Irs Scandal Gets Closer To The Wh...
-
Well, there goes Heck's claim that it was
only two goofs in Cincy. If the Obamao regime ever sent
Heck a little package of cow crap, Heck would wrap it up in
a hot dog bun and call it a hot dog.
This corrupt regime is imploding, with the scandals that are exploding.
-
Thanks Willy Wonka
-
Thanks for more zero content to the subject, "Mr. If it doesn't fit, throw a one-liner SNIT"
-
Thanks Dr Seuss
-
You're very welcome. BTW,. it has now officially come out that the IRS chief counsel office - the leader of which was appointed by Obamao himself...
"The chief counsel’s office for the Internal Revenue Service, headed by a political appointee of President Obama, helped develop the agency’s problematic guidelines for reviewing “tea party” cases, according to a top IRS attorney.In interviews with congressional investigators, IRS lawyer Carter Hull said his superiors told him that the chief counsel’s office, led by William Wilkins, would need to review applications that the agency had screened for additional scrutiny because of potential political activity.Previous accounts from IRS employees had shown that Washington IRS officials were involved in the controversy, but Hull’s comments represent the closest connection to the White House to date."Stayed tuned... I wonder if Heck will come back with his personal all time low of insisting it was only a couple of rogue agents in Cincy.,"HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA""HAHA" -
Yeah, I never "insisted" that, World's Dumbest Man. I said they have to investigate to see who was involved. From day one.
What we're now watching here is pretty laughable, and also predictable. They have completely failed to come up with anything in this "scandal", or figured out a way to do it, so check out the language here as they try to make that connection they so desperately want to make: from "The White House was involved" we've now shifted the metric to: this thing that may have been routine and not illegal or even improper was "the IRS lawyers looked at this, and the White House lawyers are headed by a political appointee, who is appointed by THE WHITE HOUSE!"
There! We're back, baby!
That's all it takes to get the rubes back on board.
-
Yes you did. You spoke of the cincy rogues, I'm sure you did.
But, despite all the stone walling, "Mr. Save your spin til the world ends"...
****************************
Questions about IRS snooping grow, extend to Biden home state...Senate candidate O'Donnell told private tax records breached...Officials in DC ordered 'special scrutiny'...IRS Chief Counsel Big Donor, Loyal Democrat... -
Cal, I once put a list up of scandals you've believed, but were total horseshit. You were literally about 0 for 27. In fact, I think this board started because you were over in the other board claiming that Bill Clinton was a murderer and a drug dealer.
Might I suggest that your radar for scandal is a tad off. You're a credulous idiot who repeats anything Glenn Beck or Drudge tells you to believe. And you always will.
Watch what comes of this "scandal." It'll be just like Benghazi. And Solyndra. And all of the others you've hyped since the first of the 176,543 times you've typed "we're in serious, serious trouble."
And yet somehow the nation endures.
You want to bet right now that it involves no one in the White House, and no criminal charges will be filed?
Right now, they have nothing to show for this IRS scandal. If they dig up something, I'll be the first to say "Hey, that person should be fired." Just like I was when this scandal started. But just because Darrell Issa is trying to resurrect this thing from the ashes, and conveniently waited until the Zimmerman trial was over so the Fox News watchers wouldn't be distracted, it doesn't mean we all have to pretend he's got something because someone in an IRS office knew something while another person in that same office was appointed by President Obama and that means IT REALLY DID COME FROM THE WHITE HOUSE!
You're even stunned to learn that a Democratic President appointed a Democrat.
Give us all a rest from your stupid thread topics, will ya? Go outside.
-
If any of the rest of you want to see how stunning these new Issa revelations are, you can read this column called:
Darrell Issa's Big New IRS Revelation About the White House Was Actually Reported Two Months Ago
-
Here's the key section:
"What did Issa prove? His two new witnesses were Elizabeth Hofacre, a 14-year employee of the IRS based in the infamous Cincinnati office, and Carter Hull, a D.C. IRS staffer. The big revelation was that Hull took his concerns about the IRS's BOLO lists to—hold your breath—the chief counsel of the IRS, a White House appointee. And he did so in 2011!
