Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Coordinator Hirings news

Coordinator Hirings news

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
129 Posts 38 Posters 7.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • gftChrisG gftChris

    @darren15 said:

    We need to pick up a decent FB whoever we start at RB

    Better blocking, for sure. Not sold on *needing* a FB though. On the other hand, the idea of having a FB that can catch screens and run with it would be interesting.

    @tour2ma said:

    I pay attention.. just don't agree... at least not here.

    Ben made Houston's line look good. He's a strong one-cut runner made for the Zone blocking scheme. If Kubiak is the OC, then for better or for worse that's what we will run.

    But is he the only one? Can we not get similar for less, and invest the money elsewhere?

    Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
    • 30k Posts
    • 6k Reputation
    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @gftchris said:

    But is he the only one? Can we not get similar for less, and invest the money elsewhere?

    Quite possibly... zone blocking has turned more than a few unknown RBs into "stars"...

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
    gftChrisG 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Tour2maT Tour2ma

      @gftchris said:

      But is he the only one? Can we not get similar for less, and invest the money elsewhere?

      Quite possibly... zone blocking has turned more than a few unknown RBs into "stars"...

      gftChris gftChrisG
      • 13k Posts
      • 428 Reputation
      gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
      #11

      @tour2ma said:

      Quite possibly... zone blocking has turned more than a few unknown RBs into "stars"...

      Alfred Morris anybody? I'd much rather have a system that can turn a RB in to a great RB, than a great RB turn a system in to a great system.

      Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • darren15D darren15
        Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 14m

        Hear there’s interest in Gary Kubiak for #Browns OC job. Would make sense, given team’s FA love for RB Ben Tate, who’d be in the same system


        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
        • 57k Posts
        • 4k Reputation
        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
        #12

        @darren15 said:

        Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 14m

        Hear there’s interest in Gary Kubiak for #Browns OC job. Would make sense, given team’s FA love for RB Ben Tate, who’d be in the same system

        If so, the offense would be in the hands of a true veteran....who, despite this year, has been a winner.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • gftChrisG gftChris

          I think Ben Tate money could be better used on other areas which are harder to find plug-and-play starters from the draft.

          thenew23 thenew23T
          • 2k Posts
          • 233 Reputation
          thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
          #13

          @gftchris said:

          I think Ben Tate money could be better used on other areas which are harder to find plug-and-play starters from the draft.

          Right now we have 1 "maybe-legit" RB... I'm pretty sure we NEED to spend some money to add weapons at that position. We should spend FA money on Tate and a relatively high draft pick on a RB. RBs get hurt, and we need a little more in the cupboard than we had last year...

          Plus, a FB like somebody mentioned...

          #Justsayin'
          hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • gftChrisG gftChris

            Also, I'm not sure who is *less* reliable, Rapoport or MKC.

            jrb12711 jrb12711J Conversation Starter Reacting Well Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 5k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by jrb12711
            #14

            @gftchris said:

            Also, I'm not sure who is *less* reliable, Rapoport or MKC.

            Follow both on Twitter and to me it's easily MKC. I swear to God half her tweets sound like she's 16 years old. I don't think she's terrible overall but her twitter skills make me cringe.

            Edit: Wouldn't dislike the Kubiak hire in the slightest. I love the zone blocking scheme and he's run that well for years.

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Spectralcow S
              • 270 Posts
              • 12 Reputation
              S Spectralcow wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Hey, no one would be more in support of greater emphasis on the run game than me. I've argued in favor of it ad naseum. I think Ben Tate is a solid back. I just don't know if he's going to be worth the money he's going to want. Tour2ma disagrees. That's fine; I may be wrong. Tate might end up being fantastic wherever he goes and may end up being quite the bargain. I don't know. I just think there's a better chance that he's solid, but not worth the FA money he gets.

              1 Reply Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • JAFBF JAFBFJ Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 10k Posts
                • 2k Reputation
                JAFBFJ JAFBF wrote on last edited by
                #16

                Kubiak might be a good move, but my concern is he had the Stroke last year, so there are health concerns.

                On Tate, hasn't he been somewhat injury prone, or am I thinking of someone else?

