Supreme Court Overturns Doma, Skips On Judgement Of Prop 8
-
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
"I think its bad and weird" isn't a reason...
I already described earlier though why you won't get that.
-
The bible says no. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it. The guy in the sky who could wiggle his little nose and make all gayness disappear forever but won't hates it. That's why.
-
Maybe woodypeckerhead would like to marry woody woodpecker.
He makes little genuine contribution to any thread on this entire forum.
Waste of space, every post of his.
-
Right Cal, but your post ^ was full of intellectual insight
Its officially, you are out of shit to say and you know you're wrong. Nothing left to do but try to insult me. Isn't that one of those damned "lib tactics" you always go on and on about?
Oh yeah that's right, you're a hypocritical fuck head
-
You fail to understand the difference between once in a while , and "every single time over an entire year.
I have many, many facets to my stuff. Extremely versatile most of us are. You are not. The only thing
you have is little strange pouty one liners most of the time, apparently you think that not really saying anything
will help you look like something you really aren't. A whole lot like Brad Paisley's song "So Much Cooler Online". Really sad.
-
Still hypocritical
Still no real reason.
Congrats.
-
You fail to understand the difference between once in a while , and "every single time over an entire year.
I have many, many facets to my stuff. Extremely versatile most of us are. You are not. The only thing
you have is little strange pouty one liners most of the time, apparently you think that not really saying anything
will help you look like something you really aren't. A whole lot like Brad Paisley's song "So Much Cooler Online". Really sad.
You "got nothin", and it seems to get less all the time.
BTW, "Its officially, you are out of shit to say and you know you're wrong" is laughable.
First graders know better than this bs. "Its" is possessive. "The monkey lost its banana"
You failed to use "It's", which is a contraction of the two words "it is".
Go have someone intelligent look it up for you. And "officially" ??? LOL.
if you said "It's official..." , You would be starting to write properly
"out of shit" ??? I reckon it takes one who is FULL of crap to come up with that twisted notion.
And "out of shit to say and ..." ...what? It's okay. I won't LOL. Really. I just feel pity for you if you don't know better.
-
Oh god... typos... oh no... you got me again...
Insulting me and calling out typos... my argument is ruined! Oh no... I've been bested...
Seriously, do you have anything of substance on why this should be illegal?
-
Yes. I have explained before, at GREAT LENGTH. I'm tired of doing that, others of us are tired of repeating ourselves.
As I have explained in the other thread, this stupid crap of asking questions, and getting long discussions
going on controversial subjects, and instead of taking legit part, you libs sit back and get mad at the answers,
then you wait til later, and start all over again, until you end up with nobody caring to keep answering.
Then you libs fraudulently claim vindication at no answers. Very lib childish and dishonest. Must really suck to live that way.
-
....so, still no actual reason? Just "I don't like it"
Alright.
You know with all of your recent posts going on and on about libs, typos and myself you could have just answered.
-
speaking of reasons I have yet to hear a list of benefits that married people are deserving of that single people aren't and why that should be. I thought you guys were all about fairness.
WSS
-
Why is it such a great idea? Haven't heard one yet. Fairness? Since when is life fair?
That's your argument against it? "Life's not fair"? Wow you're a prick.
Any real reasons against it?
No sunshine, I asked a question. my question was why is it such a great idea?That's your argument against it? "Life's not fair"? Wow you're a prick.
Any real reasons against it?
I already know that you think its unfair so that why I put fairness with a (?).
Please go into detail on why its great for the grand "woody" scheme of things.
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
-
But but but the bible! Jesus will be angry
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
There you libs go again, basing decisions and policy on "feelings" and "compassion".
Practically every modern day liberal policy enacted because "it was the right thing to do for our fellow man" has turned into a disaster.
And there will be many side effects.
"The great, historic, cross-cultural understanding of marriage as the union of husband and wife will be called bigotry in the public square. The law will teach your children and grandchildren that there is nothing special about mothers and fathers raising children together, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a bigot"
So what about the "feelings" of those who have held these beliefs all their lives are now, and will be called bigots, homophobes and haters, which is entirely not true?
What about forcing Catholic Charities to let babies be adopted by those that lead a perverted lifestyle. I believe this has already been accomplished in Illinois and Mass., forcing Catholic charities to close in those states.
Should now the people that want to marry in a polygamous relationship be allowed to do so because you bleeding heart bozos feel their happiness is denied them?
When will assuring that a minority of insignificant people are happy at the expense of harming the majority stop?
