Supreme Court Overturns Doma, Skips On Judgement Of Prop 8
-
I thought you said it actually was normal, woody.
(even though I agree that's not a useful criteria)
WSS
I thought you said it actually was normal, woody.
(even though I agree that's not a useful criteria)
WSS
I believe it is useful criteria because it devalues marriage.
Two of the 45 goals presented in 1958 by Skousen...
Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
and...
Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
No fault divorce...that 50% of marriages end in divorce. Easy divorce devalues the institution. Gays being married only further devalues it.
It's kinda like the feeling you get when you are awarded something special because you qualify....then out of compassion give someone else the very same thing who is not qualified. That makes you feel what you received less valuable.
Reminds me of another stupid liberal idea based on feelings, compassion, and self esteem...to award trophies, or awards to kids who come in last place...pathetic.
-
Well don't worry, I don't see you winning an award any time soon.
What makes you more qualified to get married? Because you and your partner can reproduce? Do infertile couples getting married "devalue" marriage?
How could letting gays marry possibly "devalue" marriage anywhere near what the high divorce rate is? Or the quicky chapels in Vegas and elsewhere?
Allowing gays that love each other and want to spend the rest of their life together get married will do more harm to marriage than people going through 4 or more spouses?
What allows you to decide what values and devalues marriage anyway? Make your own "Super Special (insert religion or group) Marriage" if you want, keep it as pure as you like.
But like I said, luckily I'm not the mminority opinion here
-
1. Woody - you have a CAR? Who's old enough to drive you around?
2. I actually might think a MALE hay bale, and a FEMALE hay bale could get married,
long before perversion reigns. Then they could, if they wanted to, have a bunch of little
hay bales around. Little Potty Mouth Johnny Woodypeckerhead seems to be getting all
nasty with his language. Maybe Little Woodypeckerhead needs a timeout... in a gay bar or something.
3. Devalues the DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE, woodypeckerhead. Your infantile rationalizations rank below
your usual fourth grade level.
4. Typical lib - getting all hateful and outraged because other real human beings don't agree with him
about some subject. haha. Why is it that libs always emotionally claim they are in the majority and so they
"rule" blah blah stupid blah.... ? Like Mao saying "the people have spoken because that's what I want..."
5. Have a nice day.
-
I'm honestly sick of some of the stuff on this board, so I'm going to tell you to fuck off.
Bunker is just a bad person, DieHard is just a crotchety old guy, but you're probably the worst. You are so damn hypocritical in everything you post, but you don't realize it because you're blinded by your one sided, black and white political beliefs.
No one has given a real reason for why it should be illegal. You thinking it "devalues" marriage, just because its different, is no argument at all. I'm sure decades ago you'd be in the group rallying against interracial marriage.
Devalues the definition? So the definition can't change? But all those other times it did, that was fine. Its just now that it can't change. Or should we go back to paying for a man's virgin daughter with livestock? Or forcing take victims to marry their attackers?
I've said it a bunch and I'll say it again, the fact your side isn't the majority at least shows some silver lining
-
Who the hell you calling crotchety you young whipper snapper?
-
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
-
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
"I think its bad and weird" isn't a reason...
I already described earlier though why you won't get that.
-
The bible says no. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it. The guy in the sky who could wiggle his little nose and make all gayness disappear forever but won't hates it. That's why.
-
Maybe woodypeckerhead would like to marry woody woodpecker.
He makes little genuine contribution to any thread on this entire forum.
Waste of space, every post of his.
-
Right Cal, but your post ^ was full of intellectual insight
Its officially, you are out of shit to say and you know you're wrong. Nothing left to do but try to insult me. Isn't that one of those damned "lib tactics" you always go on and on about?
Oh yeah that's right, you're a hypocritical fuck head
-
You fail to understand the difference between once in a while , and "every single time over an entire year.
I have many, many facets to my stuff. Extremely versatile most of us are. You are not. The only thing
you have is little strange pouty one liners most of the time, apparently you think that not really saying anything
will help you look like something you really aren't. A whole lot like Brad Paisley's song "So Much Cooler Online". Really sad.
-
Still hypocritical
Still no real reason.
Congrats.
-
You fail to understand the difference between once in a while , and "every single time over an entire year.
I have many, many facets to my stuff. Extremely versatile most of us are. You are not. The only thing
you have is little strange pouty one liners most of the time, apparently you think that not really saying anything
will help you look like something you really aren't. A whole lot like Brad Paisley's song "So Much Cooler Online". Really sad.
You "got nothin", and it seems to get less all the time.
BTW, "Its officially, you are out of shit to say and you know you're wrong" is laughable.
First graders know better than this bs. "Its" is possessive. "The monkey lost its banana"
You failed to use "It's", which is a contraction of the two words "it is".
Go have someone intelligent look it up for you. And "officially" ??? LOL.
if you said "It's official..." , You would be starting to write properly
"out of shit" ??? I reckon it takes one who is FULL of crap to come up with that twisted notion.
And "out of shit to say and ..." ...what? It's okay. I won't LOL. Really. I just feel pity for you if you don't know better.
-
Oh god... typos... oh no... you got me again...
Insulting me and calling out typos... my argument is ruined! Oh no... I've been bested...
Seriously, do you have anything of substance on why this should be illegal?
-
Yes. I have explained before, at GREAT LENGTH. I'm tired of doing that, others of us are tired of repeating ourselves.
As I have explained in the other thread, this stupid crap of asking questions, and getting long discussions
going on controversial subjects, and instead of taking legit part, you libs sit back and get mad at the answers,
then you wait til later, and start all over again, until you end up with nobody caring to keep answering.
Then you libs fraudulently claim vindication at no answers. Very lib childish and dishonest. Must really suck to live that way.
-
....so, still no actual reason? Just "I don't like it"
Alright.
You know with all of your recent posts going on and on about libs, typos and myself you could have just answered.
-
speaking of reasons I have yet to hear a list of benefits that married people are deserving of that single people aren't and why that should be. I thought you guys were all about fairness.
WSS
-
Why is it such a great idea? Haven't heard one yet. Fairness? Since when is life fair?
That's your argument against it? "Life's not fair"? Wow you're a prick.
Any real reasons against it?
No sunshine, I asked a question. my question was why is it such a great idea?That's your argument against it? "Life's not fair"? Wow you're a prick.
Any real reasons against it?
I already know that you think its unfair so that why I put fairness with a (?).
Please go into detail on why its great for the grand "woody" scheme of things.
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
-
But but but the bible! Jesus will be angry
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login