Browns V. Bills
-
Yes you're talking smack. Do I need to explain it? Ok the bills forced 5 picks and beat them by 3. Happy?
-
Yes you're talking smack. Do I need to explain it? Ok the bills forced 5 picks and beat them by 3. Happy?
Yes you're talking smack. Do I need to explain it? Ok the bills forced 5 picks and beat them by 3. Happy?
Yeah, the Bills suck man. No one's arguing lol.
This is the suck bowl.
-
Simple- if the Bills can't effecively run the ball, and expect Manuel to win the game, you're in trouble.
If the Browns can give Hoyer adequate time to throw the ball, again, trouble for the Bills. The Browns have relied mostly on quick crossing routes, capatalizing on Hoyers ability to get the ball out quickly. Then it's Cameron or Gordon time over the top. Hoyer does have enough arm to throw the ball deep.
-
Boo-shit. I've heard the Bengals lauded all over the universe, man. They were ESPN darlings until the Browns' win. Even after it, on NFLN, they were saying the Bengals have to "win games like that" to prove they're serious contenders.
And the Browns contributed to the Bengals ranking, BTW. They shut'em down. The Bills' offense is nothing remotely close to the Bengals, talent-wise. So expect fewer than 6 points (!).
Boo-shit. I've heard the Bengals lauded all over the universe, man. They were ESPN darlings until the Browns' win. Even after it, on NFLN, they were saying the Bengals have to "win games like that" to prove they're serious contenders.
And the Browns contributed to the Bengals ranking, BTW. They shut'em down. The Bills' offense is nothing remotely close to the Bengals, talent-wise. So expect fewer than 6 points (!).
No, they weren't. You just perceive it that way because youre rivals. No one outside of Ohio was even looking at the Bengals lol. In fact, I just saw an article talking about how unimpressive Dalton has been all year.
LOL. And the Vikings offense is on par with the Bills. So we should expect 28 points? HA.
You haven't faced a good offense all year. They've all sucked. The Bills offense sucks too so you won't face a good one this week either.
So you're "nasty" D will be able to pretend yet again.
-
Simple- if the Bills can't effecively run the ball, and expect Manuel to win the game, you're in trouble.
If the Browns can give Hoyer adequate time to throw the ball, again, trouble for the Bills. The Browns have relied mostly on quick crossing routes, capatalizing on Hoyers ability to get the ball out quickly. Then it's Cameron or Gordon time over the top. Hoyer does have enough arm to throw the ball deep.
Simple- if the Bills can't effecively run the ball, and expect Manuel to win the game, you're in trouble.
If the Browns can give Hoyer adequate time to throw the ball, again, trouble for the Bills. The Browns have relied mostly on quick crossing routes, capatalizing on Hoyers ability to get the ball out quickly. Then it's Cameron or Gordon time over the top. Hoyer does have enough arm to throw the ball deep.
He sucks throwing deep. Wildly inaccurate.
-
Man, I just don't agree. Both teams are vastly improved and had strong offseasons. The EJ pick was ballsy and smart... but nobody's looking to give back sack-a-game Keke, either.
Neither is an offensive juggernaut... but they both have players on that side of the ball, too. The winner of this game could launch toward a Wild Card.
-
Yes you're talking smack. Do I need to explain it? Ok the bills forced 5 picks and beat them by 3. Happy?
Yeah, the Bills suck man. No one's arguing lol.
This is the suck bowl.
-
Simple- if the Bills can't effecively run the ball, and expect Manuel to win the game, you're in trouble.
If the Browns can give Hoyer adequate time to throw the ball, again, trouble for the Bills. The Browns have relied mostly on quick crossing routes, capatalizing on Hoyers ability to get the ball out quickly. Then it's Cameron or Gordon time over the top. Hoyer does have enough arm to throw the ball deep.
He sucks throwing deep. Wildly inaccurate.
-
Boo-shit. I've heard the Bengals lauded all over the universe, man. They were ESPN darlings until the Browns' win. Even after it, on NFLN, they were saying the Bengals have to "win games like that" to prove they're serious contenders.
And the Browns contributed to the Bengals ranking, BTW. They shut'em down. The Bills' offense is nothing remotely close to the Bengals, talent-wise. So expect fewer than 6 points (!).
No, they weren't. You just perceive it that way because youre rivals. No one outside of Ohio was even looking at the Bengals lol. In fact, I just saw an article talking about how unimpressive Dalton has been all year.
LOL. And the Vikings offense is on par with the Bills. So we should expect 28 points? HA.
You haven't faced a good offense all year. They've all sucked. The Bills offense sucks too so you won't face a good one this week either.
So you're "nasty" D will be able to pretend yet again.
True about the article, referenced on ESPN. But prior to that, ESPN and NFLN were up the Bengals ass all offseason and right up until the Browns game. I don't read Cincinnati papers, only Cleveland, and while there was respect for the Bengals I never saw any Browns writers gushing like the national guys.
hahalaughlaugh said:
No, they weren't. You just perceive it that way because youre rivals. No one outside of Ohio was even looking at the Bengals lol. In fact, I just saw an article talking about how unimpressive Dalton has been all year.
LOL. And the Vikings offense is on par with the Bills. So we should expect 28 points? HA.
You haven't faced a good offense all year. They've all sucked. The Bills offense sucks too so you won't face a good one this week either.
So you're "nasty" D will be able to pretend yet again.
-
Man, I just don't agree. Both teams are vastly improved and had strong offseasons. The EJ pick was ballsy and smart... but nobody's looking to give back sack-a-game Keke, either.
Neither is an offensive juggernaut... but they both have players on that side of the ball, too. The winner of this game could launch toward a Wild Card.
Man, I just don't agree. Both teams are vastly improved and had strong offseasons. The EJ pick was ballsy and smart... but nobody's looking to give back sack-a-game Keke, either.
Neither is an offensive juggernaut... but they both have players on that side of the ball, too. The winner of this game could launch toward a Wild Card.
The Browns have 0 chance at a wild card.
You guys blow.
I don't understand this confidence from Browns fans.
You get blown out by Miami. Get beat the Ravens (who the Bills beat). Almost give the game away to a horrible Vikings team, and then beat the Bengals and all of a sudden youre a good team.
HAHAHAHAHA.
Are you all on meth?
Your. Team. BLOWS.
So does the Bills.
-
Here's a key: The Browns have proven they can win with Hoyer and no running game. The Bills have not proven the same with Manuel. Hoyer plays like a veteran, makes pre-snap reads and gets the ball out. I'm an EJ fan but he's a rookie and hasn't been asked to do much.
-
hahalaughlaugh said:
He sucks throwing deep. Wildly inaccurate.
Did you watch the games he's played in? I have to disagree.
Weeden is wildly innacurate I'll grant you that- but he won't be playing Thursday, barring injury.
Did you watch the games he's played in? I have to disagree.
Yeah I did.
I also saw ESPN making fun of his deep throws and some still pictures from a Bills forum.
-
Here's a key: The Browns have proven they can win with Hoyer and no running game. The Bills have not proven the same with Manuel. Hoyer plays like a veteran, makes pre-snap reads and gets the ball out. I'm an EJ fan but he's a rookie and hasn't been asked to do much.
Here's a key: The Browns have proven they can win with Hoyer and no running game. The Bills have not proven the same with Manuel. Hoyer plays like a veteran, makes pre-snap reads and gets the ball out. I'm an EJ fan but he's a rookie and hasn't been asked to do much.
The Browns have proven they can barely win against a crappy Vikings team and can beat a Bengals team which is a rival.
That's not the same as proven to win.
-
hahalaughlaugh said:
Yeah I did.
I also saw ESPN making fun of his deep throws and some still pictures from a Bills forum.
Fine I'll bite. Both of those passes were under pressure and into double coverage. There is such a thing as an intentional overthrow because those pictures clearly show the chance for a complete pass was really, really bad. Most browns fan aren't delusional, but Hoyer against a solid Bengals defense threw two TD's with 13 incomplete passes. Those types of stats are about 1000000x better than what we've been put through.
