Skip to content

Joe Scarborough

Political Discussion
72 11 3.4k
  • @calfoxwc said:

    including personal choices of health insurance

    That's how you're spinning this???

    Jeepers...

    mz. said:

    That's how you're spinning this???

    Jeepers...

    mz the pussy that is probably the biggest reason for this "crisis".

    Think about it; why would qa healthy 21-50 year old want to pay even a portion of his beer money for insurance?

    Odds are you won't use it and if there's a tragic illness the bankruptcy opition is there for anyone with little property.

    In Ohio (and elsewhere I'd assume) you're forced t buy auto insurance.

    WSS

  • @kosar_for_president said:

    No way man, we should be focusing on Obama smoking weed 20 years ago. That was a joke.

    Bush's stimulus gave billions to banks that are sitting on it.

    The Stimulus plan that Obama recommended he sign, correct? Obammy was all for the supposed "Bush" stimulus plan. And Obama smoking weed is an issue, he is in the highest public office. He should set an example. Not a joke, only to fools like you.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    The Stimulus plan that Obama recommended he sign, correct? Obammy was all for the supposed "Bush" stimulus plan. And Obama smoking weed is an issue, he is in the highest public office. He should set an example. Not a joke, only to fools like you.

    I'm not sticking up for either President, I am just making the point that they were all spending. Either on social programs or wars or giving banks money to sit on it. If I remember right I think I was ripping on the banks anyways? Touchy...

  • Steve you dont seem to get it do you. I am licensed in the financial sector, I actually invest and work with my own funds as well as my clients in one of my businesses. That data from 2000 was reported and sourced from the social security trust fund as well as the GAO/Congressional budget reports etc.

    I am NOT a democrat, nor do I worship Obama in any way. I dont recieve refunds yearly, I pay quarterly. Technically I should be a staunch republican based on what benefits me the most on tax allocation theories. I worry about government spending and borrowing as well as tampering with the Banking system because it directly affects my business. My children eat and are clothed/housed by my companies ability to manage our investments and plan around Banking and securities. Its not just some random topic for me like it is for you. I actually have to understand pass license qualifications to practice and use my own funds in that industry.

    I have interest in other businesses and how that income is taxed greatly effects me more than a w-2 employee or some sole proprieter. Sometimes you have to sublimate what may be more beneficial for you as an individual for the betterment or advance of the entire whole community. Most republicans and die hard individualists dont understand that concept and thats why they fall into partisan party beliefs.

    I hate the way welfare works, I hate section hud housing plans, I think they should be run with the sole goal of TEMPORARILY helping people back to WORK. I dont believe in handouts, my other culture is known for working insanely. However people do need help and if a country as wealthy as ours we should be able to provide TEMPORARY assistance with the goal of pointing people back toward self sustainment.

    I happen to hate being taxed more but I also know that other people have to work physically harder for much less than me, so I am thankful that i dont have to do what they do for less.

    Steve you must think I am a diehard liberal or something, I am most certainly not and as conservative with my children as most right wing types are.

  • Steve you dont seem to get it do you. I am licensed in the financial sector, I actually invest and work with my own funds as well as my clients in one of my businesses. That data from 2000 was reported and sourced from the social security trust fund as well as the GAO/Congressional budget reports etc.

    I am NOT a democrat, nor do I worship Obama in any way. I dont recieve refunds yearly, I pay quarterly. Technically I should be a staunch republican based on what benefits me the most on tax allocation theories. I worry about government spending and borrowing as well as tampering with the Banking system because it directly affects my business. My children eat and are clothed/housed by my companies ability to manage our investments and plan around Banking and securities. Its not just some random topic for me like it is for you. I actually have to understand pass license qualifications to practice and use my own funds in that industry.

    I have interest in other businesses and how that income is taxed greatly effects me more than a w-2 employee or some sole proprieter. Sometimes you have to sublimate what may be more beneficial for you as an individual for the betterment or advance of the entire whole community. Most republicans and die hard individualists dont understand that concept and thats why they fall into partisan party beliefs.

    I hate the way welfare works, I hate section hud housing plans, I think they should be run with the sole goal of TEMPORARILY helping people back to WORK. I dont believe in handouts, my other culture is known for working insanely. However people do need help and if a country as wealthy as ours we should be able to provide TEMPORARY assistance with the goal of pointing people back toward self sustainment.

    I happen to hate being taxed more but I also know that other people have to work physically harder for much less than me, so I am thankful that i dont have to do what they do for less.

    Steve you must think I am a diehard liberal or something, I am most certainly not and as conservative with my children as most right wing types are.

    @osusev said:

    Steve you dont seem to get it do you. I am licensed in the financial sector, I actually invest and work with my own funds as well as my clients in one of my businesses. That data from 2000 was reported and sourced from the social security trust fund as well as the GAO/Congressional budget reports etc.

