You betcha it's true. Obamao is a rogue, undermining America president
-
Just so I'm following here
You're saying that Chris's posts were the "emotional knee jerk", not yours. Correct? Because that isn't the vibe I'm getting here...
-
Just so I'm following here
You're saying that Chris's posts were the "emotional knee jerk", not yours. Correct? Because that isn't the vibe I'm getting here...
Just so I'm following here
You're saying that Chris's posts were the "emotional knee jerk", not yours. Correct? Because that isn't the vibe I'm getting here...
What's ironic is that Cal's response to someone disagreeing with him is apparently to call them a knee-jerk emotional liberal, in an extremely knee-jerk emotional way.
-
well, then, why do you care to pipe up in this thread? Our economy is our problem, not yours.
Our politics are our problem, not yours. Sounds to me like you are trying to provide cover for
your cherry picked emotional knee jerk.
The whole point is lost on you when you intentionally ignore all the other points in the post.
I gave examples of the runaway problems we are headed for, and the dishonest attempts of
the obamao regime to raise more and more money with regulatory power.
Not only outrageous fines for the smallest thing like a perfectly legal pond....
but hidden in the obamaocare bill - is a gigantic money maker for the obamao gov - money
for entitlements that will never be enough.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/02/obamacare-brings-new-taxes-fees-for-2014/
-
Boy, do I have you and your little woodypeckerhead nailed.
I'm explaining the big picture. The article also refers to the big picture.
You are being contrarian emotionally kneejerky by attacking one point of
the article - that first quarter, and ignoring everything else.
Then you defend your cherry picking by saying that "x" isn't your problem.
hahaha. That's funny. Chris - have you ever read up on the Cloward-piven philosophy?
Ever? Freaking ever one time in your lalaland liberal existence?
And naturally, woodypecker head rides another lib's coattails again.
-
I'm always glad to have Chris's input. We do need to understand he's coming from a different culture though with even higher taxes, less personal liberty, more government spending (at least probably on social programs) and, I'm assuming, more free shit. Of course that's the goal of our present administration here in the US. It's a way of life over there so there's no transition to worry about. It's not our way of life. Yet.
WSS
-
here we go again with another of cals emotional estrogen fired outbursts about improbable narratives where facts have been routinely mis analyzed. Another flaring up of conservative yeast infection.
-
here we go again with another of cals emotional estrogen fired outbursts about improbable narratives where facts have been routinely mis analyzed. Another flaring up of conservative yeast infection.
here we go again with another of cals emotional estrogen fired outbursts about improbable narratives where facts have been routinely mis analyzed. Another flaring up of conservative yeast infection.
You tell em; estrogen he must be a damn queer!
Why do you hate the gay community so badly?
WSS
-
What if I were to tell you that welfare spending has in fact gone down since 2010?
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_2003_2023USb_16s2li111mcn_40t
-
He's a hater. He hates everything and everybody. Cleve is like a foot fungus,
he's just nasty, ugly, rubs everybody with any sense the wrong way, and his
posts stink up the board.
Nasty. Cleve - a gay foot fungus liberal - who woulda thunk it?
-
I see that, Chris, but the projections are, imho, understated, and they will be a
whole lot higher.
That's my point. It's the direction we are headed in, and your own link's projections say it too.
The truth is more like this:
-
Now, you add increased dependence on entitlements, and the giant
addition of illegals getting benefits, maybe it's just me? haha,
but I see higher than that 75 percent figure.
That is very, very bad. That is what I'm talking about.
-
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
-
I see that, Chris, but the projections are, imho, understated, and they will be a
whole lot higher.
That's my point. It's the direction we are headed in, and your own link's projections say it too.
The truth is more like this:
I see that, Chris, but the projections are, imho, understated, and they will be a
whole lot higher.
That's my point. It's the direction we are headed in, and your own link's projections say it too.
The truth is more like this:
Those are absolute amounts. It's difficult to find exact figures, but the projections look to be growing by a fairly small amount, I wonder how it relates to GDP growth?
-
Good question, heck if I know. But entitlements are a growing problem, and
GDP could be unstable, and fall. I don't think anybody sees entitlements falling.
Say, here is some "frightening" emotional stuff about it:
I have to go get to work outside, haven't read much of it....
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-27/40-frightening-facts-fall-us-economy
-
That's pretty much right - spending is, in sensible terms, in line with previous governments - as a percentage of GDP, it's around the same, and is coming back in to line moreso as we move away from the crash of 2008.
-
Good question, heck if I know. But entitlements are a growing problem, and
GDP could be unstable, and fall. I don't think anybody sees entitlements falling.
Say, here is some "frightening" emotional stuff about it:
I have to go get to work outside, haven't read much of it....
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-27/40-frightening-facts-fall-us-economy
Good question, heck if I know. But entitlements are a growing problem, and
GDP could be unstable, and fall. I don't think anybody sees entitlements falling.
GDP is generally stable, and will be for some time now, as investors err on the side of caution in the post-crash environment. Another 20 years and maybe things start getting carried away, but there'll be plenty more presidents to blame for the world's problems between now and then.
Entitlements as a whole won't fall, but the bigger problem than welfare, IMHO, is pensions. When you think about it, a pension scheme is essentially a ponzi scheme - pay the people who signed up yesterday with today's money, and get as many people to join until the money runs out. It's fine when you have an expanding population, but when it's contracting as in the developed world, you end up running out of money.
-
Statistics can be misleading. Taking it to the bottom line, this country through higher taxes by Obama has brought in a record amount of money into the government but that has not stopped the growth of the national debt now over 18 trillion dollars. How can that not mean we don't have a spending problem?
-
Statistics can be misleading. Taking it to the bottom line, this country through higher taxes by Obama has brought in a record amount of money into the government but that has not stopped the growth of the national debt now over 18 trillion dollars. How can that not mean we don't have a spending problem?
Statistics can be misleading. Taking it to the bottom line, this country through higher taxes by Obama has brought in a record amount of money into the government but that has not stopped the growth of the national debt now over 18 trillion dollars. How can that not mean we don't have a spending problem?
Suppose I get a mortgage and buy a house. Now I'm in debt, but paying it off. I now want to buy a car, which pushes me further in debt, but i'm paying it off also. Do I have a spending problem?
-
Statistics can be misleading. Taking it to the bottom line, this country through higher taxes by Obama has brought in a record amount of money into the government but that has not stopped the growth of the national debt now over 18 trillion dollars. How can that not mean we don't have a spending problem?
Suppose I get a mortgage and buy a house. Now I'm in debt, but paying it off. I now want to buy a car, which pushes me further in debt, but i'm paying it off also. Do I have a spending problem?
Suppose I get a mortgage and buy a house. Now I'm in debt, but paying it off. I now want to buy a car, which pushes me further in debt, but i'm paying it off also. Do I have a spending problem?
If you buy a house over your financial means and a new car you can't afford the answer is yes.
-
I see that, Chris, but the projections are, imho, understated, and they will be a
whole lot higher.
That's my point. It's the direction we are headed in, and your own link's projections say it too.
The truth is more like this:
I see that, Chris, but the projections are, imho, understated,
So were you an economist cal? Cause you sound like you have no idea what you're talking about, which is indicative of someone who spent his professional years on the subject. Oh wait it's the other way around isn't it?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login