It's not confidence more than it's optimism. All the talk can be around how this streak won't last but until they lose we're all just riding the wave. Everyone said the same thing about the Indians and next thing you know they have a playoff game tonight. It's something crazy (Gipper can back me up) that 5-6 new teams are in the playoffs each season in the NFL. So why not the Browns? I think you'll be pleasantly shocked how good the Browns defense is.
-
This guy is a troll. Ha ha ha ha ha.
-
hahalaughlaugh said:
Yeah I did.
I also saw ESPN making fun of his deep throws and some still pictures from a Bills forum.
Fine I'll bite. Both of those passes were under pressure and into double coverage. There is such a thing as an intentional overthrow because those pictures clearly show the chance for a complete pass was really, really bad. Most browns fan aren't delusional, but Hoyer against a solid Bengals defense threw two TD's with 13 incomplete passes. Those types of stats are about 1000000x better than what we've been put through.
It's not confidence more than it's optimism. All the talk can be around how this streak won't last but until they lose we're all just riding the wave. Everyone said the same thing about the Indians and next thing you know they have a playoff game tonight. It's something crazy (Gipper can back me up) that 5-6 new teams are in the playoffs each season in the NFL. So why not the Browns? I think you'll be pleasantly shocked how good the Browns defense is.
Fine I'll bite. Both of those passes were under pressure and into double coverage. There is such a thing as an intentional overthrow because those pictures clearly show the chance for a complete pass was really, really bad. Most browns fan aren't delusional, but Hoyer against a solid Bengals defense threw two TD's with 13 incomplete passes. Those types of stats are about 1000000x better than what we've been put through.
It's not confidence more than it's optimism. All the talk can be around how this streak won't last but until they lose we're all just riding the wave. Everyone said the same thing about the Indians and next thing you know they have a playoff game tonight. It's something crazy (Gipper can back me up) that 5-6 new teams are in the playoffs each season in the NFL. So why not the Browns? I think you'll be pleasantly shocked how good the Browns defense is.
You're lying or just mistaken. The first pass was a little under pressure but he had time. The second throw, into double coverage, he had TONS of time. He just threw it into double coverage for no freaking reason.
-
Weren't both the Vikings and Bengals in the playoffs last year? Did they lose a lot of players?
Trust me: Both teams expected to beat the Browns and found out otherwise. So will the Bills.
Weren't both the Vikings and Bengals in the playoffs last year? Did they lose a lot of players?
Trust me: Both teams expected to beat the Browns and found out otherwise. So will the Bills.
The Bills were in the playoffs one year and 3-13 the next.
Pats won the SB and then went 7-9.
Prior year success means nothing.
The Bengals have one of the worst offenses in the league through 4 weeks.
The Vikings look like dog crap, only winning a game because they played the even worse Steelers.
-
Fine I'll bite. Both of those passes were under pressure and into double coverage. There is such a thing as an intentional overthrow because those pictures clearly show the chance for a complete pass was really, really bad. Most browns fan aren't delusional, but Hoyer against a solid Bengals defense threw two TD's with 13 incomplete passes. Those types of stats are about 1000000x better than what we've been put through.
It's not confidence more than it's optimism. All the talk can be around how this streak won't last but until they lose we're all just riding the wave. Everyone said the same thing about the Indians and next thing you know they have a playoff game tonight. It's something crazy (Gipper can back me up) that 5-6 new teams are in the playoffs each season in the NFL. So why not the Browns? I think you'll be pleasantly shocked how good the Browns defense is.
You're lying or just mistaken. The first pass was a little under pressure but he had time. The second throw, into double coverage, he had TONS of time. He just threw it into double coverage for no freaking reason.
hahalaughlaugh said:
You're lying or just mistaken. The first pass was a little under pressure but he had time. The second throw, into double coverage, he had TONS of time. He just threw it into double coverage for no freaking reason.
Do you actually have video of those throws or are you just assuming that too? Look I don't remember every play but again, there's such a thing as an intentional overthrow. I'll take a couple missed passes and a performance he put up against the Bengals every week.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login