Skip to content

How many players away are we?

The Browns Board
53 20 1.7k
  • Concerning starters, according to the PFF list, and our discussions with Mack/Haden, as well as the overriding feeling of "being happy to go with" Crowell and West, we're looking something like this in terms of 'good' players:

    QB
    RB - West
    RB - Crowell
    LT - Thomas
    LG - Bitonio
    C - Mack
    RG - Greco
    RT - Schwartz
    WR - Hawkins
    WR - Gabriel
    WR - Austin
    WR - Benjamin
    TE - Barnidge
    TE - Dray
    DE - Winn
    NT - Kitchen
    DE - D. Bryant
    OLB - Kruger
    ILB - Dansby
    ILB - Robertson/Kirksey
    OLB - Mingo/Sheard
    CB - Gilbert
    CB - Skrine
    CB - Haden
    SS - Whitner
    FS - Gipson
    Elite
    Good
    Average
    Aside from West/Crowell, the only place we don't have at least an 'average' player is QB. Which says it all.
  • Interesting in that Hoyer may not be as bad as we think. His ineffectiveness coincided with defensive linemen being in his face ten times more often after Mack's leg was broken. I knew there was a drop off in protection but did not realize how large it was.

    PFF is very informative.

  • Ok.....revised this slightly, using the PFF grades for all of them......and a little color to help my old eyes....hope this is helpful....



    The numbers in parenthesis are where that players "score" ranked league wide......



    QB- Hoyer



    RB - West

    RB - Crowell


    LT - Thomas(3)

    LG - Bitonio(5)

    C - Mack

    RG - Greco(11)

    RT - Schwartz(30)


    WR - Hawkins(11)

    WR - Gabriel(17)

    WR - Austin (42)

    WR - Benjamin


    TE - Barnidge

    TE - Dray


    DE - Winn

    NT - Kitchen

    DE - D. Bryant


    NOTE: Our entire D line graded in the negative. Not one bright spot there.....


    OLB - Kruger(14)

    ILB - Dansby(8)...not top 5, but close....was on track until injured

    ILB - Robertson(19)

    OLB - Mingo(15) - Sheard(16)


    CB - Skrine

    CB - Haden

    SS - Whitner

    FS - Gipson....like Mack, Gipson was on track to be #1, before he got hurt....so, Im calling him elite too...




    Elite = Top 5 type of player

    Good = Above average(plus score in the green)

    Average

    below average = Below average(negative score in the red)

  • I thought John Hughes graded out positively?

  • I thought John Hughes graded out positively?

    @gftchris said:

    I thought John Hughes graded out positively?

    actually...you're right!!.....I missed him because he didn't have enough snaps(like Mack, again).....his score was a +5.2, which if continued over 16 games, would have put him at 16.6....or #10 in the league at his position.....

  • Yeah I had a feeling I'd read that a few places. Got to remember the guys coming back from injury like Hughes and A. Bryant, who looked so good before injury last year.

  • Ok.....revised this slightly, using the PFF grades for all of them......and a little color to help my old eyes....hope this is helpful....



    The numbers in parenthesis are where that players "score" ranked league wide......



    QB- Hoyer



    RB - West

    RB - Crowell


    LT - Thomas(3)

    LG - Bitonio(5)

    C - Mack

    RG - Greco(11)

    RT - Schwartz(30)


    WR - Hawkins(11)

    WR - Gabriel(17)

    WR - Austin (42)

    WR - Benjamin


    TE - Barnidge

    TE - Dray


    DE - Winn

    NT - Kitchen

    DE - D. Bryant


    NOTE: Our entire D line graded in the negative. Not one bright spot there.....


    OLB - Kruger(14)

    ILB - Dansby(8)...not top 5, but close....was on track until injured

    ILB - Robertson(19)

    OLB - Mingo(15) - Sheard(16)


    CB - Skrine

    CB - Haden

    SS - Whitner

    FS - Gipson....like Mack, Gipson was on track to be #1, before he got hurt....so, Im calling him elite too...




    Elite = Top 5 type of player

    Good = Above average(plus score in the green)

    Average

    below average = Below average(negative score in the red)

    @mudfly said:

    Ok.....revised this slightly, using the PFF grades for all of them......and a little color to help my old eyes....hope this is helpful....

    On behalf of all the colorblind folk in the world... Thanks a lot!

  • @mudfly said:

    Ok.....revised this slightly, using the PFF grades for all of them......and a little color to help my old eyes....hope this is helpful....

    On behalf of all the colorblind folk in the world... Thanks a lot!

