Skip to content

Art Modell

The Browns Board
192 49 10.6k
  • @fairhooker11 said:

    count me as one among those here who think we should just let this go, and not feed the hate machine that is all things Modell. The family requests that we dont offer any memorials today

    for the fear (Im sure) of the negative reaction.. CMON is that how we want to be thought of? well its too late... we will be seen as classless bunch because we havent learned to move on... sheesh

    SO yes we had our hearts ripped out with the move... Show a BIGGER heart to prove that we are

    over it and give the man the respect as a guy like the rest of us who loved football.

    I really can't stand this "Be the bigger man" mentality. Yeah, your feelings are hurt, "just rise above it. Just pretend it doesn't hurt. It'll just go away."

    Bottling your emotion isn't healthy. Being pressured by the NFL to pay respects to a guy who screwed us is something I find completely demeaning and disrespectful to myself and the city. It's a false show of emotion, and it just goes to show you that the NFL and ESPN care more about political correctness than, you know, being honest. The national media would have made us out to be assholes like they always do (remember the kid getting tackled, remember people burning lebron jerseys?). To hell with being the bigger man and to hell with the national media. I don't have to respect the guy because he's dead, now. Pretending that you have respect for someone you don't is NOT a healthy way of dealing with your pent up anger.

    @vaportrail said:

    I really can't stand this "Be the bigger man" mentality. Yeah, your feelings are hurt, "just rise above it. Just pretend it doesn't hurt. It'll just go away."

    Bottling your emotion isn't healthy. Being pressured by the NFL to pay respects to a guy who screwed us is something I find completely demeaning and disrespectful to myself and the city. It's a false show of emotion, and it just goes to show you that the NFL and ESPN care more about political correctness than, you know, being honest. The national media would have made us out to be assholes like they always do (remember the kid getting tackled, remember people burning lebron jerseys?). To hell with being the bigger man and to hell with the national media. I don't have to respect the guy because he's dead, now. Pretending that you have respect for someone you don't is NOT a healthy way of dealing with your pent up anger.

    Seriously, Cleveland should have "honored" Modell with a moment of booing? So touching that pregame tribute to ART on MNF. NOT. So go toss Bob Irsay's photo up on the Jumbotron in Baltimore, and see the kind of reaction you get. I'll honor Modell when Baltimore honors Irsay. Simple as that.

  • Formerly Sane said:

    Just as I thought, you made it up.

    I gave you a source, the USA Today....or try the Baltimore Sun, the New York Times, NFL.com, Cleveland Plain Dealer, Wall Street Journal...and every other paper or sports new information source in the country.

    Try Google.

    It is common knowledge. The fact that you don't know it proves either that you are 12 years old or that you never watched football for the past 20 years.

    Based on some of your replies to other matters I am beginning to think you haven't paid any attention at all.

    Not that you should pay any attention to the annals of Art Modell. Just don't question others who have when they give you the facts.

  • @king-ghoolie-lives said:

    HE drafted Jim Brown, Greg Pruitt, Gary Collins, Warfield, Kosar, sipe and Eric Turner to mention a few. He was a hell of a lot better than Ass hat Mike Brown

    He didn't draft Jim Brown.

    Zombo

    --but he had a lot to do with his retirement.

  • @king-ghoolie-lives said:

    HE drafted Jim Brown, Greg Pruitt, Gary Collins, Warfield, Kosar, sipe and Eric Turner to mention a few. He was a hell of a lot better than Ass hat Mike Brown

    He didn't draft JB. JB was here before Modell. Drafted 1957. Modell didn't buy til 1960 And I don't think under any circumstances Art made any of the decisions on the draft choices. Sipe was a 17th rounder. Art was probably asleep when that choice was made. I know that Ernie Accorsi was responsible for the Kosar acquisition...maybe a few others.

    I also suspect the Browns had some kind of GM in place that made most of those choices.

    I mean, if you want to give him credit for the good, then you have to give him credit for the bad, like Steve Holden, Mike Junkin, Clifford Charlton, Craig Powell, Willis Adams, etc. etc. etc.

    More busts perhaps than hits.

  • Formerly Sane said:

    Just as I thought, you made it up.

    I actually found a couple of articles, posted above but none stated that he pocketed $75 million.

  • hell with schmodell. Literally. Close the thread already?

  • Gipper I can't find any source that claims he was drubbed out of the NFL by the other owners. For what its worth. Why would the NFL mandate all thirty two teams do a tribute to a guy they ran out of the league?

