BrownsBoard predicts...Republican Nominee
-
I'm not saying I disagree, it's just that you're so staunchly conservative, citing a rolling stone article is hilarious. I think everyone knows my views on the trumpet.
-
I don't see anything really wrong with what he said.
He was vocally against the Iraq war like a month after it started, well before it was cool to be against it.
But I also concur with the idea that Trump is not an idiot, in fact he's very smart.
I read somewhere he's going to start giving a series of policy speeches similar to the AIPAC one - gearing up for the general election. He's going to win many more over from those.
-
Oh trump is smart. Really smart. He's the smartest. You know, he's so smart, so smart. He's made so much money, he's smart, he's a winner. He definitely knows what he's going to do to make america great again. And that's what he's going to do, you know. Make america great again.
-
I don't see anything really wrong with what he said.
He was vocally against the Iraq war like a month after it started, well before it was cool to be against it.
But I also concur with the idea that Trump is not an idiot, in fact he's very smart.
I read somewhere he's going to start giving a series of policy speeches similar to the AIPAC one - gearing up for the general election. He's going to win many more over from those.
I don't see anything really wrong with what he said.
He was vocally against the Iraq war like a month after it started, well before it was cool to be against it.
But I also concur with the idea that Trump is not an idiot, in fact he's very smart.
I read somewhere he's going to start giving a series of policy speeches similar to the AIPAC one - gearing up for the general election. He's going to win many more over from those.
The AIPAC speech was one of Trump's best but it also was the one where he went in with a prepared speech and spoke from a teleprompter. He showed he could act presidential but even this speech was short on substance.
Charles Krauthammer's analysis:
Columnist Charles Krauthammer stated that GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump’s AIPAC speech “showed that he could act like like a president,” but “as a policy speech, it’s meaningless” on Monday’s “Special Report” on the Fox News Channel.
Krauthammer said, “Well, that was a positioning speech. He said every cliche, every line, that has ever been invented to show one’s support of Israel. Regarding negotiations, regarding Iran, regarding terrorism, regarding incitement, education. Now, as a policy speech, it’s meaningless. He says they have to reeducate their children, and stop inciting the violence, and we’re going to do it, believe me. Well, I don’t understand the applause, but I guess people at least appreciated the fact that he says it. I don’t think it gives you any idea what he would do as president. But he had to undo the damage of saying I’ll be neutral, and he essentially said, I’m not neutral, and as that, it succeeded.”
He added, “I don’t know who wrote the speech, but whoever did knows the Middle East. I do agree that was a bit of a slip, the reference to Palestine. But nonetheless, the examples he gave, showed somebody who knows the area, unlike Trump, who didn’t know Hezbollah from Hamas a few months ago. But I think as that, it showed a seriousness that he has not shown, and by staying on script, he has showed that he could act like like a president, which I think is something new.”
-
They all use prepared speeches 100% of the time - and none of them really have any substance on anything.
He has smart people working with him and advising him, he just speaks off the cuff because it's what makes him popular. People don't want to hear the same stump speech every day, etc. Though in general election mode I think giving a series of policy speeches on script will help him a lot - especially against Hillary who is more experienced and knowledgeable than everybody else in regards to foreign policy.
We need to dispel with this fiction because she is extremely knowledgeable and knows exactly what she's doing.
-
Oh trump is smart. Really smart. He's the smartest. You know, he's so smart, so smart. He's made so much money, he's smart, he's a winner. He definitely knows what he's going to do to make america great again. And that's what he's going to do, you know. Make america great again.
Oh trump is smart. Really smart. He's the smartest. You know, he's so smart, so smart. He's made so much money, he's smart, he's a winner. He definitely knows what he's going to do to make america great again. And that's what he's going to do, you know. Make america great again.
Against empty promises from Bernie or man-hating and race-baiting from Hillary whose claim to political Fame is the fact that her husband got a blowjob in the Oval Office.
WSS
-
One of my favorite lines from Trump was at one of his speeches that went something like this:
"We're going to win,win,win. And then we are going to win some more. We are going to win so much you will be telling me Trump let us lose a little bit we are getting bored with winning. And I will say no...we are going to win more"
a classic for sure.
-
They all use prepared speeches 100% of the time - and none of them really have any substance on anything.
He has smart people working with him and advising him, he just speaks off the cuff because it's what makes him popular. People don't want to hear the same stump speech every day, etc. Though in general election mode I think giving a series of policy speeches on script will help him a lot - especially against Hillary who is more experienced and knowledgeable than everybody else in regards to foreign policy.
We need to dispel with this fiction because she is extremely knowledgeable and knows exactly what she's doing.
They all use prepared speeches 100% of the time - and none of them really have any substance on anything.
He has smart people working with him and advising him, he just speaks off the cuff because it's what makes him popular. People don't want to hear the same stump speech every day, etc. Though in general election mode I think giving a series of policy speeches on script will help him a lot - especially against Hillary who is more experienced and knowledgeable than everybody else in regards to foreign policy.
