What Did We All Really Expect? !
-
I don't think they looked 100%, and by that I mean, it was by coaches design. With the list of current injuries, why risk more?
There are some things that certainly better get fixed, and that is Weeds. He has to stop starring down his receivers and his decision making has to get better. I'm not worried yet.
Yeah Weeds just looked Sanchez like in this game. That being said Weeds also has zero weapons to throw too. If only he had the big moh back to throw too.
Sanchez???? Sow what a douche. Imo weeden did about as Well as he could. Two bad throws i counted. Four dropped passes, Absolutly no running game, and recievers unable to create an inch of seperation.massaquoifan11 said:
Yeah Weeds just looked Sanchez like in this game. That being said Weeds also has zero weapons to throw too. If only he had the big moh back to throw too.
12 for 25 for 110 yrds and NO TURNOVERS with that offense Ill take it. Its kinda like playing golf with a Vinci of hacks. Naturally ur game is gonna be worse. Luck made some really poor throws too. Differece was his WRs completely outplayed weedens targets. Reverse roles one time.
-
Patriots lost to the Lions something like 40-9. Should they pack it in, too?
It's preseason. Strange shit happens. Players sit when they'd play if it were real, etc. Horton's D went vanilla (not sure why). Joe Thomas was oddly horrible. As Weeden said, it's tough to put your finger on (except that he really can't handle pressure)... things were just "off."
-
yeah i liked massaqoui too but sometimes you have to realize that what you like is not that good for you
Your logic here is flawed. We both like the browns, and we both know (or at least i know, still unsure of your mental capacity to perceive reality) that the browns are bad for us. I mean i end up in a pool of my own tears (and vomit, the browns make me drink heavily) when they inevitably get eliminated from playoff contention each year. Sometimes babe its ok to like things that are not good for you.
massaquoifan11 said:
Your logic here is flawed. We both like the browns, and we both know (or at least i know, still unsure of your mental capacity to perceive reality) that the browns are bad for us. I mean i end up in a pool of my own tears (and vomit, the browns make me drink heavily) when they inevitably get eliminated from playoff contention each year. Sometimes babe its ok to like things that are not good for you.
Braylon Edwards was cut by the Jets today and the reason he was expendable was that they signed MoMass last week. HAHAHA. The best story of the day. LOL
-
Zombo said:
I'm beginning to wonder if the Jets are going to win a game this year.
Zombo
Their motto: Let's be Clueless for Clowney
(yep, I just made that up...apt, no?)
-
I hope we get Clowney.......
-
I hope we get Clowney.......
if he's smart and if he already has agents he's signed with you won't see him play one down this season.
-
I'd trade away all our picks in the first three rounds to land this monster!
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
-
-
And when all is said and done. How often do the dominate teams in the NFL also dominate the preseason? Few.
-
-
The Browns have the best and the worst fans in all of football. One preseason game that they ddint want to show their hand and they lost and Nickers lays into the team ...you sir are a loser not a fan....why not bandwagon on the Stealers
-
The Browns have the best and the worst fans in all of football. One preseason game that they ddint want to show their hand and they lost and Nickers lays into the team ...you sir are a loser not a fan....why not bandwagon on the Stealers
The Browns have the best and the worst fans in all of football. One preseason game that they ddint want to show their hand and they lost and Nickers lays into the team ...you sir are a loser not a fan....why not bandwagon on the Stealers
LOL...I'm more of a fan than you'll ever be..I care about the damn team enough..I could never root for steeler scum..and as far as to them not showing anything is downright Retarded...screen plays are screen plays....post patterns are post patterns...get with it goofy...the browns are not suddenly gonna revolutionize football,,,I just merely pointed out some flaws...let Me make this clear so a simpleton like you can understand..I still expect this team to finish .500 or better...now go crawl back into your little hole and jerk yourself.
-
I'd say you can't trade a lot of picks to take a position that isn't QB, but I guess Dimitroff of Atlanta would disagree and he took a pretty great player from us.
But aside from a QB, I'd say a dominant pass rusher is the one position you might trade up to get. And then Alo would remind me that a lot of the better pass rushers weren't actually top 10 picks. Or even first round.
Clowney will be a 4-3 DE so I doubt he'll seriously be in the Browns discussion, especially after Kruger/Mingo/Groves. If the Browns need a QB, they'll trade the entire draft to get the guy they want because a second corner and a RG can be round in free agency. TE, too, for that matter.
-
I'd say you can't trade a lot of picks to take a position that isn't QB, but I guess Dimitroff of Atlanta would disagree and he took a pretty great player from us.
But aside from a QB, I'd say a dominant pass rusher is the one position you might trade up to get. And then Alo would remind me that a lot of the better pass rushers weren't actually top 10 picks. Or even first round.
Clowney will be a 4-3 DE so I doubt he'll seriously be in the Browns discussion, especially after Kruger/Mingo/Groves. If the Browns need a QB, they'll trade the entire draft to get the guy they want because a second corner and a RG can be round in free agency. TE, too, for that matter.
I'd say you can't trade a lot of picks to take a position that isn't QB, but I guess Dimitroff of Atlanta would disagree and he took a pretty great player from us.
But aside from a QB, I'd say a dominant pass rusher is the one position you might trade up to get. And then Alo would remind me that a lot of the better pass rushers weren't actually top 10 picks. Or even first round.
Clowney will be a 4-3 DE so I doubt he'll seriously be in the Browns discussion, especially after Kruger/Mingo/Groves. If the Browns need a QB, they'll trade the entire draft to get the guy they want because a second corner and a RG can be round in free agency. TE, too, for that matter.
if weeden plays decent and we go .500 or better, the cb (or wr....depending on what happens with gordon and little this year) SHOULD be the pick next year. hopefull everyone has their heads on straight this year and next year we're drafting for depth.
-
Your lips to God's ears. If Weeden is good this year... and he's never gonna be in a better situation more tailored to his skills... then the Browns are looking at positions that are a lot easier to fill (2nd CB, maybe guard, maybe another TE, who knows at WR) unless, as you said, some youngsters step up.
The Browns not only have a shitload of draft picks, they have a ton of money they're almost compelled to spend. In fact, I can't see them wanting that many rookies joining the team, so they'll likely consolidate into fewer (but higher) picks after signing 3-4 significant free agents.
-
Your lips to God's ears. If Weeden is good this year... and he's never gonna be in a better situation more tailored to his skills... then the Browns are looking at positions that are a lot easier to fill (2nd CB, maybe guard, maybe another TE, who knows at WR) unless, as you said, some youngsters step up.
The Browns not only have a shitload of draft picks, they have a ton of money they're almost compelled to spend. In fact, I can't see them wanting that many rookies joining the team, so they'll likely consolidate into fewer (but higher) picks after signing 3-4 significant free agents.
Your lips to God's ears. If Weeden is good this year... and he's never gonna be in a better situation more tailored to his skills... then the Browns are looking at positions that are a lot easier to fill (2nd CB, maybe guard, maybe another TE, who knows at WR) unless, as you said, some youngsters step up.
The Browns not only have a shitload of draft picks, they have a ton of money they're almost compelled to spend. In fact, I can't see them wanting that many rookies joining the team, so they'll likely consolidate into fewer (but higher) picks after signing 3-4 significant free agents.
Im wondering if it would be in the best interest of the browns to look at Johnny Manziel despite some of the issues he's up against...His arm is better than people think and, I think he could have the skill set needed to run this offense..But the ball is squarely in Weedens court,,,
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login