Skip to content

2016 qb's rated

The Browns Board
102 25 3.3k
  • Somebody must be getting kickbacks for ranking Paxton Lynch so high. He couldn't muster a touchdown against Auburn. Hopefully his stock falls before the Browns draft another Brady Quinn/Brandon Weeden.

    They need help at so many posititions a QB as the first pick better be a HOME RUN!

    Bosa, Elliot, Cardale

    @opal312 said:

    Somebody must be getting kickbacks for ranking Paxton Lynch so high. He couldn't muster a touchdown against Auburn. Hopefully his stock falls before the Browns draft another Brady Quinn/Brandon Weeden.

    They need help at so many posititions a QB as the first pick better be a HOME RUN!

    Bosa, Elliot, Cardale

    Hue went to Goff & Wentz's Pro Days, isn't going to Lynch. Tells me all I need to know.

  • (1) Paxton Lynch-nfl body, + athleticism, + arm talent, good production, played in offense that despite being a spread has NFL/WCO passing concepts (same offense as Andy Dalton)

    (2) Connor Cook-nfl body, decent athleticism, decent arm talent, very good production, played in true NFL offense

    (3) Carson Wentz-nfl body, + athleticism, good arm talent, good production, played in a true NFL offense BUT played with a decided schematic and organization advantage over competition

    (4) Jared Goff-needs to bulk up, decent athleticism, decent arm talent, top production, played in a spread air raid offense and will have to transition into NFL offense

    (5) Brandon Allen-smaller frame, average athleticism, average arm, good production, played in true NFL offense

  • Honestly......there is no QB that has yet played in the NFL that we can rate how they can turn out as an NFL QB. In any draft there are outstanding successes and outstanding busts. And those who thought would be outstanding successes turned into outstanding busts.

    So, we know nothing.

    You can rate these guys on how they performed in college....and try to extrapolate how they will do in the pros.... but nothing is certain or written.

  • Objectively looking at Cardale I don't want him. He's not going to be a franchise QB anywhere in the league.

    There's a lot better QB prospects I'd go for in the lower rounds (Prescott, Hackenberg)

    @bbedward said:

    Objectively looking at Cardale I don't want him. He's not going to be a franchise QB anywhere in the league.

    There's a lot better QB prospects I'd go for in the lower rounds (Prescott, Hackenberg)

    And not no one not no how knows this for certain...at all.

  • @opal312 said:

    Somebody must be getting kickbacks for ranking Paxton Lynch so high. He couldn't muster a touchdown against Auburn. Hopefully his stock falls before the Browns draft another Brady Quinn/Brandon Weeden.

    They need help at so many posititions a QB as the first pick better be a HOME RUN!

    Bosa, Elliot, Cardale

    Hue went to Goff & Wentz's Pro Days, isn't going to Lynch. Tells me all I need to know.

    @hoorta said:

    Hue went to Goff & Wentz's Pro Days, isn't going to Lynch. Tells me all I need to know.

    When is that? Perhaps he will go.....if he really plans to do his due diligence.

  • @hoorta said:

    Hue went to Goff & Wentz's Pro Days, isn't going to Lynch. Tells me all I need to know.

    When is that? Perhaps he will go.....if he really plans to do his due diligence.

    @the-gipper said:

    When is that? Perhaps he will go.....if he really plans to do his due diligence.

    April 6th

  • @bbedward said:

    Objectively looking at Cardale I don't want him. He's not going to be a franchise QB anywhere in the league.

    There's a lot better QB prospects I'd go for in the lower rounds (Prescott, Hackenberg)

    And not no one not no how knows this for certain...at all.

    @the-gipper said:

    And not no one not no how knows this for certain...at all.

    So why continue to post on these threads if you're going to keep repeating over and over, on every thread, that no one is capable of predicting success for a player who transitions from the college to pro games?

    Annoying. Really.

    People are here to discuss and give their opinions of who they think will be good pro players. That's the entire appeal of discussing the NFL draft.

  • @the-gipper said:

    And not no one not no how knows this for certain...at all.

    So why continue to post on these threads if you're going to keep repeating over and over, on every thread, that no one is capable of predicting success for a player who transitions from the college to pro games?

    Annoying. Really.

    People are here to discuss and give their opinions of who they think will be good pro players. That's the entire appeal of discussing the NFL draft.

    @mike-h said:

    So why continue to post on these threads if you're going to keep repeating over and over, on every thread, that no one is capable of predicting success for a player who transitions from the college to pro games?

    Annoying. Really.

    Sorry that the truth hurts.

    People are here to discuss and give their opinions of who they think will be good pro players. That's the entire appeal of discussing the NFL draft.

    I didn't say you shouldn't continue do it. I didn't say that I would not continue to do it. I am just telling the truth about the predictability of it all.

