Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. not one sack against the 3rd worst O line in the NFL

not one sack against the 3rd worst O line in the NFL

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
24 Posts 16 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan

    Our Defense against the run sucked today. Haden made critical errors. We sucked overall. Weeden didn't lose this game, the Browns did. They were not prepared. They were soft.

    hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 20k Posts
    • 5k Reputation
    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Our Defense against the run sucked today. Haden made critical errors. We sucked overall. Weeden didn't lose this game, the Browns did. They were not prepared. They were soft.

    BS- on the Haden screw up. Joe was expecting deep help on the TD- why he let up- blame that one on Gipson for not properly diagnosing the play.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
      • 24k Posts
      • 1k Reputation
      C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
      #15

      our first pick next year will be interesting to say the least. If we stay at 4 wins, which could very well possibly be....we may have a pretty good pick. But maybe not high enough before Bridgewater and Mariota come off. "If" those guys are off the board when we pick, do we still take a qb? Honestly, if the top 2 or 3 qb prospects are off the board I don't want to spend yet another first round on a "maybe/maybe not" qb. I only want to spend the 1st pick on someone who will start opening day, a guy close to what Luck is. And that will take a hell of a football brain, one i'm not sure is there with these prospects next year. Athletically yes, the tools are all there but year after year we see guys come out with all the tools but they just simply can't handle the big league. I dunno....like i said if those top guys are gone and there's an offensive lineman that will start opening day...like another JT, than take that. Or take Clowney if just to keep him away from the other AFC north teams. I really like what I see from Clowney though, he handles the run as well as he pass rushes.

      Tim Couch Pulls OutT 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • C Clevfan4life

        our first pick next year will be interesting to say the least. If we stay at 4 wins, which could very well possibly be....we may have a pretty good pick. But maybe not high enough before Bridgewater and Mariota come off. "If" those guys are off the board when we pick, do we still take a qb? Honestly, if the top 2 or 3 qb prospects are off the board I don't want to spend yet another first round on a "maybe/maybe not" qb. I only want to spend the 1st pick on someone who will start opening day, a guy close to what Luck is. And that will take a hell of a football brain, one i'm not sure is there with these prospects next year. Athletically yes, the tools are all there but year after year we see guys come out with all the tools but they just simply can't handle the big league. I dunno....like i said if those top guys are gone and there's an offensive lineman that will start opening day...like another JT, than take that. Or take Clowney if just to keep him away from the other AFC north teams. I really like what I see from Clowney though, he handles the run as well as he pass rushes.

        Tim Couch Pulls Out Tim Couch Pulls OutT Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 8k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
        #16

        @clevfan4life said:

        our first pick next year will be interesting to say the least. If we stay at 4 wins, which could very well possibly be....we may have a pretty good pick. But maybe not high enough before Bridgewater and Mariota come off. "If" those guys are off the board when we pick, do we still take a qb? Honestly, if the top 2 or 3 qb prospects are off the board I don't want to spend yet another first round on a "maybe/maybe not" qb. I only want to spend the 1st pick on someone who will start opening day, a guy close to what Luck is. And that will take a hell of a football brain, one i'm not sure is there with these prospects next year. Athletically yes, the tools are all there but year after year we see guys come out with all the tools but they just simply can't handle the big league. I dunno....like i said if those top guys are gone and there's an offensive lineman that will start opening day...like another JT, than take that. Or take Clowney if just to keep him away from the other AFC north teams. I really like what I see from Clowney though, he handles the run as well as he pass rushes.

        Why do you assume Bridgewater and Mariota aren't "maybe/maybe not" QB's? They're the best of this class, supposedly, but they are no Luck. There is no sure fire #1 QB in this draft. In a draft like this, you take the guy who fits your scheme and has the highest upside couple with the lowest amount of flaws.

        I feel there are 4 franchise QB's in this draft, and they aren't all who you'd expect.

        I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
        miktoxicM 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out

          @clevfan4life said:

          our first pick next year will be interesting to say the least. If we stay at 4 wins, which could very well possibly be....we may have a pretty good pick. But maybe not high enough before Bridgewater and Mariota come off. "If" those guys are off the board when we pick, do we still take a qb? Honestly, if the top 2 or 3 qb prospects are off the board I don't want to spend yet another first round on a "maybe/maybe not" qb. I only want to spend the 1st pick on someone who will start opening day, a guy close to what Luck is. And that will take a hell of a football brain, one i'm not sure is there with these prospects next year. Athletically yes, the tools are all there but year after year we see guys come out with all the tools but they just simply can't handle the big league. I dunno....like i said if those top guys are gone and there's an offensive lineman that will start opening day...like another JT, than take that. Or take Clowney if just to keep him away from the other AFC north teams. I really like what I see from Clowney though, he handles the run as well as he pass rushes.