  • The version that I've read was the Gateway money was County but he turned it down thinking that he wouldn't lose as much revenue as he did when the Indians moved. After losing millions when the Indians relocated he then went to the City and asked for $100 million plus to renovate. Then Baltimore offered him a new stadium and he bolted. I can't find this "inducement" payment that you're talking about.

    I did find this article where he chipped in $24 million of his own money to fund the stadium.

    http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/1996/02/22/Facilities-Venues/MODELL-AGREES-TO-CHIP-IN-$24M-FOR-BALTIMORE-STADIUM.aspx?hl=Finance&sc=0

    I did find this

    http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2012/09/when_art_modell_moved_his_clev.html

    But the $75 million was in part a training facility and for other team expenses, that doesn't suggest it was his to do with as he pleased.

    I guess if my options were to have a renovated Cleveland Municipal Stadium or a brand spanking new $200 million facility, I'd choose the later. I've never read that the City or County was willing to build a new stadium that's why I don't hold the move against him. Even if I believed the worst I still wouldn't be upset at a business owner taking more money, cause that's what they do.

    @baconhound said:

    The version that I've read was the Gateway money was County but he turned it down thinking that he wouldn't lose as much revenue as he did when the Indians moved. After losing millions when the Indians relocated he then went to the City and asked for $100 million plus to renovate. Then Baltimore offered him a new stadium and he bolted.

    That is sort of correct.

    If you'd like to learn about this topic, then a must read is: Fumble! The Browns, Modell and the Move An Insider's Story. The book was written by Michael Poplar who was the Vice President/Treasurer of the Cleveland Stadium Corporation from 1975 to 1996. It is a 330 page fact based book that walks through much of the history of Modell's contributions to the city and his screw-ups. Regarding the stadium renovation, the politics at that time simply wasn't going to let that happen until Modell was bled dry.

    Here is a small excerpt:

    One proposal to raise money for the renovation was to extend the sin tax. The term of the original sin tax, passed to raise $117 million for Gateway, was for 15 years, 1990 to 2005. The new suggestion was to extend the tax beyond 2006 to raise whatever amount was needed. A serious question was raised, however: If the money wouldn't be received until 2006, how would the contractors be paid during their work period from 1997-1999. The answer? A loan from the State of Ohio.

    A senior vice-president from McDonald & Co. said that financing this way would lead to a problem. The county could end up paying so much interest that less than $30 million would be available to pay construction costs out of a $100 million bond issue. "Because of the delayed revenue stream, resulting in a diminished revenue stream, the sin tax extension is not an efficient way to raise the amount of dollars that is involved here," he advised the mayor's task force. The city, however, did not heed this advice but announced it would place the extension on the November 7, 1995 ballot.

    The sin tax extension was a mirage, an illusion. It was nothing more than political posturing. By the way, at the time the county was also trying to solve the problem of Gateway going $28 million over budget. Also by the way, renovation estimates at the time grew from $154 million to $172 million.

    Get the book.

  • Gipper I can't find any source that claims he was drubbed out of the NFL by the other owners. For what its worth. Why would the NFL mandate all thirty two teams do a tribute to a guy they ran out of the league?

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    Gipper I can't find any source that claims he was drubbed out of the NFL by the other owners. For what its worth. Why would the NFL mandate all thirty two teams do a tribute to a guy they ran out of the league?

    I don't know where he heard he was kicked out of NFL. Never happened.

  • @baconhound said:

    The version that I've read was the Gateway money was County but he turned it down thinking that he wouldn't lose as much revenue as he did when the Indians moved. After losing millions when the Indians relocated he then went to the City and asked for $100 million plus to renovate. Then Baltimore offered him a new stadium and he bolted.

    That is sort of correct.

    If you'd like to learn about this topic, then a must read is: Fumble! The Browns, Modell and the Move An Insider's Story. The book was written by Michael Poplar who was the Vice President/Treasurer of the Cleveland Stadium Corporation from 1975 to 1996. It is a 330 page fact based book that walks through much of the history of Modell's contributions to the city and his screw-ups. Regarding the stadium renovation, the politics at that time simply wasn't going to let that happen until Modell was bled dry.