                I'd rather go with a fresh (draft) RB than overpay in FA.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Spectralcow S
                  • 270 Posts
                  • 12 Reputation
                  S Spectralcow wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  You MIGHT be thinking of Arian Foster. He's been very injury prone, and Tate replaced him a lot. Tate was injured too. here and there, but I don't know if I'd say he was "injury prone".

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • tml1138 tml1138T
                    • 745 Posts
                    • 16 Reputation
                    tml1138T tml1138 wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    Where is the most reliable source for finding salary caps, and what is the Browns current cap?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • gftChrisG gftChris

                      @tour2ma said:

                      Quite possibly... zone blocking has turned more than a few unknown RBs into "stars"...

                      Alfred Morris anybody? I'd much rather have a system that can turn a RB in to a great RB, than a great RB turn a system in to a great system.

                      Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                      • 30k Posts
                      • 6k Reputation
                      Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Yup... prolly Foster who has broken the last three years or so...

                      @gftchris said:

                      Alfred Morris anybody? I'd much rather have a system that can turn a RB in to a great RB, than a great RB turn a system in to a great system.

                      Edwin Baker showed good one-cut aptitude... he just lacks a bit of size strength needed to break an LB arm tackle..

                      @spectralcow said:

                      Hey, no one would be more in support of greater emphasis on the run game than me. I've argued in favor of it ad naseum. I think Ben Tate is a solid back. I just don't know if he's going to be worth the money he's going to want. Tour2ma disagrees.

                      I am also not sure if he is worth the money, but he sure as hell would fill the bill.

                      I was more taking issue with statement that Ben owed his success to the O-line. In zone schemes it's really up to the back to make it a success with a decisive cut. Linemen really only have to screen off defenders.

                      And for you FB lovers... you don't use one in a zone blocking scheme... at least not Kubiak's. Greg Jones was Houston's #1 FB in 2013. He played in all 16 games, but started only five. And their #2 FB??? Our old friend, Brad Smelley...

                      "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • thenew23 thenew23T
                        • 2k Posts
                        • 233 Reputation
                        thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        I hope the mention of Kubiak isn't a tease. While I'm weary about a WCO coming back to Cleveland, since Shurmur ruined my view of it, Kubiak has always been a great offensive mind. He is exactly what a rookie coach like Pettine needs on that side of the ball... Plus, Hoyer would be good fit with Kubiak, and so would Bridgewater...

                        #Justsayin'
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • tml1138 tml1138T
                          • 745 Posts
                          • 16 Reputation
                          tml1138T tml1138 wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Somebody has updated Wikipedia on the coaching staff:

                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns

                          Which seems to line up with the official site:

                          http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/coaches.html

                          Already more vacancies than I thought there would be at this point.

                          OsirisO 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • thenew23T thenew23

                            @gftchris said:

                            I think Ben Tate money could be better used on other areas which are harder to find plug-and-play starters from the draft.

                            Right now we have 1 "maybe-legit" RB... I'm pretty sure we NEED to spend some money to add weapons at that position. We should spend FA money on Tate and a relatively high draft pick on a RB. RBs get hurt, and we need a little more in the cupboard than we had last year...

                            Plus, a FB like somebody mentioned...

                            hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 20k Posts
                            • 5k Reputation
                            hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            @thenew23 said:

                            Right now we have 1 "maybe-legit" RB... I'm pretty sure we NEED to spend some money to add weapons at that position. We should spend FA money on Tate and a relatively high draft pick on a RB. RBs get hurt, and we need a little more in the cupboard than we had last year...

                            Plus, a FB like somebody mentioned...

                            @spectralcow said:

                            Hey, no one would be more in support of greater emphasis on the run game than me. I've argued in favor of it ad naseum. I think Ben Tate is a solid back. I just don't know if he's going to be worth the money he's going to want. Tour2ma disagrees. That's fine; I may be wrong. Tate might end up being fantastic wherever he goes and may end up being quite the bargain. I don't know. I just think there's a better chance that he's solid, but not worth the FA money he gets.

