Skip to content

Goff Or Lynch @2?

The Browns Board
156 37 4.4k
  • Actually in regards to the joe thomas pick the other QB selected in the 2007 draft were

    1 1 Oakland Raiders JaMarcus Russell QB LSU SEC

    1 22 Cleveland Browns Brady Quinn QB Notre Dame Ind. (FBS) from Dallas[21]

    2 36 Philadelphia Eagles Kevin Kolb QB Houston C-USA from Cleveland via Dallas[21][23]

    2 40 Miami Dolphins John Beck QB BYU MWC

    2 43 Detroit Lions Drew Stanton QB Michigan State Big Ten from Buffalo[26]

    3 92 Buffalo Bills Trent Edwards QB Stanford Pac-10 from Baltimore[42]

    4 103 Dallas Cowboys Isaiah Stanback QB Washington Pac-10 from Cleveland[31]

    5 151 Cincinnati Bengals Jeff Rowe QB Nevada WAC

    No real QB to be had in 2007. To be fair after taking JT we took the very next QB off the board in Brady Quinn.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    • A smart QB knows when his wide receiver is open, where he'll be open at and can deliver it. There are maybe 12-15 of these QB's in the league. Neither Anderson nor Quinn were generally smart QB's.
    • An accurate QB can throw with such pinpoint accuracy that he will throw his WR open even . There are maybe 8 of these QB's in the league. Neither Anderson nor Quinn were generally accurate QB's.

    This should about seal the deal for you on Goff then right πŸ˜‰ By this estimation he'll be in the company of 3-5.

    @bbedward said:

    This should about seal the deal for you on Goff then right πŸ˜‰ By this estimation he'll be in the company of 3-5.

    Your love for this guy is approaching POG levels of infatuation.

    It would be nice if he did, but to me he's in the company of group two right now. Can't be considered in the first group before you even play in the NFL.

    @tour2ma said:

    Seemed to be the case until this year when every single, Super QB looked human in multiple games. Showed there are limits to the weight even the best can carry.

    Everyone will look human at points, sure. But this season isn't enough to call Aaron Rodgers not an elite QB, is it?

  • Come on Z, say it with me. Just Say No to AJ Mac Ass Carron!! πŸ˜† Glove or No Glove

  • Come on Z, say it with me. Just Say No to AJ Mac Ass Carron!! πŸ˜† Glove or No Glove

    @gumby73 said:

    Come on Z, say it with me. Just Say No to AJ Mac Ass Carron!! πŸ˜† Glove or No Glove

    I think it was McAssMunch, but that works too.

    He was mediocre in a Hue Jack offense throwing to A.J. Green so ... let's go grab him!

    Zombo

    --Franky, he has a face you just wanna punch

  • Zombo said:

    And one inactive one, apparently.

    Zombo

    --Brady Quinn? Really??

    Surround Brady Quinn with enough talent and he'd be fine.

    It's how he excelled at Notre Dame.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Surround Brady Quinn with enough talent and he'd be fine.

    It's how he excelled at Notre Dame.

    Ah....No. I doubt it.

  • @bbedward said:

    This should about seal the deal for you on Goff then right πŸ˜‰ By this estimation he'll be in the company of 3-5.

    Your love for this guy is approaching POG levels of infatuation.

    It would be nice if he did, but to me he's in the company of group two right now. Can't be considered in the first group before you even play in the NFL.

    @tour2ma said:

    Seemed to be the case until this year when every single, Super QB looked human in multiple games. Showed there are limits to the weight even the best can carry.

    Everyone will look human at points, sure. But this season isn't enough to call Aaron Rodgers not an elite QB, is it?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Everyone will look human at points, sure. But this season isn't enough to call Aaron Rodgers not an elite QB, is it?

    Hell, no... but Rogers clearly buckled under the load this season... to a lesser extent so did Brady.

    Manning and Luck did as well, but they had injuries that added to their support-cast woes.

  • @bbedward said:

    This should about seal the deal for you on Goff then right πŸ˜‰ By this estimation he'll be in the company of 3-5.

