Supreme Court Overturns Doma, Skips On Judgement Of Prop 8
-
1. Woody - you have a CAR? Who's old enough to drive you around?
2. I actually might think a MALE hay bale, and a FEMALE hay bale could get married,
long before perversion reigns. Then they could, if they wanted to, have a bunch of little
hay bales around. Little Potty Mouth Johnny Woodypeckerhead seems to be getting all
nasty with his language. Maybe Little Woodypeckerhead needs a timeout... in a gay bar or something.
3. Devalues the DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE, woodypeckerhead. Your infantile rationalizations rank below
your usual fourth grade level.
4. Typical lib - getting all hateful and outraged because other real human beings don't agree with him
about some subject. haha. Why is it that libs always emotionally claim they are in the majority and so they
"rule" blah blah stupid blah.... ? Like Mao saying "the people have spoken because that's what I want..."
5. Have a nice day.
-
I'm honestly sick of some of the stuff on this board, so I'm going to tell you to fuck off.
Bunker is just a bad person, DieHard is just a crotchety old guy, but you're probably the worst. You are so damn hypocritical in everything you post, but you don't realize it because you're blinded by your one sided, black and white political beliefs.
No one has given a real reason for why it should be illegal. You thinking it "devalues" marriage, just because its different, is no argument at all. I'm sure decades ago you'd be in the group rallying against interracial marriage.
Devalues the definition? So the definition can't change? But all those other times it did, that was fine. Its just now that it can't change. Or should we go back to paying for a man's virgin daughter with livestock? Or forcing take victims to marry their attackers?
I've said it a bunch and I'll say it again, the fact your side isn't the majority at least shows some silver lining
-
Who the hell you calling crotchety you young whipper snapper?
-
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
-
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
We've given you many reasons. You just ignore them and ask
for reasons you will accept. Which, none. YOU'RE getting sick?
Why don't you go away and live in heckbunker's closet, maybe he'll take you in
and support you all your miserable life.
Woody = zero legit content and whining and bitching and gay stuff = butt of the board.
blech.
"I think its bad and weird" isn't a reason...
I already described earlier though why you won't get that.
-
The bible says no. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it. The guy in the sky who could wiggle his little nose and make all gayness disappear forever but won't hates it. That's why.
-
Maybe woodypeckerhead would like to marry woody woodpecker.
He makes little genuine contribution to any thread on this entire forum.
Waste of space, every post of his.
-
Right Cal, but your post ^ was full of intellectual insight
Its officially, you are out of shit to say and you know you're wrong. Nothing left to do but try to insult me. Isn't that one of those damned "lib tactics" you always go on and on about?
Oh yeah that's right, you're a hypocritical fuck head
-
You fail to understand the difference between once in a while , and "every single time over an entire year.
I have many, many facets to my stuff. Extremely versatile most of us are. You are not. The only thing
you have is little strange pouty one liners most of the time, apparently you think that not really saying anything
will help you look like something you really aren't. A whole lot like Brad Paisley's song "So Much Cooler Online". Really sad.
-
Still hypocritical
Still no real reason.
Congrats.
-
You fail to understand the difference between once in a while , and "every single time over an entire year.
I have many, many facets to my stuff. Extremely versatile most of us are. You are not. The only thing
you have is little strange pouty one liners most of the time, apparently you think that not really saying anything
will help you look like something you really aren't. A whole lot like Brad Paisley's song "So Much Cooler Online". Really sad.
You "got nothin", and it seems to get less all the time.
BTW, "Its officially, you are out of shit to say and you know you're wrong" is laughable.
First graders know better than this bs. "Its" is possessive. "The monkey lost its banana"
You failed to use "It's", which is a contraction of the two words "it is".
Go have someone intelligent look it up for you. And "officially" ??? LOL.
if you said "It's official..." , You would be starting to write properly
"out of shit" ??? I reckon it takes one who is FULL of crap to come up with that twisted notion.
And "out of shit to say and ..." ...what? It's okay. I won't LOL. Really. I just feel pity for you if you don't know better.
-
Oh god... typos... oh no... you got me again...
Insulting me and calling out typos... my argument is ruined! Oh no... I've been bested...
Seriously, do you have anything of substance on why this should be illegal?
-
Yes. I have explained before, at GREAT LENGTH. I'm tired of doing that, others of us are tired of repeating ourselves.
As I have explained in the other thread, this stupid crap of asking questions, and getting long discussions
going on controversial subjects, and instead of taking legit part, you libs sit back and get mad at the answers,
then you wait til later, and start all over again, until you end up with nobody caring to keep answering.
Then you libs fraudulently claim vindication at no answers. Very lib childish and dishonest. Must really suck to live that way.
-
....so, still no actual reason? Just "I don't like it"
Alright.
You know with all of your recent posts going on and on about libs, typos and myself you could have just answered.
-
speaking of reasons I have yet to hear a list of benefits that married people are deserving of that single people aren't and why that should be. I thought you guys were all about fairness.
WSS
-
Why is it such a great idea? Haven't heard one yet. Fairness? Since when is life fair?
That's your argument against it? "Life's not fair"? Wow you're a prick.
Any real reasons against it?
No sunshine, I asked a question. my question was why is it such a great idea?That's your argument against it? "Life's not fair"? Wow you're a prick.
Any real reasons against it?
I already know that you think its unfair so that why I put fairness with a (?).
Please go into detail on why its great for the grand "woody" scheme of things.
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
-
But but but the bible! Jesus will be angry
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
There you libs go again, basing decisions and policy on "feelings" and "compassion".
Practically every modern day liberal policy enacted because "it was the right thing to do for our fellow man" has turned into a disaster.
And there will be many side effects.
"The great, historic, cross-cultural understanding of marriage as the union of husband and wife will be called bigotry in the public square. The law will teach your children and grandchildren that there is nothing special about mothers and fathers raising children together, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a bigot"
So what about the "feelings" of those who have held these beliefs all their lives are now, and will be called bigots, homophobes and haters, which is entirely not true?
What about forcing Catholic Charities to let babies be adopted by those that lead a perverted lifestyle. I believe this has already been accomplished in Illinois and Mass., forcing Catholic charities to close in those states.
Should now the people that want to marry in a polygamous relationship be allowed to do so because you bleeding heart bozos feel their happiness is denied them?
When will assuring that a minority of insignificant people are happy at the expense of harming the majority stop?
You might as well be able to marry your dog, after all, you liberal animal rights idiots believe animals are equal to humans just because liberals act like animals....good one Stewy!
Just another step in your liberal progressive quest to "fundamentally transform" this nation... from dictating what size Coke you can buy to socialized medicine.
That brings to mind the double standards and hypocrisy so prevalent in liberalism.
When Obama first ran in 2008 he declared that marriage is between a man and woman. Was he a bigot Woody? Ever heard of him being referred to a homophobe? No, no one did.
The truth is that he lied. He only made that proclamation to get elected because he's a homosexual himself.
In 2011 he flip flopped.
Obama is gay.
-
Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
Woodie I don't know if you were responding to me but that doesn't answer the question. If you insist on fairness why should married people be given benefits beyond what single people are allowed? Why would you want to treat single people as second class citizens?Why is it the right idea to allow gays to get married? There are no negative consequences, no negative side effects. It allows a group of people denied their happiness the ability to marry. It's fair for them. It makes them not second class citizens, in a sense, and it gives them all of the benefits associated with a married couple.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login