"Can't Miss" Players in 2014 NFL Draft
-
-
Gipper there are also no safeties guards inside linebackers kickers or punters in his top 6.
And we understand that can't miss players sometimes, well, miss.
But it's probably fair to say that a guy should be a once every few years calibre player to be considered a can't miss prospect. Disagree?
WSS
Gipper there are also no safeties guards inside linebackers kickers or punters in his top 6.
And we understand that can't miss players sometimes, well, miss.
But it's probably fair to say that a guy should be a once every few years calibre player to be considered a can't miss prospect. Disagree?
WSS
OK, but no position gets the attention that a QB gets.....look at this forum....90% of it is dedicated to yammering on and on about the QB position.
If Tour says "no QB in my opinion rates a can't miss" I would not argue...probably agree. But when you state that opinion on such a hot button topic people want to also know Why?
-
Clowney is from S.Car. Not Clempsun. Please fix that egregious mistake before he realizes it and eats the entire message board.
-
I think he probably would have mentioned one if any of these four guys were being called the best to come out in years like some of the other positions. It's actually too bad there isn't a can't miss quarterback or two. Then we might have one instead of just paying for one.
WSS
-
are we staying with the 3-4 or switching back to a 4-3.
IMO the 4-3 was better suited to this team. sheard could get loose and who knows what kreuger would have ended up doing.
since they haven't named a DC yet i guess it's all up in the air.
if they were to switch to a 4-3 clowney would be 'can't miss'.
there are no probs with his motor or taking games off. you've got to understand everyone was telling him to take the year off last year. he had just seen his team mate in lattimore lose his career the year before due to injury.....what would you have done?
-
didn't we hire that Jim O'Neill from Buffalo? Or am I confusing somebody with somebody else...
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Yeah they did... and when I read what Pettine's defensive philosophy is it sounds pretty much identical to Horton's.
I guess they plan to run an aggressive 3-4,4-3 hybrid defense.
Although I really can't recall Horton getting too creative with the D last year as much as it was hyped up to be before the season started.
-
didn't we hire that Jim O'Neill from Buffalo? Or am I confusing somebody with somebody else...
WSS
didn't we hire that Jim O'Neill from Buffalo? Or am I confusing somebody with somebody else...
WSS
Yes, but Pettine is presumably going to be calling the plays this season... That means hybrid 3-4/4-3, depending on situations. Last year the Bills played a lot of 4-man fronts with 5-6 in the secondary. I think Pettine will be game-planning based on the players we have, and the team we're facing, not necessarily focusing on a "base D."
-
Ideally, I think our D would look good as a 4-3...
Taylor/Bryant in the middle, Kruger/Sheard on the outside, Jackson in the middle, Mingo/Robertson at OLB, Haden/Skrine at CB, Ward at SS, and a gaping hole at FS
That would be dependent on 3 things: 1-Mingo converting to the "Bruce Irvin-type" 4-3 OLB, 2-finding an upgrade to Robertson, and most importantly 3-we need a FS with great ball skills to round out what could be a stellar D...
I'd consider Haha Clinton-Dix a potential "can't miss" prospect at #26, but he'll probably be gone by then...
-
Gipper there are also no safeties guards inside linebackers kickers or punters in his top 6.
And we understand that can't miss players sometimes, well, miss.
But it's probably fair to say that a guy should be a once every few years calibre player to be considered a can't miss prospect. Disagree?
WSS
Gipper there are also no safeties guards inside linebackers kickers or punters in his top 6.
And we understand that can't miss players sometimes, well, miss.
But it's probably fair to say that a guy should be a once every few years calibre player to be considered a can't miss prospect. Disagree?
Ed Zachery...
You don't have to list all the "can't miss" guys who turned out good, because I don't want to list all the "can't miss" guys who turned out to bust... thanks
I'll play along though:
If there were any "can't miss" players in this draft, here's who I think:
Anthony Barr - OLB - UCLA - at 6'4" 250 with great speed, he's a can't miss OLB for a 3-4 team b/c he doesn't have to convert - he played 3-4 OLB in college.
Jadaveon Clowney - DE - So.Car - he is ONLY a "can't miss" if he plays 4-3 DE. I would never call a pass rusher who has to convert to OLB as "can't miss"
Jake Matthews - OT - TA&M - it's easy to predict OTs will be "can't miss," but different blocking schemes and QB styles can affect guys at the next level
C.J. Mosley - LB - Alabama - I call him "can't miss" because he is very versatile. Can fit inside in a 3-4 or outside in a 4-3, either way he's always around the ball
Kony Ealy - DE - Missouri - another "can't miss" ONLY if he plays 4-3 DE. "Might" fit a 3-4 DE, but again, you never know when systems change
Question marks surrounding all the other players projected in the first round IMHO. There are other players that I think will be good, but I couldn't call them "can't miss." I would never put that label on a QB, RB, WR, or CB because it is so difficult to grade those positions b/c of the widespread level of competetion they are against in college... just my thoughts...
All the hits and busts I listed were players I pegged, not "common wisdom" or consensus choices. So you can't list all my busts, because you do not know all my choices. TR was one; Brian Bosworth was another, but I never understood the hype around Tony Manderich... so I have that going for me.
But glad you played along... substitute Watkins for Mosely and add Mack and you have my list... and your rationales are virtually identical to mine.
And good thoughts they are on "other players"... so good you've inspired another thread.
clowneys not a cant miss it all depends on his desire to play he seems to take games off
Was also a major concern of mine until recently.
And the Colts drafted all of them.
LOL... damn... that's right!
Clowney is from S.Car. Not Clempsun. Please fix that egregious mistake before he realizes it and eats the entire message board.
Done... sorry for jeopardizing the entire operation...
-
Pettine, I believe, fits his scheme to his players.
All that's guaranteed is that we will field 11 players on defense. Sometimes we'll have 7 up front, 4 in coverage. Other times we may have 8 up front. Other times we may have 5 or even 6 in coverage.
That's about the only guarantee you can make right now.
If Pettine stays true to his "put the best players on the field" mantra, we'll be running the good ol' 4-4.
-
Gipper there are also no safeties guards inside linebackers kickers or punters in his top 6.
And we understand that can't miss players sometimes, well, miss.
But it's probably fair to say that a guy should be a once every few years calibre player to be considered a can't miss prospect. Disagree?
WSS
OK, but no position gets the attention that a QB gets.....look at this forum....90% of it is dedicated to yammering on and on about the QB position.
If Tour says "no QB in my opinion rates a can't miss" I would not argue...probably agree. But when you state that opinion on such a hot button topic people want to also know Why?
If Tour says "no QB in my opinion rates a can't miss" I would not argue...probably agree. But when you state that opinion on such a hot button topic people want to also know Why?
I stated it by omission?
I can link to my cases against Bridgewater and Manziel, who are the only two QBs in the draft to even approach consensus Can't Miss status... and neither is really that close from all I have read.
Ideally, I think our D would look good as a 4-3...
Taylor/Bryant in the middle, Kruger/Sheard on the outside, Jackson in the middle, Mingo/Robertson at OLB, Haden/Skrine at CB, Ward at SS, and a gaping hole at FS
Agree on the 4-3... but do not see Bryant in any DT rotation. I see Taylor/ Rubin/ Winn/ Hughes...
If you think DQ is your MLB (I do not), then draft Barr at #4 and set your LB corps Mingo-Jackson-Barr. I'd move DQ back outside, and snag Borland in the 3rd for my MLB... Mingo-Borland-Jackson.
Not sure what to do at FS...
If Pettine stays true to his "put the best players on the field" mantra, we'll be running the good ol' 4-4.
Actually more like a revolutionary 7-2-2...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
If Tour says "no QB in my opinion rates a can't miss" I would not argue...probably agree. But when you state that opinion on such a hot button topic people want to also know Why?
I stated it by omission?
I can link to my cases against Bridgewater and Manziel, who are the only two QBs in the draft to even approach consensus Can't Miss status... and neither is really that close from all I have read.
Ideally, I think our D would look good as a 4-3...
Taylor/Bryant in the middle, Kruger/Sheard on the outside, Jackson in the middle, Mingo/Robertson at OLB, Haden/Skrine at CB, Ward at SS, and a gaping hole at FS
Agree on the 4-3... but do not see Bryant in any DT rotation. I see Taylor/ Rubin/ Winn/ Hughes...
If you think DQ is your MLB (I do not), then draft Barr at #4 and set your LB corps Mingo-Jackson-Barr. I'd move DQ back outside, and snag Borland in the 3rd for my MLB... Mingo-Borland-Jackson.
Not sure what to do at FS...
If Pettine stays true to his "put the best players on the field" mantra, we'll be running the good ol' 4-4.
Actually more like a revolutionary 7-2-2...
Agree on the 4-3... but do not see Bryant in any DT rotation. I see Taylor/ Rubin/ Winn/ Hughes...