We need to dispel with this fiction because she is extremely knowledgeable and knows exactly what she's doing.
Politicians can take positions on issues and summarize them in 30-60 second sound bites. That doesn't take away that they know the issues, maybe have legislated the issues and can do a quick summary for a speech. The appeal of Trump is speaking off the cuff but he needs to learn the issues and then speak off the cuff. Trump may say he is not a politician but he is a politician now he is running for president.
I agree Trump is a smart (enough) guy and like Newt Gingrich says is making rookie mistakes but he has to clean them up. Newt has been giving Trump some good advice but Trump is apparently not listening. After getting beat in Wisconsin Trump should have given a gracious speech and congratulated Cruz on the win and say he was looking forward to the race in New York. That is called acting presidential. Does Trump do it? No. He makes wild unsubstantiated claims that Cruz is breaking the law by working with super pacs and goes back to the name calling. He comes off as being an immature sore loser. Does Trump even want to win in November?
I am not part of the never Trump movement (except in the primary but not in the general election), I don't understand why any conservative would prefer Clinton or Sanders over Trump and I intend to vote for Trump in November if he is the nominee.
-
They all use prepared speeches 100% of the time - and none of them really have any substance on anything.
He has smart people working with him and advising him, he just speaks off the cuff because it's what makes him popular. People don't want to hear the same stump speech every day, etc. Though in general election mode I think giving a series of policy speeches on script will help him a lot - especially against Hillary who is more experienced and knowledgeable than everybody else in regards to foreign policy.
We need to dispel with this fiction because she is extremely knowledgeable and knows exactly what she's doing.
Politicians can take positions on issues and summarize them in 30-60 second sound bites. That doesn't take away that they know the issues, maybe have legislated the issues and can do a quick summary for a speech. The appeal of Trump is speaking off the cuff but he needs to learn the issues and then speak off the cuff. Trump may say he is not a politician but he is a politician now he is running for president.
I agree Trump is a smart (enough) guy and like Newt Gingrich says is making rookie mistakes but he has to clean them up. Newt has been giving Trump some good advice but Trump is apparently not listening. After getting beat in Wisconsin Trump should have given a gracious speech and congratulated Cruz on the win and say he was looking forward to the race in New York. That is called acting presidential. Does Trump do it? No. He makes wild unsubstantiated claims that Cruz is breaking the law by working with super pacs and goes back to the name calling. He comes off as being an immature sore loser. Does Trump even want to win in November?
I am not part of the never Trump movement (except in the primary but not in the general election), I don't understand why any conservative would prefer Clinton or Sanders over Trump and I intend to vote for Trump in November if he is the nominee.
Politicians can take positions on issues and summarize them in 30-60 second sound bites. That doesn't take away that they know the issues, maybe have legislated the issues and can do a quick summary for a speech. The appeal of Trump is speaking off the cuff but he needs to learn the issues and then speak off the cuff. Trump may say he is not a politician but he is a politician now he is running for president.
I agree Trump is a smart (enough) guy and like Newt Gingrich says is making rookie mistakes but he has to clean them up. Newt has been giving Trump some good advice but Trump is apparently not listening. After getting beat in Wisconsin Trump should have given a gracious speech and congratulated Cruz on the win and say he was looking forward to the race in New York. That is called acting presidential. Does Trump do it? No. He makes wild unsubstantiated claims that Cruz is breaking the law by working with super pacs and goes back to the name calling. He comes off as being an immature sore loser. Does Trump even want to win in November?
I am not part of the never Trump movement, I don't understand why any conservative would prefer Clinton or Sanders over Trump and I intend to vote for Trump in November if he is the nominee.
Cruz does the same thing, it's not like he's saying anything flattering about Trump. He was expected to lose WI though, they did elect Scott Walker after all - the worst governor in the country.
Regardless of how much substance people think Trump lacks (he has some detailed policies on his website) - he is on the right side of most issues which is the most important thing.
Obama throws a tariff on Chinese steel imports (as did the UK), China throws a tariff on Australian steel imports - nobody bats an eye. Trump talks about imposing tariffs to push back on countries ripping us off and everybody loses their minds.
He's been talking about the US getting bent over by Japan, China, (Mexico is a more recent development), etc since the 80s - back then he said "if it got so bad" he would run. He's on the right side of most issues, which is why all the corrupt powers want to take him down.
-
I might be against Trump in the primary but in the general election if it is Hillary Clinton versus Trump that is an easy choice for me with Trump.
Mark Levin to #NeverTrumpers: The “Stop Trump” effort must not extend to the general election
Via Breitbart and the Right Scoop, you can grumble about this if you’re #NeverTrump but we all understand, I think, that the vast, vast majority of the party will come around to his position by November, right? Don’t get me wrong, stalwart anti-Trumpers may have the numbers to fatally damage Trump’s chances even if they’re just five percent of the electorate. But that’s probably what they’ll be — five percent, not a third of the party despite how much fun it is to ooh and ahh over numbers like that. Never underestimate the power of partisanship, especially when you’ve got a Democrat as unlikable as Hillary topping the other ticket.