    Your love for this guy is approaching POG levels of infatuation.

    It would be nice if he did, but to me he's in the company of group two right now. Can't be considered in the first group before you even play in the NFL.

    @tour2ma said:

    Seemed to be the case until this year when every single, Super QB looked human in multiple games. Showed there are limits to the weight even the best can carry.

    Everyone will look human at points, sure. But this season isn't enough to call Aaron Rodgers not an elite QB, is it?

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Your love for this guy is approaching POG levels of infatuation.

    I won't continue to love him if he busts out, or doesn't become a Brown at least so it's a little different πŸ˜‰

  • So you're a "fair weather" POG? πŸ™‚

  • @gumby73 said:

    Come on Z, say it with me. Just Say No to AJ Mac Ass Carron!! πŸ˜† Glove or No Glove

    I think it was McAssMunch, but that works too.

    He was mediocre in a Hue Jack offense throwing to A.J. Green so ... let's go grab him!

    Zombo

    --Franky, he has a face you just wanna punch

    Zombo said:

    Zombo

    --Franky, he has a face you just wanna punch

    HA!!!......so, Im not the only one......

  • Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

  • Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    @mld-woody said:

    Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    I hope people aren't expecting us to win a ton of games straight out of the gate if we lose Mack, Thomas, and Haden. Developing a kid at QB with McCown and building around them isn't a bad plan.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Surround Brady Quinn with enough talent and he'd be fine.

    It's how he excelled at Notre Dame.

    Ok.

    Good call. He was good in college.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Ok.

    Good call. He was good in college.

    Zombo

    Like Goff. Kinda.

    WSS

  • Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    @mld-woody said:

    Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    β˜†I'm not.β˜†

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    β˜†Agreed. β˜†

    WSS

  • Zombo said:

    Ok.

    Good call. He was good in college.

    Zombo

    Like Goff. Kinda.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Like Goff. Kinda.

    WSS

    They are all pretty much 50/50.

    Goff has his fifty, Brady produced a 0.

    He was slow on his progressions, indecisive in the pocket and couldn't throw a deep ball to save his life, failed in five cities, but if the Bungles drafted him he would be Andy Fucking Dalton.

    Maybe Goff will be an abject failure too, but you don't know until you try.

    Bortles, Winston and Marriota drafted by bad teams, as bad as us, but they look like good QBs, the right side of the 50/50, they will build around them and be fine

    Z

  • @mld-woody said:

    Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    I hope people aren't expecting us to win a ton of games straight out of the gate if we lose Mack, Thomas, and Haden. Developing a kid at QB with McCown and building around them isn't a bad plan.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I hope people aren't expecting us to win a ton of games straight out of the gate if we lose Mack, Thomas, and Haden. Developing a kid at QB with McCown and building around them isn't a bad plan.

    I am not so sure I would want to develop a young QB with a shell of a team around him. That's how you break QBs

  • Goff is a franchise QB pretty much guaranteed. We don't know if we're losing 3 pro bowl caliber lineman yet or not - I would guess not.

    As I've said before, there's no excuse to pass on "the guy" when he's there. Sooner you get him, the better. It's much easier to find talent everywhere else.

  • Is anyone else not sold on a QB at 2? We have no idea what our roster will look like in 3 months.

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    @mld-woody said:

    We lose Mack, Thomas, Haden, etc... Is it really to take a QB that's anything less than Andrew Luck?

    How would we lose two guys under contract?

    Odds are Mack is gone. As far as I know we are still in the hunt for Schwartz and every other impending RFA. And we just hired a pretty good salesman...

  • goff and it's not even close.

    an OC being hired now i'm thinking he goes QB then WR.............and lord knows we need both.

  • Interesting also that Sanu of the Bengals is an unrestricted free agent. Hmmm.

    Mike

  • We need a QB, this lust for Bosa or whatever makes no sense when we currently really only have a bridge QB. If they grade Goff the best QB in the class but grade him as the 7th best overall player or something, you take Goff. If they believe Goff and Lynch are bust then you go a different direction. But somehow I doubt they will grade out that way. I am sure Hue will have major input on the QBs in this class.