Homo Group Demands Christian Churches be SHUT DOWN for opposing same-sex marriage
-
I'm not religious and I have no problem with gay marriage but this should alarm anyone who still pretends that the Constitution and Bill of Rights have any meaning whatsoever. This country, for those who love to sing the praises of the founding fathers, was in part built on religious liberty which is being trumped by the politically correct whims of the left.
Which of the lefties on this board would support closing down a kosher bakery that refused to make swastika cakes? How about shutting down a soul food restaurant who refused to cater a Klan meeting?
WSS
I think this whole issue is going to come down to "religious rights" vs. "civil rights"
EVERYONE has civil rights
A lot of people don't have religion or want religion.
Everyone has religious rights according to the constitution. If they don't Obama should just go on TV and say "I'm eliminating certain sections of the Bill of Rights by executive order, fuck you all."I think this whole issue is going to come down to "religious rights" vs. "civil rights"
EVERYONE has civil rights
A lot of people don't have religion or want religion.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
I don't understand why I am supposed to subsidize religion. It would seem that a separation of church and state would not allow that. Let churches, mosques, whatever, function as corporations on their own more or less. And let them say whatever they want
-
You don't subsidize shit fagboy. And religions can't be forced to pay taxes. End of story.
:neutral_face: -
You don't subsidize shit fagboy. And religions can't be forced to pay taxes. End of story.
You don't subsidize shit fagboy. And religions can't be forced to pay taxes. End of story.
Benny Hinn definitely needs to have the tax breaks.
-
You don't subsidize shit fagboy. And religions can't be forced to pay taxes. End of story.
You don't subsidize shit fagboy. And religions can't be forced to pay taxes. End of story.
Religious institutions are the real moochers...
How am I not indirectly subsidizing them?
-
Can a Christian bakery refuse to bake a cake for a bar mitzvah or for some Islamic holiday?
Both of those go against their religion. And those are actually fucking choices too, not genetics.
-
Everyone has religious rights according to the constitution. If they don't Obama should just go on TV and say "I'm eliminating certain sections of the Bill of Rights by executive order, fuck you all."I think this whole issue is going to come down to "religious rights" vs. "civil rights"
EVERYONE has civil rights
A lot of people don't have religion or want religion.
WSS
Everyone has religious rights according to the constitution. If they don't Obama should just go on TV and say "I'm eliminating certain sections of the Bill of Rights by executive order, fuck you all."
WSS
So when it comes down to it, what will it be? Civil rights or religious rights?
Apparently some people want one more then the other
-
Mike Pence should have just waited for the rest of the common sense thinking people
to see the facist version of tolerance by the LGBT and the bully tactics from the likes of the hypocrite Tim Cook....
He and Indiana couldve had a Chic fila moment here. Maybe they still can.
-
You don't subsidize shit fagboy. And religions can't be forced to pay taxes. End of story.
Benny Hinn definitely needs to have the tax breaks.
My favorite YouTube video:Benny Hinn definitely needs to have the tax breaks.
-
Everyone has religious rights according to the constitution. If they don't Obama should just go on TV and say "I'm eliminating certain sections of the Bill of Rights by executive order, fuck you all."
WSS
So when it comes down to it, what will it be? Civil rights or religious rights?
Apparently some people want one more then the other
So when it comes down to it, what will it be? Civil rights or religious rights?
Apparently some people want one more then the other
Well whether we like it or not I think the choice has already been made and the answer is neither.
WSS
-
Benny Hinn and others like him on television give Christians a bad name. For every Benny Hinn minister there are thousands who are not on television working with needy people and doing a good work in their community. I always thought for a television minister Billy Graham was very good and we need more like him today IMO.
-
Benny Hinn and others like him on television give Christians a bad name. For every Benny Hinn minister there are thousands who are not on television working with needy people and doing a good work in their community. I always thought for a television minister Billy Graham was very good and we need more like him today IMO.
Benny Hinn and others like him on television give Christians a bad name. For every Benny Hinn minister there are thousands who are not on television working with needy people and doing a good work in their community. I always thought for a television minister Billy Graham was very good and we need more like him today IMO.
I would just question someone becoming absurdly wealthy from preaching. I am sure Hinn and Graham could donate some of their money to worthy causes given how they got the money to begin with.
-
The pretense of "your rights end where my rights begin" and vice versa is now being shown to be a pretense, as is the long projected progressive notion of tolerance. . If you are compelling someone to do something against their religious beliefs then as Steve alluded to the other person's rights have been invalidated.
-
it is kind of shitty that some of these churches who are basically thinly veiled hate groups and oppose basically everything the govt does...then go and benefit from their 501 status.
-
like the one Obamao attended for years?
I agree....
-
So ur good with ending all church welfare then? Finally enforce the separation of church and state as the forefathers intended?
-
So ur good with ending all church welfare then? Finally enforce the separation of church and state as the forefathers intended?
So ur good with ending all church welfare then? Finally enforce the separation of church and state as the forefathers intended?
Not really what they intended, they just did not want to be a theocracy or something similar, and knew how much the Vatican tried to run Europe in the centuries prior. They where almost all religious and wanted Christianity to play a part, but we as a society have moved further from religion and as such the term separation of church and state has been coined and imo for the better.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login