    Here is a small excerpt:

    One proposal to raise money for the renovation was to extend the sin tax. The term of the original sin tax, passed to raise $117 million for Gateway, was for 15 years, 1990 to 2005. The new suggestion was to extend the tax beyond 2006 to raise whatever amount was needed. A serious question was raised, however: If the money wouldn't be received until 2006, how would the contractors be paid during their work period from 1997-1999. The answer? A loan from the State of Ohio.

    A senior vice-president from McDonald & Co. said that financing this way would lead to a problem. The county could end up paying so much interest that less than $30 million would be available to pay construction costs out of a $100 million bond issue. "Because of the delayed revenue stream, resulting in a diminished revenue stream, the sin tax extension is not an efficient way to raise the amount of dollars that is involved here," he advised the mayor's task force. The city, however, did not heed this advice but announced it would place the extension on the November 7, 1995 ballot.

    The sin tax extension was a mirage, an illusion. It was nothing more than political posturing. By the way, at the time the county was also trying to solve the problem of Gateway going $28 million over budget. Also by the way, renovation estimates at the time grew from $154 million to $172 million.

    Get the book.

    @roach said:

    That is sort of correct.

    If you'd like to learn about this topic, then a must read is: Fumble! The Browns, Modell and the Move An Insider's Story. The book was written by Michael Poplar who was the Vice President/Treasurer of the Cleveland Stadium Corporation from 1975 to 1996. It is a 330 page fact based book that walks through much of the history of Modell's contributions to the city and his screw-ups. Regarding the stadium renovation, the politics at that time simply wasn't going to let that happen until Modell was bled dry.

    Here is a small excerpt:

    One proposal to raise money for the renovation was to extend the sin tax. The term of the original sin tax, passed to raise $117 million for Gateway, was for 15 years, 1990 to 2005. The new suggestion was to extend the tax beyond 2006 to raise whatever amount was needed. A serious question was raised, however: If the money wouldn't be received until 2006, how would the contractors be paid during their work period from 1997-1999. The answer? A loan from the State of Ohio.

    A senior vice-president from McDonald & Co. said that financing this way would lead to a problem. The county could end up paying so much interest that less than $30 million would be available to pay construction costs out of a $100 million bond issue. "Because of the delayed revenue stream, resulting in a diminished revenue stream, the sin tax extension is not an efficient way to raise the amount of dollars that is involved here," he advised the mayor's task force. The city, however, did not heed this advice but announced it would place the extension on the November 7, 1995 ballot.

    The sin tax extension was a mirage, an illusion. It was nothing more than political posturing. By the way, at the time the county was also trying to solve the problem of Gateway going $28 million over budget. Also by the way, renovation estimates at the time grew from $154 million to $172 million.

    Get the book.

    Awesome, Thanks

  • @the-cysko-kid said:

    Gipper I can't find any source that claims he was drubbed out of the NFL by the other owners. For what its worth. Why would the NFL mandate all thirty two teams do a tribute to a guy they ran out of the league?

    I don't know where he heard he was kicked out of NFL. Never happened.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    I don't know where he heard he was kicked out of NFL. Never happened.

    Again, were not any of you alive when this all came down? Its not like it wasn't all over the radio and TV and elsewhere. I didn't make it up.

  • This was in Wikipedia:

    "Despite a no-cost stadium lease, all revenues from parking, concessions, and TV, as well as a reported $25M Maryland subsidy, Modell's ownership of the Ravens resulted in continual financial hardships, and the NFL stepped in and directed Modell to sell his franchise."

  • Formerly Sane said:

    THIS.....is your proof that the other owners kicked him out of the league? This is weak even for you!

    This is like saying that it's common knowledge that the NFL concluded that Cleveland isn't worthy of an NFL team (because they approved the move to Baltimore)

    Modell was allowed to move only after Cleveland was guaranteed a new team, and the Franchise, name, and colors put in a trust until the new stadium was built and ownership announced. Credit Rolling Stone Al Davis setting up the tone in the good old boy owner's network to allow an owner to move if there was financial benefit to be had. "Hey, I might want to do this too." However, this was likely the last time something like this is going to happen, as cities wised up and put poison pills in their stadium leases so big, no owner will be wealthy enough to swallow them and relocate a franchise, besides "specific performance" clauses.

    Modell was about to be foreclosed on by Fleet Bank- and the other owners didn't want the embarrassment of a bank taking control of a NFL franchise. Fact.

    Also it's damn obvious with 20\20 hindsight Art was going under whether he stayed in Cleveland or moved. He was far too over leveraged. Got to the point his cash stream (even with the Maryland and Baltimore bribes) wasn't enough to pay the interest on his loans. The move just bought him a couple extra years.

