SCOTUS - Same Sex Marriage a Right in Every State
-
Mobs strip and rob people in third night of riots in London and across England
And let's ask those people if they'd rather be dead.
-
Mobs strip and rob people in third night of riots in London and across England
And let's ask those people if they'd rather be dead.
-
I know I prefer having the ability to be responsible for my own safety and not have to depend upon the timeliness of a police officer.
-
-
Police have no legal duty to respond and prevent crime or protect the victim. There have BEEN OVER 10 various supreme and state court cases the individual has never won. Notably, the Supreme Court STATED about the responsibility of police for the security of your family and loved ones is "You, and only you, are responsible for your security and the security of your family and loved ones. That was the essence of a U.S. Supreme Court decision in the early 1980's when they ruled that the police do not have a duty to protect you as an individual, but to protect society as a whole."
-
Well what you hope for doesn't concern me much, since you are such an unmitigated asshole but you are correct. The only reason that's a taboo is because it pisses you off. Just like homosexuality pisses some people off. If you came home and found you are 30 year old wife in bed with another man you'd probably kill him. Or her or want to.This was culturally decided between men and women long ago. If you ever had a young daughter and came home to find a grown man sticking is cock in her but she swore she consented, you'd still kill the guy. I hope that happens to you in your next life.
Why? The Bible says so?
So should that be illegal?
WSS
. The only reason that's a taboo is because it pisses you off. Just like homosexuality pisses some people off.
I'm sorry you must understand i'm hailing you from another planet and sometimes the connection is iffy, did you just say pedophilia is taboo because it pisses people off? And that consenting sex between two adults of the same gender must be viewed as the same because some people are pissed off by that? Did I really read that correct?
-
Physical damage is a completely different thing. Should a man with a large penis face criminal charges for marrying a small woman? Nobody should hurt anybody for fucks sake. And the psychological damage??? That's because puritanical society will hound her like the Sisters of Magdalena.Apart from the mental and possibly physical damage? OK, suspending reality to call it a 'victimless crime' - should a crime only be a crime if it's victimless? Like trespassing, gambling, speeding, smoking weed, gay marriage, things like that?
WSS
Physical damage is a completely different thing. Should a man with a large penis face criminal charges for marrying a small woman? Nobody should hurt anybody for fucks sake. And the psychological damage??? That's because puritanical society will hound her like the Sisters of Magdalena.
WSS
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
-
So here's something to think about. I'm assuming each of us masturbated for the first time in our early teens.
What was your very first fantasy? Magazine picture? One of your teachers? A girl in school? (if it's something really really kinky you don't have to tell us
)Did that experience warp your mind? Did it create psychological damage that you live with to this day? Seriously tell me why or why not.
(keep in mind your fantasy with the teacher or the magazine model or the classmate would be considered illegal)
Honest answers only
WSS
So here's something to think about. I'm assuming each of us masturbated for the first time in our early teens.
What was your very first fantasy? Magazine picture? One of your teachers? A girl in school? (if it's something really really kinky you don't have to tell us
)Did that experience warp your mind? Did it create psychological damage that you live with to this day? Seriously tell me why or why not.
(keep in mind your fantasy with the teacher or the magazine model or the classmate would be considered illegal)
Honest answers only
WSS
So a 2nd grader beating off to one of his cute classmates should be a punishable offense? Are you honestly making the argument that if a grown man can't have sex with a 2nd grader than neither should young boys her age? Look if I had an 8 year old and she had sex with another 8 year old boy, I would "very" upset...but mainly with myself because it showcased a major deficiency in my up bringing of her. A grown man having sex with my 8 year old daughter is a reflection on that man however. You seem to have trouble grasping this. Why?
-
. The only reason that's a taboo is because it pisses you off. Just like homosexuality pisses some people off.
I'm sorry you must understand i'm hailing you from another planet and sometimes the connection is iffy, did you just say pedophilia is taboo because it pisses people off? And that consenting sex between two adults of the same gender must be viewed as the same because some people are pissed off by that? Did I really read that correct?
I'm sorry you must understand i'm hailing you from another planet and sometimes the connection is iffy, did you just say pedophilia is taboo because it pisses people off? And that consenting sex between two adults of the same gender must be viewed as the same because some people are pissed off by that? Did I really read that correct?
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
-
Difference being, in your pointless analogy, the cavemen would have agreed that killing the brontosaurus for its meat was a good thing. Today you'd have one side saying "one of those brontosaurus' trampled some guy I'm vaguely related to, we must hunt down and kill every single brontosaurus" with the other saying "but we can just survive on berries, we don't need to kill *any* brontosaurus"
Charge WSS with a pointless analogy then expand on it? Way to take a stand.
