Skip to content

Camp Trade Down

The Browns Board
148 28 4.3k
  • Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?



  • Teams trying to move up to #2: load that offer with late round picks. Browns rumored to want more picks not necessarily highest pick offered


    @darren15 said:

    Teams trying to move up to #2: load that offer with late round picks. Browns rumored to want more picks not necessarily highest pick offered

    I want the highest and the most.

  • Being reported Eagles had a deal to go to number 3 before the Rams/Titans trade to take the QB Cleveland passed on .....the mega trade fucked up their plans

    @darren15 said:

    Being reported Eagles had a deal to go to number 3 before the Rams/Titans trade to take the QB Cleveland passed on .....the mega trade fucked up their plans

    And is that why they may be in the mix to trade with us?

  • Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?

    @darren15 said:

    Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?

    Joe Namath.....in his prime.

  • @darren15 said:

    Being reported Eagles had a deal to go to number 3 before the Rams/Titans trade to take the QB Cleveland passed on .....the mega trade fucked up their plans

    And is that why they may be in the mix to trade with us?

    @the-gipper said:

    And is that why they may be in the mix to trade with us?

    I would think so yes......

  • Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed

    So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?

  • Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed

    So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?

    @darren15 said:

    NFLTradeRumors.co ‏@nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago

    Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed

    So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?

    That Twitter account is garbage.

    But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.

    If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.

    I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.

    Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.

    And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.

  • Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?

    @darren15 said:

    Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?

    Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...

    Two problems:

    1. he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
    2. He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.

    Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...

  • Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.

  • Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.

    Right. That's why I'd rather see about working something out with a team like SF instead.

  • @darren15 said:

    Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?

    Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...

    Two problems:

    1. he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
    2. He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.

    Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...

    @tour2ma said:

    Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...

    Two problems:

    1. he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
    2. He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.

    Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...

    Done!! Where do Muhammad & I sign? 😉

  • @darren15 said:

    Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?

    Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...

    Two problems:

    1. he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
    2. He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.

    Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...

    @tour2ma said:

    Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...

    Take that and don't look back

    Jets: 2016#2

    Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1

    Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..

  • @tour2ma said:

    Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...

    Take that and don't look back

    Jets: 2016#2

    Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1

    Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..

    @unsympathetic said:

    Take that and don't look back

    Jets: 2016#2

    Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1

    Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..

    Not happening. Not even close. They'd get our 1st and second this year at least, we'd get their's and MW.

  • #Browns seem very likely to trade the #2 pick in the #NFLDraft, from what I've heard. But don't rule out #49ers, they have asked about pick.

    It's hotting up

    This one says Browns Eagles have agreed a framework

    http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/2016/04/browns-eagles-nfl-draft-trade-rumors/

  • @AllbrightNFL

    1/2 As I said yesterday, the cost to move to #2 is expected to be significantly less than moving to #1. #Eagles trying to get there, #Browns
    @AllbrightNFL
    2/2 seeing if other offers can help them leverage for more. There are other teams interested.
  • Last night, Alex Marvez reports that if the Browns and Eagles reach an agreement on a trade that would send the No. 2 overall pick to Philadelphia, it would include the two teams swapping first-round picks in 2016 with the Eagles sending the Browns two third-round picks this year, their first-rounder in 2017 and their 2017 third-round selection.


    However, Schefter mentioned during the interview that he believes the price to move up to No. 2 would be less than that. Eagles would like the trade completed today.



    Schefter says we may take less ........here we go, are we going to be screwed again ?

  • @darren15 said:

    NFLTradeRumors.co ‏@nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago

    Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed

    So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?

    That Twitter account is garbage.

    But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.

    If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.

    I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.

    Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.

    And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That Twitter account is garbage.

    But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.

    If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.

    I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.

    Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.

    And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.

    +1 because this is exactly how I feel. The ONLY way I'd be happy with this trade is if the Browns used those picks as ammunition to move into the early 2nd for a guy like Lynch

  • @darren15 said:

    NFLTradeRumors.co ‏@nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago

    Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed

    So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?

    That Twitter account is garbage.

    But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.

    If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.

    I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.

    Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.

    And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That Twitter account is garbage.

    But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.

    If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.

    I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.

    Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.

    And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.

    Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    That Twitter account is garbage.

    But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.

    If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.

    I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.

    Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.

    And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.

    Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.

    @the-gipper said:

    Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.

    Agreed ,,,,he wont get past Jets at 20 unless they have Fitz signed before the draft then they will go pass rush .....

  • Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.

    So take the two thirds and turn them into a 2nd... Should reach the 50th overall or so... 🙂

    The real trick Sashi faces is convincing trades partners to use the traditional chart when we are moving down:

    draftvalue1.jpg?w=640

    And our Director of Football Research's chart when we are trading up...

    career.jpg?w=960&h=597

    Here's his Harvard paper... it's been posted here before.

    https://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/how-to-value-nfl-draft-picks/