Skip to content

I'm kind of mad so to hell with it, here we go with another Watkins rant...

The Browns Board
41 17 1.7k
  • we trade manziel to the cowboys for a second rounder get moirtta and a wide receiver and another solid d pick

  • the Retard of Watkins strikes again.... Jesus Christ dude, we get it: you wanted Watkins, and overvalue the WR position by a country mile. My suggestion, either find Doc Brown and his DeLorean or learn how to cope. I hear warm water and a mild soap is good for removing sand from the vagina.

  • the Retard of Watkins strikes again.... Jesus Christ dude, we get it: you wanted Watkins, and overvalue the WR position by a country mile. My suggestion, either find Doc Brown and his DeLorean or learn how to cope. I hear warm water and a mild soap is good for removing sand from the vagina.

    @roycerolls said:

    the Retard of Watkins strikes again...

    lol... funny, but 4life's not that bad.

  • It doesn't matter who your receivers are if your QB can't hit them when they are wide open.

  • the Retard of Watkins strikes again.... Jesus Christ dude, we get it: you wanted Watkins, and overvalue the WR position by a country mile. My suggestion, either find Doc Brown and his DeLorean or learn how to cope. I hear warm water and a mild soap is good for removing sand from the vagina.

    @roycerolls said:

    the Retard of Watkins strikes again.... Jesus Christ dude, we get it: you wanted Watkins, and overvalue the WR position by a country mile. My suggestion, either find Doc Brown and his DeLorean or learn how to cope. I hear warm water and a mild soap is good for removing sand from the vagina.

    Hey fuckknuckle I said any one of the top WR talents, which obviously included Watkins you rubbish little piss flap. If you couldn't see yesterday how Gordon was nerfing our offense than stop watching football. Stop. You're awful at watching football. You stink..you have no idea what's going on. Someone could sneak up and change the ch to soccer and as long as you saw a big green lawn with numbers on it you wouldn't know the difference.

    Oh and shorts was proven right wasn't he? I'll be the first to admit I thought he was nuts, it's just a bad game or maybe two...this will right itself. But it didn't. So admit he was right and most of us, including myself, were dead wrong. We should have started Johnny a couple weeks ago. But that one is "true" hindsight given how well Hoyer played early in the year. My point about we had to take a WR in the draft last year was not hindsighting...everybody knew we needed a WR cause we didn't know what was gonna happen with Gordon. Overvaluing the position? ARe you Retarded? <----my bad that's a completely rhetorical question on my part, disregard.

  • It doesn't matter who your receivers are if your QB can't hit them when they are wide open.

    @walterwhite said:

    It doesn't matter who your receivers are if your QB can't hit them when they are wide open.

    This is true but at least we could ship Gordon out of here and still get something for him and have a #1 left over. That's how over Gordon I am. Just think about this....the dude should literally sacrifice lambs on an alter for the fact he's still on an NFL team. He hasn't played all damn season long so it's not like he's broken down......and he's still FUCKING LOAFING?? Are you kidding me? Just wtf is dude's problem? He can't run hard off the line for 6 games? We already know he can't block for dick so we don't ask what other teams ask of their WR's. Wayne and Hilton block all over the place don't they? I'd trade Josh Gordon for Reggie fucking where's my social security check Wayne.

  • Lol, butthurt much? Shorts wasn't proven right, his platform was far more than simply "Hoyer sucks". His platform was play Manziel right now incase we need to draft another first round QB, which never happens. Sure, Hoyer was given the reigns for too long, but if you honestly believe that a rookie qb who didn't fully know the playbook still adjusting to the NFL leads this team to 7-4 then you're even dumber than your "oh no a wr didn't run fast enough in one play, the sky is falling" posts would suggest. Criticize my fandom or football IQ all you want but it's about as meaningful as Kim Kardashian weighing in on astrophysics. Youve made it perfectly clear that you are a crybaby bitch and a Retard. The last word is all yours, I'm sure it will be misspelled.

  • "In case" is two words you full on window licking dumbass. And lol at "oh no a WR didn't run fast enough"...Gordons shit got called out last year and he hasn't changed despite being gifted from the heavens to still be in the NFL. That is not a sky is falling anything. For not seeing that I'm not questioning your football IQ...there is nothing to question. I wasn't joking when I expressed my doubt that you could tell the difference if you looked away for a second and someone flipped it to soccer. I think the same drooling expression would prevail. I mean, you don't think you could tell the diff at this point do you?

  • I wouldn't trade Gordon. I would see what he can do with competent QB play.

    He's one of the most gifted receivers in the league.

  • image.jpg
  • Jacoby Brissett 4th round 2015

  • This is what happens when JF ain't real happy with his best receiver. Gordon will "get it" because JF will have already laid the groundwork with the kind of off the field relationship that lets him get away with it in a game under the worst of circumstances (down and not playing well).

  • Just because I'm tired of hearing about him and the fact that he doesn't play for the Cleveland Browns I rename him.....

    Twatkins.

    🙂

    WSS

  • Just because I'm tired of hearing about him and the fact that he doesn't play for the Cleveland Browns I rename him.....

    Twatkins.

    🙂

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Just because I'm tired of hearing about him and the fact that he doesn't play for the Cleveland Browns I rename him.....

    Twatkins.

    🙂

    WSS

    That needs to be an auto - correct. Make it happen zombo.

  • Lol, butthurt much? Shorts wasn't proven right, his platform was far more than simply "Hoyer sucks". His platform was play Manziel right now incase we need to draft another first round QB, which never happens. Sure, Hoyer was given the reigns for too long, but if you honestly believe that a rookie qb who didn't fully know the playbook still adjusting to the NFL leads this team to 7-4 then you're even dumber than your "oh no a wr didn't run fast enough in one play, the sky is falling" posts would suggest. Criticize my fandom or football IQ all you want but it's about as meaningful as Kim Kardashian weighing in on astrophysics. Youve made it perfectly clear that you are a crybaby bitch and a Retard. The last word is all yours, I'm sure it will be misspelled.

    Seconded the auto-correct nomination... lol...

    Not only good for now, but also would be very cool to have in place for next game vs. Buffalo.

    @roycerolls said:

    Lol, butthurt much? Shorts wasn't proven right, his platform was far more than simply "Hoyer sucks". His platform was play Manziel right now incase we need to draft another first round QB, which never happens.

    Cool... would you mind carrying this load at season's end when the latest suspension is lifted, my brother? I've gotten awfully tired...

    I promise though that if the "discussion" sees Day 2, I'll tag in, but I do not see him lasting that long.

    @westside-steve said:

    Just because I'm tired of hearing about him and the fact that he doesn't play for the Cleveland Browns I rename him.....

    Twatkins.

    lol... well done...

  • @westside-steve said:

    Just because I'm tired of hearing about him and the fact that he doesn't play for the Cleveland Browns I rename him.....

    Twatkins.

    🙂

    WSS

    That needs to be an auto - correct. Make it happen zombo.

    @the-cysko-kid said:

    That needs to be an auto - correct. Make it happen zombo.

    +2

  • it's amazing how all these guys that couldn't wait to get gordon back now turn on him because he's come up short a couple times in two games. has anyone besides walter figured out that it might be the fact that hoyer (right now) can't hit the broadside of a barn. the 2 BIG incompletions that were questioned and looked at by replay were hardly gordon's fault. one was thrown in the dirt and the other out of bounds.

    people are so quick to turn on players. having a QB/WR tandem work well together takes time. if anyone saw the post game interview with jordy nelson of the pack last night you'll remember he said that rodgers and nelson have been on the team for 7 years together always working on timing and routes. you think 3 weeks of practice and gameday work with an inconsistent QB will solve those problems? i really doubt it.

    yes out of all the receivers i wanted evans but i also wanted gilbert. so i got one outta the two. but going forward we need that same type of tall physical WR that corners can't jump as high as and can't cover.

    the browns also could have drafted a WR at 22 but we all know who we wouldn't have on the team now if that had happened.

  • it's amazing how all these guys that couldn't wait to get gordon back now turn on him because he's come up short a couple times in two games. has anyone besides walter figured out that it might be the fact that hoyer (right now) can't hit the broadside of a barn. the 2 BIG incompletions that were questioned and looked at by replay were hardly gordon's fault. one was thrown in the dirt and the other out of bounds.

    people are so quick to turn on players. having a QB/WR tandem work well together takes time. if anyone saw the post game interview with jordy nelson of the pack last night you'll remember he said that rodgers and nelson have been on the team for 7 years together always working on timing and routes. you think 3 weeks of practice and gameday work with an inconsistent QB will solve those problems? i really doubt it.

    yes out of all the receivers i wanted evans but i also wanted gilbert. so i got one outta the two. but going forward we need that same type of tall physical WR that corners can't jump as high as and can't cover.

    the browns also could have drafted a WR at 22 but we all know who we wouldn't have on the team now if that had happened.

    @miktoxic said:

    it's amazing how all these guys that couldn't wait to get gordon back now turn on him because he's come up short a couple times in two games. has anyone besides walter figured out that it might be the fact that hoyer (right now) can't hit the broadside of a barn. the 2 BIG incompletions that were questioned and looked at by replay were hardly gordon's fault. one was thrown in the dirt and the other out of bounds.

    people are so quick to turn on players. having a QB/WR tandem work well together takes time. if anyone saw the post game interview with jordy nelson of the pack last night you'll remember he said that rodgers and nelson have been on the team for 7 years together always working on timing and routes. you think 3 weeks of practice and gameday work with an inconsistent QB will solve those problems? i really doubt it.

    yes out of all the receivers i wanted evans but i also wanted gilbert. so i got one outta the two. but going forward we need that same type of tall physical WR that corners can't jump as high as and can't cover.

    the browns also could have drafted a WR at 22 but we all know who we wouldn't have on the team now if that had happened.

    nope, sorry mik...I gave Gordon the benefit of the doubt his first game. It did seem that him and Hoyer just weren't on the same page. The loafing on sunday is why I'm done with him. And this isn't new either. This was last years shit too that they promised he's gotten out of his system. Guys were seeing this loafing on the all-22 all season long last year. Just nobody talked about it cause when he did get the ball he made shit happen. Problem is if a defense focus's on him and tails him with at least 2 guys everywhere he goes...he shuts down. So much so that by the end of the game they barely need to cover him. Can't have that.