Holmgren To Be Removed
-
well Holmgren probably was the most useless person of all time... The biggest waste of money I have seen. He will never get another front office job...
I am very excited for the new owner. Looks like some one who cares and actually give a shit!
well Holmgren probably was the most useless person of all time... The biggest waste of money I have seen. He will never get another front office job...
I am very excited for the new owner. Looks like some one who cares and actually give a shit!
Actually in that picture Haslam looks like a Marine Officer who isn't going to put up with any BS.
-
I rode the elevator at CBS with jowl face Holmgren and his wife b4 St Louis cluster fcuk last November. He had the look of a beaten man
(although she wasn't bad to look at). No surprise to see him hit the trail.
Congratulations Banner!!!! Enjoy all that crazy loot!
-
This made my day. Walrus, Shurmur, and Heckler... may your lack of production and may the end of a dead beat, status quo Browns regime bid you farewell. Until now, the Browns FO was run like the government, full of a bunch of do-nothings who only cared about their paycheck. Now, the organization will run like a well tuned corporation, full of people who still want a paycheck (of course) but strive for bigger and better. Love it
-
This is old new it's just now made official I guess.
It was reported a long time ago Banner would be coming in with a top executive position.
Holmren's tombstone was written when Haslam made sure Lerner was responsible to pay out the remainder of his contract.
As for Shurmur and Heckert idk, but everything I've heard about Hecker and Banner in Philly is that they'd butt heads a lot.
-
Also heard that Haslam has hired someone from Pepsi Co. to run his truck stops. Something changed his mind in the last five weeks to make him want to take control of what is going on here in Cleveland. For me, this sounds like a great thing. Shurmur will be gone and we will get someone in here who will take full advantage of the talent we have... let's at least hope so. A great point people are making is that when you look at Washington, they have adopted an offense around RG3. But here in Cleveland, the idiots try and cram a completely new offense down the throat of Weeden and everyone else.
These offenses are working in College, why are there bull headed guys in the NFL that don't see that?
-
Also heard that Haslam has hired someone from Pepsi Co. to run his truck stops. Something changed his mind in the last five weeks to make him want to take control of what is going on here in Cleveland. For me, this sounds like a great thing. Shurmur will be gone and we will get someone in here who will take full advantage of the talent we have... let's at least hope so. A great point people are making is that when you look at Washington, they have adopted an offense around RG3. But here in Cleveland, the idiots try and cram a completely new offense down the throat of Weeden and everyone else.
These offenses are working in College, why are there bull headed guys in the NFL that don't see that?
Also heard that Haslam has hired someone from Pepsi Co. to run his truck stops. Something changed his mind in the last five weeks to make him want to take control of what is going on here in Cleveland. For me, this sounds like a great thing. Shurmur will be gone and we will get someone in here who will take full advantage of the talent we have... let's at least hope so. A great point people are making is that when you look at Washington, they have adopted an offense around RG3. But here in Cleveland, the idiots try and cram a completely new offense down the throat of Weeden and everyone else.
These offenses are working in College, why are there bull headed guys in the NFL that don't see that?
But we need to implement the West Coast Offense. Dont you know that is the only way to win games. Seriously though, If they had adapted to a players strength then Colt might have been a half decent QB. I'm pretty sure you can design plays which take advantage of his mobility and relatively lower arm strength. Is is any wonder that the best year that Colt had as a Brown was under Eric Mangini in his final year where they were forced to play to win and not to implement an archaic system?
-
Great News
HE CAN'T DO ANY WORSE
Oh sure he can......
But as long as he doesn't bring in a POS like Michael Vick, fine.
That might not have been done under his watch in Philly anyway.
WSS
-
When Banner comes in he is going to have ZERO control over the roster, just like he did in Philly. The signing and starting of Vick was Reids choice and his alone. Rather Banner is going to be in charge of the finances (Player/Coach/Front Office) like he did in Philly. He will have the power to hire/fire (I think) but not to cut players or pull rank to pick who he wants. I think what it comes down to is he has de facto power. Heckert says he wants to sign player A and Banner tells him fine but he can only offer player A X amount of money.
-
When Banner comes in he is going to have ZERO control over the roster, just like he did in Philly. The signing and starting of Vick was Reids choice and his alone. Rather Banner is going to be in charge of the finances (Player/Coach/Front Office) like he did in Philly. He will have the power to hire/fire (I think) but not to cut players or pull rank to pick who he wants. I think what it comes down to is he has de facto power. Heckert says he wants to sign player A and Banner tells him fine but he can only offer player A X amount of money.
When Banner comes in he is going to have ZERO control over the roster, just like he did in Philly. The signing and starting of Vick was Reids choice and his alone. Rather Banner is going to be in charge of the finances (Player/Coach/Front Office) like he did in Philly. He will have the power to hire/fire (I think) but not to cut players or pull rank to pick who he wants. I think what it comes down to is he has de facto power. Heckert says he wants to sign player A and Banner tells him fine but he can only offer player A X amount of money.
We'll see if he has those limitations. I know that is how it was in Philly, but in the end Jimmy is going to decide who has what say and how much say.
Until he has official control of the club and starts making official announcements, it's only conjecture as to what will happen.
-
Formerly Sane said:
It was such a short time ago that most of you here thought I was just a troll when I said that Holmgren had very limited qualifications to be the head honcho.....and he got fired from that gig too!
It looks like it won't matter much as it's odds on he's going to get fired again. The McCoy & Weeden picks are all on Mike. BW is going to have to improve 1,000% to make it look like Holmie didn't screw up twice.
-
Formerly Sane said:
It was such a short time ago that most of you here thought I was just a troll when I said that Holmgren had very limited qualifications to be the head honcho.....and he got fired from that gig too!
It looks like it won't matter much as it's odds on he's going to get fired again. The McCoy & Weeden picks are all on Mike. BW is going to have to improve 1,000% to make it look like Holmie didn't screw up twice.
It looks like it won't matter much as it's odds on he's going to get fired again. The McCoy & Weeden picks are all on Mike. BW is going to have to improve 1,000% to make it look like Holmie didn't screw up twice.
I agree with that....and I was in favor of Weeden over Colt.
I still am and will be, but that doesn't mean I won't be in favor of replacing both of them if we continue to look like a bad HS team out there.
-
It looks like it won't matter much as it's odds on he's going to get fired again. The McCoy & Weeden picks are all on Mike. BW is going to have to improve 1,000% to make it look like Holmie didn't screw up twice.
I agree with that....and I was in favor of Weeden over Colt.
I still am and will be, but that doesn't mean I won't be in favor of replacing both of them if we continue to look like a bad HS team out there.
I agree with that....and I was in favor of Weeden over Colt.
I still am and will be, but that doesn't mean I won't be in favor of replacing both of them if we continue to look like a bad HS team out there.
Before replacing the QB's I would first replace the HC and OC and see if we get better.
-
Formerly Sane said:
It was such a short time ago that most of you here thought I was just a troll when I said that Holmgren had very limited qualifications to be the head honcho.....and he got fired from that gig too!
If Holmgren is removed it probably won't be because JH didn't think he was qualified, but because he wants to bring in his guy.
-
Well Holmgren is 9-24 so far in his tenure.
With an Offense and Run Defense that will probably be ranked towards the bottom of the league again.
How many years can we say "Well let's see if this draft pick pans out" ?
I think firing Holmgren based on performance alone is justified, remember he was made to step down as GM in Seattle.
-
Let the house cleaning begin!!!!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
