Abortion Laws
-
So you don't have to be religious to be opposed to abortion.
Unless, of course, morality is religion based.
WSS
www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons -
It's all part of god's plan.
1. create earth by weekend
2. chill out on sunday
3. plant fake dinosaur skeletons to catch people out
4. unexpected pregnancies
5. oops! I'd better take care of that
6. skiing and sauna with odin and the gang
-
So you don't have to be religious to be opposed to abortion.
Unless, of course, morality is religion based.
WSS
So you don't have to be religious to be opposed to abortion.
Unless, of course, morality is religion based.
WSS
This is true, I can perfectly understand Cysko's opposition to abortion. Though, in that case I believe we just have a different 'tolerance' of the term before abortion.
-
I agree that you don't have to be religious to oppose abortion, Cysko is a prime example of that. I just think that the religious aspect of some people's anti-abortion stance is nonsense. That's all.
-
Why stop at aborting unwanted babies? Let's just kill any unwanted child. You wanted your kid to have blue eyes but your kid has brown? Kill it! It cries too much? Just smother it then. He starts acting up in kindergarten and you don't want to deal with it? Poison him!
Why stop there? Let's kill anyone who causes us an inconvenience. McDonald's get your order wrong? Kill the cashier. Postman delivers the wrong mail? Kill him too.
-
Why stop at aborting unwanted babies? Let's just kill any unwanted child. You wanted your kid to have blue eyes but your kid has brown? Kill it! It cries too much? Just smother it then. He starts acting up in kindergarten and you don't want to deal with it? Poison him!
Why stop there? Let's kill anyone who causes us an inconvenience. McDonald's get your order wrong? Kill the cashier. Postman delivers the wrong mail? Kill him too.
Why stop at aborting unwanted babies? Let's just kill any unwanted child. You wanted your kid to have blue eyes but your kid has brown? Kill it! It cries too much? Just smother it then. He starts acting up in kindergarten and you don't want to deal with it? Poison him!
Why stop there? Let's kill anyone who causes us an inconvenience. McDonald's get your order wrong? Kill the cashier. Postman delivers the wrong mail? Kill him too.
Must be liberal. Only liberals get so emotional about these things.
-
If you want to get serious about the subject these are some deep moral issues that should not be taken lightly. With abortions you have babies that are being killed in the womb. Some will say what about a baby that is deformed and ultrasounds show it? I saw a man on television recently born without arms and legs who is living life to the fullest. What about assisted suicide for those with terminal disease who are suffering yet once the door is open where does it lead? I saw recently in Europe a young woman was allowed to have government assisted suicide because of her depression.
So many times once you open the door on these moral issues it steadily goes downhill. The democrats for decades used the slogan that abortions should be safe, legal and rare but they have now dropped the rare. Why? What has changed accept now abortions have become so common. You can use the extreme arguments of the birth defects or a woman being raped but the real facts are that the vast majority of abortions are done for convenience.
-
If you want to get serious about the subject these are some deep moral issues that should not be taken lightly. With abortions you have babies that are being killed in the womb. Some will say what about a baby that is deformed and ultrasounds show it? I saw a man on television recently born without arms and legs who is living life to the fullest. What about assisted suicide for those with terminal disease who are suffering yet once the door is open where does it lead? I saw recently in Europe a young woman was allowed to have government assisted suicide because of her depression.
So many times once you open the door on these moral issues it steadily goes downhill. The democrats for decades used the slogan that abortions should be safe, legal and rare but they have now dropped the rare. Why? What has changed accept now abortions have become so common. You can use the extreme arguments of the birth defects or a woman being raped but the real facts are that the vast majority of abortions are done for convenience.
If you want to get serious about the subject these are some deep moral issues that should not be taken lightly. With abortions you have babies that are being killed in the womb. Some will say what about a baby that is deformed and ultrasounds show it? I saw a man on television recently born without arms and legs who is living life to the fullest. What about assisted suicide for those with terminal disease who are suffering yet once the door is open where does it lead? I saw recently in Europe a young woman was allowed to have government assisted suicide because of her depression.