If you think DQ is your MLB (I do not), then draft Barr at #4 and set your LB corps Mingo-Jackson-Barr. I'd move DQ back outside, and snag Borland in the 3rd for my MLB... Mingo-Borland-Jackson.
Desmond Bryant was our most disruptive D-lineman last year before he got hurt, and one of our highest paid... why would you not see him in the rotation?
Also, DQJ never played OLB... and he was much more effective in his 2 seasons in the 4-3 than he ever was in his career... I'd add a player behind him to groom, but he is more than capable of starting at ILB with 4 linemen in front of him... he shrinks when there are only 3...
#Justsayin' -
if your definition of bust doesn't include injury then I'd place Bridgewater in the "can't miss" category. The kid is by far the most pro-ready and has the accuracy and the brain to do big things in the league. The only concern, and it isn't a big one, is that he doesn't have the frame to hold up in the NFL.
-
if your definition of bust doesn't include injury then I'd place Bridgewater in the "can't miss" category. The kid is by far the most pro-ready and has the accuracy and the brain to do big things in the league. The only concern, and it isn't a big one, is that he doesn't have the frame to hold up in the NFL.
if your definition of bust doesn't include injury then I'd place Bridgewater in the "can't miss" category. The kid is by far the most pro-ready and has the accuracy and the brain to do big things in the league. The only concern, and it isn't a big one, is that he doesn't have the frame to hold up in the NFL.
They have meds errrrr ummm I mean nutrition and conditioning to fix that
-
Agree on the 4-3... but do not see Bryant in any DT rotation. I see Taylor/ Rubin/ Winn/ Hughes...
If you think DQ is your MLB (I do not), then draft Barr at #4 and set your LB corps Mingo-Jackson-Barr. I'd move DQ back outside, and snag Borland in the 3rd for my MLB... Mingo-Borland-Jackson.
Desmond Bryant was our most disruptive D-lineman last year before he got hurt, and one of our highest paid... why would you not see him in the rotation?
Also, DQJ never played OLB... and he was much more effective in his 2 seasons in the 4-3 than he ever was in his career... I'd add a player behind him to groom, but he is more than capable of starting at ILB with 4 linemen in front of him... he shrinks when there are only 3...
Desmond Bryant was our most disruptive D-lineman last year before he got hurt, and one of our highest paid... why would you not see him in the rotation?
Also, DQJ never played OLB... and he was much more effective in his 2 seasons in the 4-3 than he ever was in his career... I'd add a player behind him to groom, but he is more than capable of starting at ILB with 4 linemen in front of him... he shrinks when there are only 3...
Bryant was a DE in our 3-4. I do not see him having the same disruptive success at DT in a 4-3.
My bad on DQ... ILB/ MLB since 2006. I have always felt he was miscast inside.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Desmond Bryant was our most disruptive D-lineman last year before he got hurt, and one of our highest paid... why would you not see him in the rotation?
Also, DQJ never played OLB... and he was much more effective in his 2 seasons in the 4-3 than he ever was in his career... I'd add a player behind him to groom, but he is more than capable of starting at ILB with 4 linemen in front of him... he shrinks when there are only 3...
Bryant was a DE in our 3-4. I do not see him having the same disruptive success at DT in a 4-3.
My bad on DQ... ILB/ MLB since 2006. I have always felt he was miscast inside.
Bryant was a DE in our 3-4. I do not see him having the same disruptive success at DT in a 4-3.
In 2012, Bryant was DT in a 4-3 at Oakland.
2012 - 16 games played - 36 total tackles (26 solo), 4 sacks, 6 TFL, 1 pass deflected, 1 kick block, and 1 FF
2013 - 12 games played - 31 total tackles (11 solo), 3.5 sacks, and 2 TFL
Seems just as disruptive when playing in a 4-3...
-
@MaryKayCabot: #Browns OC Shanahan on drafting a quarterback: "you don't need a certain type of QB, you need the best one.''
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
@MaryKayCabot: #Browns OC Shanahan on drafting a quarterback: "you don't need a certain type of QB, you need the best one.''
oh great it's that fucking easy. How comes no one has ever Thought of that. And how do we get Tom Brady for that fact.@MaryKayCabot: #Browns OC Shanahan on drafting a quarterback: "you don't need a certain type of QB, you need the best one.''
-
@MaryKayCabot: #Browns OC Shanahan on drafting a quarterback: "you don't need a certain type of QB, you need the best one.''
@MaryKayCabot: #Browns OC Shanahan on drafting a quarterback: "you don't need a certain type of QB, you need the best one.''
Is Shannie selling decoder rings?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login