags got blackmon, skins rgiii, colts luck.......so just how are you quantifying you anger? youre really saying we SHOULD improve more based on how our rookies SHOULD preform.....but lets not be foolish enough to assume that what exists on paper exists in reality. what if weedz is DA bad? obviously, we all have the O&B glasses on and dont wanna consider that....but its certainly a possibility.

                            much like you thought we were a guaranteed 11-5 team last year.....and emotional prediction. we overhauled the offense in a single year....yes.....with rookies. if youre expecting this offense to take the league by storm, then youre simply making the same mistake you made last year. keep it realistic....theyre gonna struggle, theyre gonna make some great plays, it'll be a rollercoaster season by all indications. 3 rookies at 3 key positions....not exactly a guaranteed successful formula.

                            Represent R
                            • 523 Posts
                            • 24 Reputation
                            R Represent wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            @choco said:

                            2 things....

                            one.....that top 10 D wasn't tested, and only top 10 because we were giving up 200 yards rushing and 100 passing.....or more specifically, teams had us beat at halftime because we couldn't score. there is a correlation, but this isn't to say the pass D is a complete myth. we held team to a low number of yards, in part to teams not needing to score on us. considering the list of poor passers we played last year, i think youre a bit overboard in considering our D top 10. if you dig deeper into the ranking stats, our D is good in some areas and weak in others.

                            you cant argue we improved more....because those players youre evaluating haven't played yet. the jags got blackmon, skins rgiii, colts luck.......so just how are you quantifying you anger? youre really saying we SHOULD improve more based on how our rookies SHOULD preform.....but lets not be foolish enough to assume that what exists on paper exists in reality. what if weedz is DA bad? obviously, we all have the O&B glasses on and dont wanna consider that....but its certainly a possibility.

                            much like you thought we were a guaranteed 11-5 team last year.....and emotional prediction. we overhauled the offense in a single year....yes.....with rookies. if youre expecting this offense to take the league by storm, then youre simply making the same mistake you made last year. keep it realistic....theyre gonna struggle, theyre gonna make some great plays, it'll be a rollercoaster season by all indications. 3 rookies at 3 key positions....not exactly a guaranteed successful formula.

                            2 things for forums trolls though you got me to respond which makes you good at what you do.

                            1. You don't know how to fact check to well since threads and post are time stamped, but i am not sure you would understand that concept so it's a mute point.

                            2. I clearly VERY CLEARLY stated we couldn't be ranked 32nd based on our defense alone, nothing about our rookies performing well "stop making up shit in ya mind".

                            The Browns will be better this year book it poser.... Read it, time stamp it, save this thread for the dickhead the Cleveland Browns will win 10 or more games this year. YA i fucking said it i believe my team to be better than what you believe they will be.

                            In Cleveland failure is an artform.
                            miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • choco chocoC
                              • 4k Posts
                              • 352 Reputation
                              chocoC choco wrote on last edited by choco
                              #33

                              Only 10 wins? Sure you dont wanna go 13 or 14?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • chocoC choco

                                @represent said:

                                The Browns defense held up last year for its schemes and was in the top 5 for along time and a def top 10 easily, to have the browns dead last at 32 based on our defensive ratings and play last year i don't wanna read your preseason ratings.

                                Browns realistically could be 22-24 atm buw not dead fucking last. You don't gotta bring up the Jags, Dolphins, Rams, Cardinals, Vikings, Colts, Redskins, and Bucs each of those teams i could argue did not improve as much as the Browns did in post draft/fa/S.draft.

                                2 things....

                                one.....that top 10 D wasn't tested, and only top 10 because we were giving up 200 yards rushing and 100 passing.....or more specifically, teams had us beat at halftime because we couldn't score. there is a correlation, but this isn't to say the pass D is a complete myth. we held team to a low number of yards, in part to teams not needing to score on us. considering the list of poor passers we played last year, i think youre a bit overboard in considering our D top 10. if you dig deeper into the ranking stats, our D is good in some areas and weak in others.

                                you cant argue we improved more....because those players youre evaluating haven't played yet. the jags got blackmon, skins rgiii, colts luck.......so just how are you quantifying you anger? youre really saying we SHOULD improve more based on how our rookies SHOULD preform.....but lets not be foolish enough to assume that what exists on paper exists in reality. what if weedz is DA bad? obviously, we all have the O&B glasses on and dont wanna consider that....but its certainly a possibility.

