Camp Trade Down
-
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed
So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
I'm awesome, and I fuck dolphins. Ghoolie 12/2/2012: I have absolutely no skills, training or pride -
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
-
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
Right. That's why I'd rather see about working something out with a team like SF instead.
-
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Done!! Where do Muhammad & I sign?
-
Jets moving from 20 to 2 will cost them big .....What would be the minimum you would accept for this to happen ?
Supposedly Muhammad Wilkerson is in the mix... What's the value of 12 sack, 3-4 DE just entering his prime having missed only 5 games in 5 years to us? Certainly a first... and change...
Two problems:
- he has not yet signed his franchise tender and cannot be traded until he does; and
- He ended 2015 with a broken leg... should be fine, but you never know.
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Take that and don't look back
Jets: 2016#2
Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1
Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..
-
Swap ones for MW plus a 2 this year and a 1next year? Good deal for us...
Take that and don't look back
Jets: 2016#2
Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1
Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..
Take that and don't look back
Jets: 2016#2
Browns: MW, 2016 Jets rd1, 2016 Jets rd2, 2017 Jets rd1
Take it, take it, take it.. Wilkerson next to Shelton and Bryant is legit at all 3 DL positions for the first time since the Browns reconstituted..
Not happening. Not even close. They'd get our 1st and second this year at least, we'd get their's and MW.
-
#Browns seem very likely to trade the #2 pick in the #NFLDraft, from what I've heard. But don't rule out #49ers, they have asked about pick.
It's hotting up
This one says Browns Eagles have agreed a framework
http://www.waitingfornextyear.com/2016/04/browns-eagles-nfl-draft-trade-rumors/
-
1/2 As I said yesterday, the cost to move to #2 is expected to be significantly less than moving to #1. #Eagles trying to get there, #Browns@AllbrightNFL2/2 seeing if other offers can help them leverage for more. There are other teams interested.
-
Last night, Alex Marvez reports that if the Browns and Eagles reach an agreement on a trade that would send the No. 2 overall pick to Philadelphia, it would include the two teams swapping first-round picks in 2016 with the Eagles sending the Browns two third-round picks this year, their first-rounder in 2017 and their 2017 third-round selection.
However, Schefter mentioned during the interview that he believes the price to move up to No. 2 would be less than that. Eagles would like the trade completed today.
Schefter says we may take less ........here we go, are we going to be screwed again ?
-
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed
So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
+1 because this is exactly how I feel. The ONLY way I'd be happy with this trade is if the Browns used those picks as ammunition to move into the early 2nd for a guy like Lynch
-
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed
So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.
-
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.
Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.
Agreed ,,,,he wont get past Jets at 20 unless they have Fitz signed before the draft then they will go pass rush .....
-
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
So take the two thirds and turn them into a 2nd... Should reach the 50th overall or so...
The real trick Sashi faces is convincing trades partners to use the traditional chart when we are moving down:
And our Director of Football Research's chart when we are trading up...
Here's his Harvard paper... it's been posted here before.
https://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/how-to-value-nfl-draft-picks/
-
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
"A winner never whines." Paul Brown -
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
I suspect we have a target (or targets) picked out @ #8 and if he/they is/are there we pull the trigger. If target(s) gone we have a another target further down and try to trade to that level on draft day. And I'd rather have Fuller or Doctson rather than Treadwell if we are shooting WR as our first (which I doubt anyway).
-
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
-
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
Well, there is that rumor about the Tits wanting to come up. But would Treadwell still be there at #15? I kinda doubt it.
-
Well, there is that rumor about the Tits wanting to come up. But would Treadwell still be there at #15? I kinda doubt it.
He had a slow 40 time so it might cause a slight fall to 15. I wouldn't hate it at all.
-
Rappaport reporting Browns in discussions to trade out of 8 for Elliott ( if Dallas dont take him ) or an OT ....11, 13 , 15 the proposed landing spots for Cleveland
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login