          Why do you assume Bridgewater and Mariota aren't "maybe/maybe not" QB's? They're the best of this class, supposedly, but they are no Luck. There is no sure fire #1 QB in this draft. In a draft like this, you take the guy who fits your scheme and has the highest upside couple with the lowest amount of flaws.

          I feel there are 4 franchise QB's in this draft, and they aren't all who you'd expect.

          miktoxic miktoxicM
          • 13k Posts
          • 1k Reputation
          miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on last edited by
          #17

          @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

          Why do you assume Bridgewater and Mariota aren't "maybe/maybe not" QB's? They're the best of this class, supposedly, but they are no Luck. There is no sure fire #1 QB in this draft. In a draft like this, you take the guy who fits your scheme and has the highest upside couple with the lowest amount of flaws.

          I feel there are 4 franchise QB's in this draft, and they aren't all who you'd expect.

          i agree with both your posts. man after we pick our 'franchise' QB we should finish the D with the positions you mentioned and then flush the whole right side of the OL with draft picks and FAs.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Unsympathetic U Reacting Well Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 4k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
            #18

            Tajh Boyd

            ILB

            CB

            WR

            RG

            RT

            in that order

            The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Tim Couch Pulls Out Tim Couch Pulls OutT Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 8k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out wrote on last edited by
              #19

              It doesn't matter what order, if we take Boyd we will suck next year too.

              I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride
              1 Reply Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • C calfoxwc

                ah, baloney. The sacks are simply because:

                1. Rapistbooger got the ball out, FAST. And the wr's are tall, and owens and skrine

                are midgets.

                2. They threw all over Carder, and sorry, Buster fans,

                but Skrine is too freakin short, and often finds himself

                out of position to boot. He's a great special teams player,

                and occasional nickle back, depending.

                3. They played to the Browns weakness - throwing quickly, and

                using the weather to pound on a couple of the Browns' linebackers.

                Vagitron VagitronV Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 4k Posts
                • 301 Reputation
                VagitronV Vagitron wrote on last edited by
                #20

                @calfoxwc said:

                ah, baloney. The sacks are simply because:

                1. Rapistbooger got the ball out, FAST. And the wr's are tall, and owens and skrine

                are midgets.

                2. They threw all over Carder, and sorry, Buster fans,

                but Skrine is too freakin short, and often finds himself

                out of position to boot. He's a great special teams player,

                and occasional nickle back, depending.

                3. They played to the Browns weakness - throwing quickly, and

                using the weather to pound on a couple of the Browns' linebackers.

                Jericho cotchery is over 6 feet, the rest of the steelers wide receivers are 5'11 or smaller of the ones that caught passes.

                AKA SNATCH98 or Rorbotron. The boards glorious admins decided to get cute and change my name to "homotron" Classy group of people. (Lost a bet with Columbus king and got banned for a month)
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                  • 64k Posts
                  • 8k Reputation
                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  They are tall...compared to skrine and owens. Go take out

                  your doggone garbage, wash the dishes or somethin.... ggg

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • C calfoxwc

                    ah, baloney. The sacks are simply because:

                    1. Rapistbooger got the ball out, FAST. And the wr's are tall, and owens and skrine

                    are midgets.

                    2. They threw all over Carder, and sorry, Buster fans,

                    but Skrine is too freakin short, and often finds himself

                    out of position to boot. He's a great special teams player,

                    and occasional nickle back, depending.

                    3. They played to the Browns weakness - throwing quickly, and

                    using the weather to pound on a couple of the Browns' linebackers.

                    FSG F
                    • 103 Posts
                    • 2 Reputation
                    F FSG wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    @calfoxwc said:

                    ah, baloney. The sacks are simply because:

                    1. Rapistbooger got the ball out, FAST. And the wr's are tall, and owens and skrine

                    are midgets.

                    2. They threw all over Carder, and sorry, Buster fans,

                    but Skrine is too freakin short, and often finds himself

                    out of position to boot. He's a great special teams player,

                    and occasional nickle back, depending.

                    3. They played to the Browns weakness - throwing quickly, and

                    using the weather to pound on a couple of the Browns' linebackers.

                    Rapistbooger - did you actually just say that? Which are you, a 5th grader who still calls people poopyfaces or one of the mindless morons who lack the ability to think for themselves and let whatever they hear from the media with the sole agenda of getting people to respond to innuendo (see Mike Florio) - I suppose you think Jamieus Winston is just as guilty.

                    Instead of resorting to stupid comments - its pretty simple what happened today: the Pittsburgh Steelers are simply a superior team to the Cleveland Browns.