Stuart said:
Charge WSS with a pointless analogy then expand on it? Way to take a stand.
Your life is pointless, want me to expand on that? I can. I'm here for you bro. You can always count on me to expand ad infinitum to you how useless, meaningless and pointless your existence is.
-
So here's something to think about. I'm assuming each of us masturbated for the first time in our early teens.
What was your very first fantasy? Magazine picture? One of your teachers? A girl in school? (if it's something really really kinky you don't have to tell us
)Did that experience warp your mind? Did it create psychological damage that you live with to this day? Seriously tell me why or why not.
(keep in mind your fantasy with the teacher or the magazine model or the classmate would be considered illegal)
Honest answers only
WSS
So a 2nd grader beating off to one of his cute classmates should be a punishable offense? Are you honestly making the argument that if a grown man can't have sex with a 2nd grader than neither should young boys her age? Look if I had an 8 year old and she had sex with another 8 year old boy, I would "very" upset...but mainly with myself because it showcased a major deficiency in my up bringing of her. A grown man having sex with my 8 year old daughter is a reflection on that man however. You seem to have trouble grasping this. Why?
So a 2nd grader beating off to one of his cute classmates should be a punishable offense? Are you honestly making the argument that if a grown man can't have sex with a 2nd grader than neither should young boys her age? Look if I had an 8 year old and she had sex with another 8 year old boy, I would "very" upset...but mainly with myself because it showcased a major deficiency in my up bringing of her. A grown man having sex with my 8 year old daughter is a reflection on that man however. You seem to have trouble grasping this. Why?
I'd se 2nd grade is a little young for beating off but its your own logic that says its fucked up to beat off thinking of an adult which would be illegal. Is it or not?
WSS
-
Physical damage is a completely different thing. Should a man with a large penis face criminal charges for marrying a small woman? Nobody should hurt anybody for fucks sake. And the psychological damage??? That's because puritanical society will hound her like the Sisters of Magdalena.
WSS
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
-
I'm sorry you must understand i'm hailing you from another planet and sometimes the connection is iffy, did you just say pedophilia is taboo because it pisses people off? And that consenting sex between two adults of the same gender must be viewed as the same because some people are pissed off by that? Did I really read that correct?
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
Uh yes...however in that post you were referring to said pedophilia as something that's more or less relative depending on what culture you might have been raised in. See in the modern world, and give the secular progressives their just due, they've come to the conclusion that having sex with children is pervasively damaging to them. Two children having sex with each other, while it shouldn't happen....is not the same as a grown man predating on the haplessness of small children. The empirical irrefutable evidence for this has long been in the books so put the little peener away.
-
Remember this one Chris
Remember this one Chris
England, LOL.
-
So a 2nd grader beating off to one of his cute classmates should be a punishable offense? Are you honestly making the argument that if a grown man can't have sex with a 2nd grader than neither should young boys her age? Look if I had an 8 year old and she had sex with another 8 year old boy, I would "very" upset...but mainly with myself because it showcased a major deficiency in my up bringing of her. A grown man having sex with my 8 year old daughter is a reflection on that man however. You seem to have trouble grasping this. Why?
I'd se 2nd grade is a little young for beating off but its your own logic that says its fucked up to beat off thinking of an adult which would be illegal. Is it or not?
WSS
I'd se 2nd grade is a little young for beating off but its your own logic that says its fucked up to beat off thinking of an adult which would be illegal. Is it or not?
WSS
wait wut? When did I say it's fucked up for a kid to beat off to an adult? That's actually probably the better scenario, wouldn't you agree? The kid recognizes that sexual activity between two people should start at roughly those ages where you're fully developed both physically and mentally. I will concede this issue gets murky at those ages approaching 18. But we had to arbitrarily choose an age knowing full well that some girls are fully ready to go by 16 and some women take till well over 18. All these calculations were already done for you bro.....I just feel like you're about to pull a hammy here or something with all these mental gymnastics you're trying to do equating homosexuality with other vastly depraved sexual conduct. Again the calculus was done for you long ago so just sit back and have a coke bro. Leave the heavy lifting to others.
-
Did she marry a man with a large penis by choice or was she forced? See these really aren't that hard. Of course you're flailing all over the place, my god I mean all over the place now sex with children is all relative cause we let two gays marry...but seriously this is getting old? If a woman wants to marry a man with a large penis....there's probably a good reason for that huh? Gee what would that be?