So many times once you open the door on these moral issues it steadily goes downhill. The democrats for decades used the slogan that abortions should be safe, legal and rare but they have now dropped the rare. Why? What has changed accept now abortions have become so common. You can use the extreme arguments of the birth defects or a woman being raped but the real facts are that the vast majority of abortions are done for convenience.
Pretty soon the Government will have counselors who will 'recommend' execution due to depression, bad genes, etc.
-
Slippery slope? I'm convinced
-
If you want to get serious about the subject these are some deep moral issues that should not be taken lightly. With abortions you have babies that are being killed in the womb. Some will say what about a baby that is deformed and ultrasounds show it? I saw a man on television recently born without arms and legs who is living life to the fullest. What about assisted suicide for those with terminal disease who are suffering yet once the door is open where does it lead? I saw recently in Europe a young woman was allowed to have government assisted suicide because of her depression.
So many times once you open the door on these moral issues it steadily goes downhill. The democrats for decades used the slogan that abortions should be safe, legal and rare but they have now dropped the rare. Why? What has changed accept now abortions have become so common. You can use the extreme arguments of the birth defects or a woman being raped but the real facts are that the vast majority of abortions are done for convenience.
I saw a man on television recently born without arms and legs who is living life to the fullest.
I'm not discounting that some people can make some semblance of a life with such deformities. But it ain't "full". If he doesn't have much in the way of cognitive disability then fine. But I see no valor in bringing forth severely mentally handicapped children into this world. I would rather those souls come back another time in a better form. But it's not my call, it's between the two souls involved in the pregnancy. And that is my firm final belief.
-
I saw a man on television recently born without arms and legs who is living life to the fullest.
I'm not discounting that some people can make some semblance of a life with such deformities. But it ain't "full". If he doesn't have much in the way of cognitive disability then fine. But I see no valor in bringing forth severely mentally handicapped children into this world. I would rather those souls come back another time in a better form. But it's not my call, it's between the two souls involved in the pregnancy. And that is my firm final belief.
I'm not discounting that some people can make some semblance of a life with such deformities. But it ain't "full". If he doesn't have much in the way of cognitive disability then fine. But I see no valor in bringing forth severely mentally handicapped children into this world. I would rather those souls come back another time in a better form. But it's not my call, it's between the two souls involved in the pregnancy. And that is my firm final belief.
Of course it also includes the taxpayers who will need to shell out hundreds of thousands of dollars for ongoing care.
I'm sure you wouldn't want to limit the right of bringing forth deformed children to only those with the means to pay for them.
WSS
-
I'm not discounting that some people can make some semblance of a life with such deformities. But it ain't "full". If he doesn't have much in the way of cognitive disability then fine. But I see no valor in bringing forth severely mentally handicapped children into this world. I would rather those souls come back another time in a better form. But it's not my call, it's between the two souls involved in the pregnancy. And that is my firm final belief.
Of course it also includes the taxpayers who will need to shell out hundreds of thousands of dollars for ongoing care.
I'm sure you wouldn't want to limit the right of bringing forth deformed children to only those with the means to pay for them.
WSS
Of course it also includes the taxpayers who will need to shell out hundreds of thousands of dollars for ongoing care.
I'm sure you wouldn't want to limit the right of bringing forth deformed children to only those with the means to pay for them.
WSS
did I say I want to limit anybody's rights? I said I felt it personally wrong to do so, but in the end it isn't my call. The woman can "choose" to bring forth a severely deformed child.....just as she can opt not to. It's not my business. Even if the child was mine and I had some brain injury which caused me to think that bringing such a child into this world was the right call....in the end it still isn't my call. If I don't like it than I can tell the woman to fuck off and leave her.
-
I'm not talking about anybody's rights, just the morality of bringing a severely handicapped child into the world to be paid for by society.
Or by you, should she decide to hit you up for child support and medical bills for the next 18 years.
WSS
-
I need to figure out how to post a poll here. I'm curious as to which of the four sections these guys fall into and don't trust anybody to add their name to it.