    That is part of the frustration of it all for Browns fans. I had thought we would have had something going right with Quinn/Wimbley/Richardson/Weeden/Mingo/Manziel. All these guys I predicted somewhat success. All epic failures.

    So now I go in the opposite direction: Wentz is gonna suck eggs. Goff is gonna suck swamp water. Ramsey is gonna suck lollipops. Jack isn't going to do jack.

    And Bosa is the only one I think will be any good at all.

    So, you know what's gonna happen. All these guys are gonna turn out great except Bosa.....and he is the guy the Browns will draft.

  • @mike-h said:

    So why continue to post on these threads if you're going to keep repeating over and over, on every thread, that no one is capable of predicting success for a player who transitions from the college to pro games?

    Annoying. Really.

    Sorry that the truth hurts.

    People are here to discuss and give their opinions of who they think will be good pro players. That's the entire appeal of discussing the NFL draft.

    I didn't say you shouldn't continue do it. I didn't say that I would not continue to do it. I am just telling the truth about the predictability of it all.

    That is part of the frustration of it all for Browns fans. I had thought we would have had something going right with Quinn/Wimbley/Richardson/Weeden/Mingo/Manziel. All these guys I predicted somewhat success. All epic failures.

    So now I go in the opposite direction: Wentz is gonna suck eggs. Goff is gonna suck swamp water. Ramsey is gonna suck lollipops. Jack isn't going to do jack.

    And Bosa is the only one I think will be any good at all.

    So, you know what's gonna happen. All these guys are gonna turn out great except Bosa.....and he is the guy the Browns will draft.

    @the-gipper said:

    That is part of the frustration of it all for Browns fans. I had thought we would have had something going right with Quinn/Wimbley/Richardson/Weeden/Mingo/Manziel. All these guys I predicted somewhat success. All epic failures.

    Not everyone's track record sucks as badly as yours, Gip.

  • @the-gipper said:

    That is part of the frustration of it all for Browns fans. I had thought we would have had something going right with Quinn/Wimbley/Richardson/Weeden/Mingo/Manziel. All these guys I predicted somewhat success. All epic failures.

    Not everyone's track record sucks as badly as yours, Gip.

    @tour2ma said:

    Not everyone's track record sucks as badly as yours, Gip.

    The Brown's track record is.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Not everyone's track record sucks as badly as yours, Gip.

    The Brown's track record is.

    @the-gipper said:

    The Brown's track record is.

    So that means many of us are better evaluators of talent than both you and the Browns.

  • @the-gipper said:

    The Brown's track record is.

    So that means many of us are better evaluators of talent than both you and the Browns.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    So that means many of us are better evaluators of talent than both you and the Browns.

    No, not really. None of you have really done better at all.

    Actually, looking back at it over the last like 5 years, here is where I stood:

    2015. I was on the Danny Shelton train. Still am. And I was wanting one of the WRs Agholor or Perriman over Erving. But I knew that with Farmer picking nothing like that was happening.

    2014. I was all over Khalil Mack. Or Sammy Watkins. I didn't want the trade down. With the second 1st round pick I went homer wanting Bradley Roby over JFF. It was all fun and hoopla getting Johnny....but, like I said, I was more hopeful it would work out than anything.

    2013. I was thinking Dee Milliner over Mingo. Either way that would have turned out bad.

    2012. I was OK with the TR pick. I like most others assumed he was the real deal. With the second pick I was on Whitney Mercilus...the local boy, or Nick Perry

    2011. I was on the AJ Green bandwagon. The trade down out of that didn't bother me. (Hindsight for others said we should have just taken Julio Jones. Yea, that was hindsight). But when the trade down was made, I was hoping the Browns would take Cameron Heyward, not Phil Jackson. Again, probably an OSU/homer pick for me.

    So that is where I stood on the evaluations. Overall, I could have probably done better than the Browns did.

  • Browns having a private meeting with Paxton Lynch this week according to Grossi.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    So that means many of us are better evaluators of talent than both you and the Browns.

    No, not really. None of you have really done better at all.

    Actually, looking back at it over the last like 5 years, here is where I stood:

    2015. I was on the Danny Shelton train. Still am. And I was wanting one of the WRs Agholor or Perriman over Erving. But I knew that with Farmer picking nothing like that was happening.

    2014. I was all over Khalil Mack. Or Sammy Watkins. I didn't want the trade down. With the second 1st round pick I went homer wanting Bradley Roby over JFF. It was all fun and hoopla getting Johnny....but, like I said, I was more hopeful it would work out than anything.

