Skip to content

sell off the o line and front seven in the offseason...

The Browns Board
104 26 2.9k
  • @baconhound said:

    I think you always look to improve through free agency and the draft. Unfortunately, like pitching in baseball, difference makers come at a high price and as we've seen depth is nice to have.

    which is exactly why I begrudgingly acknowledge we may have to look to unload Kruger and/or Mugshots contracts. I wish both guys would still be in a browns uni next year, but in a revamp...who knows. And a revamp is necessary. Personnel and perhaps scheme. I dunno about scheme, I'm willing to wait on scheme cause it's possible these guys were really more suited to Hortons scheme than they were pettine's. But we simply cannot let one more year pass with this abysmal run D. It utterly negates our superiority at secondary and that makes me sick.

    @clevfan4life said:

    which is exactly why I begrudgingly acknowledge we may have to look to unload Kruger and/or Mugshots contracts. I wish both guys would still be in a browns uni next year, but in a revamp...who knows. And a revamp is necessary. Personnel and perhaps scheme. I dunno about scheme, I'm willing to wait on scheme cause it's possible these guys were really more suited to Hortons scheme than they were pettine's. But we simply cannot let one more year pass with this abysmal run D. It utterly negates our superiority at secondary and that makes me sick.

    Yeah Kruger isn't worth the money he's getting paid and Haden's contract is laughable. What irks me the most is the complete lack of direction in the front office.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    I'll make the case that while Thomas may not be quite "overrated", he's getting close. Now is the time to shop him to a team that needs a LT. We're starting to see his decline but maybe some other team can be persuaded to give up something we desperately need. I don't "want" to give up JT, but we should see what the interest is.

    If Thomas is viewed as a top 2 or 3 LT in the league he is overrated. I agree if you can sell him now and get something legit you do.

    @baconhound said:

    If Thomas is viewed as a top 2 or 3 LT in the league he is overrated. I agree if you can sell him now and get something legit you do.

    only problem is there's no real good LT available in FA. Would we draft a LT high then? With what we need defensively in the draft I dunno. If we can land some high value free agents at DL like Raji, Knighton or Fairley...than maybe we can draft a tackle high if there is one. If we had taken Mack with our 1st last year we'd be good at ILB'er which would free up some options, but as it stands right now we need so much at our LB'er spot I can't imagine we don't use 1 or possibly both our 1st round picks to cover ILB and OLB since Sheard will likely be gone for sure.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    which is exactly why I begrudgingly acknowledge we may have to look to unload Kruger and/or Mugshots contracts. I wish both guys would still be in a browns uni next year, but in a revamp...who knows. And a revamp is necessary. Personnel and perhaps scheme. I dunno about scheme, I'm willing to wait on scheme cause it's possible these guys were really more suited to Hortons scheme than they were pettine's. But we simply cannot let one more year pass with this abysmal run D. It utterly negates our superiority at secondary and that makes me sick.

    Yeah Kruger isn't worth the money he's getting paid and Haden's contract is laughable. What irks me the most is the complete lack of direction in the front office.

    @baconhound said:

    Yeah Kruger isn't worth the money he's getting paid and Haden's contract is laughable. What irks me the most is the complete lack of direction in the front office.

    easy now Hadens the one guy on this team who I think is playing absolutely up to his contract.

  • I like Krueger and I'd hate to see him go but something has got to change up there

  • Kruger has elevated his game quite a bit this season. Haden, until him being hurt today and one TD given up to HIlton, has had one of the better 5-6 game stretches in the NFL.

    You fucking people have to be joking about trading these two.

  • It really all depends if Kruger fits with what comes next. Cause obviously something has to be reworked or at least tweaked with the scheme. But having 8m tied up at one OLB'er spot may not be viable tia. But no, not Haden. He's the cornerstone of our secondary.

  • @baconhound said:

    Yeah Kruger isn't worth the money he's getting paid and Haden's contract is laughable. What irks me the most is the complete lack of direction in the front office.

    easy now Hadens the one guy on this team who I think is playing absolutely up to his contract.

    @clevfan4life said:

    easy now Hadens the one guy on this team who I think is playing absolutely up to his contract.

    Giving a DB that kind of money, when you draft Gilbert 8th, in this "hands off" league is nuts. Haden has been up and down this season but overall has been good. He's gonna be a $12 to $14 million hit over the next few years.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Present your case other then "you disagree"...... "highly"

    I'll make the case that while Thomas may not be quite "overrated", he's getting close. Now is the time to shop him to a team that needs a LT. We're starting to see his decline but maybe some other team can be persuaded to give up something we desperately need. I don't "want" to give up JT, but we should see what the interest is.

    @clevfan4life said:

    I'll make the case that while Thomas may not be quite "overrated", he's getting close. Now is the time to shop him to a team that needs a LT. We're starting to see his decline but maybe some other team can be persuaded to give up something we desperately need. I don't "want" to give up JT, but we should see what the interest is.

    And his replacement would be?

  • @clevfan4life said:

    I'll make the case that while Thomas may not be quite "overrated", he's getting close. Now is the time to shop him to a team that needs a LT. We're starting to see his decline but maybe some other team can be persuaded to give up something we desperately need. I don't "want" to give up JT, but we should see what the interest is.

    And his replacement would be?

    @canton-dawg said:

    And his replacement would be?

    dunno, which is why we wouldn't get rid of him unless someone wsa really desperate for a LT and came up out of their pockets. I'm not saying firesale this. But we have to start shopping.

  • Kruger has elevated his game quite a bit this season. Haden, until him being hurt today and one TD given up to HIlton, has had one of the better 5-6 game stretches in the NFL.

    You fucking people have to be joking about trading these two.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Kruger has elevated his game quite a bit this season. Haden, until him being hurt today and one TD given up to HIlton, has had one of the better 5-6 game stretches in the NFL.

    You fucking people have to be joking about trading these two.

    I would completely agree with you if you can pay players without consequence. New England won't hap a DB cap hit over $4 million next year.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    easy now Hadens the one guy on this team who I think is playing absolutely up to his contract.

    Giving a DB that kind of money, when you draft Gilbert 8th, in this "hands off" league is nuts. Haden has been up and down this season but overall has been good. He's gonna be a $12 to $14 million hit over the next few years.

    @baconhound said:

    Giving a DB that kind of money, when you draft Gilbert 8th, in this "hands off" league is nuts. Haden has been up and down this season but overall has been good. He's gonna be a $12 to $14 million hit over the next few years.

    can't be helped. We "had" to retain Haden. Our secondary is the best in the NFL now, that has to be retained.

  • It really all depends if Kruger fits with what comes next. Cause obviously something has to be reworked or at least tweaked with the scheme. But having 8m tied up at one OLB'er spot may not be viable tia. But no, not Haden. He's the cornerstone of our secondary.

    @clevfan4life said:

    It really all depends if Kruger fits with what comes next. Cause obviously something has to be reworked or at least tweaked with the scheme. But having 8m tied up at one OLB'er spot may not be viable tia. But no, not Haden. He's the cornerstone of our secondary.

    Sheard is the most likely casualty. At least, to me he is. Rub shortly afterwards. Kruger and Mingo, will be the OLB's moving forward beyond this season. Unless of course the front office feels frisky enough to draft someone high or mid round. That said, the man has double digit sacks, has done some of the better work against the run of all our front 7 and seems to be rounding into the form. As it stands I don't think the front office has any issue with the money they're spending on him.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    It really all depends if Kruger fits with what comes next. Cause obviously something has to be reworked or at least tweaked with the scheme. But having 8m tied up at one OLB'er spot may not be viable tia. But no, not Haden. He's the cornerstone of our secondary.

    Sheard is the most likely casualty. At least, to me he is. Rub shortly afterwards. Kruger and Mingo, will be the OLB's moving forward beyond this season. Unless of course the front office feels frisky enough to draft someone high or mid round. That said, the man has double digit sacks, has done some of the better work against the run of all our front 7 and seems to be rounding into the form. As it stands I don't think the front office has any issue with the money they're spending on him.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Sheard is the most likely casualty. At least, to me he is. Rub shortly afterwards. Kruger and Mingo, will be the OLB's moving forward beyond this season. Unless of course the front office feels frisky enough to draft someone high or mid round. That said, the man has double digit sacks, has done some of the better work against the run of all our front 7 and seems to be rounding into the form. As it stands I don't think the front office has any issue with the money they're spending on him.

    as I've been saying, it all depends if someone's willing to give us something for him. If not then no, we retain him. The problem is he's the one with the highest trade value on that front 7 right now isn't he? I don't want to see him go but if we were to get a decently high 1st rounder for him with maybe a little extra?????

  • If our front 7 is the problem, why would we trade any our best players for an unproven rookie?

  • @baconhound said:

    Giving a DB that kind of money, when you draft Gilbert 8th, in this "hands off" league is nuts. Haden has been up and down this season but overall has been good. He's gonna be a $12 to $14 million hit over the next few years.

    can't be helped. We "had" to retain Haden. Our secondary is the best in the NFL now, that has to be retained.

    @clevfan4life said:

    can't be helped. We "had" to retain Haden. Our secondary is the best in the NFL now, that has to be retained.

    It was a fan friendly pick but you drafted Haden I believe 7th and picked Gilbert 8th. Gilbert then should be the new Haden and Skrine is the opposite guy and you spend that money in other places. The beauty of the NFL is through the draft you can drastically improve your team, the bad news is if you draft poorly you lose ground. The Patriots will let people go that are cap issues, Revis next year, and reload in the 4th round of the draft.

  • If our front 7 is the problem, why would we trade any our best players for an unproven rookie?

    @mudfly said:

    If our front 7 is the problem, why would we trade any our best players for an unproven rookie?

    Gotta hope you can draft and develop. I think Bitonio was a good pick. If you can draft a top tackle and develop him you save on the cap. Next year Thomas will count as $10.5 million towards the cap and Bitonio $1.5 million. When you are looking long term, which I hope they are, you have to make draft picks successful.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Kruger has elevated his game quite a bit this season. Haden, until him being hurt today and one TD given up to HIlton, has had one of the better 5-6 game stretches in the NFL.

    You fucking people have to be joking about trading these two.

    I would completely agree with you if you can pay players without consequence. New England won't hap a DB cap hit over $4 million next year.

    @baconhound said:

    I would completely agree with you if you can pay players without consequence. New England won't hap a DB cap hit over $4 million next year.

    What? You think they won't retain Revis? Browner and himself are one of the big reasons the Pats are so dangerous at home this year.

    @baconhound said:

    It was a fan friendly pick but you drafted Haden I believe 7th and picked Gilbert 8th. Gilbert then should be the new Haden and Skrine is the opposite guy and you spend that money in other places. The beauty of the NFL is through the draft you can drastically improve your team, the bad news is if you draft poorly you lose ground. The Patriots will let people go that are cap issues, Revis next year, and reload in the 4th round of the draft.

    Not a chance in hell you let a top 5 DB under 25 years old walk off your team. You draft Gilbert to form a dominant secondary, not to let Haden go.

    Also, the pats will at worst re-structure Revis' contract but you can bet your sweet ass he's staying in New England. Dude has balled out this season like the Revis of old.

  • Nothing wrong with this team that a quarterback wouldnt solve.

    We are 7-6 with a mediocre one, and 0-1 while starting little mascots.

    Z

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    Ah, so. I still disagree. And highly.

    Present your case other then "you disagree"...... "highly"

    @tiamat63 said:

    Present your case other then "you disagree"...... "highly"

    He can't... so give him a break.

    @thenew23 said:

    Injuries are going to happen. We need to be in a better position to fill-in for those injuries. A good backup C and someone that can compete with Schwartz at RT would be good. The D-line just needs an interior Run-stuffer to prevent blockers from so easily getting to the second level...

    High pick to demote a starter to back-up, Day 2 picks to compete or Day 3's and UDFA's in search of a gem. Or all the above... plenty of room available as we have not seen a single back-up step up to anything approaching a level of competence.

    Only McDaniel started showing signs of being good enough to get by... and that was after weeks of play. McQuistan and Seymore have been unmitigated disasters.

    @clevfan4life said:

    but this isn't knee jerk. You can say the D line has been decimated, but this is what we've seen from them for the most part, since opening day.

    Wow... how long would it take me to find posts within the last week about our showing against Indy?

    Today I saw Poa and Kitchen in there side by side way too many times. That's a new level of decimation in my book. Add that the only decent blows the D got all game were halftime and the late second QTR "flag-a-thon drive", and safe to say they wore down some.

    It's knee-jerk...

  • @baconhound said:

    I would completely agree with you if you can pay players without consequence. New England won't hap a DB cap hit over $4 million next year.

    What? You think they won't retain Revis? Browner and himself are one of the big reasons the Pats are so dangerous at home this year.

    @baconhound said:

    It was a fan friendly pick but you drafted Haden I believe 7th and picked Gilbert 8th. Gilbert then should be the new Haden and Skrine is the opposite guy and you spend that money in other places. The beauty of the NFL is through the draft you can drastically improve your team, the bad news is if you draft poorly you lose ground. The Patriots will let people go that are cap issues, Revis next year, and reload in the 4th round of the draft.

    Not a chance in hell you let a top 5 DB under 25 years old walk off your team. You draft Gilbert to form a dominant secondary, not to let Haden go.

    Also, the pats will at worst re-structure Revis' contract but you can bet your sweet ass he's staying in New England. Dude has balled out this season like the Revis of old.

    @tiamat63 said:

    What? You think they won't retain Revis? Browner and himself are one of the big reasons the Pats are so dangerous at home this year.

    Not a chance in hell you let a top 5 DB under 25 years old walk off your team. You draft Gilbert to form a dominant secondary, not to let Haden go.

    Also, the pats will at worst re-structure Revis' contract but you can bet your sweet ass he's staying in New England. Dude has balled out this season like the Revis of old.

    I think Revis will be gone. I don't see them taking more than a $7 to $8 million dollar hit for a DB but a team like Oakland will give him a good chunk based on this year.

    I'm not saying I dislike Haden but I really think the NFL is still a "trenches" game and if you are telling me I can spend a finite amount of money DL over DB for me.