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
omg I can't believe i'm having this conversation with a grown man. If a grown woman wants to walk funny for a couple days IT"S CAUSE SHE LIKES IT YOU GIMP. What are you not getting here? If she doesn't like it then she won't marry a guy with a huge cock. Why on earth does this need to be spelled out for you? And if it's happening against her will.......what's that called genius?
-
Again with the mised point?
Somebody brought up physical damage. Nobody should cause physical damage to anyone no matter how old they are.
WSS
omg I can't believe i'm having this conversation with a grown man. If a grown woman wants to walk funny for a couple days IT"S CAUSE SHE LIKES IT YOU GIMP. What are you not getting here? If she doesn't like it then she won't marry a guy with a huge cock. Why on earth does this need to be spelled out for you? And if it's happening against her will.......what's that called genius?
omg I can't believe i'm having this conversation with a grown man. If a grown woman wants to walk funny for a couple days IT"S CAUSE SHE LIKES IT YOU GIMP. What are you not getting here? If she doesn't like it then she won't marry a guy with a huge cock. Why on earth does this need to be spelled out for you? And if it's happening against her will.......what's that called genius?
Sorry you can't understand the conversation. There isn't any point in going further with you until you do.
Try to follow the trail of conversations if you care to. If not just move along.
WSS
-
Apparently English is not the first language on the planet you're calling from. Sex with a prepubescent child is pedophilia. It's most certainly an unnatural fetish. Disagree?
WSS
Uh yes...however in that post you were referring to said pedophilia as something that's more or less relative depending on what culture you might have been raised in. See in the modern world, and give the secular progressives their just due, they've come to the conclusion that having sex with children is pervasively damaging to them. Two children having sex with each other, while it shouldn't happen....is not the same as a grown man predating on the haplessness of small children. The empirical irrefutable evidence for this has long been in the books so put the little peener away.
Uh yes...however in that post you were referring to said pedophilia as something that's more or less relative depending on what culture you might have been raised in. See in the modern world, and give the secular progressives their just due, they've come to the conclusion that having sex with children is pervasively damaging to them. Two children having sex with each other, while it shouldn't happen....is not the same as a grown man predating on the haplessness of small children. The empirical irrefutable evidence for this has long been in the books so put the little peener away.
no it isn't, and it wasn't. I'm talking about other cultures and which 13 and 14 year olds are regularly sexually active. at the point of puberty. Which is scientifically natural in the animal kingdom of which we are a part. quit trying to sound so f****** incredulous and read something once in awhile.
WSS
-
Bottom line again since you are too lazy or stupid, is this: we have plenty of laws, many of them based on sexuality, that are in place for no scientific reason except for the fact they piss us, you and me and just about everyone, off.
That's why homosexuality has previously been illegal. Because it pisses people off. not because there's any harm that comes from it.
WSS
-
Bottom line again since you are too lazy or stupid, is this: we have plenty of laws, many of them based on sexuality, that are in place for no scientific reason except for the fact they piss us, you and me and just about everyone, off.
That's why homosexuality has previously been illegal. Because it pisses people off. not because there's any harm that comes from it.
WSS
Bottom line again since you are too lazy or stupid, is this: we have plenty of laws, many of them based on sexuality, that are in place for no scientific reason except for the fact they piss us, you and me and just about everyone, off.
That's why homosexuality has previously been illegal. Because it pisses people off. not because there's any harm that comes from it.
WSS
As I said, we've done the heavy lifting on this previously and concluded that 13 or 14 year old girls were on the high avg not even close yet to being mature enough to make their own decisions. I don't know if i'd use the term "scientific" but it was more than just "it pisses us off". Having 13 and 14 year old girls marrying off that early basically negates the rest of their lives...they're used as baby chattle than thrown away. So yes you're correct in part that it became an issue of contention that half our species was being used such...but we also concluded it a kind of scientific way that this practice wasn't just bad for the individual girls but then also bad for the rest of us. Empirical observation was our friend.
And you're also correct that homosexuality was illegal because it pissed a certain group of people off, but you were also making the morally relative point that sex with children then...because it was at one time legit, should be brought back into the conversation if we're just gonna let any old perversity stand. And my point, as well as others, is that it's not even remotely comparable. I don't live on the same planet that you do, my world is not morally relative. I have the innate ability to parse out what's right and wrong based on "everyone's" greater good. Probably because I cared to read up on those that went before me and, like I said, did all of this heavy lifting already. I'm in zero mood to debate some of these past issues we got over like was slavery really all that bad as some conservatives have put forth in recent times. Justice Clarence fucking Thomas, a black man himself, just the other day stated that "slaves didn't lose their dignity or humanity because the govt allowed them to be enslaved". So you're not alone Steve, plenty of people still don't get it....some with very very very high positions in our society.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login