And even if five percent of Republicans do end up as #NeverTrumpers, that’s not necessarily a death sentence for Trump’s campaign. Why? Because some segment of Bernie fans claim that they’re #NeverHillary:
-
Cruz campaign violates FEC rules by soliciting unlimited donations for super PAC
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/ted-cruz-keet-lewis-super-pac-donations-221656
-
-
They all use prepared speeches 100% of the time - and none of them really have any substance on anything.
He has smart people working with him and advising him, he just speaks off the cuff because it's what makes him popular. People don't want to hear the same stump speech every day, etc. Though in general election mode I think giving a series of policy speeches on script will help him a lot - especially against Hillary who is more experienced and knowledgeable than everybody else in regards to foreign policy.
We need to dispel with this fiction because she is extremely knowledgeable and knows exactly what she's doing.
Politicians can take positions on issues and summarize them in 30-60 second sound bites. That doesn't take away that they know the issues, maybe have legislated the issues and can do a quick summary for a speech. The appeal of Trump is speaking off the cuff but he needs to learn the issues and then speak off the cuff. Trump may say he is not a politician but he is a politician now he is running for president.
I agree Trump is a smart (enough) guy and like Newt Gingrich says is making rookie mistakes but he has to clean them up. Newt has been giving Trump some good advice but Trump is apparently not listening. After getting beat in Wisconsin Trump should have given a gracious speech and congratulated Cruz on the win and say he was looking forward to the race in New York. That is called acting presidential. Does Trump do it? No. He makes wild unsubstantiated claims that Cruz is breaking the law by working with super pacs and goes back to the name calling. He comes off as being an immature sore loser. Does Trump even want to win in November?
I am not part of the never Trump movement (except in the primary but not in the general election), I don't understand why any conservative would prefer Clinton or Sanders over Trump and I intend to vote for Trump in November if he is the nominee.
I am not part of the never Trump movement (except in the primary but not in the general election), I don't understand why any conservative would prefer Clinton or Sanders over Trump and I intend to vote for Trump in November if he is the nominee.
MAGA
-
After the gun and bible toting thugs from fox led by Karl Rove get done picking over the bones in their cannibalistick frenzy, it'll end up being Ryan
-
Trump has stepped in too often as time has gone on. He is now somewhere around
60-70 percent DISapproval rating per the last AP poll I saw, and that isn't just
women voting. Otherwise, I think it would be higher.....
Just an indication that Trump may very well not get the required delegates, and may
very well lose the nomination....
because he got carried away with his big mouth. We'll see how it goes.
-
Trump is taking time off campaigning saying he is trying to run a business and run a campaign at the same time. While he is taking time off to run his business Cruz is out in Colorado sweeping 21 delegates and the only republican candidate going to a meeting of republican Jewish leaders among other things. If Cruz pulls this out it will be because he worked harder and smarter and went out and did the hard work with a ground game and beat Trump. Trump seems to think all he has to do is have big rallies.
-
All I can say is there's a zero percent chance I will vote for ted cruz. If the republican establishment nominates cruz the election will effectively be over at the convention.
-
And the republicans are in a bad spot because there are more who say they will not vote for Trump under any circumstances. Even worse for republicans are polling that show the republicans losing the senate and house seats with Trump at the top of the ticket. The only candidate who beats Clinton and Sanders is Kasich but if he would get the nomination you would have both the Cruz and Trump camps likely sitting out the election. Pick your poison.
-
OBF lay off the pipe fam, Cruz is done. Trump is going to sweep the Northeast.
Just give up and concede to Trump
-
OBF lay off the pipe fam, Cruz is done. Trump is going to sweep the Northeast.
Just give up and concede to Trump
OBF lay off the pipe fam, Cruz is done. Trump is going to sweep the Northeast.
Just give up and concede to Trump
Trump will sweep the Northeast but then the map starts favoring Cruz again and it will go back and forth until California. Even with Trump sweeping the Northeast he would have swept it even more but Kasich will take more votes away from Trump than Cruz and every delegate Kasich gets is one less for Trump.
I don't know what game Kasich is playing. It seems like he is either in to try and keep Trump from getting the 1237 delegates or he is wanting a vice president spot? I don't think anyone knows what his goal is here. Right now unless the rules are changed he won't even be eligible to get the nomination because the rules as they stand now state a candidate has to win 8 states. Those rules can be changed but the delegates who would change them are mostly for Trump and Cruz so why would they?
If we have a contested convention and Trump does not win on the first ballot the delegates are not bound to their candidate after that point and who has done the best ground game? Cruz who has been working the delegates from the beginning while Trump just seemed to have learned the rules. If there is a contested convention I would put the odds in Cruz's favor. Trump has to get it on the first ballot is how I see it.
Krauthammer: Trump Has to Win On First Ballot, Otherwise "He Is Likely To Be Denied The Nomination"
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login