No abortion for any reason,
illegal in the third trimester,
illegal in the 3rd trimester but with exceptions for life rape and incest or
anytime for any reason the woman sees fit.
WSS
-
I need to figure out how to post a poll here. I'm curious as to which of the four sections these guys fall into and don't trust anybody to add their name to it.
No abortion for any reason,
illegal in the third trimester,
illegal in the 3rd trimester but with exceptions for life rape and incest or
anytime for any reason the woman sees fit.
WSS
I need to figure out how to post a poll here. I'm curious as to which of the four sections these guys fall into and don't trust anybody to add their name to it.
No abortion for any reason,
illegal in the third trimester,
illegal in the 3rd trimester but with exceptions for life rape and incest or anytime for any reason the woman sees fit.
WSS
Want me to set one up?
-
I need to figure out how to post a poll here. I'm curious as to which of the four sections these guys fall into and don't trust anybody to add their name to it.
No abortion for any reason,
illegal in the third trimester,
illegal in the 3rd trimester but with exceptions for life rape and incest or anytime for any reason the woman sees fit.
WSS
Want me to set one up?
-
I'm not talking about anybody's rights, just the morality of bringing a severely handicapped child into the world to be paid for by society.
Or by you, should she decide to hit you up for child support and medical bills for the next 18 years.
WSS
I'm not talking about anybody's rights, just the morality of bringing a severely handicapped child into the world to be paid for by society.
Or by you, should she decide to hit you up for child support and medical bills for the next 18 years.
WSS
well obviously the cost to me specifically is incremental. Not too many of these children survive to term anyway. Those that do, and the mother chooses to go to term with them....yeah fine. If there was just an epidemic of children being born that basically will never be functioning members of society, than things would have to be looked at. You can't as a society say it's no problem to bring these kids into the world but we can't give you a dime. You would have to say if you want to have children like that you're on your own, and then they're on their own once you're gone.
There's no such epidemic for now but think about events in the past with people who lived around a water supply that got shit in by companies dumping mercury into it at will....those kids were royally fucked. I absolutely would have condoned the death penalty for the heads of companies that did that knowingly. But here in the U.S we give those people blowjobs for being great capitalists.
-
I think you are dancing around the question.
You get the chick pregnant and it's her decision to abort or not even though she knows there will be serious health problems. You have no place in the decision just the 18 years of support.
But you are correct, it's not an epidemic, even though one of my very best friends has a severely damaged twin brother who has been a ward of the state on and off for most of his life. Still is.
I'm kind of referencing the idea that if it is the woman's choice alone maybe it should be her responsibility alone?
WSS
-
I think you are dancing around the question.
You get the chick pregnant and it's her decision to abort or not even though she knows there will be serious health problems. You have no place in the decision just the 18 years of support.
But you are correct, it's not an epidemic, even though one of my very best friends has a severely damaged twin brother who has been a ward of the state on and off for most of his life. Still is.
I'm kind of referencing the idea that if it is the woman's choice alone maybe it should be her responsibility alone?
WSS
I'm kind of referencing the idea that if it is the woman's choice alone maybe it should be her responsibility alone?
WSS
try to fly that one past the right wing nutjobs in this country. Cause of course what you suggest would increase the number of abortions. So if they want less abortions they have to be willing to foot the bill in these cases. Which is precisely why they won't support such a measure because they know they would be hemming themselves up.
-
I'm kind of referencing the idea that if it is the woman's choice alone maybe it should be her responsibility alone?
WSS
try to fly that one past the right wing nutjobs in this country. Cause of course what you suggest would increase the number of abortions. So if they want less abortions they have to be willing to foot the bill in these cases. Which is precisely why they won't support such a measure because they know they would be hemming themselves up.
try to fly that one past the right wing nutjobs in this country. Cause of course what you suggest would increase the number of abortions. So if they want less abortions they have to be willing to foot the bill in these cases. Which is precisely why they won't support such a measure because they know they would be hemming themselves up.
Ha, actually try to fly that past the women over on the other side of the aisle.
Sure honey decide to do whatever you want with that kid. But I don't want anything to do with it so you're on your own. Enjoy your choice.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login