#1 overall QB picks
-
Using that theory.....instead of overall 1 & 2.....lets look at the first 2 picked....last 10 years.....
2015: Marriota #1......Winston #2
2014: Bortles #3......Manziel #22
2013: Manuel #16.....Smith #39
2012: Luck #1........RGIII #2
2011: Newton #1.......Locker #8
2010: Bradford #1......Tebow #25
2009: Stafford #1.......Sanchez #5
2008: Ryan #3.......... Flacco #18
2007: Russell #1........Quinn #22
2006: Young #3..........Leinert #10
So.....there are your top 2 QB's from each season.....out of the 20 listed, I personally consider 11(55%)(in red) of them as 1st round busts.....meaning, to date, they have not played well....earned & maintained a starters role.....or even stayed in the league....
I count only 4 or 5 that Id consider to be "franchise type" QB's...(25%)......(so far)
And I count only 1 who Id consider even remotely close to being elite/super star.....and he's just getting there now(Cam)...
So...over 10 years and first 20 QB's picked.....and I see one " big star" so far........and a handful of good ones....
And a bunch of duds and "undecideds"...
-
QB taken at #2 and 2nd QB taken are two very different things.
Couldnt agree more.....plenty of years where there are no QB's at the top....because none are good enough to be there....
And just deciding to pick one at #1 or #2 does not make him worthy.....
Gip....as an example.....it sounds like you're saying if we picked GOFF at #1 he would be more successful, than if we picked him at #2 or #10......
But....in reality....no matter where you pick him....Goff is still Goff.....
So.....this year....there isnt a QB who stands out as an overall #1.....so if you just pick a guy and insert him into the #1 or #2, it does not, in any way, imply he will be more successful.....
He has to be worth it.....and some years there just isnt anyone who is...
And if you did what woody said.....and instead of listing overall #1 & #2's.....you listed the first and second QB's picked period.....you'd see a huge difference in the quality.....(cause lots of teams force it....ala Manziel and Quinn)
Couldnt agree more.....plenty of years where there are no QB's at the top....because none are good enough to be there....
And just deciding to pick one at #1 or #2 does not make him worthy.....
Gip....as an example.....it sounds like you're saying if we picked GOFF at #1 he would be more successful, than if we picked him at #2 or #10......
I am only pointing out the fact that of the many QBs taken #1 overall since 1998....a vast majority of them are to this day starting QBs in the NFL. (And I guess I only point out that there have been 12 QBs taken #1....where only 4 were taken at #2)
But....in reality....no matter where you pick him....Goff is still Goff.....
So.....this year....there isnt a QB who stands out as an overall #1.....so if you just pick a guy and insert him into the #1 or #2, it does not, in any way, imply he will be more successful.....
I am only pointing out historical trends.......the #2s have not been as successful as the #1s. What can I say? Well, I can say: If you are looking at historical trends....the only guy taken at #2 where the guy taken before him was not a QB is Bert Jones.....and Bert Jones was a mighty damn good QB.
So...if the Browns took a QB at #2....and he turned out to be as good as Bert Jones....that would be sweet for the Brown IMO.
He has to be worth it.....and some years there just isnt anyone who is...
FYI....I don't think Goff or Lynche will turn out to be as good as Bert Jones....so I say pass on them
And if you did what woody said.....and instead of listing overall #1 & #2's.....you listed the first and second QB's picked period.....you'd see a huge difference in the quality.....(cause lots of teams force it....ala Manziel and Quinn)
Sure....you never know what you might see if you do that.....but since it is Woody's idea....or yours....I will leave it up to you to do that list. Then you can both prove your own points with it...and you don't have to ask me to do it for you.
-
Couldnt agree more.....plenty of years where there are no QB's at the top....because none are good enough to be there....
And just deciding to pick one at #1 or #2 does not make him worthy.....
Gip....as an example.....it sounds like you're saying if we picked GOFF at #1 he would be more successful, than if we picked him at #2 or #10......
I am only pointing out the fact that of the many QBs taken #1 overall since 1998....a vast majority of them are to this day starting QBs in the NFL. (And I guess I only point out that there have been 12 QBs taken #1....where only 4 were taken at #2)
But....in reality....no matter where you pick him....Goff is still Goff.....
So.....this year....there isnt a QB who stands out as an overall #1.....so if you just pick a guy and insert him into the #1 or #2, it does not, in any way, imply he will be more successful.....
I am only pointing out historical trends.......the #2s have not been as successful as the #1s. What can I say? Well, I can say: If you are looking at historical trends....the only guy taken at #2 where the guy taken before him was not a QB is Bert Jones.....and Bert Jones was a mighty damn good QB.
So...if the Browns took a QB at #2....and he turned out to be as good as Bert Jones....that would be sweet for the Brown IMO.
He has to be worth it.....and some years there just isnt anyone who is...
