RG3 set to be a Brown ?
-
Shaw and Davis were undrafted for good reason. Perhaps Hue completed his evaluation of both, and realized why they were undrafted.
Perhaps Hue is giving RG3 a chance.. to be the taxi QB, which is more than he had last year.
Option B is possible, but OptionC is McCown/(Goff/Wentz)/RG3 on the roster for a "get your head right" year
The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you. "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." Paul Brown -
I really like the idea of the #2 pick being the best player in this draft!!!
-
Shaw and Davis were undrafted for good reason. Perhaps Hue completed his evaluation of both, and realized why they were undrafted.
Perhaps Hue is giving RG3 a chance.. to be the taxi QB, which is more than he had last year.
Option B is possible, but OptionC is McCown/(Goff/Wentz)/RG3 on the roster for a "get your head right" year
Shaw and Davis were undrafted for good reason. Perhaps Hue completed his evaluation of both, and realized why they were undrafted.
Perhaps Hue is giving RG3 a chance.. to be the taxi QB, which is more than he had last year.
Option B is possible, but OptionC is McCown/(Goff/Wentz)/RG3 on the roster for a "get your head right" year
If we bring in Goff/Wentz, Hue believes in them and they are the heir apparent, if not immediate starter, with McCown mentoring. If we bring in an RG3, it means Hue isn't completely sold on Wentz/Goff and envisions another player at #2 being more valuable to the team.
I don't know how Hue can be sure that RG3 is capable of a revival, but we have McCown to bridge regardless and RG3 should be cheap. It's a low-risk move to bring him in and see what he has. If he busts, no big deal. If he becomes what most expected him to be, then great, we have our QB. I just can't envision bringing in RG3 and then saying "We really love you, Goff/Wentz, but we brought in RG3 just to play games with your mind."
-
"One said:
Oh boy. The Browns sign RG3 Zombo will have a stroke over this one.
At least they are addressing the position. He's affordable and wouldnt cost a draft pick.
I wanted to trade up for him the year he came out in the draft... so maybe we will luck out and get the mature, humbled version.
Z
-
I'm into it. If hue likes it, so do i.
-
the cleveland browns QB situation as seen through the eyes of moe, dopey, QBert and homer simpson.
great stuff guys! keep it comin.
-
I really liked the last WAS QB we signed (imagine text in pink)
-
Whoopie.
WSS
-
I just don't like RG3. He looks like a frog. He's hurt all the time too. A good tackler tho.
-
We barely have to pay him shit. Better than a trade for Kaepernick. Why not? RG, McCown and Davis next year. That will get us to our franchise QB. Build up the trenches till we can feel confident throwing a kid out there.
-
We barely have to pay him shit. Better than a trade for Kaepernick. Why not? RG, McCown and Davis next year. That will get us to our franchise QB. Build up the trenches till we can feel confident throwing a kid out there.
We barely have to pay him shit. Better than a trade for Kaepernick. Why not? #1 RG, #2McCown and #3 Wentz/Goff next year. That will get us to our franchise QB. Build up the trenches till we can feel confident throwing a kid out there.
Fixed
-
RG3 and Josh Gordon getting back together could be good for both of them.
-
I just don't like RG3. He looks like a frog. He's hurt all the time too. A good tackler tho.
One Post From the Truth said:
I just don't like RG3. He looks like a frog. He's hurt all the time too. A good tackler tho.
A good tackler....maybe he can coach Gilbert
-
One Post From the Truth said:
I just don't like RG3. He looks like a frog. He's hurt all the time too. A good tackler tho.
A good tackler....maybe he can coach Gilbert
-
I just don't like RG3. He looks like a frog. He's hurt all the time too. A good tackler tho.
-
RG3 and Josh Gordon getting back together could be good for both of them.
RG3 and Josh Gordon getting back together could be good for both of them.
Uh oh, this post will surely summon PoG....... Much like uttering Beetlejuice.
-
If I have to choose between a FA RG3 (no cost to us) vs trading a THIRD for Kap, I choose RG3 EVERY DAY. Dude has talent, isn't a problem off the field, and showed he can play in this league his rookie year (injuries and a reality check have since put that ability to question). Someone is gonna give him a chance to be a backup/re-develop into a starter. Why not us?
The scenarios you have to consider are:
A. McCown/(Goff/Wentz) and our current D
B. McCown/RG3 and we can do whatever we want with #2.
Personally, I think that B might be the better of the two, ESPECIALLY if Hue and Co. aren't COMPLETELY sold on Wentz/Goff.
Dude has talent, isn't a problem off the field, and showed he can play in this league his rookie year (injuries and a reality check have since put that ability to question). Someone is gonna give him a chance to be a backup/re-develop into a starter. Why not us?
Isn't the locker room considered "off-field"? the interview room?
If the dude couldn't play for Gruden in WSH, then I don't want him.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login