                                much like you thought we were a guaranteed 11-5 team last year.....and emotional prediction. we overhauled the offense in a single year....yes.....with rookies. if youre expecting this offense to take the league by storm, then youre simply making the same mistake you made last year. keep it realistic....theyre gonna struggle, theyre gonna make some great plays, it'll be a rollercoaster season by all indications. 3 rookies at 3 key positions....not exactly a guaranteed successful formula.

                                BrownsBacker85 BrownsBacker85B
                                • 120 Posts
                                • 1 Reputation
                                BrownsBacker85B BrownsBacker85 wrote on last edited by
                                #34

                                @choco said:

                                2 things....

                                one.....that top 10 D wasn't tested, and only top 10 because we were giving up 200 yards rushing and 100 passing.....or more specifically, teams had us beat at halftime because we couldn't score. there is a correlation, but this isn't to say the pass D is a complete myth. we held team to a low number of yards, in part to teams not needing to score on us. considering the list of poor passers we played last year, i think youre a bit overboard in considering our D top 10. if you dig deeper into the ranking stats, our D is good in some areas and weak in others.

                                you cant argue we improved more....because those players youre evaluating haven't played yet. the jags got blackmon, skins rgiii, colts luck.......so just how are you quantifying you anger? youre really saying we SHOULD improve more based on how our rookies SHOULD preform.....but lets not be foolish enough to assume that what exists on paper exists in reality. what if weedz is DA bad? obviously, we all have the O&B glasses on and dont wanna consider that....but its certainly a possibility.

                                much like you thought we were a guaranteed 11-5 team last year.....and emotional prediction. we overhauled the offense in a single year....yes.....with rookies. if youre expecting this offense to take the league by storm, then youre simply making the same mistake you made last year. keep it realistic....theyre gonna struggle, theyre gonna make some great plays, it'll be a rollercoaster season by all indications. 3 rookies at 3 key positions....not exactly a guaranteed successful formula.

                                5th in points scored aginst....that is all that matters to me.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • G Gafreleets

                                  @king-ghoolie-lives said:

                                  The Browns will make a run at a playoff spot, and sweep the Steelers.

                                  why are you guys so in love with the Steelers? seriously....we weren't even the division champs last year. worry about putting together a winning season, because you managed to put up the 4th worst record in the NFL and it's odd that the main priority of browns fans is beating the Steelers (finally).

                                  VaporTrail VaporTrailV Dedicated Reacting Well Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                  • 6k Posts
                                  • 1k Reputation
                                  VaporTrailV VaporTrail wrote on last edited by VaporTrail
                                  #35

                                  @gafreleets said:

                                  why are you guys so in love with the Steelers? seriously....we weren't even the division champs last year. worry about putting together a winning season, because you managed to put up the 4th worst record in the NFL and it's odd that the main priority of browns fans is beating the Steelers (finally).

                                  Maybe because the Steelers franchise model is something that is and should be respected? How often do you guys make the playoffs? How many Super Bowls have you been to in the last decade? How many have you won? The Ravens may have won the division, but in my opinion, the franchise is not quite at the dominant level that the Steelers have been for years. I know you're a troll, but this shouldn't surprise you.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • R Represent

                                    @choco said:

                                    2 things....

                                    one.....that top 10 D wasn't tested, and only top 10 because we were giving up 200 yards rushing and 100 passing.....or more specifically, teams had us beat at halftime because we couldn't score. there is a correlation, but this isn't to say the pass D is a complete myth. we held team to a low number of yards, in part to teams not needing to score on us. considering the list of poor passers we played last year, i think youre a bit overboard in considering our D top 10. if you dig deeper into the ranking stats, our D is good in some areas and weak in others.

                                    you cant argue we improved more....because those players youre evaluating haven't played yet. the jags got blackmon, skins rgiii, colts luck.......so just how are you quantifying you anger? youre really saying we SHOULD improve more based on how our rookies SHOULD preform.....but lets not be foolish enough to assume that what exists on paper exists in reality. what if weedz is DA bad? obviously, we all have the O&B glasses on and dont wanna consider that....but its certainly a possibility.

                                    much like you thought we were a guaranteed 11-5 team last year.....and emotional prediction. we overhauled the offense in a single year....yes.....with rookies. if youre expecting this offense to take the league by storm, then youre simply making the same mistake you made last year. keep it realistic....theyre gonna struggle, theyre gonna make some great plays, it'll be a rollercoaster season by all indications. 3 rookies at 3 key positions....not exactly a guaranteed successful formula.

                                    2 things for forums trolls though you got me to respond which makes you good at what you do.

                                    1. You don't know how to fact check to well since threads and post are time stamped, but i am not sure you would understand that concept so it's a mute point.