FYI....I don't think Goff or Lynche will turn out to be as good as Bert Jones....so I say pass on them
And if you did what woody said.....and instead of listing overall #1 & #2's.....you listed the first and second QB's picked period.....you'd see a huge difference in the quality.....(cause lots of teams force it....ala Manziel and Quinn)
Sure....you never know what you might see if you do that.....but since it is Woody's idea....or yours....I will leave it up to you to do that list. Then you can both prove your own points with it...and you don't have to ask me to do it for you.
Couldnt agree more.....plenty of years where there are no QB's at the top....because none are good enough to be there....
And just deciding to pick one at #1 or #2 does not make him worthy.....
Gip....as an example.....it sounds like you're saying if we picked GOFF at #1 he would be more successful, than if we picked him at #2 or #10......
I am only pointing out the fact that of the many QBs taken #1 overall since 1998....a vast majority of them are to this day starting QBs in the NFL. (And I guess I only point out that there have been 12 QBs taken #1....where only 4 were taken at #2)
But....in reality....no matter where you pick him....Goff is still Goff.....
So.....this year....there isnt a QB who stands out as an overall #1.....so if you just pick a guy and insert him into the #1 or #2, it does not, in any way, imply he will be more successful.....
I am only pointing out historical trends.......the #2s have not been as successful as the #1s. What can I say? Well, I can say: If you are looking at historical trends....the only guy taken at #2 where the guy taken before him was not a QB is Bert Jones.....and Bert Jones was a mighty damn good QB.
So...if the Browns took a QB at #2....and he turned out to be as good as Bert Jones....that would be sweet for the Brown IMO.
He has to be worth it.....and some years there just isnt anyone who is...
FYI....I don't think Goff or Lynche will turn out to be as good as Bert Jones....so I say pass on them
And if you did what woody said.....and instead of listing overall #1 & #2's.....you listed the first and second QB's picked period.....you'd see a huge difference in the quality.....(cause lots of teams force it....ala Manziel and Quinn)
Sure....you never know what you might see if you do that.....but since it is Woody's idea....or yours....I will leave it up to you to do that list. Then you can both prove your own points with it...and you don't have to ask me to do it for you.
I already did it......look up.....^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
and the list of #3 QB taken is even worse.....................here are the last 10.......
Bryce Petty
Teddy Twatwater
Mike Glennon
Ryan Tannehill
Blaine Gabbert
Jimmy Clausen
Josh Freeman
Brian Brohm
Kevin Kolb
Jay Cultler
So.....looks like a good idea to stay away from the 3rd one available too.....
-
Couldnt agree more.....plenty of years where there are no QB's at the top....because none are good enough to be there....
And just deciding to pick one at #1 or #2 does not make him worthy.....
Gip....as an example.....it sounds like you're saying if we picked GOFF at #1 he would be more successful, than if we picked him at #2 or #10......
I am only pointing out the fact that of the many QBs taken #1 overall since 1998....a vast majority of them are to this day starting QBs in the NFL. (And I guess I only point out that there have been 12 QBs taken #1....where only 4 were taken at #2)
But....in reality....no matter where you pick him....Goff is still Goff.....
So.....this year....there isnt a QB who stands out as an overall #1.....so if you just pick a guy and insert him into the #1 or #2, it does not, in any way, imply he will be more successful.....
I am only pointing out historical trends.......the #2s have not been as successful as the #1s. What can I say? Well, I can say: If you are looking at historical trends....the only guy taken at #2 where the guy taken before him was not a QB is Bert Jones.....and Bert Jones was a mighty damn good QB.
So...if the Browns took a QB at #2....and he turned out to be as good as Bert Jones....that would be sweet for the Brown IMO.
He has to be worth it.....and some years there just isnt anyone who is...
FYI....I don't think Goff or Lynche will turn out to be as good as Bert Jones....so I say pass on them
And if you did what woody said.....and instead of listing overall #1 & #2's.....you listed the first and second QB's picked period.....you'd see a huge difference in the quality.....(cause lots of teams force it....ala Manziel and Quinn)
Sure....you never know what you might see if you do that.....but since it is Woody's idea....or yours....I will leave it up to you to do that list. Then you can both prove your own points with it...and you don't have to ask me to do it for you.
I already did it......look up.....^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I already did it......look up.....^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I guess I didn't see your post when I put mine up. Thanks boss.
-
Using that theory.....instead of overall 1 & 2.....lets look at the first 2 picked....last 10 years.....
2015: Marriota #1......Winston #2
2014: Bortles #3......Manziel #22
2013: Manuel #16.....Smith #39
2012: Luck #1........RGIII #2
2011: Newton #1.......Locker #8
2010: Bradford #1......Tebow #25
2009: Stafford #1.......Sanchez #5
2008: Ryan #3.......... Flacco #18
2007: Russell #1........Quinn #22
2006: Young #3..........Leinert #10
So.....there are your top 2 QB's from each season.....out of the 20 listed, I personally consider 11(55%)(in red) of them as 1st round busts.....meaning, to date, they have not played well....earned & maintained a starters role.....or even stayed in the league....
I count only 4 or 5 that Id consider to be "franchise type" QB's...(25%)......(so far)
And I count only 1 who Id consider even remotely close to being elite/super star.....and he's just getting there now(Cam)...