    2013. I was thinking Dee Milliner over Mingo. Either way that would have turned out bad.

    2012. I was OK with the TR pick. I like most others assumed he was the real deal. With the second pick I was on Whitney Mercilus...the local boy, or Nick Perry

    2011. I was on the AJ Green bandwagon. The trade down out of that didn't bother me. (Hindsight for others said we should have just taken Julio Jones. Yea, that was hindsight). But when the trade down was made, I was hoping the Browns would take Cameron Heyward, not Phil Jackson. Again, probably an OSU/homer pick for me.

    So that is where I stood on the evaluations. Overall, I could have probably done better than the Browns did.

    @the-gipper said:

    No, not really. None of you have really done better at all.

    Actually, looking back at it over the last like 5 years, here is where I stood:

    2015. I was on the Danny Shelton train. Still am. And I was wanting one of the WRs Agholor or Perriman over Erving. But I knew that with Farmer picking nothing like that was happening.

    2014. I was all over Khalil Mack. Or Sammy Watkins. I didn't want the trade down. With the second 1st round pick I went homer wanting Bradley Roby over JFF. It was all fun and hoopla getting Johnny....but, like I said, I was more hopeful it would work out than anything.

    2013. I was thinking Dee Milliner over Mingo. Either way that would have turned out bad.

    2012. I was OK with the TR pick. I like most others assumed he was the real deal. With the second pick I was on Whitney Mercilus...the local boy, or Nick Perry

    2011. I was on the AJ Green bandwagon. The trade down out of that didn't bother me. (Hindsight for others said we should have just taken Julio Jones. Yea, that was hindsight). But when the trade down was made, I was hoping the Browns would take Cameron Heyward, not Phil Jackson. Again, probably an OSU/homer pick for me.

    So that is where I stood on the evaluations. Overall, I could have probably done better than the Browns did.

    Got it, so we're better.

  • Paxton Lynch met with Browns today

  • Teams that hire new HC's may start offseason workouts with team April 4th. Why P. Lynch, agent, campus would hold his Pro Day after the 4th is clueless imo..

  • @opal312 said:

    Somebody must be getting kickbacks for ranking Paxton Lynch so high. He couldn't muster a touchdown against Auburn. Hopefully his stock falls before the Browns draft another Brady Quinn/Brandon Weeden.

    They need help at so many posititions a QB as the first pick better be a HOME RUN!

    Bosa, Elliot, Cardale

    Hue went to Goff & Wentz's Pro Days, isn't going to Lynch. Tells me all I need to know.

    @hoorta said:

    Hue went to Goff & Wentz's Pro Days, isn't going to Lynch. Tells me all I need to know.

    OK, Memphis has their Pro Day AFTER the Browns start workouts. Hue met up with Lynch. Fair enough.

    I'll also assume they had a heavy presence at Ohio State's Pro Day. Bunch of those guys will get drafted.

  • @the-gipper said:

    No, not really. None of you have really done better at all.

    Actually, looking back at it over the last like 5 years, here is where I stood:

    2015. I was on the Danny Shelton train. Still am. And I was wanting one of the WRs Agholor or Perriman over Erving. But I knew that with Farmer picking nothing like that was happening.

    2014. I was all over Khalil Mack. Or Sammy Watkins. I didn't want the trade down. With the second 1st round pick I went homer wanting Bradley Roby over JFF. It was all fun and hoopla getting Johnny....but, like I said, I was more hopeful it would work out than anything.

    2013. I was thinking Dee Milliner over Mingo. Either way that would have turned out bad.

    2012. I was OK with the TR pick. I like most others assumed he was the real deal. With the second pick I was on Whitney Mercilus...the local boy, or Nick Perry

    2011. I was on the AJ Green bandwagon. The trade down out of that didn't bother me. (Hindsight for others said we should have just taken Julio Jones. Yea, that was hindsight). But when the trade down was made, I was hoping the Browns would take Cameron Heyward, not Phil Jackson. Again, probably an OSU/homer pick for me.

    So that is where I stood on the evaluations. Overall, I could have probably done better than the Browns did.

    Got it, so we're better.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Got it, so we're better.

    No. I suspect that if you went back and were honest about it, your picks would have been full of busts. But I don't expect you to be honest about it for self aggrandizement purposes.

  • wanted to add watched enough of Wentz that he earned that "elite game manager" North Dakota St was 29-1 the 2 years before Wentz become starting qb and 20-3 with Wentz starting....elite defense and running attack. Wentz was barely ever called to carry the team on his shoulders..lot of 200 yard passing games in his career....actually 12 under 200

    watching entire games don't see a great passer when moving or what especially bothers me when playing in tight games...hence a game manager

    huge contrast between Goff or Lynch who had to carry their teams on their shoulders...and often did

    Wentz is the perfect qb when you draw up arm/size/intelligence but comes in #3 when I add in competitiveness

  • Hogan needs to be 6 spots higher