You might as well be able to marry your dog, after all, you liberal animal rights idiots believe animals are equal to humans just because liberals act like animals....good one Stewy!
Just another step in your liberal progressive quest to "fundamentally transform" this nation... from dictating what size Coke you can buy to socialized medicine.
That brings to mind the double standards and hypocrisy so prevalent in liberalism.
When Obama first ran in 2008 he declared that marriage is between a man and woman. Was he a bigot Woody? Ever heard of him being referred to a homophobe? No, no one did.
The truth is that he lied. He only made that proclamation to get elected because he's a homosexual himself.
In 2011 he flip flopped.
Obama is gay.
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
Woodie I don't know if you were responding to me but that doesn't answer the question. If you insist on fairness why should married people be given benefits beyond what single people are allowed? Why would you want to treat single people as second class citizens?Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
WSS
-
Oh that's original Bunker.
"Polygamy!" "and people will marry animals!"
No, that won't happen. You're an idiot.
Everything you just said was a slippery slope conservative nightmare. So it sounds like you still have no actual reason.
You said this will turn into a disaster, what's the disaster? What can you say for sure will be the disaster? Not just your slippery slope "everyone will attack straight couples and kids will all be gay!" nonsense.
So gays are "a minority of insignificant people"? Alright. Too bad you weren't around to be saying that about black people...
Your whole post just trailed off into your made up liberal disaster land and shit I never said... good job Bunker
-
So I'm assuming you would not support polygamy.
Would you?
The reason I ask is because if you do not I would wonder what makes those people second class citizens?
I can't see what possible harm it does to you or your relationship.
WSS
-
For legal standing, for all the financial matters and stuff like that which comes from being a married couple, that would get complicated with 3 or more.
Polygamy also has a bad history to it with young girls basically being indentured servants.
People aren't born polygamists though. Its not really the same thing.
That being said though if 3 or more people want to live together and do all of that, and they're all consenting adults, go ahead. I don't see there being some great moral fall out in society because of it.
But its not a marriage, it isn't two adults. If someone wants to cone up with a whole bunch of legislation and new terminology for it, and new laws, they can try.
But its nothing that they are born thinking. You aren't born with a gene that says you need 4 wives lol .
If anything it would just get taken advantage of. So yeah, there ya go. Its not anything you amend marriage for, and it probably wouldn't be the best idea to try to legally make it its own thing.
The 2nd class citizen thing. That's giving blacks less rights for something they can't control. Telling gays they can't get married because of how they were born. Polygamy isn't a genetic trait though.
-
For legal standing, for all the financial matters and stuff like that which comes from being a married couple, that would get complicated with 3 or more.
Polygamy also has a bad history to it with young girls basically being indentured servants.
People aren't born polygamists though. Its not really the same thing.
That being said though if 3 or more people want to live together and do all of that, and they're all consenting adults, go ahead. I don't see there being some great moral fall out in society because of it.
But its not a marriage, it isn't two adults. If someone wants to cone up with a whole bunch of legislation and new terminology for it, and new laws, they can try.
But its nothing that they are born thinking. You aren't born with a gene that says you need 4 wives lol .
If anything it would just get taken advantage of. So yeah, there ya go. Its not anything you amend marriage for, and it probably wouldn't be the best idea to try to legally make it its own thing.
The 2nd class citizen thing. That's giving blacks less rights for something they can't control. Telling gays they can't get married because of how they were born. Polygamy isn't a genetic trait though.
For legal standing, for all the financial matters and stuff like that which comes from being a married couple, that would get complicated with 3 or more.
Polygamy also has a bad history to it with young girls basically being indentured servants.
People aren't born polygamists though. Its not really the same thing.
That being said though if 3 or more people want to live together and do all of that, and they're all consenting adults, go ahead. I don't see there being some great moral fall out in society because of it.
But its not a marriage, it isn't two adults. If someone wants to cone up with a whole bunch of legislation and new terminology for it, and new laws, they can try.
But its nothing that they are born thinking. You aren't born with a gene that says you need 4 wives lol .
If anything it would just get taken advantage of. So yeah, there ya go. Its not anything you amend marriage for, and it probably wouldn't be the best idea to try to legally make it its own thing.
The 2nd class citizen thing. That's giving blacks less rights for something they can't control. Telling gays they can't get married because of how they were born. Polygamy isn't a genetic trait though.
So you're saying that gays are born with a 'fag' gene? Please direct me to the scientific research that found this.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login