    I am NOT a democrat, nor do I worship Obama in any way. I dont recieve refunds yearly, I pay quarterly. Technically I should be a staunch republican based on what benefits me the most on tax allocation theories. I worry about government spending and borrowing as well as tampering with the Banking system because it directly affects my business. My children eat and are clothed/housed by my companies ability to manage our investments and plan around Banking and securities. Its not just some random topic for me like it is for you. I actually have to understand pass license qualifications to practice and use my own funds in that industry.

    I have interest in other businesses and how that income is taxed greatly effects me more than a w-2 employee or some sole proprieter. Sometimes you have to sublimate what may be more beneficial for you as an individual for the betterment or advance of the entire whole community. Most republicans and die hard individualists dont understand that concept and thats why they fall into partisan party beliefs.

    I hate the way welfare works, I hate section hud housing plans, I think they should be run with the sole goal of TEMPORARILY helping people back to WORK. I dont believe in handouts, my other culture is known for working insanely. However people do need help and if a country as wealthy as ours we should be able to provide TEMPORARY assistance with the goal of pointing people back toward self sustainment.

    I happen to hate being taxed more but I also know that other people have to work physically harder for much less than me, so I am thankful that i dont have to do what they do for less.

    Steve you must think I am a diehard liberal or something, I am most certainly not and as conservative with my children as most right wing types are.

    Genius, pure genius. Selfless, that is what this country is about.

  • Genius, pure genius. Selfless, that is what this country is about.
    Great point. That's why Conservatives give so much to charity, more than liberals, regardless of tax rates. They fund most of the most effective programs to serve the poor in communities all across the country. Liberals, on the other hand, are willing to pay when everyone else has to pay the same (or much much more). I'm not against taking care of the poor, I'm against threatening my neighbor with prison if he doesnt want to give the "right" amount to the "right" programs.

    Yes, I know I'm painting with a ridiculously broad brush here.

  • Genius, pure genius. Selfless, that is what this country is about.
    Great point. That's why Conservatives give so much to charity, more than liberals, regardless of tax rates. They fund most of the most effective programs to serve the poor in communities all across the country. Liberals, on the other hand, are willing to pay when everyone else has to pay the same (or much much more). I'm not against taking care of the poor, I'm against threatening my neighbor with prison if he doesnt want to give the "right" amount to the "right" programs.

    Yes, I know I'm painting with a ridiculously broad brush here.

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    Great point. That's why Conservatives give so much to charity, more than liberals, regardless of tax rates.

    LINK?

  • @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    Great point. That's why Conservatives give so much to charity, more than liberals, regardless of tax rates.

    LINK?

  • here is a rare moment Tupa and I will actually agree.

    Typically Business owners/entrepreneurs make more therefore pay more in taxes and able to give more to charitable foundations.

    That obviously as Tupa pointed out a gross over simplification. Greed is a powerful motive, honestly it is very hard at times for me to not want to go over and become a rank and file type of republican because it would benefit me.

  • @kosar_for_president said:

    No way man, we should be focusing on Obama smoking weed 20 years ago. That was a joke.

    Bush's stimulus gave billions to banks that are sitting on it.

    The Stimulus plan that Obama recommended he sign, correct? Obammy was all for the supposed "Bush" stimulus plan. And Obama smoking weed is an issue, he is in the highest public office. He should set an example. Not a joke, only to fools like you.

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    And Obama smoking weed is an issue, he is in the highest public office. He should set an example. Not a joke, only to fools like you.

    i dont think....i dont remember too many people up in arms about dubya's days of snortin whiskey and drinkin coke.....

  • @diehardbrownsfan said:

    And Obama smoking weed is an issue, he is in the highest public office. He should set an example. Not a joke, only to fools like you.

    i dont think....i dont remember too many people up in arms about dubya's days of snortin whiskey and drinkin coke.....

    @choco said:

    i dont think....i dont remember too many people up in arms about dubya's days of snortin whiskey and drinkin coke.....

    You don't?

    Proof that weed fu*ks up the memory.

    WSS

  • I'm not sure I get the conservative logic.

    It's socialism when Obama proposes it, but when a foreign country that's not Russia or Venezuela has the same policy, it's not socialism? How does that make sense? 😳

  • I'm not sure I get the conservative logic.

    It's socialism when Obama proposes it, but when a foreign country that's not Russia or Venezuela has the same policy, it's not socialism? How does that make sense? 😳

    @pumpkin-eater said:

    I'm not sure I get the conservative logic.

    It's socialism when Obama proposes it, but when a foreign country that's not Russia or Venezuela has the same policy, it's not socialism? How does that make sense? 😳

    So what you're saying is that Obama is correct in implementing Russian and Venezuelan ideas into US policiy?

    Actually is it only the term socialist that bothers ya?

    Because those aren't the only two countries that practice some form or extent of socialism.

    WSS

  • @choco said:

    i dont think....i dont remember too many people up in arms about dubya's days of snortin whiskey and drinkin coke.....

    You don't?

    Proof that weed fu*ks up the memory.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    You don't?

    Proof that weed fu*ks up the memory.

    WSS

    yup, makes me forget everything..... 🙄

    you, on the otherhand, have selective memory from your kool-aide enema courtesy of the GOP. you have any opinions that are not republican talking points, steve?

  • @westside-steve said:

    You don't?

    Proof that weed fu*ks up the memory.

    WSS

    yup, makes me forget everything..... 🙄

    you, on the otherhand, have selective memory from your kool-aide enema courtesy of the GOP. you have any opinions that are not republican talking points, steve?

    @choco said:

    yup, makes me forget everything..... 🙄

    you, on the otherhand, have selective memory from your kool-aide enema courtesy of the GOP. you have any opinions that are not republican talking points, steve?

    Well as I often ask guys who make that baseless accusation, list a few topics in which I'm in lockstep with a party.

    If you can do that I may take the time to discuss the differences.

    If you can't I may point out that you're talking out your ass.

    Fair?

    WSS

  • @pumpkin-eater said:

    I'm not sure I get the conservative logic.

    It's socialism when Obama proposes it, but when a foreign country that's not Russia or Venezuela has the same policy, it's not socialism? How does that make sense? 😳

    So what you're saying is that Obama is correct in implementing Russian and Venezuelan ideas into US policiy?

    Actually is it only the term socialist that bothers ya?

    Because those aren't the only two countries that practice some form or extent of socialism.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    So what you're saying is that Obama is correct in implementing Russian and Venezuelan ideas into US policiy?

    Actually is it only the term socialist that bothers ya?

    Because those aren't the only two countries that practice some form or extent of socialism.

    WSS

    Norway has the highest standard of living in the World and are socialists.

  • @westside-steve said:

    So what you're saying is that Obama is correct in implementing Russian and Venezuelan ideas into US policiy?

    Actually is it only the term socialist that bothers ya?

    Because those aren't the only two countries that practice some form or extent of socialism.

    WSS

    Norway has the highest standard of living in the World and are socialists.

    @kosar_for_president said:

    Norway has the highest standard of living in the World and are socialists.

    The tenets of Jante Law are:

    . You shall not think you are special.

    . You shall not believe you are smarter than others.

    . You shall not believe you are wiser than others.

    . You shall not behave as if you are better than others.

    . You shall not believe that you know more than others.

    . You shall not believe that you can fix things better than others.

    . You shall not laugh at others.

    . You shall not believe that others care about you.

    . You shall not believe that you can teach others anything.

    As I've said repeatedly socialism is not evil.

    It is, IMO, a completely unworkable system in our culture.

    And I'd guess that even you'd admit Norway is a far different place than the US.

    And a fairly rare case of socialistic success.

    But in another thousand years who knows?

    WSS

  • @westside-steve said:

    So what you're saying is that Obama is correct in implementing Russian and Venezuelan ideas into US policiy?

    Actually is it only the term socialist that bothers ya?

    Because those aren't the only two countries that practice some form or extent of socialism.

    WSS

    Norway has the highest standard of living in the World and are socialists.

    @kosar_for_president said:

    Norway has the highest standard of living in the World and are socialists.
    So all we need to do is export as much oil as Saudi Arabia and shrink our population by 99%, and we can have a higher standard of living? Who's in?!! Yeah!
  • @kosar_for_president said:

    Norway has the highest standard of living in the World and are socialists.
    So all we need to do is export as much oil as Saudi Arabia and shrink our population by 99%, and we can have a higher standard of living? Who's in?!! Yeah!

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    So all we need to do is export as much oil as Saudi Arabia and shrink our population by 99%, and we can have a higher standard of living? Who's in?!! Yeah!

    Third largest exporter of oil in the world.

    Right behind the other socialist paradise, Russia.

    WSS

  • @choco said:

    yup, makes me forget everything..... 🙄

    you, on the otherhand, have selective memory from your kool-aide enema courtesy of the GOP. you have any opinions that are not republican talking points, steve?

    Well as I often ask guys who make that baseless accusation, list a few topics in which I'm in lockstep with a party.

    If you can do that I may take the time to discuss the differences.

    If you can't I may point out that you're talking out your ass.

    Fair?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Well as I often ask guys who make that baseless accusation, list a few topics in which I'm in lockstep with a party.

    If you can do that I may take the time to discuss the differences.

    If you can't I may point out that you're talking out your ass.

    Fair?

    WSS

    un huh....so, when are you going to support anything you say then, steve? huh?

    i dont think....i dont remember too many people up in arms about dubya's days of snortin whiskey and drinkin coke.....

    all you can make is a quip about my memory......

    so where's all the people getting their panties bunched because dubya was a coke head? have any links? something to support you implied claim? we made jokes, sure....im sure the drugs helped his fantastic oratory skills.....

    as i see it, there's a much bigger problem of a cokehead with a drinking problem at the helm than a toker.......

    so if you want me to take the time to review your post history to pwn you, you have to do your initial leg work first. you old guys are lazy as hell when it comes to proper intertube etiquette. only promising that you "may" then discuss topic is hardly invoking me to play along......just makes me think that you have nothing but your word....which is only as good as 1's and 0's on a computer screen.