                                    2. I clearly VERY CLEARLY stated we couldn't be ranked 32nd based on our defense alone, nothing about our rookies performing well "stop making up shit in ya mind".

                                    The Browns will be better this year book it poser.... Read it, time stamp it, save this thread for the dickhead the Cleveland Browns will win 10 or more games this year. YA i fucking said it i believe my team to be better than what you believe they will be.

                                    miktoxic miktoxicM
                                    • 13k Posts
                                    • 1k Reputation
                                    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
                                    #36

                                    @represent said:

                                    2 things for forums trolls though you got me to respond which makes you good at what you do.

                                    1. You don't know how to fact check to well since threads and post are time stamped, but i am not sure you would understand that concept so it's a mute point.

                                    2. I clearly VERY CLEARLY stated we couldn't be ranked 32nd based on our defense alone, nothing about our rookies performing well "stop making up shit in ya mind".

                                    The Browns will be better this year book it poser.... Read it, time stamp it, save this thread for the dickhead the Cleveland Browns will win 10 or more games this year. YA i fucking said it i believe my team to be better than what you believe they will be.

                                    our defense will be better this year? really? without one of our best DLmen? you are high.

                                    we had a weaker schedule last year and only won 4 fucking games. you must 'represent' dumbasses. we'll be lucky to win 7 games and that's all dependent on the play of our highly touted strong armed old rookie qb and if TR was worth the 3rd pick and future picks. they ain't seen nothing in their past that can get them ready for our division foe's defenses.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • Unsympathetic U Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 4k Posts
                                      • 1k Reputation
                                      U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
                                      #37

                                      The Browns offense has improved greatly. Whether or not that improvement will translate to our W/L record remains to be seen.

                                      I like using next year's second on Gordon: the only way we'd get a better WR is to use our #1 next year on this position for Keenan Allen or Robert Woods. So with that 2013 first-round pick we're free to take one of the DE's to pair with Sheard.

                                      I also think Trevin Wade will earn playing time this year at slot CB.

                                      The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
                                      miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • U Unsympathetic

                                        The Browns offense has improved greatly. Whether or not that improvement will translate to our W/L record remains to be seen.

                                        I like using next year's second on Gordon: the only way we'd get a better WR is to use our #1 next year on this position for Keenan Allen or Robert Woods. So with that 2013 first-round pick we're free to take one of the DE's to pair with Sheard.

                                        I also think Trevin Wade will earn playing time this year at slot CB.

                                        miktoxic miktoxicM
                                        • 13k Posts
                                        • 1k Reputation
                                        miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by miktoxic
                                        #38

                                        @unsympathetic said:

                                        The Browns offense has improved greatly.

                                        on paper we have. we added the number one RB prospect in the draft, the 4th best QB prospect, a RG and who else?

                                        so i guess little is our #1 receiver? then momass. then who? noone else has done diddly squat. our FB is a question mark. our tight ends (besides watson) are suspect,

                                        sure our left side of the OL is great but adding three players does not make a team.

                                        we'll be lucky to win 6 games but i'm leaning more towards 5.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • PoeticG PoeticGP Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                          • 4k Posts
                                          • 658 Reputation
                                          PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on last edited by
                                          #39

                                          Brandon Weeden

                                          Colt McCoy

                                          Joe Thomas

                                          Jason Pinkston

                                          Alex Mack

                                          Ryan Miller

                                          Mitchell Schwartz

                                          Shawn Lavao

                                          Ben Watson

                                          Evan Moore

                                          Jordan Cameron

                                          Trent Richardson

                                          Brandon Jackson

                                          Montario Hardesty

                                          Brad Smelley

                                          Greg Little

                                          Josh Cribbs

                                          Josh Gordon

                                          Mohammed Massaquoi

                                          Carlton Mitchell

                                          Travis Benjamin

                                          I've got my money on these 21 players to figure it out. I see a lot of potential and firepower in this group. I think this offense matches up very well with just about any offense in the league IMO.

                                          With Brandon and Colt we've got ourselves a good problem. If Weeden struggles then Colt can step in and take the load and allow Weeden to learn. In our Line I see a WALL ||||| In our runningbacks I'm interested in who will be backing up Richardson, as I'm sure Trent will storm the league and cause MASS SHOCK AND AWE! I love our group of TEs! I really, really like our young WRs, I'm so glad that we decided to forgo the veterans and build with potential young superstars. This group plus Smelley puts our offense in as a VERY young group that will grow together and gell in time to be a dominating force for years to come.

                                          The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain-
                                          miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate