Skip to content

Jonathan Paul Manziel

The Browns Board
16.0k 396 570.1k 1
  • What time are the players supposed to arrive at the stadium? Isn't it 11:00 am. So they were mad that he was on time.

    Hoyer camped out on the fifty yard line in his Eagle Scout pup tent. Then he rubbed two sticks together and made a fire for the fish he caught with his bare hands on Lake Erie. It was raining so hard it flooded the field so Hoyer, while walking on water, parted the flood and dried the field with one big exhale. Afterward he knitted some sweaters for the offensive line while he was dictating his memoirs about life as a backup quarterback. Before day break, he took the fish he caught and fed all the homeless people on Chester Avenue before returning to his pup tent on the fifty yard line.

    @opal312 said:

    What time are the players supposed to arrive at the stadium? Isn't it 11:00 am. So they were mad that he was on time.

    Hoyer camped out on the fifty yard line in his Eagle Scout pup tent. Then he rubbed two sticks together and made a fire for the fish he caught with his bare hands on Lake Erie. It was raining so hard it flooded the field so Hoyer, while walking on water, parted the flood and dried the field with one big exhale. Afterward he knitted some sweaters for the offensive line while he was dictating his memoirs about life as a backup quarterback. Before day break, he took the fish he caught and fed all the homeless people on Chester Avenue before returning to his pup tent on the fifty yard line.

    Even if Hoyer was Jesus, I say start Johnny next week. But then I'd probably find myself as Satan's new sex toy.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    I don't know much about JFF except what I have read in here, and very little anywhere else. I think he comes from a well to do/rich family. He is probably spoiled rotten and used to getting his own way. Odds are he won't change his ways if that is the case. So as long as he performs, screw it. The coach is not his father. As long as he is on time and shows up, and gives 100 percent that is all that matters. Like I said before, these guys are not high school/college players, they are pros.

    Good, thoughtful post, DH... disagree with much of it (shocker), but doesn't mean I can't appreciate it.

    Basically you're OK with JM doing as he likes, so long as he wins games? How many games will you tolerate losing per season due to game prep not up to NFL standards?

    Game prep may well be at the core of Pettine's now clear reluctance to even consider starting JM. It's also at the core of being a pro...

    Football is JM's job now... not a student activity.

    @tour2ma said:

    Good, thoughtful post, DH... disagree with much of it (shocker), but doesn't mean I can't appreciate it.

    Basically you're OK with JM doing as he likes, so long as he wins games? How many games will you tolerate losing per season due to game prep not up to NFL standards?

    Game prep may well be at the core of Pettine's now clear reluctance to even consider starting JM. It's also at the core of being a pro...

    Football is JM's job now... not a student activity.

    Wow, that's a leap! So now he doesn't game prep properly? That appears to be your conclusion. Are you sure you don't want to reword or clarify that?

    Opal312-you need a post script on that-Then he went out and fucked his team with well prepared, but poorly executed, QB play.

  • @mudfly said:

    The only facts I need is that he clearly....and publicly....said he will not change for anything...not his teammates....not his coaches....not the team....and to me that is, by definition, disrespect for his role here

    Thats enough for me.

    I hope he plays well.....I really do.....just wish we had a Brady, Manning, Kosar, Aikman, Rodgers type of pro, instead of a TMZ spoiled drunk party kid type of pro.....

    If you cant get your head around that, then I can not explain it further......sorry

    Psst you mentioned Bernie Kosar among your list of teetotaler choirboys... Just saying.

    😉

    @westside-steve said:

    Psst you mentioned Bernie Kosar among your list of teetotaler choirboys... Just saying. 😉

    Bernie drank during his playing days with us? Seriously... I'm asking.

    @letsgojackets said:

    Wow Johnny is a real piece of shit. You got me Mudfly.

    Sarcasm followed but incredulity when Mud fails to take a subsequent post seriously... Nice defense mechanism you got there.

    @westside-steve said:

    Nobody is really suggesting that he's neglected game prep have they? Maybe he should be in Berea at 2 a.m. With the coaching staff? And since that's your biggest gripe apparently game prep aint everything since Brian Hoyer has kind of set the high-water mark for that, right?

    @letsgojackets said:

    Has any coach come out and publicly said JFF is not studying enough. Maybe Shanny's offense is really hard to learn? Or maybe we have some bitter geriatrics that don't like the way he "acts". He's not old school enough I guess. This board has to have the record for the amount of insiders that know the ins and outs of the team and staff.

    Lumping these quotes together as I am still new to this "fanboy" thing and may not have it down yet... 😉

    What do we know:

    - Hoyer has played badly of late. Six games and counting by some estimates I've read here.

    - Pettine places emphasis on competition during the week.

    - Competitions occur on the practice fields and in the film rooms.

    - Hoyer has started every game to date.

    Can we not infer that Hoyer is beating JM soundly during the week? I think so... I think you can infer JM's lack of preparedness from the clear reluctance to play him. Be it playbook or reading D's or any combo of the two.

    As far as prescribing the actions for JM to win the week? Sorry, guys, can't do that... not even if I mustered all the wisdom of my advanced age. That would take true "insider knowledge" of what is occurring behind closed doors and not just a logical examination of what is public knowledge.

    Beyond "griping" now Steve, just rationalizing a potential outcome that, BTW, I no longer support. Not as of 12:53 CDT Sunday... Didn't you get the memo?

  • Johnny's game prep is so bad, he out-produced 4 weeks of Hoyer with ONE DRIVE vs. Buffalo.

  • Johnny's game prep is so bad, he out-produced 4 weeks of Hoyer with ONE DRIVE vs. Buffalo.

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    Johnny's game prep is so bad, he out-produced 4 weeks of Hoyer with ONE DRIVE vs. Buffalo.

    😆

  • @tour2ma said:

    When has Haden gone?

    Google Joe Haden and then Cavs. Then click on pictures.

    Manziel vs playbook? I don't understand what you're saying has to do with my quote?

    @letsgojackets said:

    Google Joe Haden and then Cavs. Then click on pictures.

    Manziel vs playbook? I don't understand what you're saying has to do with my quote?

    As in JM v the playbook... a competition he lost. Did his loss not hurt the team?

    Damn... that google machine is cool...

    Got the pics... especially like this one of Joe and his chaperone...

    635503863494174224-USATSI-8173234.jpg

  • I'm not a life long Browns fan, so of course I have no long-term dog in this fight like those that suffered for years of misery with piss-poor teams over the last decade+.

    I wanted to make a few comments.

    What you are seeing from Brian Hoyer is what you saw from him in college. Brian had shown his ceiling years ago and people (Browns coaching) chose to believe that he'd be a good game manager.

    Look at his MSU college stats. He had a great year in 2007 and still managed just 59.3% completion. He regressed his following year.

    **NOTE***

    Not sure why, but the table I pasted from wiki showed up as a normal format and was only converted after posting the message...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Hoyer

    Of the meaningful snaps he took, I look to AZ where had 53 attempts. Again, the guy is around 56% completion.

    Yes, I'm a Johnny homer. I had the privilege to watch just about every game he played in (home and away) while at Texas A&M. The kid is electric and has incredible accuracy while throwing on the run. But more than just that, it is his attitude which is somehow positively infectious to a team. Teammates playing alongside Johnny believe in the kid. They knew that he was going to give 110% to win the game and it pissed him off like no other if he came up short. It genuinely pisses him off and he hates to lose ala Tom Brady. When the defense would stink (which was often), he'd march down the sidelines and fire the team up. He'd tell them to just get one more stop and he'd win the game. A&M was a mediocre to poor team. We should have lost to Arkansas early in the season. We were playing in AT&T Stadium and down multiple touch downs. I watched Johnny go to the sidelines and pump up the team. They responded to him. They rallied back and somehow won that game in overtime down 14 pts in the 4th quarter.

    Again, I don't know what it is about this guy, but I fully believe the vets on the Browns team will eventually come around. He is a fiery piss-ant of a competitor and somehow he elevates everyone else's play around him. It's like they want to go out there and be every bit of a bad ass as they can. Of course Johnny wouldn't win every game he is in, but I honestly think Manziel would have won vs the Colts, which probably isn't hard to say given what everyone saw on the offensive side of the ball Sunday.

    @evan_aggie said:

    I'm not a life long Browns fan, so of course I have no long-term dog in this fight like those that suffered for years of misery with piss-poor teams over the last decade+.

    I wanted to make a few comments.

    Welcome to the party...

  • @letsgojackets said:

    Google Joe Haden and then Cavs. Then click on pictures.

    Manziel vs playbook? I don't understand what you're saying has to do with my quote?

    As in JM v the playbook... a competition he lost. Did his loss not hurt the team?

    Damn... that google machine is cool...

    Got the pics... especially like this one of Joe and his chaperone...

    635503863494174224-USATSI-8173234.jpg

    @tour2ma said:

    As in JM v the playbook... a competition he lost. Did his loss not hurt the team?

    Damn... that google machine is cool...

    Got the pics... especially like this one of Joe and his chaperone...

    635503863494174224-USATSI-8173234.jpg

    Haden looks buzzed.

  • @letsgojackets said:

    Google Joe Haden and then Cavs. Then click on pictures.

    Manziel vs playbook? I don't understand what you're saying has to do with my quote?

    As in JM v the playbook... a competition he lost. Did his loss not hurt the team?

    Damn... that google machine is cool...

    Got the pics... especially like this one of Joe and his chaperone...

    635503863494174224-USATSI-8173234.jpg

    @tour2ma said:

    As in JM v the playbook... a competition he lost. Did his loss not hurt the team?

    I was under the assumption we were seeing what we had in Hoyer and let JFF sit. But you know everything so I'll let you handle it big guy.

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    ^ This.

    @letsgojackets said:

    ^This

    Ditto... kumbaya moment?

    @tml1138 said:

    Even if Hoyer was Jesus, I say start Johnny next week. But then I'd probably find myself as Satan's new sex toy.

    lol...

  • " What do we know: - Hoyer has played badly of late. Six games and counting by some estimates I've read here. - Pettine places emphasis on competition during the week. - Competitions occur on the practice fields and in the film rooms. - Hoyer has started every game to date.

    Can we not infer that Hoyer is beating JM soundly during the week? I think so... I think you can infer JM's lack of preparedness from the clear reluctance to play him. Be it playbook or reading D's or any combo of the two."

    NO, THIS SHOULD NOT BE INFERRED!

    It's the opposite.

    Paraphrasing

    Pettine: Well, Johnny played well, provided a spark, got a td against Buffalo, but we're 7-5 with (in spite of) Hoyer, and still in the playoff hunt.

    All I've heard is that Manziel is getting better every day and even causes problems for 1st team defense when he's scout team qb.

    After the debacle of "Hoyer gives us the best chance to beat Indy", how can you infer anything logical about the qb controversy

  • Johnny's game prep is so bad, he out-produced 4 weeks of Hoyer with ONE DRIVE vs. Buffalo.

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    Johnny's game prep is so bad, he out-produced 4 weeks of Hoyer with ONE DRIVE vs. Buffalo.

    When you want to do a serious breakdown of that ONE DRIVE, start a new thread.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Wow, that's a leap! So now he doesn't game prep properly? That appears to be your conclusion. Are you sure you don't want to reword or clarify that?

    Sure, Ag... especially since I already have:

    @tour2ma said:

    What do we know:

    - Hoyer has played badly of late. Six games and counting by some estimates I've read here.

    - Pettine places emphasis on competition during the week.

    - Competitions occur on the practice fields and in the film rooms.

    - Hoyer has started every game to date.

    Can we not infer that Hoyer is beating JM soundly during the week? I think so... I think you can infer JM's lack of preparedness from the clear reluctance to play him. Be it playbook or reading D's or any combo of the two.

  • I suspect that if it was strictly a playbook/not winning the head to head issue then no one would have argued on the staff for JM to play yesterday. It seemed to me that 7-5 plus 3 last year was the big issue that he got from mutual teammates that convinced him Hoyer should start. They went with their gut/loyalty to the one that got them there over an untried rookie. And now they know their answer. Hoyer once again screwed the pooch despite all that extra prep time and showing up hours before the QB who had by then been told to sit the bench once again. A QB who knows in his own heart that he is far the better QB and was disappointed in not getting the start.

    Sorry but facts don't support the inference in was a game prep issue. Pettine clearly stated that there was a 'spirited" discussion and it was a close call that he had to choose the QB that still had them in the playoff hunt. We may find soon find out what other issues were there if he still sticks with Hoyer the rest of the season. But at the moment it's just a guess, not an inference, that it was a playbook issue (Edit) or a D reading issue (I read that after posting the first part).

  • " What do we know: - Hoyer has played badly of late. Six games and counting by some estimates I've read here. - Pettine places emphasis on competition during the week. - Competitions occur on the practice fields and in the film rooms. - Hoyer has started every game to date.

    Can we not infer that Hoyer is beating JM soundly during the week? I think so... I think you can infer JM's lack of preparedness from the clear reluctance to play him. Be it playbook or reading D's or any combo of the two."

    NO, THIS SHOULD NOT BE INFERRED!

    It's the opposite.

    Paraphrasing

    Pettine: Well, Johnny played well, provided a spark, got a td against Buffalo, but we're 7-5 with (in spite of) Hoyer, and still in the playoff hunt.

    All I've heard is that Manziel is getting better every day and even causes problems for 1st team defense when he's scout team qb.

    After the debacle of "Hoyer gives us the best chance to beat Indy", how can you infer anything logical about the qb controversy

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    After the debacle of "Hoyer gives us the best chance to beat Indy", how can you infer anything logical about the qb controversy

    Gotta say that no one knows. It is a dilemma all righty. WHY they would play Hoyer when he looks so damn terrible is beyond me.

    But, since NONE of us know the truth, and we ALL gotta take guesses, you HAVE to think there is a problem somewhere there. Dont know what it is. But why would you sit a projected superstar if he's owning practices and playing great and play a less than average back up whos stinking up the joint?

    I doubt he was sat down because of a cavs game. No way. Theres more to the story, but coach aint gonna say it out loud. All possibilities are

    1) he's not ready

    2) he's not good

    3) coach just doesn't like him

    4) he doesn't know the plays

    5) he went to a cavs game?

    6) he arrived almost late?

    7) he's on TMZ too much

    😎 he smelled like booze

    9) coach just doesn't like him

    10) Hoyer sucks, but is still better

    11) coach is just dumb

    12) coach is gay for hoyer

    13) is being punished....out late, swans, tmz, etc?

    13) none of the above

    I honestly dont know the answer and have no agenda, but do think we will find out soon enough.....

  • " When you want to do a serious breakdown of that ONE DRIVE, start a new thread."

    It's already been done by a guru who praised Johnny for his reads and great arm. The link was in this board, but you probably didn't want to see it because of your anti-Johnny bias. It was really cool, pics, video, explanations of the plays. I'll try to find it, not that you actually care.

  • I was absolutely right when I said the locker room is compromised.

  • Manzier's back. Must've been a rough couple of days.

  • I was absolutely right when I said the locker room is compromised.

    @walterwhite said:

    I was absolutely right when I said the locker room is compromised.

    Exactly what do you mean by that Walter?

  • @tour2ma said:

    As in JM v the playbook... a competition he lost. Did his loss not hurt the team?

    I was under the assumption we were seeing what we had in Hoyer and let JFF sit. But you know everything so I'll let you handle it big guy.

    @letsgojackets said:

    I was under the assumption we were seeing what we had in Hoyer and let JFF sit. But you know everything so I'll let you handle it big guy.

    Now who is being disingenuous?

  • I was absolutely right when I said the locker room is compromised.

    @walterwhite said:

    I was absolutely right when I said the locker room is compromised.

    They have to be, assuming there are still players who are backing hoyer. Is that even possible? The locker room probably sounds a lot like this board.

    @aggie-brown-fan said:

    Manzier's back. Must've been a rough couple of days.

    Thanks for noticing. It was very rough.