                    The Steelers Offensive Line - which has struggled this year; is simply not as bad as the stats indicate - and in fact it is getting better because two players who were very high draft picks and missed most of 2012 are gaining traction (David DeCastro at RG and Marcus Gilbert at RT). DeCastro is especially becoming effective - dominating Suh and Fairley two weeks ago and manhandling Taylor today. Gilbert had a good rookie year in 2011 - and after a slow start right side of the Steelers line is getting settled. When their best lineman Maurkice Pouncey returns next year (and if Adams can at all improve enough to push to start at LT) the Steelers OL problems will be a thing of the past.

                    This is not the same Steelers team that started 0-4.

                    • Le'Veon Bell - is giving the Steelers better balance at the RB position and making plays
                    • Heath Miller - the Steelers team MVP in 2012 is the best TE no one talks about; was still recovering from a knee injury suffered in Week 17 last year
                    • Antonio Brown - had a slow start but is leading the NFL in catches (74 for 952) and on Thursday will be the 3rd WR this year to top 1000 yards - probably will break the franchise record for catches & yards (Ward - 112 & Thigpen - 1398) in the same season.

                    Ironic - I do remember how in 2007, this board was ablaze with how superior Kellen Winslow and Brandon Edwards were to Steelers counterparts Heath Miller and Hines Ward. Yet Winslow and Edwards were all but given away and bounced around the league. Of course there were some fools from the old Akron Beacon Journal msg board who claimed Charlie Frye was better than Roethlisberger

                    And at the end of the day - to make it simple - the biggest difference between these teams is BEN ROETHILSBERGER.

                    • You hate him because he always beats you - the only time the Browns have beaten him was when he was playing very hurt.
                    • The highlight of your 2011 season was the severe high ankle sprain that effectively ruined the Steelers playoff chances in a 12-4 season; it possibly cost the Steelers another Super Bowl and your radio stations were full of callers celebrating it as if it were 1986 and the Browns/Kosar were about to play Denver in the AFC Championship.
                    • You wanted him to be guilty of sexual assault, even though he was innocent, (although you would never let the facts get in the way of your opinion) - which is disgusting. You wanted a rape to have occured just because he is a Quarterback of a rival team - shows where your priorities in life are.
                    • And you hate him because he was sitting right there at pick #7 in 2004 - with no need to have the Matt Millen led Detriot Lions fleece you out of a 2nd round pick; and he was an Ohio born and raised Quarterback but your organization chose to go with a TE who is hanging onto his career by a thread with the Jets
                    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • F FSG

                      @calfoxwc said:

                      ah, baloney. The sacks are simply because:

                      1. Rapistbooger got the ball out, FAST. And the wr's are tall, and owens and skrine

                      are midgets.

                      2. They threw all over Carder, and sorry, Buster fans,

                      but Skrine is too freakin short, and often finds himself

                      out of position to boot. He's a great special teams player,

                      and occasional nickle back, depending.

                      3. They played to the Browns weakness - throwing quickly, and

                      using the weather to pound on a couple of the Browns' linebackers.

                      Rapistbooger - did you actually just say that? Which are you, a 5th grader who still calls people poopyfaces or one of the mindless morons who lack the ability to think for themselves and let whatever they hear from the media with the sole agenda of getting people to respond to innuendo (see Mike Florio) - I suppose you think Jamieus Winston is just as guilty.

                      Instead of resorting to stupid comments - its pretty simple what happened today: the Pittsburgh Steelers are simply a superior team to the Cleveland Browns.

                      The Steelers Offensive Line - which has struggled this year; is simply not as bad as the stats indicate - and in fact it is getting better because two players who were very high draft picks and missed most of 2012 are gaining traction (David DeCastro at RG and Marcus Gilbert at RT). DeCastro is especially becoming effective - dominating Suh and Fairley two weeks ago and manhandling Taylor today. Gilbert had a good rookie year in 2011 - and after a slow start right side of the Steelers line is getting settled. When their best lineman Maurkice Pouncey returns next year (and if Adams can at all improve enough to push to start at LT) the Steelers OL problems will be a thing of the past.

                      This is not the same Steelers team that started 0-4.

                      • Le'Veon Bell - is giving the Steelers better balance at the RB position and making plays
                      • Heath Miller - the Steelers team MVP in 2012 is the best TE no one talks about; was still recovering from a knee injury suffered in Week 17 last year
                      • Antonio Brown - had a slow start but is leading the NFL in catches (74 for 952) and on Thursday will be the 3rd WR this year to top 1000 yards - probably will break the franchise record for catches & yards (Ward - 112 & Thigpen - 1398) in the same season.

