What Makes A Playoff Team?
-
Third down percentage is a key as well. You get off the field, they don't score points, basically. It also limits the yards you can give up.
-
OK, none of the rest of you will do this so I have to: The teams that allowed the fewest points this year are as follows:
1. Seattle
2. Cincinnati
3. Kansas City
4. Denver
5. Minnesota
6. Carolina
7. Houston
8. Arizona
9. NY Jets
10.New England
11. Pittsburgh
12. Green Bay
So, 11 of the 12 teams that allowed the fewest points made the playoff. The Jets should have made the playoffs....and Redskins are the only one not in the Top 12.
You say "sure Captain Obvious". Point is you have to see who does not break.
I suggest that the opposite would not be quite as true: that the teams that scored the most points are the ones that get in the playoffs. Maybe....but not nearly as much as the rate of teams that stop opponents from scoring.
-
Gip, it's about breaking down the causes of that. It's pretty easy to just say "what makes a playoff team? well, score lots of points and don't give up many points" but I was trying to go a level or two beyond that.
-
Gip, it's about breaking down the causes of that. It's pretty easy to just say "what makes a playoff team? well, score lots of points and don't give up many points" but I was trying to go a level or two beyond that.
Gip, it's about breaking down the causes of that. It's pretty easy to just say "what makes a playoff team? well, score lots of points and don't give up many points" but I was trying to go a level or two beyond that.
In other words, you are trying to overthink it? It is pretty simple really: good defense gets you to the playoffs.
-
-
O and D line, anyone still disagree?
O and D line, anyone still disagree?
Vince Lombardi said: "Its all about blocking and tackling". Who would question him?
-
O and D line, anyone still disagree?
O and D line, anyone still disagree?
Not a matter of agreeing or not, it's a matter of what metrics are out there...
What are your OL and DL metrics?
-
http://footballscoop.com/news/there-have-been-68-nfl-coaching-changes-in-the-last-decade/
There is a good statistic boys
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
-
O and D line, anyone still disagree?
Not a matter of agreeing or not, it's a matter of what metrics are out there...
What are your OL and DL metrics?
Not a matter of agreeing or not, it's a matter of what metrics are out there...
What are your OL and DL metrics?
best talent available either O or D line. If that's Bosa it's Bosa, Tunsil etc, etc. Actually I should also include the LB'ers in the defensive trenches. If there was a LB'er rated higher than Bosa I'd be all for it. We just need to draft big strong athletic kids that can throw people around. Mean fuckers too.
-
http://footballscoop.com/news/there-have-been-68-nfl-coaching-changes-in-the-last-decade/
There is a good statistic boys
WSS
http://footballscoop.com/news/there-have-been-68-nfl-coaching-changes-in-the-last-decade/
There is a good statistic boys
WSS
Well, it is pretty simple: teams that lose a lot fire their coaches. Those that make the playoffs usually do not.
Does anyone foresee any of this years playoff coaches being fired? Likely not.
-
http://footballscoop.com/news/there-have-been-68-nfl-coaching-changes-in-the-last-decade/
There is a good statistic boys
WSS
Well, it is pretty simple: teams that lose a lot fire their coaches. Those that make the playoffs usually do not.
Does anyone foresee any of this years playoff coaches being fired? Likely not.
And 2 and out usually puts you behind the eight ball since no matter who's on the team and no matter what they can do the new regime wants their own guys. And it usually takes a while to replace everybody with your own guy. And your own guys need time to develop.. Then you get fired again.Well, it is pretty simple: teams that lose a lot fire their coaches. Those that make the playoffs usually do not.
Does anyone foresee any of this years playoff coaches being fired? Likely not.
WSS
-
Not a matter of agreeing or not, it's a matter of what metrics are out there...
What are your OL and DL metrics?
best talent available either O or D line. If that's Bosa it's Bosa, Tunsil etc, etc. Actually I should also include the LB'ers in the defensive trenches. If there was a LB'er rated higher than Bosa I'd be all for it. We just need to draft big strong athletic kids that can throw people around. Mean fuckers too.
best talent available either O or D line. If that's Bosa it's Bosa, Tunsil etc, etc. Actually I should also include the LB'ers in the defensive trenches. If there was a LB'er rated higher than Bosa I'd be all for it. We just need to draft big strong athletic kids that can throw people around. Mean fuckers too.
So... you're not a metrics guy...
-
best talent available either O or D line. If that's Bosa it's Bosa, Tunsil etc, etc. Actually I should also include the LB'ers in the defensive trenches. If there was a LB'er rated higher than Bosa I'd be all for it. We just need to draft big strong athletic kids that can throw people around. Mean fuckers too.
So... you're not a metrics guy...
So... you're not a metrics guy...
not in the slightest. The metrics guys passed on Vontaze. So yeah.
-
An elite QB (Brady, Rodgers & Peyton 7 years ago) and enough junk to keep it moving forward, a franchise QB (Ben, Eli, Brees, Wilson, etc.) with very good players around them or just a ton of talent on both sides of the ball to disguise the fact you've got Trent Dilfer at the helm.
-
Not adding anything just wanted to say awesome thread. This is why I'm here great job.
-
I honestly don't understand anyone who thinks that line play is irrelevant.
The whole idea of "just get a QB" and it makes no difference who is blocking just mystifies me.
No offense is consistently good without an O line. End of story.
Defense wins football games. Always did. Unless there are significant rule changes, it always will.
And that starts with D line. In a 3-4, you better have stud LBs too.
Build from the lines up and you have a dynasty.
Build defense first and you get to playoffs sooner.
-
I honestly don't understand anyone who thinks that line play is irrelevant.
The whole idea of "just get a QB" and it makes no difference who is blocking just mystifies me.
No offense is consistently good without an O line. End of story.
Defense wins football games. Always did. Unless there are significant rule changes, it always will.
And that starts with D line. In a 3-4, you better have stud LBs too.
Build from the lines up and you have a dynasty.
Build defense first and you get to playoffs sooner.
Yeah thats worked out well. We have 5 top 40 picks on the o line.I honestly don't understand anyone who thinks that line play is irrelevant.
The whole idea of "just get a QB" and it makes no difference who is blocking just mystifies me.
No offense is consistently good without an O line. End of story.
Defense wins football games. Always did. Unless there are significant rule changes, it always will.
And that starts with D line. In a 3-4, you better have stud LBs too.
Build from the lines up and you have a dynasty.
Build defense first and you get to playoffs sooner.
-
So.. what?
All that says to me is that our talent evaluation sucks.
They could have had all 40 top picks and still screwed it up by picking the wrong guys.
Doesn't change the fact that an O line that can protect this precious QB pick is paramount.
Without it you don't win games.
Without it, you're the Browns.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login