  • Formerly Sane said:

    THIS.....is your proof that the other owners kicked him out of the league? This is weak even for you!

    This is like saying that it's common knowledge that the NFL concluded that Cleveland isn't worthy of an NFL team (because they approved the move to Baltimore)

    Modell was allowed to move only after Cleveland was guaranteed a new team, and the Franchise, name, and colors put in a trust until the new stadium was built and ownership announced. Credit Rolling Stone Al Davis setting up the tone in the good old boy owner's network to allow an owner to move if there was financial benefit to be had. "Hey, I might want to do this too." However, this was likely the last time something like this is going to happen, as cities wised up and put poison pills in their stadium leases so big, no owner will be wealthy enough to swallow them and relocate a franchise, besides "specific performance" clauses.

    Modell was about to be foreclosed on by Fleet Bank- and the other owners didn't want the embarrassment of a bank taking control of a NFL franchise. Fact.

    Also it's damn obvious with 20\20 hindsight Art was going under whether he stayed in Cleveland or moved. He was far too over leveraged. Got to the point his cash stream (even with the Maryland and Baltimore bribes) wasn't enough to pay the interest on his loans. The move just bought him a couple extra years.

    @hoorta said:

    Modell was allowed to move only after Cleveland was guaranteed a new team, and the Franchise, name, and colors put in a trust until the new stadium was built and ownership announced. Credit Rolling Stone Al Davis setting up the tone in the good old boy owner's network to allow an owner to move if there was financial benefit to be had. "Hey, I might want to do this too." However, this was likely the last time something like this is going to happen, as cities wised up and put poison pills in their stadium leases so big, no owner will be wealthy enough to swallow them and relocate a franchise, besides "specific performance" clauses.

    Modell was about to be foreclosed on by Fleet Bank- and the other owners didn't want the embarrassment of a bank taking control of a NFL franchise. Fact.

    Also it's damn obvious with 20\20 hindsight Art was going under whether he stayed in Cleveland or moved. He was far too over leveraged. Got to the point his cash stream (even with the Maryland and Baltimore bribes) wasn't enough to pay the interest on his loans. The move just bought him a couple extra years.

    yeah but that didn't answer the question whether or not he was kicked out of the NFL.

  • This was in Wikipedia:

    "Despite a no-cost stadium lease, all revenues from parking, concessions, and TV, as well as a reported $25M Maryland subsidy, Modell's ownership of the Ravens resulted in continual financial hardships, and the NFL stepped in and directed Modell to sell his franchise."

    @the-gipper said:

    This was in Wikipedia:

    "Despite a no-cost stadium lease, all revenues from parking, concessions, and TV, as well as a reported $25M Maryland subsidy, Modell's ownership of the Ravens resulted in continual financial hardships, and the NFL stepped in and directed Modell to sell his franchise."

    This hardly means he was "kicked out of the NFL." He was directed to sell because they were concerned about his financial status. Not the same thing, and I think you know that.

  • Afaik it went down like this.

    Art Modell - Fuck this shit I'm outta here, fuck off Cleveland.

    NFL Owners - Do your thing Art, Fuck Cleveland.

    City of Cleveland - HEY! Hold the fuck on here, you have a lease with us! You can't leave us you're breaking the lease.

    Art Modell - Fuck you Cleveland. I'm leaving anyhow.

    NFL owners - "shrug"

    City of Cleveland - We're suing.

    Magistrate - Okay, Mr. Modell, you may transfer your football team from the City of Cleveland and break your lease with the city but the terms of the agreement specify you must forfeit any rights to the history,namesake,uniforms and logo.

    City of Cleveland, you will receive a new football team in three years.

    NFL owners - Yeah we're cool with that.

  • Formerly Sane said:

    1) I'm curious about the first part? I specifically remember Modell being talked in to leaving the name and colors well after the move was announced. Ernie Acorsi said so the other day.

    "It's tough, for someone who literally hangs on every word he utters, to admit anything. It's easier for him to remember it that way."

    1) That's a gray area. We like to believe Modell was "talked into it" by the threat he was going to be forced to play another 3 years in Cleveland to fulfill his lease agreement. Yes, Fred Nance (Cleveland's lead lawyer) had that going for him- and believe me, had Art balked at the conditions allowing his departure, it could, and would have been enforced.