                      Ironic - I do remember how in 2007, this board was ablaze with how superior Kellen Winslow and Brandon Edwards were to Steelers counterparts Heath Miller and Hines Ward. Yet Winslow and Edwards were all but given away and bounced around the league. Of course there were some fools from the old Akron Beacon Journal msg board who claimed Charlie Frye was better than Roethlisberger

                      And at the end of the day - to make it simple - the biggest difference between these teams is BEN ROETHILSBERGER.

                      • You hate him because he always beats you - the only time the Browns have beaten him was when he was playing very hurt.
                      • The highlight of your 2011 season was the severe high ankle sprain that effectively ruined the Steelers playoff chances in a 12-4 season; it possibly cost the Steelers another Super Bowl and your radio stations were full of callers celebrating it as if it were 1986 and the Browns/Kosar were about to play Denver in the AFC Championship.
                      • You wanted him to be guilty of sexual assault, even though he was innocent, (although you would never let the facts get in the way of your opinion) - which is disgusting. You wanted a rape to have occured just because he is a Quarterback of a rival team - shows where your priorities in life are.
                      • And you hate him because he was sitting right there at pick #7 in 2004 - with no need to have the Matt Millen led Detriot Lions fleece you out of a 2nd round pick; and he was an Ohio born and raised Quarterback but your organization chose to go with a TE who is hanging onto his career by a thread with the Jets
                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                      • 57k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by The Gipper
                      #23

                      @fsg said:

                      Rapistbooger - did you actually just say that? Which are you, a 5th grader who still calls people poopyfaces or one of the mindless morons who lack the ability to think for themselves and let whatever they hear from the media with the sole agenda of getting people to respond to innuendo (see Mike Florio) - I suppose you think Jamieus Winston is just as guilty.

                      Instead of resorting to stupid comments - its pretty simple what happened today: the Pittsburgh Steelers are simply a superior team to the Cleveland Browns.

                      Yes, but that all comes down to one single factor:

                      The Steelers Offensive Line - which has struggled this year; is simply not as bad as the stats indicate - and in fact it is getting better because two players who were very high draft picks and missed most of 2012 are gaining traction (David DeCastro at RG and Marcus Gilbert at RT). DeCastro is especially becoming effective - dominating Suh and Fairley two weeks ago and manhandling Taylor today. Gilbert had a good rookie year in 2011 - and after a slow start right side of the Steelers line is getting settled. When their best lineman Maurkice Pouncey returns next year (and if Adams can at all improve enough to push to start at LT) the Steelers OL problems will be a thing of the past.

                      This is not the same Steelers team that started 0-4.

                      • Le'Veon Bell - is giving the Steelers better balance at the RB position and making plays
                      • Heath Miller - the Steelers team MVP in 2012 is the best TE no one talks about; was still recovering from a knee injury suffered in Week 17 last year
                      • Antonio Brown - had a slow start but is leading the NFL in catches (74 for 952) and on Thursday will be the 3rd WR this year to top 1000 yards - probably will break the franchise record for catches & yards (Ward - 112 & Thigpen - 1398) in the same season.

                      Ironic - I do remember how in 2007, this board was ablaze with how superior Kellen Winslow and Brandon Edwards were to Steelers counterparts Heath Miller and Hines Ward. Yet Winslow and Edwards were all but given away and bounced around the league. Of course there were some fools from the old Akron Beacon Journal msg board who claimed Charlie Frye was better than Roethlisberger

                      And at the end of the day - to make it simple - the biggest difference between these teams is BEN ROETHILSBERGER.

                      You can stop right there. Whatever else you said is either wrong or irrelevent.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                        • 64k Posts
                        • 8k Reputation
                        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by calfoxwc
                        #24

                        Well, FSG, nice of you to drop in and gloat after the fact.

                        Coward...

                        I hate the squeelers, and most squeeler fans who act like you.

                        That's all. Even the ratbird fans at the tailgate...they hate you worse, maybe.

                        Although, it's probably a tie.

                        I've already said before the game that the squeelers had been losing because

                        they didn't cheapshot qb's out of games, and olinestruggles. Add to that,

                        our qb, the one who has a brain and a heart to match to be qb.... is hurt.

                        And Lewis is hurt. And, with the Browns having little running game going...

                        the weather made it tougher.

                        The squeelers just went to a quick wr screen thing. It worked. Don't plan

                        on it working every week, that's all.

                        And bent rothlicksbooger is just a sasquatch behind fast, get open receivers.

                        And again, our qb was taken out of the game. Like the cheapshot, most notably,

                        vs Cincy when they took out their qb asap.

                        What goes around, comes around. Eventually.

                        But I'm sure that whatever gay site you come from, will ban Browns fans from showing

                        up at the next Browns win over the squeerlers.

                        Have a nice day, buttcrack.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate