Top MIT Climate Scientist disses Bernie Sanders position on mmgw
-
I don't see what you have a problem with woody? He essentially just posted four articles. I'm not reading them, or yours, because I couldn't give a shit about global warming but the fashion in which he posts his isn't bothersome to me.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
Cysko, Cal has a bad habit of just slinging mountains of links to sites because he did a google search. They could all be billybobsbackyard.blog.com types of sites but it doesn't matter so long as you show a lot of them.
He basically only does it to Woody though haha.
-
Yeah one of them is from whatsupwitthat I wouldn't trust it but the economist and Forbes ought to be somewhat reputable.
Early man walked away as modern man took control. Their minds weren't all the same and to conquer was their goal. So He built his great empires and he slaughtered his own kind, and he died a confused man and killed himself in his own mind... -
Mostly me, haha. I think you're right.
I'm just saying, if we're trying to have some back and forth or debate here, that helps no one. Either posting Google searches or posting 10 posts in rapid succession from all over the internet.
-
Yeah one of them is from whatsupwitthat I wouldn't trust it but the economist and Forbes ought to be somewhat reputable.
Yeah one of them is from whatsupwitthat I wouldn't trust it but the economist and Forbes ought to be somewhat reputable.
FWIW, the Economist article basically explains the pause in temperature rise, ending with:
The solar cycle is already turning. And aerosol cooling is likely to be reined in by China’s anti-pollution laws. Most of the circumstances that have put the planet’s temperature rise on “pause” look temporary. Like the Terminator, global warming will be back.
-
So either Cal's changed his tune on global warming, or didn't really read the article.
-
Of course global warming will be back.
It's called summer
-
I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.
CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.
Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with
asinine, politically oriented alarmism.
It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...
which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was
the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.
Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,
to the "end justifies the means".
-
Without curbing rampant population growth we can't stop global warming. It's my opinion that when we become a legit danger something will put a hurting on us. Plague, war, crab people whatever.
-
I don't see what you have a problem with woody? He essentially just posted four articles. I'm not reading them, or yours, because I couldn't give a shit about global warming but the fashion in which he posts his isn't bothersome to me.
I don't see what you have a problem with woody? He essentially just posted four articles. I'm not reading them, or yours, because I couldn't give a shit about global warming but the fashion in which he posts his isn't bothersome to me.
I agree. Who gives a shit? We, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have survived before the oceans rise 8 inches.
-
I don't see what you have a problem with woody? He essentially just posted four articles. I'm not reading them, or yours, because I couldn't give a shit about global warming but the fashion in which he posts his isn't bothersome to me.
I agree. Who gives a shit? We, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have survived before the oceans rise 8 inches.
I agree. Who gives a shit? We, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will have survived before the oceans rise 8 inches.
I would still feel bad about fucking over my great great grandkids. (or maybe just great grandkids for me, idk your age).
I think the notion of "it isn't affecting me now, so it is not my problem" is part of the reason we are here right now.
-
I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.
CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.
Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with
asinine, politically oriented alarmism.
It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...
which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was
the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.
Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,
to the "end justifies the means".
I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.
CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.
Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with
asinine, politically oriented alarmism.
It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...
which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was
the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.
Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,
to the "end justifies the means".
You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.
You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I haven't seen a State of the Union by a president yet that wasn't just complete horse shit. Every president does it but the thing that irritates me the most is the "...and that reminds me of (insert male name) and (insert female name) from Podunk, Iowa who sent me a letter...." It could be on any subject and all of a sudden they can go to the mail bag and come back with some great or awful tale for the audience to gasp or applaud.
-
Don't worry guys, I predict there will be a SOTU thread soon enough...
-
I simply posted more than one article, in response to one.
CO2 is going up, and there has been a huge lull in gw.
Go figure, when the libturds keep parroting Al Gorish with
asinine, politically oriented alarmism.
It always comes around to liberal political power, and money...
which is what that one UN official admitted - that global warming was
the only chance for global redistribution of wealth.
Which means, any lie is a good lie, and any half truth, is a good truth,
to the "end justifies the means".
You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.
You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.
You describe it as a "huge lull", but that isn't necessarily the case. This slow down was addressed in a link I posted. That site does a good job explaining it all IMO.
You then go on about "libturds", and "Al Gorish" and politics in general. My suggestion would be to ignore the politicians, and look at the scientists. The real experts in the field. Look at the peer reviewed studies and impartial data. No lies, no politics.
Woody, the slow down was addressed in a link Cal posted as well.
-
Look, here is all you need to know about mmgw.
It's a farce. All these idiots flew in all these JETS, to
go to this Davos conference.
And the other big item on their agenda? Wait for it......
-
"40 heads of state and 2,500 top business executives"
Note the lack of scientists...
-
So, there ya go.....
"Another big theme of the mega-rich confab will be combating “income inequality” and how the world’s rich can pay their fair share to reduce the gap between top earners and the lower class. Admission price for Davos: roughly $40,000 a ticket."
See that? INCOME INEQUALITY. WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.
That's why they demand that mmgw be accepted as an absolute, immediate crisis.
To expedite, facilitate... redistributing wealth from the richer countries to the poorer countries.
That is what I've been saying again and again all this time.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login