    @tour2ma said:

    On behalf of all the colorblind folk in the world... Thanks a lot!

    Ha!....sorry bout that.....adjusted the color and bolded now......

  • How is it that the previous year with our dc we were nearly top 10, but this year with the same base defense, and same players our Dline is suddenly the worst on this team. Prior to the 2014 season, everyone had to think that the dline was our strength. I wonder if it has to do with our DC. Ray Horton 3-4 was top 10 for what 13 weeks, and top 12 for the season, but Jim O'Neal's 3-4 is horrible? Rubin, Taylor and Bryant were very good in 2013, and Hughes, and Wynn were solid rotational guys. Now our dline is terrible? I blame O'Neil.

  • How is it that the previous year with our dc we were nearly top 10, but this year with the same base defense, and same players our Dline is suddenly the worst on this team. Prior to the 2014 season, everyone had to think that the dline was our strength. I wonder if it has to do with our DC. Ray Horton 3-4 was top 10 for what 13 weeks, and top 12 for the season, but Jim O'Neal's 3-4 is horrible? Rubin, Taylor and Bryant were very good in 2013, and Hughes, and Wynn were solid rotational guys. Now our dline is terrible? I blame O'Neil.

    cbbacker said:

    How is it that the previous year with our dc we were nearly top 10, but this year with the same base defense, and same players our Dline is suddenly the worst on this team. Prior to the 2014 season, everyone had to think that the dline was our strength. I wonder if it has to do with our DC. Ray Horton 3-4 was top 10 for what 13 weeks, and top 12 for the season, but Jim O'Neal's 3-4 is horrible? Rubin, Taylor and Bryant were very good in 2013, and Hughes, and Wynn were solid rotational guys. Now our dline is terrible? I blame O'Neil.

    Horton's defense was also very bad in a number of key defense statistical categories. Just because we were giving up less YPG doesn't mean we had a good defense, it means our terrible offense gave the opponents the ball in great field position. We were ranked near the bottom of the league in average starting position for defense, if I recall correctly.

    I had a whole post about this at year's end last year, about how Horton's defense wasn't nearly as good as was advertised.

    Injuries also had something to do with it, as did designation changes.

  • We are about thirty guys away.

  • cbbacker said:

    How is it that the previous year with our dc we were nearly top 10, but this year with the same base defense, and same players our Dline is suddenly the worst on this team. Prior to the 2014 season, everyone had to think that the dline was our strength. I wonder if it has to do with our DC. Ray Horton 3-4 was top 10 for what 13 weeks, and top 12 for the season, but Jim O'Neal's 3-4 is horrible? Rubin, Taylor and Bryant were very good in 2013, and Hughes, and Wynn were solid rotational guys. Now our dline is terrible? I blame O'Neil.

    Horton's defense was also very bad in a number of key defense statistical categories. Just because we were giving up less YPG doesn't mean we had a good defense, it means our terrible offense gave the opponents the ball in great field position. We were ranked near the bottom of the league in average starting position for defense, if I recall correctly.

    I had a whole post about this at year's end last year, about how Horton's defense wasn't nearly as good as was advertised.

    Injuries also had something to do with it, as did designation changes.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Horton's defense was also very bad in a number of key defense statistical categories. Just because we were giving up less YPG doesn't mean we had a good defense, it means our terrible offense gave the opponents the ball in great field position. We were ranked near the bottom of the league in average starting position for defense, if I recall correctly.

    I had a whole post about this at year's end last year, about how Horton's defense wasn't nearly as good as was advertised.

    Injuries also had something to do with it, as did designation changes.

    I have no doubt, but there is no denying that this years defense was far worse, that was my point. I don't care if we gave up less yards; I am just wondering how the same players, same base defense (yes I know their styles are different) but it's still the same base defense, and it is far worse than last year.

    Even the injuries can be explained away. The Dline was supposed to be our deepest group of players. Just frustrates me to no end that a group of positions now likely needs addressed in FA or the draft after only a year when they were very good.

  • @gftchris said:

    I think if that's the criteria, it's probably a bit unfair. But yeah, Crowell/West makes a pretty good RB duo, Mack is a top center, and Haden is as good as anyone not named Sherman/Peterson. So...we're only 3 players away?

    That's how I've seen it all year.

    An ILB, a pass rushing OLB, and a QB away.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That's how I've seen it all year.

    An ILB, a pass rushing OLB, and a QB away.

    This sums it up perfectly although I might add a tall WR to the list. I'd kill for Dez or DT but I'm a tad bias as they hail from my two schools.

    Some DL and OL depth would certainly help as well but that could be said for every NFL team.