So...over 10 years and first 20 QB's picked.....and I see one " big star" so far........and a handful of good ones....
And a bunch of duds and "undecideds"...
Using that theory.....instead of overall 1 & 2.....lets look at the first 2 picked....last 10 years.....
2015: Marriota #1......Winston #2
2014: Bortles #3......Manziel #22
2013: Manuel #16.....Smith #39
2012: Luck #1........RGIII #2
2011: Newton #1.......Locker #8
2010: Bradford #1......Tebow #25
2009: Stafford #1.......Sanchez #5
2008: Ryan #3.......... Flacco #18
2007: Russell #1........Quinn #22
2006: Young #3..........Leinert #10
So.....there are your top 2 QB's from each season.....out of the 20 listed, I personally consider 11(55%)(in red) of them as 1st round busts.....meaning, to date, they have not played well....earned & maintained a starters role.....or even stayed in the league....
I count only 4 or 5 that Id consider to be "franchise type" QB's...(25%)......(so far)
Which ones are these?
And I count only 1 who Id consider even remotely close to being elite/super star.....and he's just getting there now(Cam)...
So...over 10 years and first 20 QB's picked.....and I see one " big star" so far........and a handful of good ones....
And a bunch of duds and "undecideds"...
-
I guess I didn't see your post when I put mine up. Thanks boss.
So...if you add these to your lists.....it's pretty obvious you need to tap the one guy a year who's worth anything.....if he exists....
cause the second and third ones tend not to do well......at all.....
Using that theory.....instead of overall 1 & 2.....lets look at the first 2 picked....last 10 years.....
2015: Marriota #1......Winston #2
2014: Bortles #3......Manziel #22
2013: Manuel #16.....Smith #39
2012: Luck #1........RGIII #2
2011: Newton #1.......Locker #8
2010: Bradford #1......Tebow #25
2009: Stafford #1.......Sanchez #5
2008: Ryan #3.......... Flacco #18
2007: Russell #1........Quinn #22
2006: Young #3..........Leinert #10
I count only 4 or 5 that Id consider to be "franchise type" QB's...(25%)......(so far)
Which ones are these?
My 5 would be Ryan, Stafford, Flacco, Newton and Luck......(so far).....
And, Id say, Marriota & Winston are looking fairly decent and have a good chance of getting to franchise status too....
-
Too much work for me but maybe the Gipper can help. What were the records of the teams that took those quarterbacks the last couple or three seasons before they did?
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
Extrapolating....here are a few names of people that were taken as the 4th or lower QB taken in a draft:
Derek Carr
Brock Osweiler
Russell Wilson
Nick Foles
Kurt Cousins
Andy Dalton
Colin Kaepernick
Ryan Mallet
Trent Edwards
Kyle Orton
Matt Schaub
Luke McCown
Rex Grossman
Josh McCown
Daunte Culpepper
Brian Griese
Neil O'Donnell
Jim Harbaugh
Rich Gannon
Ken O'Brien
Dan Marino
Joe Montana
Joe Ferguson
Dan Fouts
Ken Anderson
Joe Theisman
Ken Stabler.
-
Too much work for me but maybe the Gipper can help. What were the records of the teams that took those quarterbacks the last couple or three seasons before they did?
WSS
Too much work for me but maybe the Gipper can help. What were the records of the teams that took those quarterbacks the last couple or three seasons before they did?
WSS
Not sure what you are asking....and it sounds like too much work for me as well.
But.....if you are referring to what were the records of teams that took QBs with the first or second overall pick through the years....I would say: pretty shitty. After all, they were awarded the #1 or #2 pick. (unless a trade....like the RGIII trade was made.)
On the list of "2d QB taken regardless of draft slot" taking a look at it....in two cases I know, Quinn and JMZ, those were our 2d picks in the first round.
And remember, the Jets got Sanchez using a pick traded FROM the Browns in a trade up.
If you take into account the trade that got us Weeden......the Browns have been very active at Quarterback dealing in the first round of the draft.
Or, as Shakespeare said: A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
-
Too much work for me but maybe the Gipper can help. What were the records of the teams that took those quarterbacks the last couple or three seasons before they did?
WSS
Not sure what you are asking....and it sounds like too much work for me as well.
But.....if you are referring to what were the records of teams that took QBs with the first or second overall pick through the years....I would say: pretty shitty. After all, they were awarded the #1 or #2 pick. (unless a trade....like the RGIII trade was made.)
On the list of "2d QB taken regardless of draft slot" taking a look at it....in two cases I know, Quinn and JMZ, those were our 2d picks in the first round.
And remember, the Jets got Sanchez using a pick traded FROM the Browns in a trade up.
If you take into account the trade that got us Weeden......the Browns have been very active at Quarterback dealing in the first round of the draft.
Or, as Shakespeare said: A lot of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
if you are referring to what were the records of teams that took QBs with the first or second overall pick....I would say: pretty shitty.
HA!....thats about right....
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login