                            I agree Tate may not be worth the money he's going to want- we've seen Denver start no-names in the backfield rack up 1,000+ yard seasons. Tre Mason or Carlos Hyde would fill the bill, and taking either would make me very happy draft day. Mason is no T-Rich IMO.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • gftChris gftChrisG
                              • 13k Posts
                              • 428 Reputation
                              gftChrisG gftChris wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Tate would be a serviceable running back, most likely, in a system he already knows. But, why should we spend big FA money on a RB whose production could most likely be reproduced by a second or third rounder, or below? Instead of giving him $5m a year (or whatever it'd be) and drafting a 3rd round CB - because let's be honest, we're most likely looking offense with picks 1b and 2 - spend that money of decent CB, for example.

                              The GipperT Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • beare B One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 585 Posts
                                • 60 Reputation
                                B beare wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                Id rather draft a young rb pair him with dion lewis then spend big money on tate

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply
                                • gftChrisG gftChris

                                  Tate would be a serviceable running back, most likely, in a system he already knows. But, why should we spend big FA money on a RB whose production could most likely be reproduced by a second or third rounder, or below? Instead of giving him $5m a year (or whatever it'd be) and drafting a 3rd round CB - because let's be honest, we're most likely looking offense with picks 1b and 2 - spend that money of decent CB, for example.

                                  The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                  • 57k Posts
                                  • 4k Reputation
                                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @gftchris said:

                                  Tate would be a serviceable running back, most likely, in a system he already knows. But, why should we spend big FA money on a RB whose production could most likely be reproduced by a second or third rounder, or below? Instead of giving him $5m a year (or whatever it'd be) and drafting a 3rd round CB - because let's be honest, we're most likely looking offense with picks 1b and 2 - spend that money of decent CB, for example.

                                  At this point, I agree, I would rather get an RB out of the draft.....maybe a couple with out 10 picks.

                                  Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • The GipperT The Gipper

                                    @gftchris said:

                                    Tate would be a serviceable running back, most likely, in a system he already knows. But, why should we spend big FA money on a RB whose production could most likely be reproduced by a second or third rounder, or below? Instead of giving him $5m a year (or whatever it'd be) and drafting a 3rd round CB - because let's be honest, we're most likely looking offense with picks 1b and 2 - spend that money of decent CB, for example.

                                    At this point, I agree, I would rather get an RB out of the draft.....maybe a couple with out 10 picks.

                                    Zombo Z
                                    • 8k Posts
                                    • 0 Reputation
                                    Z Zombo wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @the-gipper said:

                                    At this point, I agree, I would rather get an RB out of the draft.....maybe a couple with out 10 picks.

                                    I totally agree. Why buy some used tread when we have plenty of draft picks to grab some fresh legs. Running backs don't need a lot of seasoning or coaching, Grab them when they are young (not 34 like Willis ... what a bad joke that was).

                                    Seems like a lot of good running backs coming out early in this draft, grab a bruiser to go with Lewis and Baker/Oby.

                                    Zombo

                                    Tim Couch Pulls OutT 1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • tml1138T tml1138

                                      Somebody has updated Wikipedia on the coaching staff:

                                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns

                                      Which seems to line up with the official site:

                                      http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/coaches.html

                                      Already more vacancies than I thought there would be at this point.

                                      Osiris OsirisO Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 2k Posts
                                      • 125 Reputation
                                      OsirisO Osiris wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @tml1138 said:

                                      Somebody has updated Wikipedia on the coaching staff:

                                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Browns

                                      Which seems to line up with the official site:

                                      http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/coaches.html

                                      Already more vacancies than I thought there would be at this point.

                                      The funny thing is the wikipedia entry for Mike Pettine had him listed as HC of the Browns before it was even announced.

                                      "I said, 'I need someone who's going to want to get on the roller coaster with me knowing that it's not always going to be fun,'" -Paul DePodesta
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • Spectralcow S
                                        • 270 Posts
                                        • 12 Reputation
                                        S Spectralcow wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        NBC Sports just called the possibility of Kubiak coming to the Browns as the OC "unlikely".

                                        The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • S Spectralcow

                                          NBC Sports just called the possibility of Kubiak coming to the Browns as the OC "unlikely".

                                          The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                          • 57k Posts
                                          • 4k Reputation
                                          The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @spectralcow said:

                                          NBC Sports just called the possibility of Kubiak coming to the Browns as the OC "unlikely".

                                          Then that should mean its a done deal, right?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate