Scientists admit they underestimated the number of trees
-
Just a little joke since some of you guys like to be right Cal for bringing it up.
WSS
Cal brings it up like "but you don't care about the rainforests! see, it's all about taking my money" - conveniently ignoring the whole 'save the rainforest' thing that's been around for decades.
Cal brings it up like "but you don't care about the rainforests! see, it's all about taking my money" - conveniently ignoring the whole 'save the rainforest' thing that's been around for decades.
Right, that's the joke. Not just the fact cal is bringing it up but the context used when he brings it up
-
you why they do it right? cause now some people realize it's an issue but they want it for themselves. They can't bring themselves to acknowledge that the people they ridiculed so belligerently for decades....were right. So now they act as if this is something new that ONLY they care about. Contemptible really.
-
I'm not certain that's it, but I don't know what it is.
-
Liberals can't stand it when others believe what they don't,
and when others have money they don't.
They will bitch and mock it most of the time.
They are VICTIMS. Poor liberals. They deserve free stuff,
and they want redistribution of all wealth.
-
I'm not certain that's it, but I don't know what it is.
Believe it, it's an amazing showcase of cognitive dissonance within the conservative movement because some still don't want to acknowledge it outright but peripherally and tacitly acknowledge things in other settings. Eventually they'll come around because they have to, and for now we're going to be subjected to amazing political maneuvering. They will try to own the conservationist movement somehow, just watch. Instead of just saying yeah you guys were right, lets get to work on this. Yeah, wishful thinking.
-
Liberals can't stand it when others believe what they don't,
and when others have money they don't.
They will bitch and mock it most of the time.
They are VICTIMS. Poor liberals. They deserve free stuff,
and they want redistribution of all wealth.
Liberals can't stand it when others believe what they don't,
and when others have money they don't.
They will bitch and mock it most of the time.
They are VICTIMS. Poor liberals. They deserve free stuff,
and they want redistribution of all wealth.
ahh trying to get away from the subject, that good ole playbook. Don't address in any way that you were tragically erroneous in your assertion that "liberals" never cared about the rainforests...which might in fact be one of the stupidest things I've seen you type here. Devoid of any kind of reality whatsoever.
-
For years now, I've argued about the farce "mmgw".
And not once has a lib who wailed about mmgw ever brought
up the destruction of the earth's global rainforests.
I always have to bring it up, because they fart about "we have
to do something here in America"... (turning down thermostats,
taxing every freakin thing they can think of, stop cows from
farting, bitch about big corps causing it so they can get tons
of money from those corps, ....
and they -never- talk about the destruction of the rainforests. I mean,
millions and millions of acres of rainforest.
Always "tax, alternative energy, tax more, vote for liberal because of mmgw
and he talks about it, those rednecks and their pickup trucks, those who drive
those nasty big SUV's, stop people and corps from burning fossile fuels, or
fine them out of existence (the obamao way)...
so, I keep bringing up the destruction of the rainforests.
because if we non-liberals on the board don't bring it up, it will never be
mentioned. And that's a fact. So, they either don't care, or they are so
ignorant, they can't think of it as a problem.
-
Sorry, I forgot to insult you and everyone else while disagreeing with you
can I still play?Sorry, I forgot to insult you and everyone else while disagreeing with you
can I still play?It's ok, the fact that you quoted a biased, faulted study as real science is insulting enough.
:neutral_face: -
You are all about science until some nut job MAN says the "feel" like a woman. Then you ignore the science that clearly indicates that the person has an X and Y chromosome (therefore they are a man) and you ignore the clear observation that they are a man just because the mentally ill person says they feel like a woman.
It's interesting how stupid you really can be sometimes.
What the fuck are you talking about?
I'm pretty sure Chris' follow up addressed this post appropriately
What the fuck are you talking about?
I'm pretty sure Chris' follow up addressed this post appropriately
So any "study" that supports your views is valid? That explains a lot.
-
For years now, I've argued about the farce "mmgw".
And not once has a lib who wailed about mmgw ever brought
up the destruction of the earth's global rainforests.
I always have to bring it up, because they fart about "we have
to do something here in America"... (turning down thermostats,
taxing every freakin thing they can think of, stop cows from
farting, bitch about big corps causing it so they can get tons
of money from those corps, ....
and they -never- talk about the destruction of the rainforests. I mean,
millions and millions of acres of rainforest.
Always "tax, alternative energy, tax more, vote for liberal because of mmgw
and he talks about it, those rednecks and their pickup trucks, those who drive
those nasty big SUV's, stop people and corps from burning fossile fuels, or
fine them out of existence (the obamao way)...
so, I keep bringing up the destruction of the rainforests.
because if we non-liberals on the board don't bring it up, it will never be
mentioned. And that's a fact. So, they either don't care, or they are so
ignorant, they can't think of it as a problem.
For years now, I've argued about the farce "mmgw".
And not once has a lib who wailed about mmgw ever brought
up the destruction of the earth's global rainforests.
bullshit bullshit bullshit. Complete and utter farcical bullshit. Not to be believed under any circumstances. I grew up in the 80's during non stop save the rainforest documentaries couple times a year. You were probably already in your 50's then so I know this wasn't "before your time". Horseshit horseshit horseshit. You lie out of your ass if you think i'm going to believe you had all these convo's with vast amounts of libs specifically about the environment but none of them ever brought up the rainforests. Peddle that miracle oil somewhere else.
-
It's ok, the fact that you quoted a biased, faulted study as real science is insulting enough.
I'd be interested to hear why you think that's the case?
-
and I love how the issue is now being framed as is gw being caused by the incessant burning of fossil fuels OR is it the destruction of the rainforests.....cause it can't be both right? Has to be one or the other.
facepalm.
-
On the board, douche. ON THE BOARD.
Your wild ass emotional outbursts don't make you
look like you have any kind of a point.
-
On the board, douche. ON THE BOARD.
Your wild ass emotional outbursts don't make you
look like you have any kind of a point.
On the board, douche. ON THE BOARD.
Your wild ass emotional outbursts don't make you
look like you have any kind of a point.
so ur trying to paint yourself as the browns board "save the whale, er, rainforest" hippy dippy stoner now? You've got to be kidding me. This fantasy life of yours is getting crazier by the minute.
-
I've never heard Cal talk about dangers malaria poses in some countries. I can't believe you don't care about that.
-
I've never heard Cal talk about dangers malaria poses in some countries. I can't believe you don't care about that.
I've never heard Cal talk about dangers malaria poses in some countries. I can't believe you don't care about that.
Ikr? I for one want to make sure everyone knows that because I hven't ever brought up sudden infant death syndrome here, I don't care about your babies sudden deaths. I mean why would I? They should have been aborted anyway right? <----lols, who saw what I did there?
-
nah. We don't generally ever discuss diseases, nor do we discuss
the deaths of bables outside of abortion/murder. A lot of bad things happen,
but we are talking about politics.
-
nah. We don't generally ever discuss diseases, nor do we discuss
the deaths of bables outside of abortion/murder. A lot of bad things happen,
but we are talking about politics.
nah. We don't generally ever discuss diseases, nor do we discuss
the deaths of bables outside of abortion/murder. A lot of bad things happen,
but we are talking about politics.
right so just because someone's never brought up a specific point doesn't mean they don't care about it. It just never came up. Good to know. Next time you might try asking first before you accuse people of not giving a fuck about something. You could start that query off with "do you give a fuck about (insert noun)" try that sometime.
-
again, if we are discussing mmgw endlessly, for years, and it never comes up,
unless I or a couple of non-mmgw believers bring it up...
it is very obvious that you can't get libs to talk about it.
-
Please read to the end! The Washington PostThe Arctic Ocean is warming up, icebergs are growing scarcer and in some
places the seals are finding the water too hot, according to a report to the
Commerce Department yesterday from Consulate, at Bergen, Norway.Reports from fishermen, seal hunters and explorers all point to a radical
change in climate conditions and hitherto unheard-of temperatures in the Arctic
zone.Exploration expeditions report that scarcely any ice has been met as far
north as 81 degrees 29 minutes, (81°, 29").Soundings to a depth of 3,100 meters showed the gulf stream still very
warm. Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth
and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have
entirely disappeared.Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while
vast shoals of herring and smelts which have never before ventured so far north,
are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.Within a few years it is predicted that due to the ice melt the sea will
rise and make most coastal cities uninhabitable.I must apologize. I neglected to mention that this report was from
November 2, 1922, as reported by the AP and published in The Washington Post -
92 years ago.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login