One problem: Anyone reading the available IG research on the IRS investigation already knew about this. Two full months ago, the IG report mentioned that IRS "Rulings and Agreements office personnel held a meeting with Chief Counsel so that everyone would have the latest information," back in August 2011. So Issa didn't have anything new. He was repacking a revelation that didn't get a ton of attention in May because it seemed like a weak connection to the White House."
-
Yes, he told Fox that he had a big bombshell revelation and we all needed to tune in ...and then he told us something we already knew, something that's not even scandalous. They asked the lawyers to look at it. (Dear God, no!!)
But hey, remember. This is theater. And theater doesn't have to be true. It's just got to convince people like Cal that it's true. And that's not very hard to do.
But maybe it's time you stopped trusting the guy who used to engage in theft and insurance fraud to be on the up and up.
-
Sorry, Heckbunker, but you are a dishonest moron. You diss Drudge, and you quote articles from moveon.orgy, solon, and
now Slate?
Really? You lost cred years ago, when you insisted that Bill Clinton never had sex with that woman, that is was
just all a witch hunt by the Republicans.
Dredge up the past is all you have? That isn't much, meathead. The current news is bad for your honey bear president.
He's a failure, a lying blowhard, and a community Horganizer. Say, the Obamaocare you loved so much? Now, even Dems in Congress
and major unons all over the country are po'd at the failure.
And, Zimmerman was definately going to be found NOT GUILTY, you hopingformanslaughter politically dense wingnut.
I will say this about you that is positive, you spell correctly, and you add a lot to this forum when you are gone on vacation. That's
legitimately called "addition by subtraction"......you Dumbass sumbeech. There's a hell of a lot more legitimacy about
Benghazi, Fast and Furious, IRS and Zimmerman trial interference and subsidy of anti-Zimmerman rallies scandals than
there is with your nanny fraud man made goober warning bs. Have a nice really hot day.
-
I must have missed hecks demand for a full and thorough investigation.
to be fair I've been out of town...
WSS
-
No, you were here for it. It was weeks ago. You want to see?
-
Here's me suggesting that we need to investigate this three times in one thread. Here, here, and here. And me correctly predicting the outcome here.
And that's not the only place. I can remember doing it in an earlier thread, suggesting that if these charges were true people shouldn't only be fired, they should go to jail. Should I dig up that for you too?
As a bonus, you can even see where Cal says he knows it was "Senior White House advisors."
-
If I recall correctly, I suggested a special prosecutor since something stinks here (and I don't trust the DOJ in particular) but you seemed to be dead set against that.
and you did predict that it would be nothing beyond a couple rogue flunkeys and a paperwork snafu.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Yes, he did. He most always runs from what he said in the past. He either quibbles and dribbles about what
the "real" meaning of words are, or he goes on vacation, and comes back triumphantly, hoping nobody
remembers him being stupidly wrong in the past.
Meanwhile, all Congress has to do, I found out, is to subpoena those survivors of Benghazi who were told to
sign NDA's on Benghazi in a huge coverup, and they MUST testify before Congress regardless.
-
If I recall correctly, I suggested a special prosecutor since something stinks here (and I don't trust the DOJ in particular) but you seemed to be dead set against that.
and you did predict that it would be nothing beyond a couple rogue flunkeys and a paperwork snafu.
WSS
If I recall correctly, I suggested a special prosecutor since something stinks here (and I don't trust the DOJ in particular) but you seemed to be dead set against that.
and you did predict that it would be nothing beyond a couple rogue flunkeys and a paperwork snafu.
WSS
You really don't have to poorly surmise my arguments when you can look them up, or when I look them up for you.
I said at the time that this needed to be investigated and that if the allegations were true people should not only be fired, but go to jail. As we learned more, I said that this doesn't look like the initial allegations were going to turn out to be true, and they haven't. I also said the Republicans would overplay their hand on something that was likely far less scandalous than they imagine, and that's also been the case.
Only in this bizarro world do you guys imagine you've been proven right and I've been proven wrong.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login