    2) Plueezzze- "Kicked out" or "forced to sell" that's splitting hairs over semantics. The bottom line is Artie was divested of his property involuntarily. No, they didn't get the cops to padlock the place- but the difference between that and a home foreclosure? None in my book. Whether it was the other owners or the Commish makes not a whit of difference.

  • Afaik it went down like this.

    Art Modell - Fuck this shit I'm outta here, fuck off Cleveland.

    NFL Owners - Do your thing Art, Fuck Cleveland.

    City of Cleveland - HEY! Hold the fuck on here, you have a lease with us! You can't leave us you're breaking the lease.

    Art Modell - Fuck you Cleveland. I'm leaving anyhow.

    NFL owners - "shrug"

    City of Cleveland - We're suing.

    Magistrate - Okay, Mr. Modell, you may transfer your football team from the City of Cleveland and break your lease with the city but the terms of the agreement specify you must forfeit any rights to the history,namesake,uniforms and logo.

    City of Cleveland, you will receive a new football team in three years.

    NFL owners - Yeah we're cool with that.

    @badnewsbrowns said:

    Afaik it went down like this.

    Art Modell - Fuck this shit I'm outta here, fuck off Cleveland.

    NFL Owners - Do your thing Art, Fuck Cleveland.

    City of Cleveland - HEY! Hold the fuck on here, you have a lease with us! You can't leave us you're breaking the lease.

    Art Modell - Fuck you Cleveland. I'm leaving anyhow.

    NFL owners - "shrug"

    City of Cleveland - We're suing.

    Magistrate - Okay, Mr. Modell, you may transfer your football team from the City of Cleveland and break your lease with the city but the terms of the agreement specify you must forfeit any rights to the history,namesake,uniforms and logo.

    City of Cleveland, you will receive a new football team in three years.

    NFL owners - Yeah we're cool with that.

    ^ +1 exactly.

  • Formerly Sane said:

    1) I'm curious about the first part? I specifically remember Modell being talked in to leaving the name and colors well after the move was announced. Ernie Acorsi said so the other day.

    "It's tough, for someone who literally hangs on every word he utters, to admit anything. It's easier for him to remember it that way."

    1) That's a gray area. We like to believe Modell was "talked into it" by the threat he was going to be forced to play another 3 years in Cleveland to fulfill his lease agreement. Yes, Fred Nance (Cleveland's lead lawyer) had that going for him- and believe me, had Art balked at the conditions allowing his departure, it could, and would have been enforced.

    2) Plueezzze- "Kicked out" or "forced to sell" that's splitting hairs over semantics. The bottom line is Artie was divested of his property involuntarily. No, they didn't get the cops to padlock the place- but the difference between that and a home foreclosure? None in my book. Whether it was the other owners or the Commish makes not a whit of difference.

    @hoorta said:

    1) That's a gray area. We like to believe Modell was "talked into it" by the threat he was going to be forced to play another 3 years in Cleveland to fulfill his lease agreement. Yes, Fred Nance (Cleveland's lead lawyer) had that going for him- and believe me, had Art balked at the conditions allowing his departure, it could, and would have been enforced.

    2) Plueezzze- "Kicked out" or "forced to sell" that's splitting hairs over semantics. The bottom line is Artie was divested of his property involuntarily. No, they didn't get the cops to padlock the place- but the difference between that and a home foreclosure? None in my book. Whether it was the other owners or the Commish makes not a whit of difference.

    He was not allowed to continue to own the team because he couldn't afford it. He was not "kicked out" of the NFL, i.e., not eligible to be in the HOF, etc.

  • @the-gipper said:

    This was in Wikipedia:

    "Despite a no-cost stadium lease, all revenues from parking, concessions, and TV, as well as a reported $25M Maryland subsidy, Modell's ownership of the Ravens resulted in continual financial hardships, and the NFL stepped in and directed Modell to sell his franchise."

    This hardly means he was "kicked out of the NFL." He was directed to sell because they were concerned about his financial status. Not the same thing, and I think you know that.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    This hardly means he was "kicked out of the NFL." He was directed to sell because they were concerned about his financial status. Not the same thing, and I think you know that.

    Paul Tagliabue orderd Modell to sell the Ravens.

    That is like your boss ordering you to pack up your desk and never come back.

    Yet, you would claim that that would not constitute you being "fired".

    Please don't strectch credulity.

    And there is your source: Paul Tagliabue.